Dental scaling

牙科缩放
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究试图开发2种含有Salvadorapersica(miswak)或异硫氰酸苄酯(BITC)提取物的可生物降解的牙周芯片,并评估其在治疗牙周炎中的临床有效性。
    这项临床试验是在牙科学院进行的,TeknologiMARAShahAlam大学,Selangor,马来西亚,从2010年9月到2012年4月。使用S.persica配制牙周芯片,异硫氰酸苄酯(BITC)和壳聚糖提取物。所有患者均在基线时接受全口刮削和根部平整治疗。此后,将牙周袋(长度≥5mm)分为4组:对照组;第2组(普通壳聚糖芯片);第3组(S。桃提取物);和第4组(BITC提取物)。斑块指数(PI),探查出血(BOP),仅在第0天和第60天记录牙周探诊袋深度和临床附着水平。
    共有12名患者参加了这项研究。总的来说,评价240个牙周袋。这项研究揭示了PI的显着改善,4组均有BOP和牙周袋深度减少(P<0.05)。与对照组和其他芯片治疗组相比,接受S.persica芯片的组的临床附着水平的改善明显更高(P<0.001)。
    含有S.persica的牙周芯片可用作辅助治疗牙周炎患者。
    UNASSIGNED: This study attempted to develop 2 biodegradable periodontal chips containing Salvadora persica (miswak) or benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) extracts and evaluate their clinical effectiveness in managing periodontitis.
    UNASSIGNED: This clinical trial was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, from September 2010 to April 2012. Periodontal chips were formulated using S. persica, benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) and chitosan extracts. All patients were treated with full mouth scaling and root planing at baseline. Thereafter, the periodontal pockets (≥5 mm in length) were divided into 4 groups: the control group; group 2 (plain chitosan chip); group 3 (S. persica extract); and group 4 (BITC extract). Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), periodontal probing pocket depth and clinical attachment levels were recorded at days 0 and 60 only.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 patients participated in this study. Overall, 240 periodontal pockets were evaluated. The study revealed significant improvements in PI, BOP and reduction in periodontal pocket depth in all 4 groups (P <0.05). The improvement in clinical attachment level was significantly higher (P <0.001) among the group that received S. persica chips compared to the control and other chip-treated groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Periodontal chips containing S. persica can be used as adjuncts to treat patients with periodontitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估慢性肾脏病患者的术后并发症和死亡率。
    生化测量,2009-2017年,我们从台湾三家大型医院的电子病历中获取了年龄≥20岁手术患者的CKD诊断代码和合并症.我们通过使用倾向评分匹配方法来平衡CKD和非CKD组之间的基线特征,进行了这项回顾性队列研究。多因素logistic回归分析用于估计与CKD相关的主要结局(包括术后死亡率)和次要结局(包括术后感染性并发症和非感染性并发症)风险的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。
    在31950名合格的手术患者中,与非CKD对照组相比,CKD患者院内死亡率的校正OR为5.49(95%CI3.42~8.81).术后败血症的校正OR,CKD患者的肺炎和蜂窝织炎为5.90(95%CI2.12-16.5),5.39(95%CI1.37-21.16),和4.42(95%CI1.57-12.4),分别,与非CKD患者相比。CKD也与术后卒中相关(OR2.21,95%CI1.47-3.31)。
