Cervical Plexus Block

颈丛阻滞
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    疼痛是癌症患者可能面临的最可怕的疾病之一。骨是许多恶性肿瘤的常见转移部位,包括乳房,前列腺,肾,还有肺癌.肿瘤相关骨痛的常规治疗包括使用阿片类药物,非甾体抗炎药,和双膦酸盐。姑息性放射治疗可用于难治性骨痛。我们描述了在阿片类药物不耐受的患者中,通过浅表颈丛阻滞成功治疗了与癌症相关的锁骨疼痛的创新案例。考虑到在这种情况下缺乏疼痛干预指南,这种外周神经阻滞可能是治疗难治性癌痛的一种有用的辅助手段.
    Pain is one of the most feared conditions a cancer patient may face. Bone is a common site of metastasis in many malignancies, including breast, prostate, kidney, and lung cancer. Conventional therapy for tumor-related bone pain involves the use of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and bisphosphonates. Palliative radiation therapy may be incorporated for refractory bone pain. We describe an innovative case of cancer-related clavicle pain successfully managed with a superficial cervical plexus block in an opioid-intolerant patient. Considering the lack of guidelines for pain interventions in this setting, such peripheral nerve blocks may be a useful adjunctive tool in refractory cancer pain management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉内膜切除术用于有症状的颈动脉闭塞患者。手术可以在全身和区域麻醉下进行。传统上,手术是在深颈丛阻滞下进行的,这在技术上是很难进行的,并且会引起严重的并发症。本病例系列描述了5例病例,其中中间颈丛阻滞与浅表颈丛阻滞联合用于颈动脉内膜切除术。
    方法:5名被归类为美国麻醉医师协会2-3的患者因症状和超过70%的颈动脉闭塞而计划进行颈动脉内膜切除术。这些程序是在大学教学医院-Peradeniya进行的,斯里兰卡。所有患者均给予浅颈丛阻滞,然后使用2%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因进行中间颈丛阻滞。
    结果:有4例患者获得了充分的麻醉,1例患者需要局部浸润。两个病人出现声音嘶哑,在手术后2小时稳定下来。5例患者均出现血流动力学波动。无严重并发症发生。所有5例患者均恢复顺利。
    结论:CEA的区域麻醉在医学上复杂的患者或无法进行脑监测的患者中是优选的。文献中描述了中间颈丛阻滞用于甲状腺手术,但关于它在颈动脉手术中的用途没有太多的细节。深颈丛阻滞几乎没有严重的并发症,而ICPB的使用使其成为CEA手术的良好替代品。
    结论:颈浅丛阻滞和中间颈丛阻滞可有效用于颈动脉内膜切除术患者的麻醉。它比深颈丛阻滞更安全,更容易进行,并且可以监测脑功能。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is performed for patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusions. Surgery can be performed under general and regional anesthesia. Traditionally, surgery is performed under deep cervical plexus block which is technically difficult to perform and can cause serious complications. This case series describes 5 cases in which an intermediate cervical plexus block was used in combination with a superficial cervical plexus block for Carotid endarterectomy surgery.
    METHODS: Five patients who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists 2-3 were scheduled for Carotid endarterectomy due to symptoms and more than 70% occlusion of the carotid arteries. The procedures were carried out in the University Teaching Hospital- Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. All patients were given superficial cervical plexus block followed by intermediate cervical plexus block using 2% lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine.
    RESULTS: Adequate anesthesia was achieved in 4 patients, and local infiltration was necessary in 1 patient. Two patients developed hoarseness of the voice, which settled 2 h after surgery. Hemodynamic fluctuations were observed in all 5 patients. No serious complications were observed. All 5 patients had uneventful recoveries.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regional anesthesia for CEA is preferable in patients who are medically complicated to undergo anesthesia or in patients for whom cerebral monitoring is not available. Intermediate cervical plexus block is described for thyroid surgeries in literature, but not much details on its use for carotid surgeries. Deep cervical plexus blocks has few serious complications which is not there with the use of ICPB making it a good alternative for CEA surgeries .
