OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and outcomes of switching neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients from aflibercept to faricimab, focusing on visual acuity, retinal fluid management, and treatment intervals. The primary aim was to assess the early outcomes in nAMD patients refractory to aflibercept and explore faricimab\'s potential as a longer-lasting therapeutic alternative.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 50 refractory nAMD patients at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi from September 2022-May 2023. Patients were switched from aflibercept to faricimab, having met specific criteria for refractory nAMD. The study analyzed best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and fluid changes post-switch, using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
RESULTS: After three faricimab injections, significant reductions in CST were observed, with a notable decrease in retinal fluid. The mean BCVA remained stable throughout the study period. Although there was a decrease in the maximum pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height, it was not statistically significant. Treatment intervals post-switch showed that the majority of patients maintained or extended their treatment intervals, with a significant proportion achieving resolution of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF).
CONCLUSIONS: Switching to faricimab from aflibercept in refractory nAMD patients led to significant improvements in retinal fluid management and CST, with stable BCVA outcomes. Faricimab presents a promising alternative for patients requiring frequent aflibercept injections, potentially offering a more manageable treatment regimen with extended dosing intervals. This study highlights the need for personalized therapeutic strategies in nAMD treatment, though further research is necessary to optimize treatment switches.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse clinical outcomes of a non-medical switch from originator adalimumab (ADA) to its ABP501 biosimilar (ABP) over 6 months in patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) in relation to comorbidity as a risk factor for therapy discontinuation.
METHODS: RMD patients switching from originator ADA to ABP were identified from a large routine database from October 2018 onwards. Documented clinical data at the time of non-medical switching (baseline), and at 3 and 6 months were collected. Comorbidities were represented by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at baseline and patients were categorized based on CCI > 0. Differences in the ABP retention rate over 6 months between patients with CCI = 0 and patients with CCI > 0 were analysed using Bayesian exponential regression.
RESULTS: A total of 111 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (n = 68), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 23) and psoriatic arthritis (n = 15), were identified, 74.8% of whom had continued treatment with ABP after 6 months, while a smaller proportion had either switched to another ADA biosimilar (10.8%), switched back to originator ADA (7.2%), switched to a different biologic (3.6%), or dropped out (3.6%). At baseline, a CCI > 0 was found in 38% of patients. Cardiovascular comorbidities (40%) were most prevalent followed by diseases of the skin (33%), the gastrointestinal tract (20%) and the eye (20%). ABP treatment was continued after 6 months in 74% of patients with CCI = 0 and in 76% with CCI > 0. Bayesian analysis showed only a small difference (months) in the APB continuation rate between groups (estimate 0.0012, 95% credible interval (CrI) -0.0337 to 0.0361). Adjusting for age, sex, and disease subtype revealed somewhat shorter retention rates for patients with CCI > 0, but the distribution of the difference included 0 (estimate -0.0689, 95% CrI -0.2246 to 0.0234).
CONCLUSIONS: In a non-medical switch scenario of RMD patients, there was no evidence for a considerable difference in ABP retention rates over 6 months between comorbidity groups.

UNASSIGNED: Patients often use manufacturer-sponsored coupons to reduce their out-of-pocket spending. However, little is known whether coupon use is associated with medication-switching behaviors.
UNASSIGNED: To examine if using a manufacturer-sponsored coupon to initiate a medication is associated with patterns of medication-switching behaviors among patients with type 2 diabetes.
UNASSIGNED: Using IQVIA\'s retail pharmacy claims data from October 2017 to September 2019, we analyzed commercially insured patients with type 2 diabetes who had newly started taking the following noninsulin diabetes drugs: generic metformin (nearly no coupon use), Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors (SGLT2, high coupon use), and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP-IV inhibitors, moderate coupon use). We assessed if drug-switching behaviors, defined as no switching, switching to a same-class drug, or switching to a drug in a different class, differed among patients who did and did not use coupons to initiate treatments. We performed multinomial logistic regression to estimate the probability of each switching type associated with patients\' initial coupon use.