    CKD患者术后卒中的风险增加,感染并发症,和死亡率。我们的研究表明,改善CKD患者术前血红蛋白和K水平至关重要。应制定预防策略以改善这些人群的临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the postoperative complications and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Biochemical measurements, diagnosis codes for CKD and comorbid conditions for surgical patients aged ≥20 years were obtained from electronic medical records of three large hospitals in Taiwan in 2009-2017. We conducted this retrospective cohort study by using propensity score-matching methods to balance the baseline characteristics between CKD and non-CKD groups. The multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of risks of primary outcome (included postoperative mortality) and secondary outcome (included postoperative infectious complications and non-infectious complications) associated with CKD.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 31950 eligible surgical patients, the adjusted OR of in-hospital mortality in patients with CKD was 5.49 (95% CI 3.42-8.81) compared with that in non-CKD controls. The adjusted ORs of postoperative septicemia, pneumonia and cellulitis in patients with CKD were 5.90 (95% CI 2.12-16.5), 5.39 (95% CI 1.37-21.16), and 4.42 (95% CI 1.57-12.4), respectively, when compared with the non-CKD patients. CKD was also associated with postoperative stroke (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.47-3.31).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with CKD are at increased risk of postoperative stroke, infectious complications, and mortality. Our study implicated that it is crucial to improve the levels of hemoglobin and K+ in patients with CKD before surgery. Preventive strategies should be developed to improve clinical outcomes in these populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:牙周炎和种植体周围疾病是发生在口腔中的慢性炎性疾病。未经治疗,牙周炎会逐渐破坏牙齿支撑装置。种植体周围疾病发生在牙种植体周围的组织中,其特征是种植体周围粘膜发炎,随后逐渐丧失支持骨。治疗旨在清洁牙齿或牙科植入物周围的口袋,并防止对周围的软组织和骨骼造成损害,包括改善口腔卫生,危险因素控制(如鼓励戒烟)和手术干预。标准非手术治疗的关键方面是使用龈下器械(SI)(也称为鳞屑和根部平整)去除龈下生物膜。抗微生物光动力疗法(aPDT)可用作SI的辅助治疗。它使用光能杀死在aPDT之前立即用光吸收光敏剂处理的微生物。
    目的:评估SI联合辅助aPDT与单纯SI或安慰剂aPDT对成人牙周炎和种植体周围疾病的影响。
    方法:我们搜索了Cochrane口腔健康试验注册,中部,MEDLINE,Embase,截至2024年2月14日,另外两个数据库和两个试验登记。
    方法:我们纳入了临床诊断为牙周炎的参与者的随机对照试验(RCT)(平行组和口设计),种植体周围炎或种植体周围疾病。我们比较了抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)的辅助使用,其中在牙龈下或粘膜下器械(SI)后给予aPDT,与单独SI或SI和安慰剂aPDT的组合在活性或支持治疗阶段。
    方法:我们使用了标准的Cochrane方法学程序,我们用等级来评估证据的确定性.我们优先考虑了六个结果和从基线到治疗后六个月的变化测量:探查口袋深度(PPD),探查出血(BOP),临床依恋水平(CAL),牙龈衰退(REC),口袋闭合和与aPDT相关的不良反应。我们还对骨水平的变化感兴趣(对于患有种植体周围炎的参与者),以及参与者的满意度和生活质量。
    结果:我们纳入了50项RCT,其中有1407名参与者。大多数研究使用口裂研究设计;只有18项研究使用平行组设计。研究很小,参与者从10到88。在39项研究中,辅助aPDT在一个疗程中被给予,在11项研究的多次会议(两到四次会议)中,一项研究包括单次和多次会议。SI使用手动或动力驱动仪器(或两者)给出,并在辅助aPDT之前进行。5项研究在对照组中使用安慰剂aPDT,我们在荟萃分析中将这些研究与仅使用SI的研究相结合。所有研究都包括高或不清楚的偏倚风险,例如人员的选择偏差或绩效偏差(当SI由知道组分配的操作员执行时)。由于这些偏见的风险,我们降低了所有证据的确定性,以及合并效应估计中无法解释的统计学不一致或证据来自极少数参与者且置信区间(CI)显示干预组和对照组可能受益的不精确.在牙周炎的积极治疗期间,辅助aPDT与单独SI相比(44项研究)我们非常不确定在牙周炎的积极治疗期间辅助aPDT与单独SI相比是否在六个月时导致任何临床结果的改善:PPD(平均差异(MD)0.52mm,95%CI0.31至0.74;15项研究,452名参与者),防喷器(MD5.72%,95%CI1.62至9.81;5项研究,171项研究),CAL(MD0.44mm,95%CI0.24至0.64;13项研究,414名参与者)和REC(MD0.00,95%CI-0.16至0.16;4项研究,95名参与者);非常低的确定性证据。辅助aPDT和单独SI之间的任何明显差异均未被认为是临床重要的。24项研究(639名参与者)没有观察到与aPDT相关的不良反应(中度确定性证据)。没有研究报告六个月时口袋关闭,参与者满意度或生活质量。在牙周炎的支持治疗期间,辅助aPDT与单独SI相比(六项研究)我们非常不确定在牙周炎的积极治疗期间,辅助aPDT与单独SI相比是否会在六个月时导致任何临床结果的改善:PPD(MD-0.04毫米,95%CI-0.19至0.10;3项研究,125名参与者),防喷器(MD4.98%,95%CI-2.51至12.46;3项研究,127名与会者),CAL(MD0.07mm,95%CI-0.26至0.40;2项研究,85名参与者)和REC(MD-0.20毫米,95%CI-0.48至0.08;1项研究,24名参与者);确定性非常低的证据。这些发现都是不精确的,并且不包括aPDT的临床重要益处。三项研究(134名参与者)报告了不良反应:一名参与者出现脓肿,尽管目前尚不清楚这是否与aPDT有关,两项研究未观察到与aPDT相关的不良反应(中度确定性证据)。没有研究报告六个月时口袋关闭,参与者满意度或生活质量。
