Biochemical recurrence

生化复发
  • 文章类型: Letter
    准确的前列腺癌(PCa)患者诊断和风险评估是确保最佳结果的关键。目前,由于疾病的惰性性质,低和有利的中危PCa患者可能会接受AS治疗。尽管如此,在积极监测和治愈性治疗之间做出决定仍然是一项复杂的任务,这些患者的一部分最终可能会进展,预后较差。在这里,我们试图构建基于癌症生物标志物的风险计算器,能够在患者之间进行更准确的区分,这可能会从积极的干预措施中受益。Ki67免疫核心,在PCa组织中评估GSTP1和KLF8启动子甲基化水平(me)。研究终点包括总体和无生化复发(BCR)存活。结合相关临床病理参数,可以构建图形计算工具(列线图)。较高的Ki67指数与较差的无BCR生存率相关,而较高的KLF8me水平与总生存率的提高有关,尤其是低度肿瘤患者。GSTP1me水平无预后价值。在测试的预后模型中,BCR风险计算器-ProstARK(包括Ki67和临床病理参数)-揭示了79.17%的特异性,灵敏度66.67%,55%的阳性预测值,86%阴性预测值,准确率为75.76%。使用独立的PCa活检队列发现了类似的结果,验证其预测能力。将临床病理特征和Ki67指数结合到风险计算器中,可以轻松准确地实施新型PCa预测工具。此列线图可用于更准确地选择主动监测方案的患者。尽管如此,在一个更大的验证,多中心,为了进一步确认这些结果,必须进行一组诊断性PCa活检.
    Accurate prostate cancer (PCa) patient diagnosis and risk assessment are key to ensure the best outcome. Currently, low- and favorable intermediate-risk PCa patients may be offered AS due to the indolent nature of the disease. Nonetheless, deciding between active surveillance and curative-intent treatment remains an intricate task, as a subset of these patients may eventually progress, enduring poorer prognosis. Herein, we sought to construct risk calculators based on cancer biomarkers, enabling more accurate discrimination among patients which may benefit from active interventions.Ki67 immunoscore, GSTP1 and KLF8 promoter methylation levels (me) were assessed in PCa tissues. Study endpoints included overall and biochemical recurrence-free (BCR) survival. Combination with relevant clinicopathological parameters allowed for construction of graphical calculating tools (nomograms).Higher Ki67 index correlated with worse BCR-free survival, whereas higher KLF8me levels were associated with improved overall survival, especially in patients with lower-grade tumors. GSTP1me levels had no prognostic value. Among prognostic models tested, a BCR-risk calculator - ProstARK (including Ki67 and clinicopathologic parameters) - disclosed 79.17% specificity, 66.67% sensitivity, 55% positive predictive value, 86% negative predictive value, and 75.76% accuracy. Similar results were found using an independent PCa biopsy cohort, validating its prognostication ability.Combining clinicopathologic features and Ki67 index into a risk calculator enables easy and accurate implementation of a novel PCa prognostication tool. This nomogram may be useful for a more accurate selection of patients for active surveillance protocols. Nonetheless, validation in a larger, multicentric, set of diagnostic PCa biopsies is mandatory for further confirmation of these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肿瘤侵袭和转移的主要原因之一是抗肛门凋亡。前列腺癌(PCa)的生化复发(BCR)是其远处转移的先兆。然而,失稳在PCa生化复发中的作用尚未完全阐明.
    根据TCGA和GeneCards数据库,使用差异表达分析来鉴定与失巢凋亡相关的基因。利用LASSO回归构建预后模型,单变量和多变量Cox回归分析。此外,应用基因表达综合数据集(GSE70770和GSE46602)作为验证群组。基因本体论,KEGG和GSVA用于探索生物学途径和分子机制。Further,使用CIBERSORT评估免疫谱,ssGSEA,和潮汐,同时通过GDSC数据库分析抗癌药物的敏感性。此外,使用在线数据库(人蛋白质图谱和肿瘤免疫单细胞中心)检查模型中的基因表达。
    发现了113个差异表达的失巢凋亡相关基因。四个基因(EEF1A2,RET,选择FOSL1,PCA3)构建预后模型。利用Cox回归分析的结果,我们将患者分为高危组和低危组.高危人群预后较差,最大AUC为0.897。此外,记忆B细胞的免疫浸润百分比较大,CD8T细胞,中性粒细胞,和M1巨噬细胞在高危组比在低危组观察到,而高风险组中激活的肥大细胞和树突状细胞的百分比较低。在高危人群中发现了增加的TIDE评分,提示ICI治疗的有效性降低。此外,化疗药物的IC50结果表明,低危组对大多数药物更敏感.最后,EEF1A2,RET,根据HPA网站,FOSL1在PCa病例中表达。TISCH数据库表明,这四种ARG可能有助于PCa的肿瘤微环境。
    我们利用四种ARG创建了一个风险模型,可以有效预测PCa患者的BCR风险。这项研究为BCR的PCa患者的风险分层和生存结局预测奠定了基础。
    UNASSIGNED: One of the primary reasons for tumor invasion and metastasis is anoikis resistance. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) serves as a harbinger of its distant metastasis. However, the role of anoikis in PCa biochemical recurrence has not been fully elucidated.
