UNASSIGNED: To evaluate how risk factors impact success rates of initial probing and nasolacrimal duct (NLD) tube intubation in children over 18 months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).
UNASSIGNED: This cohort study included 98 CNLDO patients aged 18 months to 10 years who underwent NLD probing with stent insertion. We employed the multivariate frailty model as our final model to conceptually elaborate on our correlated eye data, with the primary outcome measure evaluating the success rates of probing and tube intubation. Factors such as age, probing complexity, tube type, prior surgeries, and passive smoking were considered in the evaluation.
UNASSIGNED: The study involved 98 patients (54 males, 44 females) with a mean age of 41.46 months and an average follow-up of 98.37 days (95 % CI 87.65-109.1). Out of the 110 eyes that underwent surgery, 13 (11.8 %) experienced failure while 97 (88.2 %) were censored. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated significant differences in age category and probing (P-value = 0.03 and 0.006 respectively), but not tube type (P-value = 0.8). Multivariable analysis confirmed that older age and complex probing were associated with higher failure rates in CNLDO cases, with each monthly increase correlating to a two percent higher likelihood of intubation failure.
UNASSIGNED: Patient age and probing complexity influence CNLDO treatment, impacting surgical techniques and outcomes. Tube type, prior surgery, and passive smoking have no significant impact on treatment success.

UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study aimed to explore the diversity in lacrimal pathway morphology among patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) by examining dacryocystography (DCG) images.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 64 patients who underwent DCG before undergoing general anesthesia probing for unilateral CNLDO. Several parameters were measured from the lateral view of the DCG images: (1) the lacrimal sac (LS) and the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) angle, (2) the angle formed by the superior orbital rim (SOR), LS, and the NLD, (3) LS length, and (4) bony NLD length. Additionally, frontal views of the DCG images were utilized to measure (5) LS-NLD angle and (6) LS angle concerning the midline.
UNASSIGNED: The average age of the patients was 34.3 months. The mean ± standard deviation of the measurements of the above parameters was (1) -1.2° ± 16.5° (range: -44.6° ± 46.6°), (2) -5.0° ± 10.3° (range: -24.0° ± 19.0°), (3) 10.2 ± 2.4 mm (range: 6.5-16.0 mm), (4) 8.0 ± 2.5 mm (range: 3.1-14.8 mm), (5) 15.6° ± 11.2° (range: -16.8° ± 41.0°), and (6) 15.1 ± 5.2° (range: 3.3°-29.8°). All parameters, except for parameter (3), conformed to a normal distribution.
UNASSIGNED: This study provides valuable anthropometric data derived from DCG images, highlighting the substantial variability in lacrimal pathway morphology among patients with CNLDO. Furthermore, anatomical constraints made probing with a straight metal bougie anatomically infeasible in 25.0% of the patients included in this study.
Understanding the morphology of the lacrimal pathway is crucial for the successful probing treatments in patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). This study represents an initial effort to quantify anthropometric parameters of the lacrimal drainage system through dacryocystography images, specifically aiming to highlight the limitations of blind probing procedure. The results underscore significant variations in the morphology of the lacrimal drainage system among patients, which could impact diagnostic approaches and treatment strategies. Additionally, the findings suggest that patients with CNLDO who do not respond to blind probing may have underlying anatomical complexities. Therefore, rather than relying on repeated blind probing, employing dacryoendoscopy-guided probing under direct visualization could offer a more effective therapeutic alternative for complicated cases of CNLDO.