    结论:因为证据的确定性非常低,我们无法确定辅助aPDT在牙周炎的积极或支持治疗期间是否能改善临床结果;此外,结果表明,任何改善都可能太小而不具有临床重要性.这种证据的确定性只能通过包含大量的,进行良好的RCTs进行了适当的分析,以解释随时间的结果变化或参与者内部的口口裂研究设计(或两者)。我们没有发现包括种植体周围炎在内的研究,只有一项研究包括患有种植体周围粘膜炎的人,但是这项非常小的研究报告六个月没有数据,在这一人群中,有更多辅助aPDT的证据。
    Periodontitis and peri-implant diseases are chronic inflammatory conditions occurring in the mouth. Left untreated, periodontitis progressively destroys the tooth-supporting apparatus. Peri-implant diseases occur in tissues around dental implants and are characterised by inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa and subsequent progressive loss of supporting bone. Treatment aims to clean the pockets around teeth or dental implants and prevent damage to surrounding soft tissue and bone, including improvement of oral hygiene, risk factor control (e.g. encouraging cessation of smoking) and surgical interventions. The key aspect of standard non-surgical treatment is the removal of the subgingival biofilm using subgingival instrumentation (SI) (also called scaling and root planing). Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) can be used an adjunctive treatment to SI. It uses light energy to kill micro-organisms that have been treated with a light-absorbing photosensitising agent immediately prior to aPDT.
    To assess the effects of SI with adjunctive aPDT versus SI alone or with placebo aPDT for periodontitis and peri-implant diseases in adults.
    We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases and two trials registers up to 14 February 2024.
    We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (both parallel-group and split-mouth design) in participants with a clinical diagnosis of periodontitis, peri-implantitis or peri-implant disease. We compared the adjunctive use of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), in which aPDT was given after subgingival or submucosal instrumentation (SI), versus SI alone or a combination of SI and a placebo aPDT given during the active or supportive phase of therapy.
    We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures, and we used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We prioritised six outcomes and the measure of change from baseline to six months after treatment: probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (REC), pocket closure and adverse effects related to aPDT. We were also interested in change in bone level (for participants with peri-implantitis), and participant satisfaction and quality of life.
