Background Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization is crucial for central venous access, but the choice between the supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches lacks comprehensive comparison. This study addresses this gap by conducting a prospective observational analysis of both techniques. The supraclavicular method accesses the vein from above the clavicle while the infraclavicular targets it below. Our model-driven approach aims to elucidate the procedural nuances, success rates, and complications associated with each method. The findings intend to equip clinicians with evidence-based insights, facilitating informed decision-making for improved procedural outcomes in ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization. Aim and objective This study aims to comprehensively compare the supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches in ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization, evaluating the procedural minutiae, potential advantages, and challenges associated with each technique. Employing a prospective observational methodology, our objective is to provide evidence-based insights for approaches in ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization, evaluating procedural nuances, success rates, and complications during the procedure. Methods In this prospective investigation, 276 patients aged between 20 and 55 years were randomly assigned to two groups: 143 patients in the supraclavicular group and 133 patients in the infraclavicular group. Specifically, patients admitted for elective surgery necessitating postoperative ICU care were considered. The study assessed various variables, including success rate, time required for venous visualization, venous puncture, catheterization, total procedure duration, and incidence of mechanical complications, to facilitate group comparisons. Results The mean procedural time was shorter in the supraclavicular group compared to the infraclavicular group, with durations of 2 minutes and 2 seconds versus 3 minutes and 40 seconds, respectively (95% CI). This difference was statistically significant. Similarly, the mean durations for venous visualization, venous puncture, and venous catheterization were also shorter in the supraclavicular group, and these differences were statistically significant. Both groups achieved a 100% success rate, with the first attempt success rate being higher in the supraclavicular subclavian vein group. Conclusion The findings of this study demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in favor of the supraclavicular approach for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization. The shorter mean procedural time, as well as durations for venous visualization, puncture, and catheterization, emphasize the efficiency of the supraclavicular technique. The consistently achieved 100% success rate, coupled with a higher first-attempt success rate, further underscores the proficiency of the supraclavicular subclavian vein group. These results collectively suggest that the supraclavicular approach is not only time-efficient but also superior in terms of successful central line placement, making it a promising choice for both emergency and critical care settings.

UNASSIGNED: The subclavian vein is frequently cannulated using ultrasound. There are two techniques of subclavian vein catheterization (SVC): Supraclavicular (SC) and infraclavicular (IC). Though the IC route is often preferred, the SC approach offers several distinct advantages. This study was planned to compare the technique of SVC using SC and IC approaches in terms of catheterization technique and complications in elective surgeries in adults.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1, 2, or 3 adult patients posted for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were divided into SC or IC groups randomly. Right-sided subclavian vein was cannulated in both the groups (n = 30). Visualization time, Likert scale, subclavian vein diameter, skin-to-subclavian vein depth, number of attempts, puncture time, ease of guidewire insertion, catheter insertion time, and total procedural time were observed. A comparison of complications for each approach was noted.
UNASSIGNED: Total procedural time, time to visualization of the subclavian vein, and puncture time was lower for group SC and higher for group IC. Catheter insertion time was higher with the IC approach than with the SC approach. Better ultrasound view scores were seen in group SC than in group IC. The first attempt success rate was higher in group SC than in group IC. Comparatively, lower complications both during and after the procedure were noted in the SC approach than the IC approach.
UNASSIGNED: Ultrasonography (USG) guidance guided SC approach to access the subclavian vein is quicker, relatively secure, and a better technique than the IC approach. Additionally, the SC approach is associated with comparatively fewer immediate and delayed complications.
UNASSIGNED: Jaiswal P, Saini S, Chhabra PH. Subclavian Vein Cannulation via Supraclavicular or Infraclavicular Route Which is Better? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(4):375-380.

BACKGROUND: The authors present a 50-year-old female with high-grade glioma involving the motor cortex as the cause of her drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) was chosen for epilepsy treatment. Due to concerns regarding the generator impeding the regular imaging surveillance required for treatment and monitoring of her glioma, surgeons placed the internal pulse generator (IPG) within an infraclavicular chest pocket.
METHODS: Implantation of the RNS device and IPG within the infraclavicular pocket was uneventful. However, both subdural and depth electrodes were used and connected to the IPG, and subdural electrodes are considerably shorter than depth electrodes (37 vs 44 cm). The shorter strip leads presumably generated significant tension, leading to fracture of the leads. Therefore, surgery was repeated using only depth electrodes for more length and less tension. The device has good-quality electrocorticography signals that continue to be used for device programming. The seizure burden was reduced, and quality of life improved for the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The RNS system with infraclavicular IPG placement reduced the seizure burden and improved the quality of life of a patient with glioma-associated epilepsy. Surgeons may consider the infraclavicular location as an alternative site for implantation for RNS candidates who require recurrent intracranial magnetic resonance imaging.

UNASSIGNED: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block by triple-point injection method was aimed at blocking the three individual cords in the infraclavicular region. Recently, a single-point injection method which does not require visualization of cords to produce nerve block has been introduced. This study compared the block onset time, performance time, patient\'s satisfaction, and complications between the ultrasound guided triple-point injection and single-point injection methods.
UNASSIGNED: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sixty patients were divided into two groups - Group S: 30 patients received single-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Group T: 30 patients received triple-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Drugs used were 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone.
UNASSIGNED: The sensory onset time was significantly longer in Group S (11.13 ±1.83 min) than Group T (6.20 ±1.19min). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding mean motor onset time. The composite sensorimotor onset time was similar between the groups. The mean time to perform the block was significantly lesser in Group S (1.35 ±0.38 min) when compared to group T (3.44 ±0.61min). The patient satisfaction score, conversion to general anesthesia and complications were not significant among the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: We concluded that single-point injection method had a shorter performance time and similar total onset time with less procedural complications compared with triple point injection method.