    CONCLUSIONS: Superficial cervical plexus block and intermediate cervical plexus block can be used effectively for providing anesthesia for patients undergoing Carotid endarterectomy. It is safe and easier to conduct than deep cervical plexus block and enables monitoring of cerebral function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:局部镇痛技术对于颈椎手术后的疼痛管理至关重要。麻醉师努力为宫颈区域选择最有效和最不危险的区域镇痛技术。我们的假设是,与接受颈椎前路手术的患者相比,中间颈丛(IC)阻滞可以提供足够的术后镇痛。
    方法:在这项双盲前瞻性试验中,在全身麻醉之前,将58例患者随机分为两个相等的组。IC组(n=29)的患者接受了超声引导的双侧中间颈丛阻滞,每侧给予15ml0.25%的布比卡因。ES组(n=29)接受了超声引导的双侧宫颈竖脊肌平面阻滞,在C6水平的两侧分别给予15ml0.25%布比卡因。主要结果是记录到第一次呼叫抢救镇痛(纳布啡)的时间,次要结果是衡量绩效时间,感觉阻滞的开始,术中芬太尼的消耗,使用VAS的术后疼痛强度,术后纳布啡的总消耗量,术后并发症如恶心,呕吐,低血压,和心动过缓.
    结果:与ES组相比,IC组的表现和感觉阻滞开始时间明显缩短。与ES组(11.10±1.82h)相比,IC组首次调用纳布啡的时间(7.31±1.34h)明显缩短。两组在测量时间点的平均术后VAS评分具有可比性,除了在8小时,在IC组中明显更高,在12小时,在ES组中明显更高。IC组纳布啡的总消耗量(33.1±10.13mg)明显高于ES组(22.76±8.62mg)。
    结论:对于接受颈椎前路手术的患者,中间颈丛阻滞与颈勃起脊髓阻滞相比,不能提供更好的术后区域镇痛。IC组的表现时间和起效时间较短,而ES组的纳布啡消费量较低。
    背景:该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册。(NCT05577559,注册日期:13-10-2022)。
    BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia techniques are crucial for pain management after cervical spine surgeries. Anesthesiologists strive to select the most effective and least hazardous regional analgesia technique for the cervical region. Our hypothesis is that an intermediate cervical plexus (IC) block can provide adequate postoperative analgesia compared to a cervical erector spinae (ES) block in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.
    METHODS: In this double-blind prospective trial, 58 patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups prior to the administration of general anesthesia. Patients in the IC group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral intermediate cervical plexus block with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% administered to each side. The ES group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral cervical erector spinae plane blocks with 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine administered to each side at the C6 level. The primary outcome was to record the time to the first call for rescue analgesia (nalbuphine), and the secondary outcomes were to measure the performance time, the onset of the sensory block, the intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain intensity using VAS, the postoperative total nalbuphine consumption, and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia.
    RESULTS: The performance and onset of sensory block times were significantly shorter in the IC group compared to the ES group. The time to first call for nalbuphine was significantly shorter in the IC group (7.31 ± 1.34 h) compared to the ES group (11.10 ± 1.82 h). The mean postoperative VAS scores were comparable between the two groups at the measured time points, except at 8 h, where it was significantly higher in the IC group, and at 12 h, where it was significantly higher in the ES group. The total nalbuphine consumption was significantly higher in the IC group (33.1 ± 10.13 mg) compared to the ES group (22.76 ± 8.62 mg).
