Institutional care

机构护理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多国家都面临着医护人员短缺的问题。此外,医护人员正在经历许多压力源,导致心理问题,健康受损,并增加了离开工作场所的意愿。近年来,实施了不同的技术来减轻医护人员的工作量,如电子病人档案。机器人解决方案仍然相当罕见。为了帮助接受和实际使用机器人,其功能应符合用户的需求。
    在初步研究Care4All-Initial中,我们开发并现场测试了移动服务机器人在心理社会中的应用,痴呆症患者的多模式团体治疗。指导过程并评估可能的促进者和障碍,我们进行了一个反复发作的焦点小组,包括痴呆症患者,治疗师,专业护理人员以及来自不同学科的研究人员,以用户为中心的设计方法。焦点小组建议并审查了应用程序,并讨论了道德含义。我们以书面形式记录焦点小组讨论,并使用内容分析。
    焦点小组讨论了15个关于道德问题的不同主题,我们将其用作研究项目的框架:道德促进者尊重痴呆症患者的自主权及其在参与和数据共享方面的代理人。此外,机器人必须对治疗师和参与者有用。道德障碍是痴呆症患者或治疗师的欺骗和可能的伤害。焦点小组建议了32种不同的应用。我们实施了13个应用程序,这些应用程序集中在机器人与痴呆症患者的互动上,减轻了治疗师的工作量。通过利用现有的硬件和软件以及基于应用程序的构建来促进实现的应用程序。实施的障碍是由于硬件,软件,或不适合项目范围的应用程序。
    为了防止在痴呆症患者的集体治疗中使用机器人的障碍,机器人的应用程序必须开发足够的完美和安全的使用,机器人的使用不应引起刺激或激动,而是对其用户有意义和有用。为了促进发展足够的时间,钱,专业知识和规划至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Many countries are facing a shortage of healthcare workers. Furthermore, healthcare workers are experiencing many stressors, resulting in psychological issues, impaired health, and increased intentions to leave the workplace. In recent years, different technologies have been implemented to lighten workload on healthcare workers, such as electronic patient files. Robotic solutions are still rather uncommon. To help with acceptance and actual use of robots their functionalities should correspond to the users\' needs.
    UNASSIGNED: In the pilot study Care4All-Initial, we developed and field-tested applications for a mobile service robot in a psychosocial, multimodal group therapy for people with dementia. To guide the process and assess possible facilitators and barriers, we conducted a reoccurring focus group including people with dementia, therapists, professional caregivers as well as researchers from different disciplines with a user-centered design approach. The focus group suggested and reviewed applications and discussed ethical implications. We recorded the focus group discussions in writing and used content analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The focus group discussed 15 different topics regarding ethical concerns that we used as a framework for the research project: Ethical facilitators were respect for the autonomy of the people with dementia and their proxies regarding participating and data sharing. Furthermore, the robot had to be useful for the therapists and attendees. Ethical barriers were the deception and possible harm of the people with dementia or therapists. The focus group suggested 32 different applications. We implemented 13 applications that centered on the robot interacting with the people with dementia and lightening the workload off the therapists. The implemented applications were facilitated through utilizing existing hard- and software and building on applications. Barriers to implementation were due to hardware, software, or applications not fitting the scope of the project.