    We included 50 RCTs with 1407 participants. Most studies used a split-mouth study design; only 18 studies used a parallel-group design. Studies were small, ranging from 10 participants to 88. Adjunctive aPDT was given in a single session in 39 studies, in multiple sessions (between two and four sessions) in 11 studies, and one study included both single and multiple sessions. SI was given using hand or power-driven instrumentation (or both), and was carried out prior to adjunctive aPDT. Five studies used placebo aPDT in the control group and we combined these in meta-analyses with studies in which SI alone was used. All studies included high or unclear risks of bias, such as selection bias or performance bias of personnel (when SI was carried out by an operator aware of group allocation). We downgraded the certainty of all the evidence owing to these risks of bias, as well as for unexplained statistical inconsistency in the pooled effect estimates or for imprecision when evidence was derived from very few participants and confidence intervals (CI) indicated possible benefit to both intervention and control groups. Adjunctive aPDT versus SI alone during active treatment of periodontitis (44 studies) We are very uncertain whether adjunctive aPDT during active treatment of periodontitis leads to improvement in any clinical outcomes at six months when compared to SI alone: PPD (mean difference (MD) 0.52 mm, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.74; 15 studies, 452 participants), BOP (MD 5.72%, 95% CI 1.62 to 9.81; 5 studies, 171 studies), CAL (MD 0.44 mm, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.64; 13 studies, 414 participants) and REC (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.16; 4 studies, 95 participants); very low-certainty evidence. Any apparent differences between adjunctive aPDT and SI alone were not judged to be clinically important. Twenty-four studies (639 participants) observed no adverse effects related to aPDT (moderate-certainty evidence). No studies reported pocket closure at six months, participant satisfaction or quality of life. Adjunctive aPDT versus SI alone during supportive treatment of periodontitis (six studies) We were very uncertain whether adjunctive aPDT during supportive treatment of periodontitis leads to improvement in any clinical outcomes at six months when compared to SI alone: PPD (MD -0.04 mm, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10; 3 studies, 125 participants), BOP (MD 4.98%, 95% CI -2.51 to 12.46; 3 studies, 127 participants), CAL (MD 0.07 mm, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.40; 2 studies, 85 participants) and REC (MD -0.20 mm, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.08; 1 study, 24 participants); very low-certainty evidence. These findings were all imprecise and included no clinically important benefits for aPDT. Three studies (134 participants) reported adverse effects: a single participant developed an abscess, though it is not evident whether this was related to aPDT, and two studies observed no adverse effects related to aPDT (moderate-certainty evidence). No studies reported pocket closure at six months, participant satisfaction or quality of life.
    Because the certainty of the evidence is very low, we cannot be sure if adjunctive aPDT leads to improved clinical outcomes during the active or supportive treatment of periodontitis; moreover, results suggest that any improvements may be too small to be clinically important. The certainty of this evidence can only be increased by the inclusion of large, well-conducted RCTs that are appropriately analysed to account for change in outcome over time or within-participant split-mouth study designs (or both). We found no studies including people with peri-implantitis, and only one study including people with peri-implant mucositis, but this very small study reported no data at six months, warranting more evidence for adjunctive aPDT in this population group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:没有足够的临床和微生物学证据支持使用二极管激光和赤藓糖醇的空气抛光作为鳞片和根部规划(SRP)的补充。本研究的目的是评估赤藓糖醇牙龈下空气抛光和二极管激光治疗牙周炎的临床和微生物疗效。
    方法:该研究包括24名寻求牙周治疗并诊断为I期和II期牙周炎的个体。八名患者仅接受了SRP。另有8名患者接受了SRP,然后进行了赤藓糖醇龈下空气抛光,8例患者接受了SRP,然后应用了二极管激光。在基线和六周,测量牙周临床参数,包括斑块指数(PI),牙龈指数(GI),牙周探伤深度(PPD),和临床依恋水平(CAL)。放线菌的细菌计数(A.A),牙龈卟啉单胞菌(P.G)在不同的时间点进行评价。
    结果:微生物学评估显示,治疗后立即激光组和赤藓糖醇组之间的A.A.计数存在显着差异,表明对微生物水平的潜在影响。然而,微生物水平在随后的几周内出现波动,没有统计学上的显著差异。各组治疗后斑块指数显著下降,组间无显著差异。牙龈指数下降,激光组显示低于赤藓糖醇和对照组。PPD和CAL在所有组显著下降,激光组表现出最低值。
    结论:补充使用二极管激光和赤藓糖醇空气抛光,与SRP一起,代表加速牙周治疗方式。这种方法导致细菌的减少和牙周健康的改善。
    背景:该临床试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(注册ID:NCT06209554)上注册,并于2024年01月08日发布。
    BACKGROUND: There is insufficient clinical and microbiological evidence to support the use of diode laser and air-polishing with erythritol as supplements to scaling and root planning(SRP). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic efficacy of erythritol subgingival air polishing and diode laser in treatment of periodontitis.