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery, the intermediate cervical plexus block does not provide better postoperative regional analgesia compared to the cervical erector spinae block. Performance time and onset time were shorter in the IC group, whereas nalbuphine consumption was lower in the ES group.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (NCT05577559, and the date of registration: 13-10-2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景与目的:脑室-腹腔(VP)分流术是脑脊液分流术中最常见的治疗方法。很少报道VP分流插入后长时间发生的头颈部疼痛。这里,我们介绍了一例罕见的头颈部疼痛病例,该病例在手术后2年发生,原因是VP分流刺激了颈浅丛。病例描述:一名46岁女性患者接受了VP分流置放手术。手术两年后,她经历了左颞叶头痛,左侧颈部疼痛,延伸到左耳旁和筋膜区域。超声(US)扫描显示VP分流通过颈浅筋膜并通过左胸锁乳突肌(SCM)。此外,在SCM的外侧边界下方发现了由VP分流引起的颈浅丛分支以及耳大神经和枕小神经的摩擦。随后,对左浅颈丛进行阻滞和水力释放。经过四个系列的治疗,病人的头部和颈部疼痛消失了,头痛的频率大大减少。患者在神经外科门诊定期随访。结论:由于VP分流导管异常延迟发作而引起的头颈部疼痛是很少报道的并发症,很容易被忽略。应使用US扫描检查VP分流后头颈部疼痛的患者,以确定疼痛的潜在起源并接受适当的治疗。建议在术中进行US引导的隧道检查,以避免VP分流导管的错位。
    Background and Objectives: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is the most common treatment for cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Head and neck pain occurring after a long period following VP shunt insertion is rarely reported. Here, we present a rare case of head and neck pain occurring 2 years after surgery due to irritation of the superficial cervical plexus by the VP shunt. Case Description: A 46-year-old female patient received VP shunt placement surgery. Two years after the surgery, she experienced a left temporal headache with neck pain on the left side, which extended to the left para-auricular and fascial region. Ultrasound (US) scanning revealed that the VP shunt passed within the superficial cervical fascia and through the left sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM). Additionally, friction of the branches of the superficial cervical plexus and of the greater auricular and lesser occipital nerves caused by the VP shunt was found underneath the lateral border of the SCM. Subsequently, the blocking and hydro-release of the left superficial cervical plexus were performed. After four series of treatments, the patient\'s head and neck pain vanished, and the frequency of the headaches was substantially reduced. The patient was regularly followed-up in the outpatient department of neurosurgery. Conclusions: Head and neck pain caused by the malpositioning of a VP shunt catheter with an unusually delayed onset is a rarely reported complication and could be easily neglected. Patients with head and neck pain following VP shunt insertion should be checked using US scanning to identify the potential origin of the pain and receive adequate treatments. Intraoperative US-guided tunnelling is suggested to avoid the malpositioning of the VP shunt catheter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:探讨超声引导下颈浅筋膜阻滞联合臂丛神经阻滞在锁骨手术中的应用效果。
    方法:40名患者,25名男性和15名女性,年龄18-85岁,ASAI级或II级,接受单侧锁骨骨折内固定。将患者随机分为颈浅丛阻滞组(S组,n=20)和颈浅筋膜阻滞组(F组,n=20)。首先,在超声引导下,两组患者的肌间沟臂丛神经均在超声引导下注射1次15ml的0.33%罗哌卡因.第二,S组再次注射5-8ml0.33%罗哌卡因阻断浅颈丛,F组通过注射5-8ml0.33%罗哌卡因阻断颈浅筋膜。我们评估了手术时间,麻醉的开始时间,两组神经阻滞效果的有效时间和分级。此外,我们评估了局部麻醉中毒的发生率,声音嘶哑,呼吸困难,术后恶心呕吐,和24小时内需要补救镇痛的患者人数。重复测量通过重复数据分析进行方差分析,计数数据进行χ2检验。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:F组手术时间和起效时间明显短于S组(P<0.05);术中阻滞效果明显优于S组(P<0.05)。F组显效时间明显长于S组(P<0.05)。然而,没有严重的呼吸困难,两组均发生局部麻醉中毒或麻醉后声音嘶哑。两组患者术后挽救镇痛率和术后恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义。
    结论:在锁骨手术中应用超声引导下颈浅筋膜阻滞联合臂丛神经阻滞的单次注射技术是有益的,因为它缩短了手术时间。起病更快,产生更有效的阻滞和延长镇痛时间。
    背景:中国临床试验注册-ChiCTR2200064642(2022年10月13日)。
    To investigate the effects of a single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery.
    Forty patients, 25 males and 15 females, aged 18-85 years with ASA class I or II underwent unilateral clavicular fracture internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into a superficial cervical plexus block group (group S, n = 20) and a superficial cervical fascia block group (group F, n = 20). First, the brachial plexus of the intermuscular sulcus of all patients was blocked with an ultrasound-guided injection of one injection with 15ml 0.33% ropivacaine 15ml in both groups. Second, the superficial cervical plexus was blocked by another injection of 5-8ml 0.33% ropivacaine in group S, and the superficial cervical fascia was blocked by an injection with 5-8ml 0.33% ropivacaine in Group F. We evaluated operation time, onset time of anaesthesia, effective time and the grades of nerve block effect in the two groups. Additionally, we evaluated the incidences of local anaesthetic poisoning, hoarseness, dyspnoea, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the number of patients requiring remedial analgesia within 24 h. Repeated measurements were analysed by repeated data analysis of variance, and count data were compared by the χ2 test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    The operation time and onset time in Group F were significantly shorter than those in group S (P < 0.05); the effect of intraoperative block was better than that in group S (P < 0.05), and the effective time was significantly longer in group F than in group S (P < 0.05). However, no severe case of dyspnoea, local anaesthetic poisoning or hoarseness after anaesthesia occurred in either of two groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative salvage analgesia or that of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups.
