Mediastinoscopy

纵隔镜
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一种称为纤维化纵隔炎的罕见疾病会导致纵隔纤维组织过厚。真菌或特发性起源是最常见的病理学病因。在患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的个体中,纤维化纵隔炎,类似于支气管癌,在纵隔镜检查后的解剖病理学检查中发现。
    An uncommon illness known as fibrosing mediastinitis causes the mediastinum to grow excessively thick fibrous tissue. Fungal or idiopathic origins are the most common etiologies of pathology. In an individual suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), fibrosing mediastinitis, which resembled a bronchogenic cancer, was identified during anatomopathological examination following mediastinoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:联合支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)和内镜超声引导下组织采集(EUS-TA)是诊断和分期肺癌纵隔淋巴结(MLN)的准确方法。然而,单独和联合手术在诊断和分期中的各自贡献尚未得到充分研究.这项研究的目的是评估他们各自的表现。
    方法:对PET-CT诊断为肺癌的疑似恶性MLN或复发患者行EBUS-TBNA和EUS-TA联合治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。
    结果:共有141例患者接受了这两种手术。用EBUS-TBNA获得了82%的正确诊断,91%与EUS-TA,94%与合并程序。整体灵敏度,特异性,EBUS-TBNA的阳性和阴性预测值(PPV和NPV),EUS-TA,诊断恶性肿瘤的联合程序是[75%,100%,100%,58%],[87%,100%,100%,75%],和[93%,100%,100%,80%],分别,联合手术的灵敏度明显更好(p<0.0001)。在74%的患者中,EBUS-TBNA正确评估了分期(82/141例),68%的EUS-TA,85%与合并程序。整体灵敏度,特异性,PPV,EBUS-TBNA的净现值,EUS-TA,肺癌分期的联合程序为[62%,100%,100%,55%],[54%,100%,100%,50%],和[79%,100%,100%,68%],分别,在联合手术的敏感性方面明显更好(p<0.001)。
    结论:与单独使用EBUS-TBNA和EUS-TA相比,EBUS-EUS联合方法在肺癌患者的诊断和分期中显示出更好的准确性和敏感性。
    BACKGROUND: Combined endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) are accurate procedures for the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) in lung cancer. However, the respective contribution of separate and combined procedures in diagnosis and staging has not been fully studied. The aim of this study was to assess their respective performances.
    METHODS: Patients with suspected malignant MLNs in lung cancer or recurrence identified by PET-CT who underwent combined EBUS-TBNA and EUS-TA were retrospectively reviewed.
    RESULTS: A total of 141 patients underwent both procedures. Correct diagnosis was obtained in 82% with EBUS-TBNA, 91% with EUS-TA, and 94% with the combined procedure. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of EBUS-TBNA, EUS-TA, and the combined procedure for diagnosing malignancy were [75%, 100%, 100%, 58%], [87%, 100%, 100%, 75%], and [93%, 100%, 100%, 80%], respectively, with a significantly better sensitivity of the combined procedure (p < 0.0001). Staging (82/141 patients) was correctly assessed in 74% with EBUS-TBNA, 68% with EUS-TA, and 85% with the combined procedure. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EBUS-TBNA, EUS-TA, and the combined procedure for lung cancer staging were [62%, 100%, 100%, 55%], [54%, 100%, 100%, 50%], and [79%, 100%, 100%, 68%], respectively, significantly better in terms of sensitivity for the combined procedure (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The combined EBUS-EUS approach in lung cancer patients showed better accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosis and staging when compared with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-TA alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:纵隔镜下食管癌手术可促进术后早期恢复。然而,偶尔会引起严重的并发症。这里,我们介绍了一例在纵隔镜下食管次全切除术中呼气末二氧化碳(EtCO2)突然增加诊断为气管损伤的患者.
