OBJECTIVE: Knowledge-based planning (KBP) aims to automate and standardize treatment planning. New KBP users are faced with many questions: How much does model size matter, and are multiple models needed to accommodate specific physician preferences? In this study, six head-and-neck KBP models were trained to address these questions.
METHODS: The six models differed in training size and plan composition: The KBPFull (n = 203 plans), KBP101 (n = 101), KBP50 (n = 50), and KBP25 (n = 25) were trained with plans from two head-and-neck physicians. KBPA and KBPB each contained n = 101 plans from only one physician, respectively. An independent set of 39 patients treated to 6000-7000 cGy by a third physician was re-planned with all KBP models for validation. Standard head-and-neck dosimetric parameters were used to compare resulting plans. KBPFull plans were compared to the clinical plans to evaluate overall model quality. Additionally, clinical and KBPFull plans were presented to another physician for blind review. Dosimetric comparison of KBPFull against KBP101 , KBP50 , and KBP25 investigated the effect of model size. Finally, KBPA versus KBPB tested whether training KBP models on plans from one physician only influences the resulting output. Dosimetric differences were tested for significance using a paired t-test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Compared to manual plans, KBPFull significantly increased PTV Low D95% and left parotid mean dose but decreased dose cochlea, constrictors, and larynx. The physician preferred the KBPFull plan over the manual plan in 20/39 cases. Dosimetric differences between KBPFull , KBP101 , KBP50 , and KBP25 plans did not exceed 187 cGy on aggregate, except for the cochlea. Further, average differences between KBPA and KBPB were below 110 cGy.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, all models were shown to produce high-quality plans. Differences between model outputs were small compared to the prescription. This indicates only small improvements when increasing model size and minimal influence of the physician when choosing treatment plans for training head-and-neck KBP models.

UNASSIGNED: Interactive segmentation seeks to incorporate human knowledge into segmentation models and thereby reducing the total amount of editing of auto-segmentations. By performing only interactions which provide new information, segmentation performance may increase cost-effectively. The aim of this study was to develop, evaluate and test feasibility of a deep learning-based single-cycle interactive segmentation model with the input being computer tomography (CT) and a small amount of information rich contours.
UNASSIGNED: A single-cycle interactive segmentation model, which took CT and the most cranial and caudal contour slices for each of 16 organs-at-risk for head-and-neck cancer as input, was developed. A CT-only model served as control. The models were evaluated with Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff Distance 95th percentile and average symmetric surface distance. A subset of 8 organs-at-risk were selected for a feasibility test. In this, a designated radiation oncologist used both single-cycle interactive segmentation and atlas-based auto-contouring for three cases. Contouring time and added path length were recorded.
UNASSIGNED: The medians of Dice coefficients increased with single-cycle interactive segmentation in the range of 0.004 (Brain)-0.90 (EyeBack_merged) when compared to CT-only. In the feasibility test, contouring time and added path length were reduced for all three cases as compared to editing atlas-based auto-segmentations.
UNASSIGNED: Single-cycle interactive segmentation improved segmentation metrics when compared to the CT-only model and was clinically feasible from a technical and usability point of view. The study suggests that it may be cost-effective to add a small amount of contouring input to deep learning-based segmentation models.

Penetrating vascular injury has become the topic of interest with increased gun violence in the United States. The radiologist plays a crucial role in establishing and systemizing the signs of vascular injury such as intimal flap, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, rupture, and arteriovenous fistula. Various imaging techniques such as ultrasound Doppler, computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography, and conventional angiography are being employed based on clinical recommendations. Of all the techniques, CTA has been shown to embrace a promising role in identifying vascular injuries with superior sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. An acquaintance of the imaging features has been shown to improve the approach to trauma patients in clinical settings. This article details the imaging modalities and the features of the head-and-neck penetrating vascular injury.