UNASSIGNED: Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a rare and locally infiltrative tumor that commonly occurs in extremities in older adults; however, truncal and head and neck cases have been reported. They are characterized by multinodular growth, incomplete fibrous septa, and myxoid stroma. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The authors report a case of a combined, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, transaxillary, and posterior subscapular approaches for resection of giant MFS.
UNASSIGNED: The anatomical complexity and rarity of tumors involving the brachial plexus impose many challenges onto surgeons performing surgical resections. Treatment choices and surgical outcomes rely heavily on meticulous multidisciplinary planning, anatomical knowledge, careful dissection, and extent of resection. This case is unique in utilizing four different approaches to the brachial plexus to resect one tumor.

UNASSIGNED: The parasagittal ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block (ICB) aims to cover all the elements of brachial plexus for the surgeries at and below the elbow. Our aim was to demonstrate the spread of 20 ml latex in vicinity of brachial plexus cords after injecting posterior to the axillary artery in Thiel embalmed cadavers.
UNASSIGNED: A blunt insulated needle was inserted posterior to the axillary artery in a traditional parasagittal infraclavicular in 2 Thiel embalmed cadavers, on both the sides (four specimens). A day later cadaver 1 was dissected and cadaver 2 was frozen at ‒20ºC for 2 weeks and sectioned. Both cadavers were photographed.
UNASSIGNED: In cadaver 1, dissection revealed a spread of red latex on the lateral cord extending onto the musculocutaneous nerve, the posterior cord engulfing the radial and axillary nerves distally. In cadaver 2, a cross-section revealed latex engulfed all three cords.
UNASSIGNED: Single injection of 20 ml latex aimed posterior to the axillary artery in the parasagittal infraclavicular approach engulfed the posterior, medial and lateral cord in Thiel embalmed cadavers. This needs to be investigated in patients who receive ICB clinically and using contrast studies.

Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia. Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematological assessments. Neuraxial blocks include spinal, epidural, and combined spinal epidural. Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary. Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block, saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve block, iPACK block, ankle block and lumbar plexus block. The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment. The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation, patient positing, operative structures, operative manipulation, tourniquet use and the impact of post-operative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy. Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, falls, hematoma, infection and allergic reactions. Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications. LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications (intralipid) should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have become standard of care for enhanced recovery pathways after surgery. For brachial plexus delivery of anesthesia, both supraclavicular (SC) and infraclavicular (IC) approaches have been shown to require less supplemental anesthesia, are performed more rapidly, have quicker onset time, and have lower rates of complications than other approaches (axillary, interscalene, etc.). Ultrasound-guidance is commonly utilized to improve outcomes, limit the need for deep sedation or general anesthesia, and reduce procedural complications. Given the SC and IC approaches are the most common approaches for brachial plexus blocks, the differences between the two have been critically evaluated in the present manuscript. Various studies have demonstrated slight favorability towards the IC approach from the standpoint of complications and safety. Two prospective RCTs found a higher incidence of complications in the SC approach - particularly Horner syndrome. The IC method appears to support a greater block distribution as well. Overall, both SC and IC brachial plexus nerve block approaches are the most effective and safe approaches, particularly under ultrasound-guidance. Given the success of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks, these techniques are an important skill set for the anesthesiologist for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

UNASSIGNED: The ultrasound-infraclavicular block (US-ICB) is a popular and efficient block for below-elbow surgeries. However, the vascular anatomy of infraclavicular area close to the brachial plexus has remained unresearched. We aimed to explore the presence of aberrant vasculature in the infraclavicular area that could pose a contraindication to US-ICB.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the US images of patients undergoing below-elbow surgery under US-ICB. Before performing the block, a scout scan of parasagittal infraclavicular areas was performed and the scan images were saved. The primary objective was to find the prevalence of aberrant vasculature due to which the US-ICB was abandoned. The secondary objective was to understand the pattern and position of the aberrant vessels.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 912 patients, 793 patients underwent surgery under US-ICB and in 119 patients (13.05%), the USG-ICB was abandoned due to aberrant vasculature close to the brachial cords and intended position of the needle tip. The anomalous vessels were identified in the lower inner, lower outer, and upper outer quadrants around the axillary artery (AA). Some of these vascular structures also had classical patterns which we described as \"satellites,\" \"clamping,\" or \"hugging\" of the AA.
UNASSIGNED: Anomalous vascular structures in the infraclavicular area were seen in 13.05% of patients planned for US-ICB. We, therefore, recommend, that a thorough scout US scan should be mandatorily performed ICB and in the presence of aberrant vascular structures, an alternative approach to brachial plexus block may be adopted.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus block has become one of the most widely-used anaesthetic techniques in the world for upper limb anaesthesia. There are three different brachial blocks techniques: supraclavicular, infraclavicular and axillary block. However, its execution is not exempt from possible clinical complications, and it is not clear which of these is associated with a lower complication rate and greater anaesthetic success.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis following the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify controlled clinical trials reporting the three techniques. The main outcome was the incidence of anaesthetic complications, and the secondary ones were an anaesthetic success, time of performance and anaesthetic latency.
RESULTS: 25 controlled clinical trials, with 2012 patient, were included. The methodological quality of the included studies is moderate to high. For the main outcome, the main complication reported was a vascular puncture, followed by transient neurological injury, symptomatic diaphragmatic paralysis and pneumothorax. No differences were found in complications associated with the three anaesthetic techniques. Additionally, no differences were found regarding anaesthetic success.
CONCLUSIONS: Anesthetic complications associated with the three brachial block techniques are low, with no medium and long-term sequelae; however, none of the three techniques seems to be superior among them to reduce these complications. All three techniques are highly successful when performed using ultrasound imaging.