    方法:一名52岁被诊断为食管癌的男子被安排进行纵隔镜下食管次全切除术。在纵隔镜检查过程中,EtCO2水平突然上升到200mmHg以上,血压降到80mmHg以下。我们立即要求操作人员停止吹气,经支气管镜检查发现气管右侧隆突附近有气管损伤。用双腔管代替了气管导管,并通过右侧开胸手术修复气管。术中无进一步并发症。手术后,患者被拔管并进入重症监护室。
    结论:监测EtCO2水平并与操作者密切沟通,对于纵隔镜下食管切除术中气管突发性损伤的安全管理非常重要。
    BACKGROUND: Mediastinoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer facilitates early postoperative recovery. However, it can occasionally cause serious complications. Here, we present the case of a patient with a tracheal injury diagnosed by a sudden increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) during mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy.
    METHODS: A 52-year-old man diagnosed with esophageal cancer was scheduled to undergo mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. During the mediastinoscopic procedure, the EtCO2 level suddenly increased above 200 mmHg, and the blood pressure dropped below 80 mmHg. We immediately asked the operator to stop insufflation and found a tracheal injury on the right side of the trachea near the carina by bronchoscopy. The endotracheal tube was replaced with a double-lumen tube, and the trachea was repaired via right thoracotomy. There were no further intraoperative complications. After surgery, the patient was extubated and admitted to the intensive care unit.
    CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring EtCO2 levels and close communication with the operator is important for safely managing sudden tracheal injury during mediastinoscopic esophagectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自1959年由Carlens(1)推出以来,纵隔镜检查,很长一段时间,用于评估纵隔(上和中),以建立不明原因纵隔肿块的组织学诊断,和肺癌分期。最近,由于引入了其他侵入性较小的技术(例如,内窥镜超声引导的细针穿刺细胞学),然而,它仍然是一种廉价有效的工具,可以在贫困中心使用。
    为了强调纵隔镜检查在确认孤立性纵隔淋巴结病的临床诊断和回顾其实用性方面如何发挥重要作用。
    这些是对沙特阿拉伯大学医院(2012-2018年)期间接受诊断性宫颈纵隔镜检查的患者的病历的回顾性分析。纳入的患者出现孤立的纵隔淋巴结肿大,在没有潜在原因的情况下,通过计算机断层扫描发现显著(短轴>1cm)。已知病因的患者(例如,结节病)或通过其他工具诊断,被排除在外。
    对56例患者进行了纵隔镜检查,其中男性38人(68%),女性18人(32%),平均年龄(37.5±10岁)。患者最常见的症状是持续咳嗽(49%),不明原因发热(38%)和体重减轻(36%),平均每位患者出现2种症状,而在4例患者(7%)中,由于其他原因,在CT扫描中偶然发现了淋巴结病。此外,获得的标本的组织病理学检查证实了最常见的诊断,结节病17例(30%),淋巴瘤12例(21%),TB10例(18%)。平均住院时间(从手术当天开始计算)为(2.5±4天),包括治疗,只有1例患者死亡(2%),3例患者(5%)出现术后并发症.
    诊断纵隔淋巴结肿大的诊断既安全又有效,需要一个最小的手术设置,被认为是具有成本效益的。因此,这是在其他贫困中心调查此类案件的有效选择,当它达到基于组织的诊断时,而其他技术用于分期目的。
    UNASSIGNED: Since its introduction in 1959 by Carlens (1), Mediastinoscopy has been, for long, used for assessment of the mediastinum (superior and middle) for establishing a histological diagnosis of mediastinal masses of undefined cause, and for Lung carcinomas staging. The use of Mediastinoscopy has been decreasing lately due to the introduction of other less invasive techniques (e.g., endoscopic ultrasound-directed fine needle aspiration cytology), however, it is still a cheap and effective tool that can be utilized in underprivileged centers.
    UNASSIGNED: To emphasize how does Mediastinoscopy plays an important role in confirming the clinical diagnosis of isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy and reviewing its utility.