OBJECTIVE: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) involves frequent in-room imaging sessions contributing to additional patient irradiation. The present work provided patient-specific dosimetric data related to different imaging protocols and anatomical sites.
METHODS: We developed a Monte Carlo based software able to calculate 3D personalized dose distributions for five imaging devices delivering kV-CBCT (Elekta and Varian linacs), MV-CT (Tomotherapy machines) and 2D-kV stereoscopic images from BrainLab and Accuray. Our study reported the dose distributions calculated for pelvis, head and neck and breast cases based on dose volume histograms for several organs at risk.
RESULTS: 2D-kV imaging provided the minimum dose with less than 1 mGy per image pair. For a single kV-CBCT and MV-CT, median dose to organs were respectively around 30 mGy and 15 mGy for the pelvis, around 7 mGy and 10 mGy for the head and neck and around 5 mGy and 15 mGy for the breast. While MV-CT dose varied sparsely with tissues, dose from kV imaging was around 1.7 times higher in bones than in soft tissue. Daily kV-CBCT along 40 sessions of prostate radiotherapy delivered up to 3.5 Gy to the femoral heads. The dose level for head and neck and breast appeared to be lower than 0.4 Gy for every organ in case of a daily imaging session.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the dosimetric impact of IGRT procedures. Acquisition parameters should therefore be chosen wisely depending on the clinical purposes and tailored to morphology. Indeed, imaging dose could be reduced up to a factor 10 with optimized protocols.

To address the challenges posed by fat-water chemical shift artifacts and relaxation rate discrepancies to quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) outside the brain, and to generate accurate susceptibility maps of the head-and-neck at 3 and 7 Tesla.
Simultaneous Multiple Resonance Frequency (SMURF) imaging was extended to 7 Tesla and used to acquire head-and-neck gradient echo images at both 3 and 7 Tesla. Separated fat and water images were corrected for Type 1 (displacement) and Type 2 (phase discrepancy) chemical shift artefacts, and for the bias resulting from differences in T1 and T2∗ relaxation rates, recombined and used as the basis for QSM. A novel phase signal-based masking approach was used to generate head-and-neck masks.
SMURF generated well-separated fat and water images of the head-and-neck. Corrections for chemical shift artefacts and relaxation rate differences removed overestimation of the susceptibility values, blurring in the susceptibility maps, and the disproportionate influence of fat in mixed voxels. The resulting susceptibility maps showed high correspondence between the paramagnetic areas and the locations of fatty tissues and the susceptibility estimates were similar to literature values. The proposed masking approach was shown to provide a simple means of generating head-and-neck masks.
Corrections for Type 1 and Type 2 chemical shift artefacts and for fat-water relaxation rate differences, mainly in T1 , were shown to be required for accurate susceptibility mapping of fatty-body regions. SMURF made it possible to apply these corrections and generate high-quality susceptibility maps of the entire head-and-neck at both 3 and 7 Tesla.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to present a biomathematical model based on the dynamics of cell populations to predict the tolerability/intolerability of mucosal toxicity in head-and-neck radiotherapy.
METHODS: Our model is based on the dynamics of proliferative and functional cell populations in irradiated mucosa, and incorporates the three As: Accelerated proliferation, loss of Asymmetric proliferation, and Abortive divisions. The model consists of a set of delay differential equations, and tolerability is based on the depletion of functional cells during treatment. We calculate the sensitivity (sen) and specificity (spe) of the model in a dataset of 108 radiotherapy schedules, and compare the results with those obtained with three phenomenological classification models, two based on a biologically effective dose (BED) function describing the tolerability boundary (Fowler and Fenwick) and one based on an equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2 ) boundary (Strigari). We also perform a machine learning-like cross-validation of all the models, splitting the database in two, one for training and one for validation.
RESULTS: When fitting our model to the whole dataset, we obtain predictive values (sen + spe) up to 1.824. The predictive value of our model is very similar to that of the phenomenological models of Fowler (1.785), Fenwick (1.806), and Strigari (1.774). When performing a k = 2 cross-validation, the specificity and sensitivity in the validation dataset decrease for all models, from ˜1.82 to ˜1.55-1.63. For Fowler, the worsening is higher, down to 1.49.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model has proved useful to predict the tolerability/intolerability of a dataset of 108 schedules. As the model is more mechanistic than other available models, it could prove helpful when designing unconventional dose fractionations, schedules not covered by datasets to which phenomenological models of toxicity have been fitted.

Despite a great improvement in target volume dose conformality made possible in recent years by modulated therapies, xerostomia remains a common and severe side effect for head-and-neck radiotherapy patients. It is known that parotid glands exhibit a spatially varying dose response; however, the relative importance of subregions throughout the entire gland has yet to be incorporated into treatment plan optimization, with the current standard being to minimize the mean dose to whole parotid glands. The relative importance of regions within contralateral parotid glands has been recently quantified, creating an opportunity for the development of a method for including this data in plan optimization. We present a universal and straightforward approach for imposing varying sub-parotid gland dose constraints during inverse treatment planning by using patient-specific artificial base plans to penalize dose deposited in sensitive regions. In this work, the proposed method of optimization is demonstrated to reduce dose to regions of high relative importance throughout contralateral parotids and improve predictions for stimulated saliva output at 1-year post-radiotherapy. This method may also be applied to impose varying dose constraints to other organs-at-risk for which regional importance data exists.

