Drug repurposing has gained significant interest in recent years due to the high costs associated with de novo drug development; however, comprehensive pharmacological information is needed for the translation of pre-existing drugs across clinical applications. In the present study, we explore the current pharmacological understanding of the orphan drug, hemin, and identify remaining knowledge gaps with regard to hemin repurposing for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Originally approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1983 for the treatment of porphyria, hemin has attracted significant interest for therapeutic repurposing across a variety of pathophysiological conditions. Yet, the clinical translation of hemin remains limited to porphyria. Understanding hemin\'s pharmacological profile in health and disease strengthens our ability to treat patients effectively, identify therapeutic opportunities or limitations, and predict and prevent adverse side effects. However, requirements for the pre-clinical and clinical characterization of biologics approved under the U.S. FDA\'s Orphan Drug Act in 1983 (such as hemin) differed significantly from current standards, presenting fundamental gaps in our collective understanding of hemin pharmacology as well as knowledge barriers to clinical translation for future applications. Using information extracted from the primary and regulatory literature (including documents submitted to Health Canada in support of hemin\'s approval for the Canadian market in 2018), we present a comprehensive case study of current knowledge related to hemin\'s biopharmaceutical properties, pre-clinical/clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing, and safety, focusing specifically on the drug\'s effects on heme regulation and in the context of acute myocardial infarction.

The pharmaceutical industry is vital for healthcare advancement through innovative medications, improving lives. A substantial challenge is \"Drug lag,\" hindering patient access and increasing disease adjusted life years burdens. We aim to examine drug lag for Iran Food and Drug Administration (IFDA) approved drugs versus US Food & Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) over 2001 to 2021. We reviewed new molecular entities within this period, using descriptive statistics in Excel 2019. Drug lag is assessed from relative and absolute perspectives, considering approval gaps and annual rates. Among 710 FDA-approved drugs, 410 received EMA approval, 344 from PMDA, and 148 from IFDA. For 148 IFDA and FDA-approved drugs, the maximum drug lag was 237 months. The mean relative drug lag was 65.18 ± 61.56 months. Compared to EMA (112 drugs), the maximum lag was 257 months, with a mean relative lag of 70.29 ± 53.67 months. With PMDA (127 drugs), the maximum lag was 253 months, with a mean relative lag of 38.23 ± 60.57 months. Iran faces significant drug lag compared to developed countries\' regulatory bodies, limiting patient access to innovative treatments. Addressing this issue is crucial for timely drug access, reducing disease burdens. Further research and policy interventions are needed to mitigate drug lag\'s impact on Iran healthcare landscape.

Biosimilar vaccines and immunotherapeutic are innovative approaches in medical research. This commentary addresses the current disparities in regulations of biosimilar vaccines and immunotherapeutic products across different nations. It also navigates the benefits of global regulatory alignment and challenges that may be encountered. The current discrepancies in regulations across different countries, which pose significant challenges for the development and approval of biosimilar vaccines and immunotherapeutic products. These disparities often lead to delayed market access, increased development costs, and hindered innovation. The commentary stresses that such obstacles could be mitigated through harmonized regulations, resulting in faster approvals, reduced healthcare costs, and improved patient outcomes. Moreover, the commentary explores the specific complexities associated with biosimilar vaccines and immunotherapeutic, such as the intricate evaluation of biosimilarity due to their molecular composition and immunogenic properties. In conclusion, the editorial advocates for collaborative efforts to overcome the challenges in achieving global regulatory harmonization for biosimilars. This includes establishing uniform standards, fostering international cooperation among regulatory agencies, and promoting educational initiatives for healthcare providers and regulators. The ultimate goal is to ensure that patients worldwide have timely access to safe, effective, and affordable biosimilar treatments.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical benefit value of approved antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for solid tumours using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) V.1.1.
METHODS: Systematic descriptive analysis.
METHODS: PubMed was searched for publications from 1 January 2000 to 18 October 2023.
METHODS: We included the phase III randomised controlled trials or phase II pivotal trials leading to approval of ADCs in solid tumours.
METHODS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and discrepancies were resolved by consensus in the presence of a third investigator.
RESULTS: ESMO-MCBS Scores were calculated for 16 positive clinical trials of eight ADCs, which were first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the China National Medical Products Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency for solid cancers. Among 16 trials, 4 (25%) met the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade, while 12 (75%) of the regimens did not meet the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade. 5 (31%) of the 16 trials had no published scorecard on the ESMO website due to the approval by other jurisdictions but not by the FDA or EMA. Discrepancies between our results and the ESMO scorecard were observed in 4 (36%) of 11 trials, mostly owing to integration of more recent data.
CONCLUSIONS: ESMO-MCBS is an important tool for assessing the clinical benefit of cancer drugs, but not all drugs met the meaningful benefit threshold.