    UNASSIGNED: To prevent barriers of robot employment in a group therapy for people with dementia, the robot\'s applications have to be developed sufficiently for a flawless and safe use, the use of the robot should not cause irritation or agitation, but rather be meaningful and useful to its users. To facilitate the development sufficient time, money, expertise and planning is essential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:退伍军人指导护理(VDC)计划通过提供资金雇用退伍军人选择的护理人员来帮助有长期机构护理风险的退伍军人留在家中。VDC是通过退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心(VAMC)与第三方老龄化和残疾网络机构提供商之间的合作伙伴关系运营的。
    目标:我们的目标是确定促进者,障碍,1个地区的7个VAMC的VDC实施和调整:退伍军人综合服务网络(VISN)8,覆盖佛罗里达州,南乔治亚,波多黎各,美属维尔京群岛。我们还试图了解领导和利益相关者对VDC计划的影响和实施,并确定VISN8的VDC计划所服务的退伍军人,并描述他们基于家庭和社区的服务使用。最后,我们希望将VISN8中VDC计划所服务的退伍军人与整个VA中VDC计划所服务的退伍军人进行比较。此信息旨在用于确定策略并提出建议,以指导VISN8中的VDC计划扩展。
    方法:混合方法研究设计包括电子交付调查,半结构化面试,和行政数据。它由实施研究综合框架(CFIR2.0版)指导。参与者包括VAMC的工作人员以及VISN8的老龄化和残疾网络机构的合作伙伴,这些VAMC和VISN8的领导,参加VDC的退伍军人,和拒绝VDC登记的退伍军人及其照顾者。我们采访了选定的VAMC社会工作现场负责人,老年医学和扩展护理,和照顾者支持计划。每位受访者将被要求完成一份包括其个人特征信息的面试前调查,VDC计划的经验,以及根据CFIR(2.0版)框架对程序方面的看法。参与者将完成半结构化面试,涵盖与受访者和主持人相关的结构,障碍,以及现场VDC实施中的调整。
    结果:我们将计算描述性统计数据,包括均值,SDs,以及调查答复的百分比。主持人,障碍,登记的患者数量,人员配置也将被介绍。访谈将使用由CFIR域和构造指导的快速定性技术进行分析。将对VISN8的结果进行整理,以确定VDC扩展的策略。我们将使用管理数据来描述VISN8中计划所服务的退伍军人。
    结论:VA优先考虑在全国范围内推广VDC,这项研究将为这些扩展工作提供信息。这项研究的结果将提供有关员工经验的信息,领导力,退伍军人,和VDC计划中的护理人员,并确定计划促进者和障碍。这些结果可用于改善计划交付,促进VISN8内的增长,并随着VDC计划的扩展在全国其他站点建立新计划。
    DERR1-10.2196/57341。
    BACKGROUND: The Veteran-Directed Care (VDC) program serves to assist veterans at risk of long-term institutional care to remain at home by providing funding to hire veteran-selected caregivers. VDC is operated through partnerships between Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers (VAMCs) and third-party Aging and Disability Network Agency providers.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify facilitators, barriers, and adaptations in VDC implementation across 7 VAMCs in 1 region: Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 8, which covers Florida, South Georgia, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands. We also attempted to understand leadership and stakeholder perspectives on VDC programs\' reach and implementation and identify veterans served by VISN 8\'s VDC programs and describe their home- and community-based service use. Finally, we want to compare veterans served by VDC programs in VISN 8 to the veterans served in VDC programs across the VA. This information is intended to be used to identify strategies and propose recommendations to guide VDC program expansion in VISN 8.
    METHODS: The mixed methods study design encompasses electronically delivered surveys, semistructured interviews, and administrative data. It is guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR version 2.0). Participants included the staff of VAMCs and partnering aging and disability network agencies across VISN 8, leadership at these VAMCs and VISN 8, veterans enrolled in VDC, and veterans who declined VDC enrollment and their caregivers. We interviewed selected VAMC site leaders in social work, Geriatrics and Extended Care, and the Caregiver Support Program. Each interviewee will be asked to complete a preinterview survey that includes information about their personal characteristics, experiences with the VDC program, and perceptions of program aspects according to the CFIR (version 2.0) framework. Participants will complete a semistructured interview that covers constructs relevant to the respondent and facilitators, barriers, and adaptations in VDC implementation at their site.
    RESULTS: We will calculate descriptive statistics including means, SDs, and percentages for survey responses. Facilitators, barriers, number of patients enrolled, and staffing will also be presented. Interviews will be analyzed using rapid qualitative techniques guided by CFIR domains and constructs. Findings from VISN 8 will be collated to identify strategies for VDC expansion. We will use administrative data to describe veterans served by the programs in VISN 8.