UNASSIGNED: Among 9,781 patients in our sample, 83.7% of them initiated treatments with metformin, 8.2% with SGLT2, and 8.1% with DPP-IV inhibitors. The overall switching rate was the lowest for generic metformin (40%) than brand-name drugs (56%-57%). Among the brand-name drug users, patients who used a coupon to initiate these drugs were less likely to switch to any drug compared with patients without coupon use (SGLT2 = -18% [95% CI = -24% to -13%]; DPP-IV inhibitors = -9% [-16% to -2%]). These patients were also less likely to switch to drugs in other competing classes (SGLT2 = -16% [95% CI = -22% to -10%]; DPP-IV inhibitors = -9% [-16% to -2%]).
UNASSIGNED: Patients who started their treatment with generic metformin had the lowest rate of drug switching. Using coupons to initiate brand-name drugs in classes with prevalent coupons was associated with reduced medication switching to other class drugs.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical effectiveness of switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to upadacitinib (TNFi-UPA), another TNFi (TNFi-TNFi), or an advanced therapy with another mechanism of action (TNFi-other MOA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey administered to rheumatologists and their consulting patients in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the UK, Japan, Canada, and the USA from May 2021 to January 2022. Patients who switched treatment from an initial TNFi were stratified by subsequent therapy of interest: TNFi-UPA, TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-other MOA. Physician-reported clinical outcomes including disease activity (with formal DAS28 scoring available for 29% of patients) categorized as remission, low/moderate/high disease activity, as well as pain were recorded at initiation of current treatment and ≥ 6 months from treatment switch. Fatigue and treatment adherence were measured ≥ 6 months from treatment switch. Inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment compared outcomes by subsequent class of therapy: TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA.
RESULTS: Of 503 patients who switched from their first TNFi, 261 were in TNFi-UPA, 128 in TNFi-TNFi, and 114 in TNFi-other MOA groups. At the time of switch, most patients had moderate/high disease activity (TNFi-UPA: 73%; TNFi-TNFi: 52%; TNFi-other MOA: 60%). After adjustment for differences in characteristics at point of switch, patients in TNFi-UPA group (n = 261) were significantly more likely to achieve physician-reported remission (67.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.0015), no pain (55.7% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.0007), and complete adherence (60.0% vs. 34.2%; p = 0.0049) compared with patients in TNFi-TNFi group (n = 121). Similar findings were observed for TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA groups (n = 111).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who switched from TNFi to UPA had significantly better clinical outcomes of remission, no pain, and complete adherence than those who cycled TNFi or switched to another MOA.

UNASSIGNED: There is a need to understand health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWH) switching treatment regimens.
UNASSIGNED: To describe HCRU and cost during lines of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treatment-experienced PWH switching to or restarting guideline-recommended, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based multitablet regimens and single-tablet regimens.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective claims study used data from Optum Research Database (January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020) to identify lines of therapy (LOTs) for treatment-experienced adults who switched to or restarted INSTI-based regimens between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The first LOT during the study period was included in the analysis. We examined all-cause HCRU and costs and HIV-related HCRU and combined costs to the health plan and direct patient costs by site of service and compared between INSTI-based regimens: bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) (single tablet) vs dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) (single tablet), dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DTG+FTC/TAF) (multitablet), and dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DTG+FTC/TDF) (multitablet). Analysis of HCRU by site of service was conducted following inverse probability treatment weighting. Multivariable regression was conducted using a generalized linear model with stepwise covariate selection to estimate HIV-related medical costs and control for remaining differences after inverse probability treatment weighting.