BACKGROUND: This prospective clinical study evaluates the effect of a silicone stent tube (SST) on the success rate of endonasal-endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) to treat primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive EN-DCR with or without SST intubation over a period of 3 months. The surgery was performed using standardized techniques. Patients were assessed at three different timepoints: one day, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery. The results were compared in order to evaluate statistical differences. Surgical success was determined by means of positive irrigation procedures, as well as by the improvement of symptoms and a high level of patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: A total of 56 randomized cases completed 24 weeks of follow up. 1 Patient dropped out due to malignant genesis of the nasolacrimal duct obstruction. After 24 weeks of follow up no statistically significant differences in levels of epiphora (p > .10) or patency (p > .16) were revealed. Comparisons regarding changes in time did not show levels of significance (p > .28).
CONCLUSIONS: This study could not confirm a statistically significant benefit or disadvantage for SST Insertion in EN-DCR.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with lacrimal canalicular wall dehiscence/thinning from January 2020 to January 2024 and found three patients. Two patients were male, and the other patient was female. Patient ages ranged from 53 to 82 years. None of the patients had a history of ocular trauma, congenital anomaly, or other ocular diseases except for cataract. All patients complained of epiphora, and the duration of symptom ranged from 15 months to 10 years. Unilateral involvement of the lower canaliculus and isolated single wall involvement affecting only the canalicular roof were observed in all patients. The roof was dehiscent in one case and thinned out in the other two cases. The dehiscent canaliculus was closed by sutures, and the thinned-out canalicular wall of one patient was covered using a conjunctival flap. However, recurrences were noted at two and five months after surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anti-glaucoma eye drops have been investigated due to their production of fibrotic changes on the conjunctival surface, undermining the functioning of the upper lacrimal drainage system. We aimed to assess whether these effects may impair the effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR).
METHODS: This is a single-center observational retrospective study on EE-DCR via a posterior approach. Resolution of epiphora and dacryocystitis were analyzed after 1 (T1) and 6-months (T2) from surgery. Surgical success was defined as anatomical (patency at irrigation, no recurring dacryocystitis) or complete (zeroing of Munk score).
RESULTS: Twenty patients (32 sides) were enrolled. Preoperatively, 93.75% (n = 30/32) presented severe (Munk 3-4) epiphora and 68.75% (n = 22/32) recurrent dacryocystitis. At T1, 50.0% (n = 16/32) were referred with residual epiphora (Munk ≥ 1) and 18.75% (n = 6/32) dacryocystitis. At T2, 31.25% (n = 10/32) still complained of epiphora (Munk ≥ 1) and 6.25% (n = 2/32) dacryocystitis. Difference of outcomes at aggregate and paired timepoints (except for T1 versus T2) resulted in statistical significance (p < 0.05). At T2, 22 (68.75%) complete, 8 (25.0%) anatomical successes and 2 (6.25%) surgical failures were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the chronic uptake of anti-glaucoma eye drops, EE-DCR guaranteed high rates of clinical relief from epiphora and remarkable decreases in the rates of recurrent dacryocystitis.

Pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) are benign tumors of the salivary glands. Rarely, they arise in the sinonasal cavity, presenting as well-defined, homogeneous soft tissue masses, causing expansive bony changes. The significance of PAs is the possibility of giving rise to malignant carcinoma - \"carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma\" (CXPA).Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old female complaining of progressive unilateral congestion and external nose deformation, mostly along the left contour of the radix, with epiphora of the ipsilateral eye. Eventually, a tumor began protruding from the left naris. The computed tomography excluded osteolysis, while the surgical procedure discovered the inferior turbinate as the origin of the tumor. In addition, the ipsilateral maxillary sinus was found to have developed secondary sinusitis. After complete surgical excision, the histological result was sinonasal melanoma, but following no progression of the disease, a second pathologist with additional immunohistochemical markers (HMB-45 (human melanoma black 45) negative, Melan-A (melanoma antigen recognized by T-cells 1) negative, S100 (protein soluble in 100% ammonium sulfate at neutral pH) positive, panCK AE1/AE3 (pan cytokeratin antibodies AE1 and AE3) negative, p63 (tumor protein 63) negative, Ki-67 (marker of proliferation Kiel 67) 10%, CD68 (cluster of differentiation 68) negative, CK7 (cytokeratin 7) negative, and CDX2 (caudal-type homeobox 2) negative) placed the definitive diagnosis of PA.PA of the inferior turbinate is an extremely rare finding, with the clinical symptoms being unspecific. Sometimes, SOX-10 (SRY-box transcription factor 10) positivity can mislead to malignant melanoma, as in our case, which is why a broad panel of immunohistochemical markers is critical for the definitive diagnosis.