    The application of the single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery is beneficial because it shortens the operation time, has a faster onset, produces a more effective block and prolongs the longer analgesia time.
    Chinese Clinical Trial Registry- ChiCTR2200064642(13/10/2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在这项研究中,在术中血流动力学方面评估肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞(ISB)与颈浅丛神经阻滞和全身麻醉(GA)的应用,肩袖撕裂修复患者的手术时间和术后镇痛需求。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了70名年龄在18至75岁之间的患者。所有患者均进行关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复手术。患者被随机分为2组,即ISB组接受了肌间神经阻滞的浅表颈丛阻滞组合,和GA组,对于那些收到GA的人。操作持续时间,等待时间,术中血流动力学数据,术后视觉模拟量表(VAS),镇痛需求,以及患者和外科医生的满意度,两组之间进行比较。
    结果:虽然ISB组在2和24小时麻醉后监护病房的VAS值较低(P<0.05),第6小时和第12小时测量的VAS值之间无显著差异(P≥.05).在GA组中,术后吗啡和双氯芬酸的消耗量较高,早期需要抢救镇痛(P<0.05)。住院时间较短(P<0.05),ISB组的外科医生和患者满意度较高(P<0.05)。
    在肩袖撕裂修复麻醉中,ISB与颈浅丛阻滞提供足够的术中麻醉,术后VAS水平低,减少和推迟阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药的消费,更高的患者和外科医生满意度和早期出院。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) with superficial cervical plexus block added and general anesthesia (GA) application were evaluated in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, operative time and postoperative analgesia need in patients who underwent rotator cuff tear repair.
    METHODS: 70 patients aged between 18 and 75 years were included in this prospective study. Arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair surgery was performed in all patients. The patients were randomized into 2 groups, namely Group ISB who received a combination of superficial cervical plexus block added to the Interscalene Nerve Block, and Group GA, for those who received GA. Duration of operation, waiting times, intraoperative hemodynamic data, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), analgesic requirement, as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction levels, were compared between the 2 groups.
    RESULTS: While VAS values at the post-anesthesia care unit were lower in ISB group at 2 and 24 hours (P < .05), there was no significant difference between VAS values measured at 6th and 12th hours (P ≥ .05). In the GA group, postoperative morphine and diclofenac consumption was higher, and rescue analgesia was needed earlier (P < .05). The hospital stay was shorter (P < .05), and surgeon and patient satisfaction were higher in the ISB group (P < .05).
    UNASSIGNED: In rotator cuff tear repair anesthesia, ISB with superficial cervical plexus block provides adequate intraoperative anesthesia, low postoperative VAS level, reduced and deferred consumption of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, higher patient and surgeon satisfaction and early discharge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:在当前舒适医学和增强术后恢复的背景下,需要一种新的麻醉方法来减少不良反应并加速手术后的恢复。这项随机对照试验旨在比较无阿片类麻醉(OFA)联合超声引导颈丛神经阻滞(ICPB)和阿片类麻醉在甲状腺手术后患者中的有效性和安全性。
    方法:在本研究中,将75例全麻下行甲状腺手术患者随机分为两组。主要结果包括术后24小时内恶心的发生率。主要次要结果包括术后24h内呕吐的发生率和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分以及术后24h后40份恢复质量问卷(QoR-40)评分。
    结果:在OFA组中,术后恶心发生率为6.1%,对照组为39.4%(p=0.001)。OFA组无患者出现术后呕吐,而对照组中有15.2%的患者出现术后呕吐(p=0.063)。患者在麻醉后监护病房(PACU)和2h的VAS评分,4h,术后6小时,OFA组较低,差异具有统计学意义。此外,患者在术后24h休息时(p=1.000)和吞咽时(p=1.000)的VAS评分具有可比性.