UNASSIGNED: 4,251 PWH were identified: B/F/TAF (n = 2,727; 64.2%), DTG/ABC/3TC (n = 898; 21.1%), DTG+FTC/TAF (n = 539; 12.7%), and DTG+FTC/TDF (n = 87; 2.1%). PWH treated with DTG+FTC/TAF had a significantly higher mean of all-cause ambulatory visits than PWH treated with B/F/TAF (1.8 vs 1.6, P < 0.001). A significantly smaller proportion of PWH treated with DTG/ABC/3TC had an all-cause ambulatory visit vs PWH treated with B/F/TAF (90.6% vs 93.9%, P < 0.001). All-cause total costs were not significantly different between regimens. Mean (SD) medical HIV-related costs per month during the LOT were not significantly different between B/F/TAF $699 (3,602), DTG/ABC/3TC $770 (3,469), DTG+FTC/TAF $817 (3,128), and DTG+FTC/TDF $3,570 (17,691). After further controlling for unbalanced measures, HIV-related medical costs during the LOT were higher (20%) but did not reach statistical significance for DTG/ABC/3TC (cost ratio = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.851-1.694; P = 0.299), 49% higher for DTG+FTC/TAF (cost ratio = 1.489, 95% CI = 1.018-2.179; P = 0.040), and almost 11 times greater for DTG+FTC/TDF (cost ratio = 10.759, 95% CI = 2.182-53.048; P = 0.004) compared with B/F/TAF.
UNASSIGNED: HIV-related medical costs during the LOT were lowest for PWH treated with INSTI-based single-tablet regimens. Simplifying treatment regimens may help PWH maintain lower health care costs.

BACKGROUND: Effective management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is crucial in combating the global HIV pandemic. This study, the first of its kind in Yemen, investigates the rate and determinants of switching from first-line to second-line ART among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Aden City, Yemen.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from PLWH who started first-line ART at Al-Wahda Hospital from 2007 to May 2022. PLWH in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs, those already on second-line ART at enrollment, and those with less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Cumulative incidence curves and multivariable proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with switching, considering death and loss to follow-up as competing risks. Analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS version 26.
RESULTS: Out of 149 PLWH, 18 (12.1%) switched to second-line ART with a cumulative incidence rate of 1.8 per 100 person-years. Significant factors for switching included being older than 33 years (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.12-1.89), having WHO stage 3 disease (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.21-2.06), and being on a TDF-FTC-EFV-based first-line regimen (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.77). This switching rate is consistent with rates observed in other resource-limited settings, indicating it is neither exceptionally high nor low compared to similar contexts​.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights key factors associated with switching to second-line ART in Yemen, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions and continuous monitoring to enhance treatment outcomes. These findings are consistent with regional data from other resource-limited settings.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). The aim of this study was to evaluate improvements in NPAEs after switching an INSTI-based regimen to darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) or doravirine (DOR). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the reversibility of NPAEs via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and D) in patients who started antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC). These patients were switched to DRV/c or DOR. Scales were compared at the moment of the switch and 12 weeks later. Results: We included 1153 treatment-naïve men, 676 (58.7%) with BIC and 477 (41.3%) with DTG. A total of 32 (2.7%) experienced NPAEs that led to discontinuation. Insomnia was found in 20 patients; depression via PHQ-9 in 21 patients, via HADS-D in 5 patients, and anxiety via HADS-A in 12 patients. All of them were evaluated by a psychiatrist at the moment of the symptoms; 7 (21.8%) started psychotropic drugs. After 12 weeks of follow-up, PHQ-9, ISI, HADS-A, and HADS-D decreased, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: NPAEs seem to improve after switching to a DRV/c- or DOR-based regimen after the first 4 and 12 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) a central nervous system autoimmune disorder, mainly affecting young adults and more prevalent among women, can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) among both males and females with MS. Female sexual dysfunction can be defined as dyspareunia, a lack of sexual desire, disorders in the arousal and orgasm phases, and sexual pain disorders. The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in sexual function among females with MS whose treatment was switched from first-line injectable medications to other agents after a six-month duration. And assess the changes in all three domains of SD.
