BACKGROUND: We proposed the term \"UIPAF\" to define patients with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) associated with only one domain of the classification called \"Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features\" (IPAF). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation and prognosis of UIPAF patients, compared with two cohorts, composed of IPAF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, respectively.
METHODS: The patients were enrolled as IPAF, UIPAF, or IPF based on clinical, serological, and radiological data and evaluated by a multidisciplinary team.
RESULTS: We enrolled 110 patients with IPF, 69 UIPAF, and 123 IPAF subjects. UIPAF patients were similar to IPAF regarding autoimmune features, except for the prevalence of Rheumatoid Factor in UIPAF and anti-SSA in IPAF. A similar proportion of the two cohorts progressed toward a specific autoimmune disease (SAD), with differences in the kind of SAD developed. The real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF patients proved to be almost identical to IPF.
CONCLUSIONS: UIPAF shared with IPAF similar autoimmune features, suggesting the opportunity to be considered IPAF, excluding the morphological domain by the classification. However, the real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF are similar to IPF. These data suggest a possible modification in the therapeutic management of UIPAF.

BACKGROUND: \"Interstitial lung disease\" (ILD) is a broad term encompassing diseases of different backgrounds. \"Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features\" (IPAF) is a recent term that implies the presence of autoimmunity.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the characteristics of Polish patients with IPAF, compare them with patients with other interstitial pneumonias, and search for the prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers of IPAF in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF).
METHODS: This multicenter prospective study plans to recruit 240 participants divided into 1 study group and 2 control groups. Biological fluid samples will be collected according to Polish Respiratory Society management guidelines and stored at -80°C for further tests. Prospective 5-year observations of 60 newly diagnosed individuals are planned. The study will be divided into subsections. First, we plan to characterize Polish patients with IPAF (study group) against their peers with other ILDs (2 control groups). Control group 1 will comprise patients with idiopathic ILDs, including mainly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Control group 2 will comprise patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, Sjögren\'s syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiological and functional parameters will be analyzed. Patients will be compared in terms of high-resolution computed tomography results, the 6-minute walking test performance, and pulmonary function test parameters. The diagnosis of IPAF will be reassessed on a regular basis through multidisciplinary discussion in order to determine its clinical stability. In the laboratory arm, inflammation and fibrosis pathways will be assessed. Cytokine levels (interleukin 8, transforming growth factor beta 1, chemokine C-C motif ligand [CXCL]18, CXCL1, surfactant protein [SP]-A, SP-D, Krebs von den Lungen-6 protein, and chitinase 1) will be measured in serum and BALF. A comparative analysis of serum and BALF cytokine levels will be performed in order to establish potential differences between systemic and local inflammatory pathways. In the quality of life (QoL) arm of the study, dyspnea and cough and their impact on various aspects of the QoL will be assessed. Depression and anxiety will be measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Modified Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and potential correlations with symptom prevalence will be assessed.
RESULTS: This study will start recruiting patients to phase 1 in October 2023. The final results will be available in 2028. We plan to publish preliminary results after 2-3 years from the start of phase 1.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will be a step toward a better understanding of IPAF etiopathogenesis and outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/44802.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether cytokines could be potential biomarkers to predict the occurrence of the progressive fibrosis (PF) phenotype among patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF).
METHODS: This study prospectively collected 51 IPAF and 15 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients who were diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from July 2020 to June 2021. All IPAF patients were followed up for 1 year to assess the development of PF phenotype. Paired bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum samples were collected at enrolment and analysed for differences in 39 cytokines expression. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis were conducted to identify a subgroup of IPAF patients at high risk for developing the PF phenotype. Finally, cytokine differences were compared between subgroups to identify potential biomarkers for PF-IPAF occurrence.
RESULTS: According to the PCA analysis, 81.25% of PF-IPAF patients share overlapped BALF cytokine profiles with IPF. Cluster analysis indicated that IPAF patients in subtype 2 had a higher risk of developing the PF phenotype within 1 year (P = 0.048), characterized by higher levels of CCL2 and CXCL12, and lower lymphocyte proportion (LYM%) in BALF. Elevated levels of BALF CCL2 (>299.16 pg/ml) or CXCL12 (>660.115 pg/ml) were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing PF phenotype within the 1-year follow-up period (P = 0.009, 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: PF-IPAF phenotype exhibits similar inflammatory cytokine profiles to IPF. Cytokine CCL2 and CXCL12, and LYM% in BALF serve as potential biomarkers for predicting the PF phenotype in IPAF patients.
BACKGROUND: Register: Qian Han, Website: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=61619, Registration number: ChiCTR2000040998.