    CONCLUSIONS: The VA has prioritized VDC rollout nationwide and this study will inform these expansion efforts. The findings from this study will provide information about the experiences of the staff, leadership, veterans, and caregivers in the VDC program and identify program facilitators and barriers. These results may be used to improve program delivery, facilitate growth within VISN 8, and inform new program establishment at other sites nationwide as the VDC program expands.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/57341.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在机构环境中饲养的儿童经历了早期剥夺,这对神经认知功能的多个方面具有持久的影响,包括执行功能(EF)。大脑发育的变化被认为有助于这些持续的EF挑战,但是很少有研究使用功能磁共振成像来调查有早期剥夺史的儿童与EF相关的大脑活动。这项研究检查了12-14岁儿童的响应冲突任务的行为和神经数据,这些儿童在收养前在机构护理中花费了不同的时间(N=84;收养年龄-平均值:15.85个月,中位数:12个月,范围:4-60个月)。在初步分析中,早期和后来采用(EA,将LA)青年与在其生物家庭中长大的一组儿童(未收养,NA).NA青年的表现明显比LA青年准确,EA青年介于两者之间。影像学数据表明,以前制度化的(PI)青年激活了其他额叶顶区域,包括背外侧前额叶皮质,与NA青年相比。此外,EA青年独特激活内侧前额区,在此任务中,LA独特激活了顶叶区域。在较大的PI青年组中进行的单独分析检查了EF的行为或大脑测量是否随剥夺时间的变化而变化。剥夺持续时间与默认模式网络(DMN)区域的激活呈负相关。总的来说,结果表明,剥夺对EF有持久的影响,但是那些早期从机构护理中被移除的人可能能够招募额外的神经资源作为补偿机制。
    Children reared in institutional settings experience early deprivation that has lasting implications for multiple aspects of neurocognitive functioning, including executive function (EF). Changes in brain development are thought to contribute to these persistent EF challenges, but little research has used fMRI to investigate EF-related brain activity in children with a history of early deprivation. This study examined behavioral and neural data from a response conflict task in 12-14-year-olds who spent varying lengths of time in institutional care prior to adoption (N = 84; age at adoption - mean: 15.85 months, median: 12 months, range: 4-60 months). In initial analyses, earlier- and later-adopted (EA, LA) youth were compared to a group of children raised in their biological families (non-adopted, NA). NA youth performed significantly more accurately than LA youth, with EA youth falling in between. Imaging data suggested that previously institutionalized (PI) youth activated additional frontoparietal regions, including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as compared to NA youth. In addition, EA youth uniquely activated medial prefrontal regions, and LA uniquely activated parietal regions during this task. A separate analysis in a larger group of PI youth examined whether behavioral or brain measures of EF varied with the duration of deprivation experienced. Duration of deprivation was negatively associated with activation of default mode network (DMN) regions. Overall, results suggest that there are lasting effects of deprivation on EF, but that those who are removed from institutional care earlier may be able to recruit additional neural resources as a compensatory mechanism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在当前老龄化的背景下,智能养老领域逐渐发展起来,有助于促进老年人的健康。虽然对健康的积极影响已经确立,缺乏研究其对生活质量(QoL)的影响的研究。本研究旨在探讨社会支持在老年人智能养老与生活质量关系中的中介作用。
    方法:浙江省1313名老年人,中国,参与研究。问卷调查被用来收集参与者的基本人口统计信息,聪明的老人护理,社会支持,和QoL。对3个变量的人口统计学特征进行描述性分析和相关性分析。使用自举置信区间(CI)测试间接效应。
    结果:分析显示,聪明的老年人护理与社会支持呈正相关(β=0.42,p<0.01),社会支持与生活质量呈正相关(β=0.65,p<0.01)。值得注意的是,在智能老年人护理与QoL之间的关系中,社会支持成为重要的独立中介(效应大小=0.28,95%bootstrapCI0.24至0.32)。
    结论:这项研究的结果强调了促进智能老年人护理的利用和改善老年人多方面社会支持的重要性,因为这些因素对整体QoL有积极贡献。
    BACKGROUND: In the current context of ageing, the field of smart elderly care has gradually developed, contributing to the promotion of health among older adults. While the positive impact on health has been established, there is a scarcity of research examining its impact on the quality of life (QoL). This study aims to investigate the mediating role of social support in the relationship between smart elderly care and QoL among older adults.
    METHODS: A total of 1313 older adults from Zhejiang Province, China, participated in the study. Questionnaires were used to collect data on participants\' basic demographic information, smart elderly care, social support, and QoL. The descriptive analyses of the demographic characteristics and correlation analyses of the three variables were calculated. Indirect effects were tested using bootstrapped confidence intervals (CI).