UNASSIGNED: Studies show the presence of a mismatch between drug research and disease burden. A study conducted in the European Union found that new drug development was restricted to certain diseases. A study of biosimilar approvals in India found that 87% of drugs were for treating noncommunicable diseases. This study aimed to determine the new drugs approved in India from 2017 to 2021 and the top ten causes of morbidity and mortality and detect the presence of any discordance between these.
UNASSIGNED: A descriptive study was conducted using data on new drug approvals accessed from the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization website. The top ten causes of mortality and morbidity in India from 2015 to 2019 were identified from the Global Burden of Diseases database. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the drug approvals and the leading diseases.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred twenty-six drugs were approved during the study period. Antineoplastic drugs constituted 19.84% of the approvals, antimicrobials 18.25%, and cardiovascular drugs 9.52%. Ischemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Diarrheal diseases, lower respiratory tract infection, and drug-susceptible tuberculosis were among the top ten causes. Ten antibacterials, including four antitubercular drugs, were approved during this period. Two drugs were approved for rare diseases.
UNASSIGNED: Our study showed that the drugs approved were largely in line with the prevalent disease burden, and there was no significant discordance observed. Some diseases, such as ischemic stroke/intracranial hemorrhage, require further efforts in bringing forth newer pharmacotherapy options.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Brand-name drugs are sold at high prices in the US during market exclusivity periods protected by patents. Multiple overlapping patents protecting a drug are known as patent thickets and can effectively delay the emergence of price-lowering generic competition for many years.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the composition of patent thickets of 10 top-selling prescription drugs in the US and compare the characteristics of drug patents filed during development with those filed on these products after US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.
UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study examined US patent thickets of the 10 prescription drugs with the highest US net sales revenue in 2021 using information on issued patents and patent applications as of June 30, 2022, obtained from a public database by the Initiative for Medicines, Access, and Knowledge. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to June 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Prevalence of patents filed before and after FDA approval; types of claims present in issued patents (ie, chemical composition, method of use, process or synthesis, formulation, and delivery device); and patent thicket density (number of active patents at a given time).
UNASSIGNED: The 10 top-selling prescription drugs in the US for 2021 included 4 small-molecule drugs and 6 biologics. These 10 drugs were linked to 1429 patents and patent applications: 742 (52%) issued patents, 218 (15%) pending applications, and 469 (33%) abandoned applications. Almost three-quarters of patent applications (1028 [72%]) were filed after FDA approval. The postapproval proportion was higher for biologics (80%) than for small-molecule drugs (58%). Postapproval filing of patent applications peaked in the first 5 years after FDA approval for small-molecule drugs and 12 years after FDA approval for biologics. Of 465 patents issued for applications filed after FDA approval, 189 (41%) had method of use claims, 127 (27%) had formulation claims, and 103 (22%) had process or synthesis claims, while 86 (19%) had chemical composition claims and 46 (10%) had device claims. Patent thicket density peaked 13 years after FDA approval, at which time these 10 drugs were protected by a median (IQR) of 42 (18-83) active patents, 66% of which were filed after FDA approval.
UNASSIGNED: This study found that among the 10 top-selling prescription drugs in the US in 2021, patents filed after FDA approval and containing claims covering aspects other than the active ingredient of the drug contributed to patent thickets. Scrutiny of patent applications and of patents filed after FDA approval is needed to facilitate timely generic or biosimilar competition.

UNASSIGNED: Preapproval information exchange (PIE) has increased between biopharma companies and health care decision-makers (HCDMs) over the last several years. However, there still exists a gap in what HCDMs need and what biopharma companies are providing.
UNASSIGNED: To assess trends in the utilization of preapproval information by HCDMs and identify resources that may best support organizations in evaluating product information for formulary coverage prior to US Food and Drug Administration approval.
UNASSIGNED: A double-blinded, web-based survey was fielded to a research panel of HCDMs from FormularyDecisions from May 16, 2022, to May 23, 2022.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 30 advisors were invited to take the survey and 17 responded to the survey, with representation largely from health plans (41%), pharmacy benefit managers (24%), and integrated delivery networks (12%) across commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid lines of business. Of the respondents, 47% noted that the availability of preapproval information has shortened the time to make a formulary decision. Almost all respondents (90%) ranked the availability of clinical and economic information in a timely manner to evaluate budget impact as a top benefit for PIE. Respondents noted that Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) preapproval dossiers (88%), AMCP PIE webinars (76%), preapproval presentations/videos (65%), and posters and abstracts of clinical trials results (59%) were the main resources used to facilitate PIE.
UNASSIGNED: The availability of preapproval information for HCDMs (particularly content related to anticipated place in therapy and product pricing) has an impact on shortening formulary decision-making timelines.

This cross-sectional study evaluates the use of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) program in confirming the effectiveness of cancer drugs.

暂无摘要。