Perinuclear Anti Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (p-ANCA) is a serological marker of Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), a vasculitis associated with lung involvement potentially mimicking Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). In this study, we evaluated the role of p-ANCA in predicting clinical evolution and prognosis in a cohort of IPF patients. In this observational, retrospective, case-control study, we compared 18 patients with an IPF diagnosis and p-ANCA positivity with 36 patients with seronegative IPF, matched for age and sex. IPF patients with and without p-ANCA showed similar lung function decline during the follow-up, but IPF p-ANCA+ showed better survival. Half of IPF p-ANCA+ patients were classified as MPA for the development of renal involvement (55%) or skin signs (45%). The progression towards MPA was associated with high levels of Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at baseline. In conclusion, p-ANCA, mainly when associated with RF, could predict the evolution of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) towards a definite vasculitis in patients, with a better prognosis compared with IPF. In this view, ANCA testing should be included in the diagnostic workup of UIP patients.

UNASSIGNED: A subgroup of IPF patients can meet IPAF criteria (features suggesting an underlying autoimmune process without fulfilling established criteria for a CTD). This study was aimed to evaluate whether IPAF/IPF patients compared to IPF patients differ in clinical profile, prognosis and disease course.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective, single center, case-control study. We evaluated 360 consecutive IPF patients (Forlì Hospital, between 1/1/2002 and 28/12/2016) and compared characteristics and outcome of IPAF/IPF to IPF.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-two (6%) patients met IPAF criteria. IPAF/IPF patients compared to IPF were more frequently females (N = 9/22, 40.9% vs. N = 68/338, 20.1%, p = 0.02), suffered more frequently from gastroesophageal reflux (54.5% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.01), and showed a higher prevalence of arthralgias (86.4% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.0001), myalgias (14.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.001) and fever (18.2% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.002). The serologic domain was detected in all cases (the most frequent were ANA in 17 and RF in nine cases) and morphologic domain (histology features) was positive in 6 out of 10 lung biopsies (lymphoid aggregates). Only patients with IPAF/IPF evolved to CTD at follow-up (10/22, 45.5%; six rheumatoid arthritis, one Sjögren\'s and three scleroderma). The presence of IPAF was a positive prognostic determinant (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.61, p = 0.003), whereas the isolated presence of circulating autoantibody did not impact prognosis (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67-1.49, p = 0.99).
UNASSIGNED: The presence of IPAF criteria in IPF has a major clinical impact correlating with the risk of evolution to full blown-CTD during follow-up and identifying a subgroup of patients with a better prognosis.

This narrative review will focus on the role of the rheumatologist in evaluating patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) without a defined rheumatic disease and will outline the current classification criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and describe what is known regarding IPAF pathobiology, natural history, prognosis, and treatment. Lastly, knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research will be discussed.
IPAF is a recently defined classification of ILD patients who have features suggesting an autoimmune-mediated process, but do not fulfill current rheumatic disease criteria. The goal of the IPAF criteria is to provide a uniform case definition for the study of autoimmune ILD patients who do not currently fit within standard ILD diagnostic categories, ultimately improving diagnosis and therapy. Many of these patients are referred for rheumatologic evaluation to aid the diagnostic process. The care of the IPAF patient is complex and is multidisciplinary with pulmonology, rheumatology, pathology, radiology, physical therapy, primary care, pulmonary transplant providers all serving vital roles. The rheumatologist has several roles which include classification, disease monitoring, and management.