    结论:与阿片类药物麻醉相比,OFA联合超声引导ICPB能更好地改善患者术后恢复,减少恶心,并降低疼痛评分。
    背景:中国临床试验,ChiCTR2200056344,https://www.chictr.org.cn.
    In the context of the current comfort medicine and enhanced recovery after surgery, there is a demand for a new anesthesia method to reduce adverse reactions and accelerate recovery after surgery. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block (ICPB) and opioid-based anesthesia in patients after thyroid surgery.
    In this study, 75 patients scheduled for thyroid surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. The primary outcome included the incidence of nausea within 24 h after surgery. The main secondary outcomes included the incidence of vomiting and the visual analog score (VAS) scores within 24 h after surgery as well as the quality of recovery 40 questionnaires (QoR-40) scores 24 h after surgery.
    In the OFA group, the incidence of postoperative nausea was 6.1%, compared to 39.4% in the control group (p = 0.001). No patient presented with postoperative vomiting in the OFA group, while 15.2% of patients suffered from postoperative vomiting in the control group (p = 0.063). The VAS scores of patients in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) and 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after surgery were lower in the OFA group, and the difference is statistically significant. Besides, the VAS scores of patients at rest (p = 1.000) and during swallowing (p = 1.000) 24 h after surgery were comparable.
    Compared with opioid-based anesthesia, the OFA combined with the ultrasound-guided ICPB can better improve patients\' postoperative recovery, reduce nausea, and decrease pain scores.
    Chinese Clinical Trial Regisrty, ChiCTR2200056344, https://www.chictr.org.cn.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甲状腺手术是中等疼痛,并且已经研究了许多减轻术后疼痛的技术。区域技术是用于各种手术病例的多模式镇痛的一部分。双侧浅颈丛阻滞(BSCPB)是甲状腺手术镇痛的常用区域麻醉技术。该小组先前的荟萃分析对该技术的某些方面提出了疑问,进一步的审判对此有贡献。
    系统评价和荟萃分析已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)CRD42022315499上注册。这是对2018年以前发表的论文的更新。更新的系统搜索,批判性评估,并对临床试验进行分析。调查甲状腺手术患者术前或术后BSCPB与对照组相比的试验包括在搜索中。主要结果是术后阿片类药物的消耗。次要结果是镇痛持续时间(到要求镇痛的时间),视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分在0,4,12和24小时,术后,术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生率,术后抢救镇痛消耗,术中使用吗啡。
    本分析共纳入31项研究和2,273例患者。BSCPB显著减少甲状腺切除术后阿片类药物的消耗(P<0.001)。此外,BSCPB术后镇痛持续时间延长.24h(术后)的VAS评分,术中使用吗啡,接受BSCPB的患者的抢救镇痛(术后)仍然显着降低。PONV也有统计学上的显著降低(P=0.02)。
    BSCPB提供卓越的术后镇痛,减少了阿片类药物的使用,PONV的减少,和VAS评分的提高。
    UNASSIGNED: Thyroid surgery is moderately painful, and many techniques to reduce postoperative pain have been studied. Regional techniques are a part of multimodal analgesia employed for various surgical cases. Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is a commonly used regional anaesthesia technique for analgesia for thyroid surgery. A previous meta-analysis by this group had left questions about some facets of the technique, to which further trials have contributed.