    UNASSIGNED: These are a retrospective analysis of medical charts for patients who underwent diagnostic cervical mediastinoscopy during (2012 - 2018) at a University hospital in Saudi Arabia. The included patients are presented with an isolated mediastinal lymph node enlargement, in the absence of underlying cause and was found to be significant (>1cm in its short axis) by computed tomography. The patient who had a known cause (e.g., Sarcoidosis) or were diagnosed via other tools, was excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: Mediastinoscopy was performed on 56 patients, 38 of them were males (68%) and 18 females (32%), with a mean age of (37.5 ± 10 years). The patients\' most common presenting symptoms were persistent cough (49%), fever of unknown origin (38%) and weight loss (36%) with an average of 2 symptoms per patient, while in 4 patients (7%) lymphadenopathy was discovered incidentally during the CT scan for other reasons. In addition, the histopathological examination of specimens obtained confirmed the most common diagnoses, Sarcoidosis in 17 patients (30%), lymphoma in 12 patients (21%) and TB in 10 patients (18%). The mean hospital stay (calculated from the day of the procedure) was (2.5 ± 4 days) including work up, with only one mortality (2%) and 3 patients (5%) had experienced post-operative complications.
    UNASSIGNED: The diagnostic Mediastinoscopy is both safe and efficient in the diagnosis of patients with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy, requiring a minimal surgical setup and is considered cost-effective. Therefore, it is a valid choice of investigating such cases in other underprivileged centers, as it reaches a tissue-based diagnosis, while other techniques are used for staging purposes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诊断声带麻痹的咽下超声检查(TLUSG),一个相对较新的,安全、无创的床边技术,呼吸道感染传播风险最小,对甲状腺疾病患者有效。我们研究了将其用作通过柔性喉镜(FL)进行视觉检查的替代方法,用于胸外科手术患者的声带评估。
    在机构伦理委员会批准和试验注册后,在这个单臂上,前瞻性研究,接受全食管切除术或纵隔镜检查的110例患者在拔管后立即通过FL和TLUSG评估声带功能.使用Hopkin内窥镜(HL)和重复TLUSG通过喉镜检查进行随访评估。主要结果是直接可视化(FL或HL)和TLUSG之间的一致性。
    通过TLUSG在90%的男性和所有女性患者中成功观察到声带。在103例患者中,89例(86.4%)在首次评估时进行的FL和TLUSG的结果相匹配,一致度为0.69(95%置信区间[CI]=0.52-0.83)。在第二次评估中,88例患者中有83例(94.3%)的HL和TLUSG结果一致,一致度为0.89(95%CI=0.77-0.98)。
    TLUSG是直接可视化声带评估的有效非侵入性替代方法,适用于接受胸外科手术的男性和女性患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Translaryngeal ultrasonography (TLUSG) for diagnosis of vocal cord palsy, a relatively new, safe and noninvasive bedside technique with minimal risk of respiratory infection transmission, has been effective in patients with thyroid disease. We studied its use as an alternative method to visual inspection by flexible laryngoscopy (FL) for vocal cord assessment in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval and trial registration, in this single-arm, prospective study, the vocal cord function of 110 patients who underwent either total oesophagectomy or mediastinoscopy was assessed immediately after extubation by both FL and TLUSG. A follow-up assessment was done by laryngoscopy using Hopkin\'s endoscope (HL) and a repeat TLUSG. The primary outcome was the concordance between direct visualisation (FL or HL) and TLUSG.
    UNASSIGNED: Vocal cords were successfully visualised by TLUSG in 90% of male and all female patients. Findings of FL and TLUSG done at the first assessment matched in 89 (86.4%) out of 103 patients, and the degree of concordance was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.52-0.83). At the second assessment, HL and TLUSG findings matched in 83 (94.3%) out of 88 patients, and the degree of concordance was 0.89 (95% CI = 0.77-0.98).