    METHODS: The study encompassed twenty-four individuals seeking periodontal therapy and diagnosed with stage I and stage II periodontitis. Eight patients simply underwent SRP. Eight more patients had SRP followed by erythritol subgingival air polishing, and eight patients had SRP followed by diode laser application. At baseline and six weeks, clinical periodontal parameters were measured, including Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), periodontal Probing Depth (PPD), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). The bacterial count of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans(A.A), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.G) was evaluated at different points of time.
    RESULTS: The microbiological assessment revealed significant differences in the count of A.A. between the laser and erythritol groups immediately after treatment, indicating a potential impact on microbial levels. However, the microbial levels showed fluctuations over the subsequent weeks, without statistically significant differences. Plaque indices significantly decreased post-treatment in all groups, with no significant inter-group differences. Gingival indices decreased, and the laser group showed lower values than erythritol and control groups. PPD and CAL decreased significantly across all groups, with the laser group exhibiting the lowest values.
    CONCLUSIONS: The supplementary use of diode laser and erythritol air polishing, alongside SRP, represents an expedited periodontal treatment modality. This approach leads to a reduction in bacteria and improvement in periodontal health.
    BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was registered on Clinical Trials.gov (Registration ID: NCT06209554) and released on 08/01/2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    牙周炎非手术治疗的金标准是刮削和牙根平整(SRP)。近年来,自体血小板浓缩物的使用已经遍布牙科的许多专业,因此,在牙周治疗中也越来越受欢迎。它的两个主要部分是富血小板血浆(PRP)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF),which,自2014年起,也可以通过注射作为可注射的富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)使用。作者根据PRISMA2020指南进行了全面的系统评价。它涉及搜索PubMed,Embase,Scopus,和GoogleScholar数据库使用短语(“根平整”或“牙龈下刮治”或“牙周清创”)和(“富含血小板的血浆”)。根据作者的纳入和排除标准,12个结果包括在审查中,在1170个总结果中。本综述的目的是确定在SRP中使用PRP和i-PRF的影响。结果表明,发现PRP和i-PRF的掺入与牙龈袋深度和临床附着水平的差异显着相关;然而,i-PRF在改善临床参数方面显示出优越性。此外,i-PRF对牙龈卟啉单胞菌表现出明显的杀菌效果。另一方面,PRP在临床参数改善方面被证明不如Nd:YAG激光;但是,它也表现出显著的效率。这篇文献综述使作者得出结论,自体血小板浓缩物可能是改善SRP治疗效果的有效药物。
    The gold standard in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis is scaling and root planing (SRP). In recent years, the use of autogenous platelet concentrates has spread over many specialties in dentistry and, thus, has also been gaining popularity in periodontal treatment. Its two main fractions are platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), which, since 2014, can also be used via injection as injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. It involved searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the phrases (\"Root Planing\" OR \"Subgingival Curettage\" OR \"Periodontal Debridement\") AND (\"Platelet-Rich Plasma\"). Based on the authors\' inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 results were included in the review, out of 1170 total results. The objective of this review was to ascertain the impact of utilizing PRP and i-PRF in SRP. The results revealed that both the incorporation of PRP and i-PRF were found to be significantly associated with are duction in gingival pocket depth and again in clinical attachment level; however, i-PRF demonstrated superiority in improving clinical parameters. Furthermore, i-PRF demonstrated notable bactericidal efficacy against Porphyromonas gingivalis. On the other hand, PRP proved inferior to an Nd:YAG laser in clinical parameter improvement; however, it demonstrated significant efficiency as well. This literature review led the authors to the conclusion that autologous platelet concentrates might be competent agents for improving the therapeutic outcomes of SRP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了光动力疗法对慢性牙周炎患者的影响,然后评估了微生物,免疫学,牙周,和临床结果。