METHODS: In this longitudinal study females diagnosed with MS, aged between 18 and 50 years old, and were candidates for switching their treatment from interferon beta-1a (intra-muscular and subcutaneous), and Glatiramer Acetate (GA), to Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF), or Natalizumab (NTZ) due to patients\' convenience and tolerability and adverse events were included. \"Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19\" was used to evaluate the SD changes before and six months after the new treatment initiation. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS V.24 software. Histograms and the Shapiro-Wilk test were used to assess the normality of the variables; due to the non-normal distribution of quantitative variables (except for age), the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the scores, before and six months after the medication change. The level of significance was considered less than 0.05.
RESULTS: Out of 107 female participants (average age: 35.09 ± 5.61), The mean of overall MSISQ-19 scores, before and six months after the medication change were not significant (p-value = 0.091). However, considering the subdomains, the medication changes only affected the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 (p-value = 0.017). Still, the scores of other subdomains did not change significantly (p-value = 0.761 for primary SD and 0.479 for secondary SD). Also, there wasn\'t any significant difference between EDSS before and after the medication change (p-value = 0.461).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this was the first study, assessing the effect of MS medication change on the improvement of SD among patients. According to the results of the presented cross-sectional study, we found that during a six-month period, the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 symptoms improved significantly, while the changes in other SD domains were not significant.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-awwb in the off-label treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME).
UNASSIGNED: All patients with n-AMD and DME treated in the maintenance phase according to the \"treat and extend\" strategy, who underwent forced drug substitution from bevacizumab to bevacizumab-awwb from October 2022 to April 2023 at the Tor Vergata Polyclinic in Rome, were evaluated in a retrospective study. The primary outcome was changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) over time following drug substitution. The secondary outcomes were variations in drug durability, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal fluid, and the incidence of drug-related local and systemic serious adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: Of 80 eyes of 76 patients with n-AMD and 55 eyes of 44 patients with DME included, before and after drug substitution, the average CRT did not statistically differ; the proportion of patients within time intervals of q8, q12, and q16 was not different; and the mean BCVA remained constant. Of a cumulative 3496 bevacizumab-awwb treatments (2154 for patients with n-AMD and 1342 for patients with DME), no local severe complications were detected. Out of a total of 544 patients (342 affected by n-AMD and 202 affected by DME), no serious adverse events were reported.
UNASSIGNED: In our cohort of patients with n-AMD and DME in the maintenance phase, bevacizumab-awwb seems to represent a viable and cost-effective intravitreal therapy with comparable efficacy and safety to the originator.
UNASSIGNED: This study provides a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab-awwb, which is widely used off-label in retinal vascular diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN [v for variant]) is a rare, progressive disease associated with multisystemic impairments. This study assessed the real-world outcomes of patients with ATTRv-PN who switched from tafamidis to patisiran, as well as the reasons for the treatment switch.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study at a large expert referral center. Data were extracted from medical charts of patients with ATTRv-PN who switched from tafamidis to patisiran on or before 30 August 2019. Data elements included demographic and clinical characteristics, rationale for switch, and disease measures evaluated from tafamidis initiation through the 12-month patisiran treatment period.
RESULTS: Among the 24 patients with ATTRv-PN included in the study, 50.0% had a V30M variant, and the mean (SD) age was 67.3 (8.0) years. During tafamidis treatment (mean [SD] = 30.1 [17.5] months) before switching to patisiran, patients worsened across multiple polyneuropathy measures, including walking ability, Neuropathy Impairment Score, and autonomic function. Neuropathic disease progression on tafamidis was the principal reason for switching to patisiran. After 12 months on patisiran (mean [SD] = 11.7 [1.4] months), patients experienced attenuated disease progression or improvement in the aforementioned measures of polyneuropathy.
CONCLUSIONS: Switching from tafamidis to patisiran attenuated the rate of functional decline, and most patients experienced stabilization or improvement of at least one polyneuropathy measure within 12 months of patisiran treatment. Timely switch from tafamidis to patisiran can be beneficial to avoid rapid disease progression in patients with ATTRv-PN.