    RESULTS: The analysis revealed a positive association between smart elderly care and social support (β = 0.42, p < 0.01), as well as a positive correlation between social support and QoL (β = 0.65, p < 0.01). Notably, social support emerged as an important independent mediator (effect size = 0.28, 95% bootstrap CI 0.24 to 0.32) in the relationship between smart elderly care and QoL.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underscore the importance of promoting the utilization of smart elderly care and improving multi-faceted social support for older adults, as these factors positively contribute to the overall QoL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:生活中的意义是在机构护理中促进社会心理健康的一个被广泛接受的目标。然而,照顾者互动和感知控制如何影响老年人的生活意义尚不清楚.本研究探讨了机构护理人员互动的效果,家庭照顾者互动,中国老年居民对生活意义的感知控制,以及老年人与社会工作者比率在这些协会中的潜在调节作用。
    方法:采用多阶段随机抽样的方法,从中国城市4家养老院抽取452名老年居民。使用结构方程模型来检验研究假设。
    结果:机构照顾者互动与生活意义呈正相关,老年居民的感知控制对生活意义有积极影响。此外,老年人与社会工作者的比例调节了机构照料者互动与生活意义之间的关系,以及家庭照顾者之间的互动和生活意义。
    结论:增加老年人的生活意义是机构护理行业的重要服务目标。社会工作者在机构护理中影响对老年人生命意义的干预效果。较高的老年人与社会工作者比率可以提高老年居民生活意义干预措施的有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Meaning in life is a widely accepted aim in promoting psychosocial health in institutional care. However, how caregiver interaction and perceived control impact meaning in life among the elderly remains unclear. This study explores the effect of institutional caregiver interaction, family caregiver interaction, and perceived control on meaning in life among elderly residents in China, and the potential moderating effect of elderly-to-social worker ratio in these associations.
    METHODS: Multistage random sampling was used to recruit a sample of 452 elderly residents from 4 elderly care homes in urban China. A structural equation model was used to test the study hypothesis.
    RESULTS: Institutional caregiver interaction is positively related to meaning in life, and perceived control among elderly residents has a positive impact on meaning in life. Moreover, the elderly-to-social worker ratio moderated the relationship between institutional caregiver interaction and meaning in life, as well as between family caregiver interaction and meaning in life.
    CONCLUSIONS: Increase elderly\'s meaning in life is an important service target for the caring professions in institutional care. Social workers affect the effectiveness of interventions on elderly\'s meaning in life in institutional care. A higher elderly-to-social worker ratio could improve the effectiveness of interventions on meaning in life for elderly residents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管越来越多的文献关于在机构痴呆症护理环境中使用远程临场机器人,有限的研究集中在提供痴呆症护理的一线工作人员的观点上。我们的目标是了解员工对使用远程呈现机器人支持痴呆症患者及其家人的看法。在《实施研究综合框架》的指导下,我们在加拿大的四家长期护理(LTC)家庭和一家医院进行了4个焦点小组和11个半结构化访谈.我们包括22名跨学科工作人员(例如,注册护士,社会工作者,职业治疗师,娱乐治疗师),以了解他们对远程呈现机器人的体验。主题分析确定了三个关键主题:1)人员培训和支持;2)机器人功能;3)实施的环境动态。我们的结果强调了微观结构支持的必要性,为痴呆症护理环境中的工作人员提供中观和宏观层面,以有效实施技术。本研究通过阐明促进员工参与技术研究的因素,为未来的研究和实践做出了贡献。将员工的声音纳入技术实施计划,并制定战略为员工提供结构性支持,护理团队,和护理之家。
    Although there is a growing literature on the use of telepresence robots in institutional dementia care settings, limited research focused on the perspectives of frontline staff members who deliver dementia care. Our objective was to understand staff perspectives on using telepresence robots to support residents with dementia and their families. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted four focus groups and 11 semi-structured interviews across four long-term care (LTC) homes and one hospital in Canada. We included 22 interdisciplinary staff members (e.g., registered nurses, social workers, occupational therapists, recreational therapists) to understand their experiences with telepresence robots. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: 1) Staff Training and Support; 2) Robot Features; 3) Environmental dynamics for Implementation. Our results underscore the imperative of structural support at micro-, meso- and macro-levels for staff in dementia care settings to effectively implement technology. This study contributes to future research and practice by elucidating factors facilitating staff involvement in technology research, integrating staff voices into technology implementation planning, and devising strategies to provide structural support to staff, care teams, and care homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    易怒反映了沮丧和愤怒的倾向,是一种外化和内化精神病理学的转化诊断症状。虽然早期不良经历与更高水平的易怒有关,早期社会心理剥夺的经历,以及基于家庭的安置是否可以减轻对随后易怒的影响,保持未充分开发。本研究通过一项随机对照试验研究了107名具有机构护理史的16岁儿童的烦躁情绪,该试验是寄养护理替代机构护理和49名社区比较儿童。16岁时,使用父母和自我报告形式的情感反应性指数评估烦躁.与社区青少年相比,有机构护理史的患者表现出明显的易怒水平升高.在那些经历过机构护理的人中,与随机分配到照常护理组的参与者相比,随机分配到寄养护理组的参与者的烦躁程度较低,在控制基线负面情绪后,这种效果仍然存在。这些发现表明,在心理社会剥夺后,高质量的寄养与较低的易怒之间存在因果关系。此外,16岁时机构护理和非家庭安置的持续时间较长与较高的易怒程度相关,强调照顾在解释青春期易怒变化中的作用。支持长期的政策,应优先考虑没有定期照顾者的儿童的高质量家庭安置。