UNASSIGNED: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is usually treated using endoscopic or external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The anatomic outcomes of both the endoscopic and external approaches are considered excellent. However, anatomic success does not translate into patient satisfaction. The current study assessed pre- and postoperative lacrimal problems using the symptom-based Lacrimal Symptom Questionnaire (Lac-Q) and investigated patient satisfaction depending on the choice of surgical technique.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 112 eligible patients with lacrimal problems treated using external or endonasal DCR at the ophthalmology and ear, nose, and throat clinics at Skane University Hospital, Scania, Sweden, over a four-year period, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were considered eligible if they experienced preoperative epiphora and had lacrimal duct stenosis. They were offered treatment using either external or endonasal DCR and were allowed to freely choose the technique. Exclusion criteria consisted of previous ipsilateral DCR, congenital NLDO, age < 18 years, presence of cancer, previous orbital trauma, or noncompliance with postoperative follow-up. After surgery, the patients were sent the Lac-Q to evaluate their lacrimal symptoms pre- and postoperatively. Complementary questions were added pertaining to the operative scar and the patients\' overall satisfaction with the operation.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 67 (60%) patients with ages ranging from 18 to 88 years completed the questionnaire, 33 (49%) of whom underwent external DCR and 34 (51%) endonasal DCR. Of the 67 respondents, 51 (76%) were women and 16 (24%) were men. Patients scored preoperative lacrimal problems highly on the Lac-Q, reporting both symptomatic and social problems due to epiphora. Following surgery, the group that underwent external DCR remained home from work for 2 - 14 days (median, 3.5 days). However, 17 (52%) were retired. After the endonasal DCR, the patients remained home for 0 - 7 days (median, 2 days). Most patients were satisfied after DCR surgery, with both techniques significantly improving total, lacrimal symptom, and social impact scores (all P < 0.001). No differences in postoperative satisfaction were observed between the external DCR and endonasal DCR groups (P > 0.05). A small number of patients expressed scar-related concerns after external DCR.
UNASSIGNED: The patients perceived lacrimal problems as a significant symptomatic and social burden. Postoperative satisfaction and symptom relief were good regardless of the surgical approach. Further prospective studies assessing patient satisfaction and its correlation with anatomical and functional success rates after external and endonasal DCR could provide robust, practical, real-world implications.

UNASSIGNED: We report the case of a 10-month-old with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) associated with osteochondromyxoma (OMX), a very rare bone tumor.
UNASSIGNED: A 10-month-old boy presented with a 6-month history of right eye epiphora not responding to digital massage and topical steroid-antibiotics eye drops. The ophthalmic exam showed right medial canthal swelling. During the ophthalmic exam an abnormal snoring sound was noted. The mother also reported that patient experienced frequent upper respiratory tract infections. Inspection of nostrils showed a right nasal lesion that upon comprehensive evaluation by ENT and pathology teams turned out to be an OMX with loss of PRKAR1A expression. Further genetic testing confirmed the Carney complex (CNC) diagnosis and the patient was referred to multidisciplinary care. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first cases of OMX-induced NLDO, where a typical looking congenital NLDO ended up with a diagnosis of a rare genetic disease.
UNASSIGNED: We have described a case of OMX of the nasal cavity masquerading as congenital NLDO. This case emphasizes that NLDO is not always congenital if presenting within the first few months of life. It is important to obtain a thorough history and exam to evaluate potential differential diagnoses to guide subsequent decision-making steps.

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of office-based probing with dacryoendoscopy under local anesthesia for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). This single-institution study retrospectively reviewed data on 72 eyes of 64 consecutive children (38 boys, 43 eyes; 26 girls, 29 eyes), aged between 6 and 17 (mean age: 10.0 ± 2.7) months with suspected CNLDO, from July 2016 to February 2022. These patients underwent probing with dacryoendoscopy under local anesthesia. CNLDO was diagnosed clinically based on the presence of epiphora and sticky eyes due to mucous discharge commencing within the first 3 months of life, increased tear meniscus height, and fluorescein dye disappearance test results. A total of 63 of the 72 eyes had narrowly defined CNLDO, and 9 eyes had other types of obstructions. The intervention success rate was 100% (63/63 eyes) for patients with typical CNLDO and 97.2% (70/72 eyes) for the entire study cohort. Moreover, CNLDO was classified into five types based on the features of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. Probing with dacryoendoscopy is safe and yields a high success rate in pediatric patients with CNLDO. This is the first study to assess the safety and efficacy of probing with dacryoendoscopy under local anesthesia in pediatric patients with CNLDO.

We report a case series of supernumerary puncta-canaliculi, a very rare congenital anomaly, and describe different clinical presentations and new treatment options. This is a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with supernumerary lacrimal puncta during the time between June 2015 and December 2021 at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt. Four patients (two females and two males) with a mean presenting age of 54 ± 14 years had unilateral double puncta. Of those four patients, three had double puncta on the right lower eyelid whereas one had double puncta on the left upper and lower eyelid. In one of the three patients, the double puncta anomaly was an incidental finding, and the patient was asymptomatic. The other three patients had associated epiphora. All four patients were found to have patent double puncta with no mechanical obstruction. No surgical interventions were necessary for all four patients as one resolved after discontinuing the topical eye drops. Another patient resolved after the diagnostic probing of the puncta, and the third asymptomatic patient required no interventions. Epiphora in the fourth patient resolved with botulinum toxin injection in the lacrimal gland. Accessory lacrimal puncta can present in patients as an incidental asymptomatic finding or patients may present with epiphora. Patients who present with unilateral epiphora, dry eye, or canaliculitis should be carefully evaluated with a detailed slit-lamp examination using lid eversion to appreciate potentially easily missed supernumerary lacrimal puncta.