    UNASSIGNED: TLUSG is an effective noninvasive alternative to direct visualisation for vocal cord assessment in both male and female patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    肿瘤学大回合系列旨在将发表在杂志上的原始报告置于临床背景下。病例介绍之后是对诊断和管理挑战的描述,对相关文献的回顾,并总结了作者建议的管理方法。本系列的目的是帮助读者更好地理解如何应用关键研究的结果,包括发表在《临床肿瘤学杂志》上的文章,在自己的临床实践中看到的患者。在可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,纵隔淋巴结的准确分期对于确定肿瘤的总体分期和指导后续治疗至关重要。分期过程通常始于正电子发射断层扫描(PET)或计算机断层扫描成像;但是,仅靠成像是不够的,和组织采集是需要确认淋巴结疾病。纵隔镜检查一直被认为是纵隔淋巴结分期的金标准,但是,最近,支气管内超声引导(EBUS)细针穿刺(FNA)已成为护理标准。EBUS-FNA,结合补充技术,如结内钳活检和食管超声检查,对淋巴结转移的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性。EBUS-FNA还能够评估N1疾病并获得足够的组织用于肿瘤基因组分析以帮助指导治疗。在EBUS的负面发现的情况下,欧洲胸外科医师协会指南仍建议进行确认视频纵隔镜检查.然而,是否有必要进行纵隔镜检查是一个有争议的问题,在北美并不常见。为了解决这个问题,Bousema及其同事进行了一项随机非劣效性试验,以确定在可切除的NSCLC患者中,单独使用EBUS与经证实的纵隔镜检查的EBUS后不可预见的淋巴结转移率。作者得出的结论是,在确诊的纵隔镜检查中,单独的EBUS不劣于EBUS。这些发现肯定了我们目前的做法,即在EBUS检查结果阴性后放弃确诊的纵隔镜检查。
    The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors\' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Accurate staging of the mediastinal lymph nodes in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critically important to determine the overall stage of the tumor and guide subsequent management. The staging process typically begins with positron emission tomography (PET) or computed tomography imaging; however, imaging alone is inadequate, and tissue acquisition is required for confirmation of nodal disease. Mediastinoscopy was long considered the gold standard for staging of mediastinal lymph nodes, but, recently, endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has become the standard of care. EBUS-FNA, in combination with supplementary technologies, such as intranodal forceps biopsy and esophageal ultrasonography, has a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of nodal metastases. EBUS-FNA is also capable of assessing N1 disease and obtaining adequate tissue for tumor genomic analysis to help guide treatment. In the case of negative findings on EBUS, a confirmatory video mediastinoscopy is still recommended by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines. However, whether confirmatory mediastinoscopy is necessary is a matter of debate, and it is not commonly performed in North America. To address this question, Bousema and colleagues performed a randomized noninferiority trial to determine rates of unforeseen nodal metastases after EBUS alone versus EBUS with confirmatory mediastinoscopy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The authors concluded that EBUS alone is noninferior to EBUS with confirmatory mediastinoscopy. These findings affirm our current practice to forgo confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative findings on EBUS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:纵隔淋巴结受累的可能性很高的可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)需要通过内镜检查进行纵隔分期,在没有淋巴结转移的情况下,根据现行指南进行纵隔镜检查。然而,缺乏关于系统超声造影后立即切除肺肿瘤与切除前额外确认纵隔镜检查的随机数据.