通过体外和体内研究获得的光动力疗法的显着效果使其成为近年来牙周病的流行治疗方法。光动力疗法是一种新的杀菌策略,更强,更快,并且比缩放和根部平整便宜。
    这项研究在PROSPERO(CRD42021267008)上注册,并通过搜索9个数据库检索了53个随机对照试验(Medline,Embase,Scopus,打开灰色,谷歌学者,ProQuest,Cochrane图书馆,WebofScience,和ClinicalTrials.gov)从2008年到2023年。在标题和全文分析后通过数据库搜索确定的721条记录中,并排除重复和不相关的出版物,本系统综述共53篇。53项符合条件的研究中有50项符合JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)RCT清单中的所有标准;其余文章符合9-12项标准,被认为是高质量的。
    本研究表明,光动力疗法辅助牙垢和牙根平整具有改善牙周参数的潜力,例如临床附着丧失或增加,探查时出血减少,和探测口袋深度。此外,光动力疗法可降低牙周病原体和炎症标志物的发生率,which,反过来,减少牙周炎的进展。
    光动力疗法被认为是有前途的,辅助,和对组织修复有效的低成本治疗方法,减少慢性牙周炎,减少炎症,患者耐受性良好。
    UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the effect of photodynamic therapy on chronic periodontitis patients and then evaluated the microbial, immunological, periodontal, and clinical outcomes. The significant effects of photodynamic therapy obtained by in vitro and in vivo studies have made it a popular treatment for periodontal diseases in recent years. Photodynamic therapy is a novel bactericidal strategy that is stronger, faster, and less expensive than scaling and root planing.
    UNASSIGNED: This study registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021267008) and retrieved fifty-three randomized controlled trials by searching nine databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Open Gray, Google Scholar, ProQuest, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) from 2008 to 2023. Of 721 records identified through database searches following title and full-text analysis, and excluding duplicate and irrelevant publications, 53 articles were included in this systematic review. Fifty of the 53 eligible studies fulfilled all the criteria in the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s (JBI\'s) Checklist for RCTs; the remaining articles met 9-12 criteria and were considered high quality.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study showed that photodynamic therapy in adjunct to scaling and root planing has the potential to improve periodontal parameters such as clinical attachment loss or gain, decrease in bleeding on probing, and probing pocket depth. In addition, photodynamic therapy decreases the rate of periodontal pathogens and inflammation markers, which, in turn, reduces the progression of periodontitis.
    UNASSIGNED: Photodynamic therapy is considered a promising, adjunctive, and low-cost therapeutic method that is effective in tissue repair, reducing chronic periodontitis, reducing inflammation, and well-tolerated by patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    牙周器械骨折是牙科罕见的事件,关于它们的发生和管理的文献有限。此病例报告重点介绍了一起涉及在手动器械清除结石过程中牙周镰刀洁刀刀片断裂的事件。骨折发生在上颌右第二磨牙内侧表面的器械上,分离的叶片随后被推入沟中。进行射线照相评估以验证骨折段的精确位置。确认后,随后使用弯曲的动脉钳取回断裂的刀片。病例报告强调了导致器械骨折的因素,强调仪器维护的重要性,灭菌周期,和操作员技术。关于患者披露的伦理考虑,知情同意,和仪器检索方法进行了很好的讨论。这个案例凸显了真实沟通的重要性,正确使用仪器,牙科设备维护,以及持续的专业发展对加强治疗安全的重要性,熟练程度,和牙科护理的道德标准。