    Irritability reflects a propensity for frustration and anger, and is a transdiagnostic symptom of both externalizing and internalizing psychopathology. While early adverse experiences are associated with higher levels of irritability, experiences of early psychosocial deprivation and whether family-based placements can mitigate the impact on subsequent irritability, remain underexplored. The current study examined irritability in 107 16-year-olds with a history of institutional care from a randomized controlled trial of foster care as an alternative to institutional care and 49 community comparison children. At age 16 years, irritability was assessed using parent- and self-report forms of the Affective Reactivity Index. Compared to community adolescents, those with a history of institutional care exhibited significantly elevated irritability levels. Among those who experienced institutional care, those randomized to foster care had lower levels of irritability compared to participants randomized to the care-as-usual group, and this effect persists after controlling for baseline negative emotionality. These findings suggest a causal link between high-quality foster care and lower irritability following psychosocial deprivation. Additionally, longer duration in institutional care and non-family placement at age 16 years were associated with higher levels of irritability, highlighting the role of caregiving in explaining variation in irritability in adolescence. Policies that support long-term, high-quality family placements for children without regular caregivers should be prioritized.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:本研究旨在通过对新问卷的验证,比较制度化和就地老化(AIP)老年人之间的社交网络。(2)方法:横断面研究包括100名老年人(平均年龄:73.53±5.49岁;年龄范围:65-85岁),48名制度化受试者和52名AIP受试者。我们开发了,已验证,并发放了一份新的问卷,老年人社交网络评估问卷(SNAOPQ),使用描述性和推断性统计方法评估老年人的社交网络。(3)结果:SNAOPQ表现出优异的内部一致性(Cronbachα为0.91,McDonaldω为0.91)。统计分析显示变量之间存在显著关联,强调制度化个人和AIP个人之间社交网络的差异(p≤0.001)。社会人口因素,如年龄,教育,生活安排状况,和后代数量显着影响SNAOPQ得分(p≤0.001)。年龄和居住类型显著影响参与者的分数,表明社交网络规模随着年龄的增长而减小。高等教育和夫妻生活与更广泛的社交网络有关,而更多的后代与社交网络扩张相关。(4)结论:我们的研究强调了基于居住类型的老年人社交网络的显著差异,强调社会人口因素的影响,如年龄,教育,生活安排,以及后代的数量。
    (1) Background: This research aims to compare social networks among institutionalized and aging-in-place (AIP) older adults through the validation of a new questionnaire. (2) Methods: The cross-sectional study included 100 older adults (mean age: 73.53 ± 5.49 years; age range: 65-85 years), with 48 institutionalized subjects and 52 AIP subjects. We developed, validated, and administered a new questionnaire, the Social Network Assessment for Older People Questionnaire (SNAOPQ), to assess older adults\' social networks using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. (3) Results: The SNAOPQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha of 0.91 and McDonald\'s omega of 0.91). Statistical analysis revealed significant associations between variables, highlighting differences in social networks between institutionalized and AIP individuals (p ≤ 0.001). Sociodemographic factors like age, education, living arrangement status, and number of descendants significantly influenced SNAOPQ scores (p ≤ 0.001). Age and residence type notably impacted participants\' scores, indicating reduced social network size with age. Tertiary education and living in a couple were associated with more extensive social networks, while a higher number of descendants correlated with social network expansion. (4) Conclusions: Our study highlights significant differences in social networks among older adults based on residence type, emphasizing the impact of sociodemographic factors such as age, education, living arrangement, and the number of descendants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本论文调查了意大利四组家庭外护理儿童在安全依恋水平和行为问题上的差异:封闭式收养(收养后儿童和亲生父母没有联系),公开收养(安置后仍有联系的儿童和亲生父母),寄养(暂时与亲戚或不相关的寄养父母住在一起的儿童)和机构照料(大型儿童群体的寄宿儿童)。这项研究包括了130名10-19岁的儿童。儿童和青少年依恋访谈和Achenbach青年自我报告被用来衡量参与者的安全依恋水平和行为问题。进行了协方差的多变量分析和测量变量路径分析。年龄,性别和儿童保护请求与接受家庭外护理之间经过的时间被用作协变量.结果显示,封闭式收养青少年的安全依恋分数高于寄养和机构照料青少年,而开放收养的青少年在问题行为上的得分明显高于其他家庭外护理组。从局限性和对未来研究的影响方面讨论了研究结果。