    方法:患者(疑似)可切除的非小细胞肺癌,在系统超声检查阴性后有纵隔分期指征,被随机分配到立即肺肿瘤切除或确诊纵隔镜检查,然后进行肿瘤切除。这项非劣效性试验的主要结果(8%的非劣效性,以前显示不影响生存率,Pnonlivelow<.0250)是在进行淋巴结清扫的肿瘤切除后存在不可预见的N2疾病。次要结果是30天主要发病率和死亡率。
    结果:在2017年7月17日至2020年10月5日之间,360名患者被随机分配,178例立即进行肺肿瘤切除(7例退出),182例首先进行确诊的纵隔镜检查(纵隔镜检查前7例退出,纵隔镜检查后6例退出)。纵隔镜检查在8.0%(14/175;95%CI,4.8至13.0)的患者中发现了转移。在两种意向治疗中,立即切除后的意外N2率(8.8%)与首次纵隔镜检查(7.7%)相比均不差(Δ,1.03%;UL95%CIΔ,7.2%;伪劣=.0144)和符合方案分析(Δ,0.83%;UL95%CIΔ,7.3%;次品=.0157)。立即切除后的主要发病率和30天死亡率为12.9%,首次纵隔镜检查后为15.4%(P=.4940)。
    结论:根据我们选择的不可预见的N2发生率的非劣效性,对于可切除的非小细胞肺癌患者和纵隔分期的指征,可以省略系统超声检查阴性后的确诊纵隔镜检查。
    Resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high probability of mediastinal nodal involvement requires mediastinal staging by endosonography and, in the absence of nodal metastases, confirmatory mediastinoscopy according to current guidelines. However, randomized data regarding immediate lung tumor resection after systematic endosonography versus additional confirmatory mediastinoscopy before resection are lacking.
    Patients with (suspected) resectable NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging after negative systematic endosonography were randomly assigned to immediate lung tumor resection or confirmatory mediastinoscopy followed by tumor resection. The primary outcome in this noninferiority trial (noninferiority margin of 8% that previously showed to not compromise survival, Pnoninferior < .0250) was the presence of unforeseen N2 disease after tumor resection with lymph node dissection. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major morbidity and mortality.
    Between July 17, 2017, and October 5, 2020, 360 patients were randomly assigned, 178 to immediate lung tumor resection (seven dropouts) and 182 to confirmatory mediastinoscopy first (seven dropouts before and six after mediastinoscopy). Mediastinoscopy detected metastases in 8.0% (14/175; 95% CI, 4.8 to 13.0) of patients. Unforeseen N2 rate after immediate resection (8.8%) was noninferior compared with mediastinoscopy first (7.7%) in both intention-to-treat (Δ, 1.03%; UL 95% CIΔ, 7.2%; Pnoninferior = .0144) and per-protocol analyses (Δ, 0.83%; UL 95% CIΔ, 7.3%; Pnoninferior = .0157). Major morbidity and 30-day mortality was 12.9% after immediate resection versus 15.4% after mediastinoscopy first (P = .4940).
    On the basis of our chosen noninferiority margin in the rate of unforeseen N2, confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative systematic endosonography can be omitted in patients with resectable NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:尽管经纵隔入路作为食管癌患者的根治性食管癌切除术引起了人们的关注,其优于经胸入路的优势尚不清楚.本研究旨在评估经纵隔食管切除术(TME)与开腹食管切除术(TTE)相比,术后呼吸系统并发症的疗效。
    方法:我们回顾了2014年2月至2021年11月期间接受TME或TTE的胸腹食管癌患者。我们比较了术后呼吸道并发症作为主要结果。次要结果包括围手术期手术时间,失血,术后并发症,和纵隔淋巴结的数量。
    结果:总体而言,60和54例患者接受了TME和TTE,分别。两组的基线特征相似,除了年龄和组织学类型。两组均无术中致死性并发症。TME组呼吸系统并发症的发生率明显低于TTE组(6.7vs.22.2%,p=0.03)。TME组手术时间较短(403vs.451分钟,p<0.01),更少的失血(107vs.253毫升,p<0.01),吻合口漏稍高(11.7vs.5.6%,p=0.33)。两组中收集的淋巴结数量相似(24vs.26,p=0.10)。多因素分析显示,TME是减少呼吸系统并发症的独立因素(比值比=0.27,p=0.04)。
    结论:TME治疗食管癌是安全的。TME在术后呼吸系统并发症方面优于TTE;然而,吻合口漏的发生频率相对较高,应予以考虑,需要进一步评估.