    Periodontal instrument fractures are rare events in dentistry, with limited literature available on their occurrence and management. This case report highlights an incident involving the fracture of a periodontal sickle scaler blade during manual instrumentation for the removal of calculus. The fracture occurred during instrumentation on the mesial surface of the maxillary right second molar, and the separated blade was subsequently pushed into the sulcus. A radiographic assessment was performed to verify the precise location of the fractured segment. Following confirmation, the broken blade was subsequently retrieved using curved artery forceps. The case report highlights factors contributing to instrument fractures, emphasizing the importance of instrument maintenance, sterilization cycles, and operator technique. Ethical considerations regarding patient disclosure, informed consent, and instrument retrieval methods are well discussed. This case underscores the importance of truthful communication, the proper use of instruments, equipment maintenance in dentistry, and the significance of ongoing professional development to enhance treatment safety, proficiency, and ethical standards in dental care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:特发性牙龈肿大与菌斑有关,但其他促成因素尚不清楚。特发性牙龈肿大的预后与患者的口腔卫生习惯和定期随访密切相关。
    方法:本文报道一例32岁男性特发性牙龈肿大患者。患者就诊于口腔科,有2个月的右上后牙牙龈肿胀和疼痛史。在治疗过程中,口腔卫生指导,牙龈上清洁,龈下缩放,进行了根系规划,部分增生性牙龈被取出并送去做病理检查。病理检查为牙龈肿大伴慢性化脓性炎症。在4个月的随访中,患者的牙周状况基本保持稳定,牙龈肿大没有复发。
    结论:通过非手术治疗和良好的菌斑控制,治疗后牙龈肿胀明显减轻,患者疼痛减轻,说明特发性牙龈肿大患者通过非手术治疗也能达到理想的效果。通过口腔卫生指导,患者掌握了自我控制斑块的方法,有利于牙周状况的长期稳定。
    BACKGROUND: Idiopathic gingival enlargement is associated with plaque, but other contributing factors are unclear. The prognosis of idiopathic gingival enlargement is closely related to the patient\'s oral hygiene habits and regular follow-up.
    METHODS: This article reports a case of a 32-year-old male patient with idiopathic gingival enlargement. The patient presented to the department of stomatology with a 2-month history of gingival swelling and pain on the right upper posterior teeth. During the treatment, oral hygiene instruction, supragingival cleaning, subgingival scaling, and root planning were carried out, and part of the hyperplastic gingiva was taken and sent for pathology. Pathological examination showed gingival enlargement with chronic suppurative inflammation. At 4-month follow-up, the patient\'s periodontal condition remained basically stable, and the gingival enlargement did not recur.
    CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of this case resulted in significant reduction of gingival swelling and patient\'s pain reduction through non-surgical treatment and good plaque control, indicating that patients with idiopathic gingival enlargement can also achieve ideal results through non-surgical treatment. Through oral hygiene instruction, the patient mastered the method of self-plaque control, which is conducive to the long-term stabilization of the periodontal situation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在证明铒的疗效,铬掺杂:钇,钪,镓,和石榴石(呃,Cr:YSGG)在8周愈合期间对牙周炎患者进行激光辅助的非手术牙周治疗。
    方法:张口,单盲,对12例诊断为III/IV期牙周炎的患者进行了随机对照临床试验,这些患者在至少两个象限中至少有2颗探诊袋深度(PPD)>5mm的牙齿.随机化后,每个象限被指定为常规刮伤和根部平整(SRP)手术或使用径向发射尖端的激光辅助治疗(SRP+激光)(RFPT5,Biolase).进行临床测量和龈沟液收集以进行统计分析。
    结果:在对整个受试者牙齿的初步统计分析中,改良牙龈指数(MGI)的降低在测试组中大于1(P=0.0153),4(P=0.0318),与同期对照相比8周(P=0.0047)。试验组4周时PPD降低为-1.67±0.59,与对照组相比有显著性差异(-1.37±0.63,P=0.0253)。当平均PPD≥5mm的牙齿被分类时,在第1周(P=0.003)和第8周(P=0.0102)随访时,测试组的MGI下降幅度明显更大。在4周期间,测试组的PPD降低也显着更大(-1.98±0.55vs-1.58±0.56,测试与对照,P=0.0224)。
    结论:呃,Cr:YSGG辅助牙周治疗有利于早期愈合期MGI和PPD的减少。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser-assisted nonsurgical periodontal therapy in periodontitis patients during 8 weeks of healing.