UNASSIGNED: Reduced toxicity while maintaining loco-regional control rates have been reported after reducing planning target volume (PTV) margins for head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT). In this context, quantifying anatomical changes to monitor patient treatment is preferred. This retrospective feasibility study investigated the application of deformable image registration (DIR) and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts for this purpose.
UNASSIGNED: DIR between the computed tomography for treatment planning (pCT) images of twelve patients and their daily on-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images quantified anatomical changes during treatment. EWMA charts investigated corresponding trends. Uncertainty analysis provided 90% confidence limits which were used to confirm whether a trend previously breached a threshold.
UNASSIGNED: Trends in patient positioning reproducibility occurred before the end of treatment week four in 54% of cases. Using SPC process limits, only 24% of these were confirmed at a 90% confidence level before the end of treatment. Using an a priori clinical limit of 2 mm, absolute changes in patient pose were detected in 39% of cases, of which 82% were confirmed. Soft tissue trends outside SPC process limits occurring before the end of treatment week four were confirmed in 90% of cases.
UNASSIGNED: Structure specific action thresholds enabled detection of systematic anatomical changes during the first four weeks of treatment. Investigation of the dosimetric impact of the observed deviations is needed to show the efficacy of SPC to timely indicate required treatment adaptation and provide a safety net for PTV margin reduction.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with locally advanced oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma have suboptimal outcomes with standard chemoradiation. Here, we evaluated toxicity and oncologic outcomes of dose escalation using radiosurgical boost for patients with unfavorable oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: Between 2010-2017, Thirty four patients with intermediate- or high-risk oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled onto this prospective phase I trial. Each patient received concurrent cisplatin and fractionated radiotherapy totaling 60 Gy or 66 Gy followed by radiosurgery boost to areas of residual gross tumor: single fraction of 8 Gy or 10 Gy, or two fractions of 5 Gy each. Primary endpoint was treatment toxicity. Secondary endpoints were local, regional, and distant disease control.
RESULTS: Eleven, sixteen and seven patients received radiosurgery boost with 8 Gy in 1 fraction, 10 Gy in 1 fraction, and 10 Gy in 2 fractions respectively. Acute toxicities include 4 patients with tumor necrosis causing grade 3 dysphagia, of which 3 developed grade 4 pharyngeal hemorrhage requiring surgical intervention. At 24 months after treatment, 7%, 9%, and 15% had grade 2 dysgeusia, xerostomia, and dysphagia, respectively, and two patients remained feeding tube dependent. No grade 5 toxicities occurred secondary to treatment. Local, regional, and distant control at a median follow up of 4.2 years were 85.3%, 85.3% and 88.2%, respectively. Five patients died resulting in overall survival of 85.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to report the use of radiosurgery boost dose escalation in patients with unfavorable oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Longer follow-up, larger cohorts, and further refinement of boost methodology are needed prior to implementation in routine clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Northwell Health Protocol #09-309A (NCT02703493) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02703493 ).

OBJECTIVE: During treatment planning for head-and-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), manual contouring of the metal artifact area of artificial teeth is done, and the area is replaced with water computed tomography (CT) values for dose calculation. This contouring of the metal artifact areas, which is performed manually, is subject to human variability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze the effect of inter-observer variation on dose distribution.
METHODS: The subjects were 25 cases of cancer of the oropharynx for which VMAT was performed. Six radiation oncologists (ROs) performed metal artifact contouring for all of the cases. Gross tumor volume, clinical target volume, planning target volume (PTV), and oral cavity were evaluated. The contouring of the six ROs was divided into two groups, small and large groups. A reference RO was determined for each group and the dose distribution was compared with those of the other radiation oncologists by gamma analysis (GA). As an additional experiment, we changed the contouring of each dental metal artifact area, creating enlarged contours (L), reduced contours (S), and undrawn contours (N) based on the contouring by the six ROs and compared these structure sets.
RESULTS: The evaluation of inter-observer variation showed no significant difference between the large and small groups, and the GA pass rate was 100%. Similar results were obtained comparing structure sets L and S, but in the comparison of structure sets L and N, there were cases with pass rates below 70%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the artificial variability of manual artificial tooth metal artifact contouring has little effect on the dose distribution of VMAT. However, it should be noted that the dose distribution may change depending on the contouring method in cases where the overlap between PTV and metal artifact areas is large.