    UNASSIGNED: The systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42022315499. It is an update to a previously published paper in 2018. An updated systematic search, critical appraisal, and analysis of clinical trials were performed. Trials investigating preoperative or postoperative BSCPB compared to control in patients undergoing thyroid surgery were included in the search. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes were the duration of analgesia (time to request of analgesia), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores at 0, 4, 12, and 24 h, postoperatively, rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative rescue analgesic consumption, and intraoperative morphine use.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 31 studies and 2,273 patients were included in this analysis. BSCPB significantly reduced post-thyroidectomy opioid consumption (P < 0.001). Additionally, the duration of analgesia was prolonged following BSCPB. VAS scores for 24 h (postoperatively), intraoperative morphine use, and rescue analgesia (postoperatively) remained significantly lower in patients who received BSCPB. There was also a statistically significant reduction in PONV (P = 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: BSCPB offers superior postoperative analgesia with a reduction in opioid use, reduction in PONV, and improvement in VAS scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一例在全身麻醉下接受右上颌部分切除术和颈部清扫术的患者,使用罗哌卡因进行超声引导的颅颈神经阻滞用于围手术期局部/区域麻醉。该患者是一名85岁的女性,患有多种医学合并症,其中使用非甾体类抗炎药和阿片类药物进行镇痛有望增加术后并发症的风险。进行双侧超声引导的上颌(V2)神经阻滞和右侧浅颈丛阻滞,提供了充分的围手术期麻醉,避免了术后并发症。使用超声引导的颅颈神经阻滞与罗哌卡因可以提供延长围手术期局部麻醉和镇痛的有效方法。最大限度地减少对其他潜在有问题的镇痛药的需求。
    We report a case of ultrasound-guided craniocervical nerve blocks performed with ropivacaine for perioperative local/regional anesthesia in a patient who underwent right partial maxillary resection and neck dissection under general anesthesia. The patient was an 85-year-old woman with multiple medical comorbidities in whom analgesia using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids was expected to increase the risk of postoperative complications. Bilateral ultrasound-guided maxillary (V2) nerve blocks and a right superficial cervical plexus block were performed, which provided adequate perioperative anesthesia and avoided postoperative complications. The use of ultrasound-guided craniocervical nerve blocks with ropivacaine can be an effective approach for providing prolonged perioperative local anesthesia and analgesia, minimizing the need for other potentially problematic analgesics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    双侧颈浅丛阻滞(BSCPB)对甲状腺手术的术后镇痛有效。我们评估了在全身麻醉下,右美托咪定和地塞米松与0.25%罗哌卡因在BSCPB中作为佐剂用于甲状腺切除术的镇痛效果。抢救镇痛需求总量,术中和术后血流动力学参数的变化,VAS评分,和不良事件,如果有的话。
    计划一项前瞻性双盲试验,对80名成年人进行甲状腺切除术,随机分为两个相等的组,给予BSCPB和20ml0.25%罗哌卡因,辅以右美托咪定50mg(A组)或地塞米松4mg(B组),每侧10毫升,全身麻醉诱导后。使用视觉模拟量表监测术后疼痛,并通过首次抢救镇痛的时间来测量镇痛的持续时间。记录术后血流动力学和任何不良事件。
    A组的平均镇痛持续时间略有延长,但与B组相比无统计学意义(1037±97vs.1004±122分钟;P0.18)。前24h两组患者术后中位VAS评分及生命指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组PONV的发生率显著降低(P<0.05)。
    尽管地塞米松在降低PONV的发生率方面有轻微的优势,使用罗哌卡因和右美托咪定或地塞米松作为佐剂的BSCPB赋予足够的镇痛作用,并具有稳定的血流动力学,可在甲状腺手术中用作先发制人的镇痛技术。
    UNASSIGNED: The bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is efficacious for post-operative analgesia in thyroid surgeries. We assessed the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone administered as adjuvants with 0.25 percent ropivacaine in BSCPB for thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia with regard to the duration of analgesia, total amount of rescue analgesic requirement, changes in intra- and post-operative haemodynamic parameters, VAS scores, and adverse events, if any.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective double-blind trial was planned with 80 adults undergoing thyroidectomy, randomized into two equal groups and given BSCPB with 20 ml 0.25% ropivacaine with adjuvants as either dexmedetomidine 50mg (group A) or dexamethasone 4mg (group B), 10 ml on each side, after the induction of general anaesthesia. Post-operative pain was monitored using the visual analog scale and the duration of analgesia was measured by time to first rescue analgesia. Post-operative haemodynamics and any adverse events were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean duration of analgesia was slightly prolonged in group A but statistically non-significant as compared to group B (1037 ± 97 vs. 1004 ± 122 minutes; P0.18). The post-operative median VAS scores and vital parameters were relatively comparable for both groups (P > 0.05) for the first 24h. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of PONV (P < 0.05) in group B.
    UNASSIGNED: Although dexamethasone offers a slight advantage of decreased incidence of PONV, BSCPB using ropivacaine with either dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone as an adjuvant imparted adequate analgesia with stable haemodynamics and may be used as a pre-emptive analgesic technique in thyroid surgeries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号