    BACKGROUND: Although the transmediastinal approach as a radical esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma patients has attracted attention, its advantages over the transthoracic approach remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transmediastinal esophagectomy (TME) in terms of postoperative respiratory complications compared to that of open transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE).
    METHODS: We reviewed patients with thoracic and abdominal esophageal carcinoma who underwent TME or TTE between February 2014 and November 2021. We compared postoperative respiratory complications as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included perioperative operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and the number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes.
    RESULTS: Overall, 60 and 54 patients underwent TME and TTE, respectively. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for age and histological type. There were no intraoperative lethal complications in either group. The incidence of respiratory complications was significantly lower in the TME group than in the TTE group (6.7 vs. 22.2%, p = 0.03). The TME group had a shorter operation time (403 vs. 451 min, p < 0.01), less blood loss (107 vs. 253 mL, p < 0.01), and slightly higher anastomotic leakage (11.7 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.33). The number of harvested lymph nodes was similar in both groups (24 vs. 26, p = 0.10). Multivariate analysis revealed that TME is an independent factor in reducing respiratory complications (odds ratio = 0.27, p = 0.04).
    CONCLUSIONS: TME for esophageal carcinoma was performed safely. TME was superior to TTE in terms of postoperative respiratory complications; however, the relatively higher frequency of anastomotic leakage should be considered and requires further evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:目的比较食管癌电视辅助纵隔镜食管切除术(VATE)与电视辅助胸腔镜食管切除术(VATE)的临床病理特征和围手术期结果。
    UNASSIGNED:我们全面搜索了在线数据库(PubMed,Embase,WebofScience和Wiley在线图书馆)寻找可用的研究,探索食管癌中VaME和VATE之间的临床病理特征和围手术期结局。采用95%置信区间(CI)的相对危险度(RR)和95%CI的标准化均差(SMD)评价围手术期预后和临床病理特征。
    UNASSIGNED:共有7项观察性研究和一项涉及733名患者的随机对照试验被认为符合这项荟萃分析的条件。其中350例患者接受了VATE,而383例患者接受了VATE。VaME组患者肺部合并症较多(RR=2.18,95%CI1.37-3.46,P=0.001)。合并结果显示,VaME缩短了手术时间(SMD=-1.53,95%CI-2.308--0.76,P=0.000),总淋巴结较少(SMD=-0.70,95%CI-0.90--0.50,P=0.000)。在其他临床病理特征上没有观察到差异,术后并发症或死亡率。
    UASSIGNED:这项荟萃分析显示,VAME组患者在手术前有更多的肺部疾病。VaME方法显着缩短了手术时间,并且恢复了较少的总淋巴结,并且没有增加术中或术后并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted mediastinoscopy esophagectomy (VAME) compared to video-assisted thoracoscopy esophagectomy (VATE) in esophageal cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: We comprehensively searched online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Wiley online library) to find available studies exploring the clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes between VAME and VATE in esophageal cancer. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI were used to evaluate the perioperative outcomes and clinicopathological features.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of seven observational studies and one randomized controlled trial involving 733 patients were considered eligible for this meta-analysis, of which 350 patients underwent VAME in contrast to 383 patients underwent VATE. Patients in the VAME group had more pulmonary comorbidities (RR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.37-3.46, P = 0.001). The pooled results showed that VAME shortened the operation time (SMD = -1.53, 95% CI -2.308--0.76, P = 0.000), and retrieved less total lymph nodes (SMD = -0.70, 95% CI -0.90--0.50, P = 0.000). No differences were observed in other clinicopathological features, postoperative complications or mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis revealed that patients in the VAME group had more pulmonary disease before surgery. The VAME approach significantly shortened the operation time and retrieved less total lymph nodes and did not increase intra- or postoperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号