    METHODS: A split-mouth, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 12 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV periodontitis and had a minimum of two teeth with probing pocket depth (PPD) > 5 mm in at least two quadrants. Upon randomization, each quadrant was assigned for conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) procedure or laser-assisted therapy (SRP + laser) using radial firing tip (RFPT 5, Biolase). Clinical measurements and gingival crevicular fluid collection were performed for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: In the initial statistical analysis on the whole subject teeth, modified gingival index (MGI) reduction was greater in test group at 1(P = 0.0153), 4 (P = 0.0318), and 8 weeks (P = 0.0047) compared to the control in the same period. PPD reduction at 4 weeks in test group was -1.67 ± 0.59 showing significant difference compared to the control (-1.37 ± 0.63, P = 0.0253). When teeth with mean PPD ≥5 mm were sorted, MGI decrease was significantly greater in test group at 1 (P=0.003) and 8 week (P=0.0102) follow-ups. PPD reduction was also significantly greater in test group at 4 week period (-1.98 ± 0.55 vs -1.58 ± 0.56, test vs control, P=0.0224).
    CONCLUSIONS: Er,Cr:YSGG-assisted periodontal therapy is beneficial in MGI and PPD reductions during early healing period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了比较基于具有不同工作频率的平面压电换能器的超声洁牙器原型,该换能器具有钛(Ti-20,Ti-28和Ti-40)或不锈钢(SS-28)仪器,在生物膜去除和改造方面,使用市售的洁治器(com-29),牙本质表面粗糙度和牙周成纤维细胞的粘附。
    方法:在具有牙本质切片的标本上形成牙周多物种生物膜。此后,在牙周袋模型中用洁牙器对标本进行测量或不处理(对照)。对剩余的生物膜进行定量并使其在仪器化的牙本质切片上重新形成。此外,培养72小时后接种成纤维细胞用于附着评估。在仪器之前和之后分析牙本质表面粗糙度。
    结果:所有测试的仪器都将菌落形成单位(cfu)计数减少了约3至4log10,生物膜数量(每个p<0.01vs.control),但仪器组之间无统计学差异。经过24小时的生物膜改造,任何组间的cfu计数均无差异,但与对照组相比,所有仪器组的生物膜数量约为50%。成纤维细胞在仪器化牙本质上的附着显著高于未处理牙本质(p<0.05),除了Ti-20。牙本质表面粗糙度不受任何仪器的影响。
    结论:平面压电洁牙器原型能够有效去除生物膜,而不会改变牙本质表面,无论工作频率或仪器材料。
    结论:基于平面压电换能器的超声洁牙器可能是目前可用的超声洁牙器的替代方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare ultrasonic scaler prototypes based on a planar piezoelectric transducer with different working frequencies featuring a titanium (Ti-20, Ti-28, and Ti-40) or stainless steel (SS-28) instrument, with a commercially available scaler (com-29) in terms of biofilm removal and reformation, dentine surface roughness and adhesion of periodontal fibroblasts.
    METHODS: A periodontal multi-species biofilm was formed on specimens with dentine slices. Thereafter specimens were instrumented with scalers in a periodontal pocket model or left untreated (control). The remaining biofilms were quantified and allowed to reform on instrumented dentine slices. In addition, fibroblasts were seeded for attachment evaluation after 72 h of incubation. Dentine surface roughness was analyzed before and after instrumentation.
    RESULTS: All tested instruments reduced the colony-forming unit (cfu) counts by about 3 to 4 log10 and the biofilm quantity (each p < 0.01 vs. control), but with no statistically significant difference between the instrumented groups. After 24-hour biofilm reformation, no differences in cfu counts were observed between any groups, but the biofilm quantity was about 50% in all instrumented groups compared to the control. The attachment of fibroblasts on instrumented dentine was significantly higher than on untreated dentine (p < 0.05), with the exception of Ti-20. The dentine surface roughness was not affected by any instrumentation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The planar piezoelectric scaler prototypes are able to efficiently remove biofilm without dentine surface alterations, regardless of the operating frequency or instrument material.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic scalers based on a planar piezoelectric transducer might be an alternative to currently available ultrasonic scalers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号