UNASSIGNED: This review aims to collate current evidence on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of various connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) and present a contemporary framework for the management of such patients. It also seeks to summarize treatment outcomes including efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants, anti-fibrotics, and stem cell transplantation in CTD-ILD.
UNASSIGNED: Screening for ILD has been augmented by the use of artificial intelligence, ultra-low dose computerized tomography (CT) of the chest, and the use of chest ultrasound. Serum biomarkers have not found their way into clinical practice as yet. Identifying patients who need treatment and choosing the appropriate therapy is important to minimize the risk of therapy-related toxicity. The first-line drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD include mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for use in SSc-ILD. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved tocilizumab subcutaneous injection for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in adult patients with SSc-ILD. Autologous stem cell transplantation may have a role in select cases of SSc-ILD.
UNASSIGNED: CTD-ILD is a challenging area with diverse entities and variable outcomes. High-resolution CT is the investigative modality of choice. Treatment decisions need to be individualized and are based on patient symptoms, lung function, radiologic abnormalities, and the risk of disease progression. Precision medicine may play an important role in determining the optimal therapy for an individual patient in the future.

UNASSIGNED: Many patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) have autoimmune manifestations but do not meet criteria for a systemic rheumatic disease. A subset meets criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and have ILD requiring therapy. We conducted a multicentre observational study to examine the use of rituximab (RTX) in IPAF.
UNASSIGNED: Patients from Mass General Brigham (MGB) and University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) were included if they were ≥18 years old, met the 2015 classification criteria for IPAF and were treated with RTX. Clinical improvement was defined as improvement in four out of four domains at 1 year after RTX initiation: documented clinician global assessment; oxygen requirement; need for respiratory-related hospitalization; and survival.
UNASSIGNED: At MGB, 36 IPAF patients (mean age 61 years, 44% female) were treated with RTX. At 1 year, 18 (50%) were clinically improved, 12 (33%) were stable, and 6 (17%) died from progressive respiratory failure. At UCM, 14 IPAF patients (mean age 53 years, 71% female) were treated with RTX. At 1 year, eight (57%) were improved, two (14%) were stable, three (21%) died from progressive respiratory failure, and one (7%) was lost to follow-up. Two patients experienced minor infusion reactions, and two patients discontinued therapy owing to adverse events (infections).
UNASSIGNED: In patients with IPAF treated with RTX at two medical centres, the majority (40 [80%]) demonstrated improvement/stability at 1 year. These findings call for prospective studies, including randomized clinical trials, to determine the risks, benefits and cost effectiveness of RTX in IPAF.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) was proposed to describe patients with interstitial lung disease who do not meet the classification criteria for a defined connective tissue disease. Here, we report a spontaneous improvement case of IPAF. A 58-year-old man developed dry cough and dyspnoea. Positive result was obtained for the anti-centromere antibody. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) showed reticular abnormalities and ground-glass opacities. Cryobiopsy specimens revealed cellular non-specific interstitial pneumonia. The patient displayed periungual erythema and nail fold bleeding, but no sclerosis. He did not meet the criteria for systemic scleroderma, but did meet those for IPAF. Because symptoms slightly improved, the patient declined immunosuppressive treatment. After 6 months, repeated HRCT showed an apparent reduction in the area of ground-glass opacities. The forced vital capacity improved from 2.72 to 3.47 L and serum Krebs von den Lungen (KL)-6 decreased from 1977 to 531 U/ml, and symptoms disappeared.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes, including risk factors, for exacerbation between monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF).
METHODS: We assessed 672 patients between April 2009 and March 2019 who were evaluated using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. We applied the IPAF criteria. Fifty-two patients who visited our department for at least 6 months were diagnosed with IPAF. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected from medical records and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Among the 52 cases of IPAF, we compared the characteristics at diagnosis between treated (n = 28) and untreated patients (n = 24). The exacerbation rates were 42.9% (n = 12) and 8.3% (n = 2) (P = 0.0051), respectively. Among the treated patients, smoking history, high titer of KL-6, and the duration from diagnosis to the start of treatment were significant risk factors for exacerbation (P = 0.0062, 0.011, and 0.019, respectively). The number of risk factors was significantly and positively associated with exacerbation rate (P = 0.0053). Among the treated patients, glucocorticoid (GC) monotherapy was used in 13 cases, and GC and immunosuppressant (IS) combination therapy was used in 14 patients. There was no significant difference in the treatment methods between patients with and without risk factors (P = 0.47). When comparing the long-term outcomes between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, the 3-year non-exacerbation rates were 72.9 and 45.9% (P = 0.020), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: IPAF patients with risk factors had a high exacerbation rate, regardless of the type of treatment. New interventions aimed at preventing exacerbations in these patients are required.