    The current paper investigated differences in secure attachment levels and behavioral problems among four groups of children in out-of-home care in Italy: closed adoption (child and birth parents not in contact following adoption), open adoption (child and birth parents still in contact after placement), foster care (child living temporarily with relatives or unrelated foster parents) and institutional care (child in residential care for large groups of children). One hundred and thirty children aged 10-19 were included in this study. The Attachment Interview for Childhood and Adolescence and the Achenbach Youth Self-Report were employed to measure participants\' secure attachment levels and behavioral problems. Both a multivariate analysis of covariance and measured variable path analysis were performed. Age, gender and time elapsed between the request for child protection and placement on out-of-home care were used as covariates. The results showed that adolescents in closed adoption had higher secure attachment scores than those in foster care and institutional care, while adolescents in open adoption scored significantly higher on problem behaviors than those in the other out-of-home care groups. Findings were discussed in terms of limitations and implications for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长期护理可改善痴呆症(PWD)患者的独立性和生活质量。社会经济地位对获得长期护理的影响研究不足。
    目的:探讨PWD长期护理的社会经济差异。
    方法:这项基于注册的研究包括14,786名PWD,在瑞典认知障碍和痴呆症登记处注册(2014-2016)。教育和收入,两个传统的社会经济指标,是主要的曝光。结果是任何形式的长期护理,特定类型的长期护理(家庭护理,机构护理),和每月平均家庭护理时间。使用零膨胀负二项回归和二元逻辑回归检查结果与社会经济地位之间的关联。
    结果:接受义务教育的PWD接受任何类型的长期护理的可能性较低(OR0.80,95%CI0.68-0.93),或家庭护理(OR0.83,95%CI0.70-0.97),与拥有大学学位的个人相比。他们每月平均家庭护理时间比拥有大学学位的人低0.70倍(95%CI0.59-0.82)。教育与接受机构护理之间没有显着关联。对患有阿尔茨海默病的人进行分层显示,较低的教育程度与任何类型的长期护理之间存在显着关联,在收入和家庭护理时间之间。
    结论:长期护理中的社会经济不平等在本研究人群中存在。受教育程度较低的PWD不太可能获得一般长期护理,家庭护理和家庭护理时间较低,与受过高等教育的同行相比。收入与接受长期护理没有显着相关。
    Long-term care improves independence and quality of life of persons with dementia (PWD). The influence of socioeconomic status on access to long-term care was understudied.
    To explore the socioeconomic disparity in long-term care for PWD.
    This registry-based study included 14,786 PWD, registered in the Swedish registry for cognitive and dementia disorders (2014-2016). Education and income, two traditional socioeconomic indicators, were the main exposure. Outcomes were any kind of long-term care, specific types of long-term care (home care, institutional care), and the monthly average hours of home care. The association between outcomes and socioeconomic status was examined with zero-inflated negative binomial regression and binary logistic regression.
    PWD with compulsory education had lower likelihood of receiving any kind of long-term care (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), or home care (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.97), compared to individuals with university degrees. Their monthly average hours of home care were 0.70 times (95% CI 0.59-0.82) lower than those of persons with university degrees. There was no significant association between education and the receipt of institutional care. Stratifying on persons with Alzheimer\'s disease showed significant association between lower education and any kind of long-term care, and between income and the hours of home care.
    Socioeconomic inequalities in long-term care existed in this study population. Lower-educated PWD were less likely to acquire general long-term care, home care and had lower hours of home care, compared to their higher-educated counterparts. Income was not significantly associated with the receipt of long-term care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号