    UNASSIGNED: Differential expression analysis was used to identify anoikis-related genes based on the TCGA and GeneCards databases. Prognostic models were constructed utilizing LASSO regression, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Moreover, Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE70770 and GSE46602) were applied as validation cohorts. Gene Ontology, KEGG and GSVA were utilized to explore biological pathways and molecular mechanisms. Further, immune profiles were assessed using CIBERSORT, ssGSEA, and TIDE, while anti-cancer drugs sensitivity was analyzed by GDSC database. In addition, gene expressions in the model were examined using online databases (Human Protein Atlas and Tumor Immune Single-Cell Hub).
    UNASSIGNED: 113 differentially expressed anoikis-related genes were found. Four genes (EEF1A2, RET, FOSL1, PCA3) were selected for constructing a prognostic model. Using the findings from the Cox regression analysis, we grouped patients into groups of high and low risk. The high-risk group exhibited a poorer prognosis, with a maximum AUC of 0.897. Moreover, larger percentage of immune infiltration of memory B cells, CD8 Tcells, neutrophils, and M1 macrophages were observed in the high-risk group than those in the low-risk group, whereas the percentage of activated mast cells and dendritic cells in the high-risk group were lower. An increased TIDE score was founded in the high-risk group, suggesting reduced effectiveness of ICI therapy. Additionally, the IC50 results for chemotherapy drugs indicated that the low-risk group was more sensitive to most of the drugs. Finally, the genes EEF1A2, RET, and FOSL1 were expressed in PCa cases based on HPA website. The TISCH database suggested that these four ARGs might contribute to the tumor microenvironment of PCa.
    UNASSIGNED: We created a risk model utilizing four ARGs that effectively predicts the risk of BCR in PCa patients. This study lays the groundwork for risk stratification and predicting survival outcomes in PCa patients with BCR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与模拟PET/CT相比,数字正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)显示出增强的灵敏度和空间分辨率。本研究比较了数字和模拟PET/CT与[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11在前列腺切除术后发生生化复发(BCR)的前列腺癌患者中的诊断性能。40名经历过BCR的前列腺癌患者,定义为前列腺切除术后血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度超过0.2ng/mL,被前瞻性招募。根据血清PSA水平将这些患者分为三组。[68Ga]将Ga-PSMA-11注入每位患者,使用模拟和数字PET/CT扫描仪采集图像。模拟和数字PET/CT显示病变检出率相当(71.8%vs.74.4%),灵敏度(85.0%vs.90.0%),和阳性预测值(PPV,100.0%vs.100.0%)。然而,数字PET/CT检测到更多的病变(139vs.111),并具有更高的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax,14.3vs.10.3)和更高的卡帕指数(0.657vs.0.502)比模拟PET/CT,无论血清PSA水平。在模拟和数字PET/CT上,病变检出率和评分者间的一致性随着血清PSA水平的增加而增加。与模拟PET/CT相比,在前列腺切除术后发生BCR的前列腺癌患者中,数字PET/CT检测到更多的病灶,SUVmax更高,评估者之间的一致性更好。
    Digital positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown enhanced sensitivity and spatial resolution compared with analog PET/CT. The present study compared the diagnostic performance of digital and analog PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer patients who experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy. Forty prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR, defined as serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations exceeding 0.2 ng/mL after prostatectomy, were prospectively recruited. These patients were stratified into three groups based on their serum PSA levels. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was injected into each patient, and images were acquired using both analog and digital PET/CT scanners. Analog and digital PET/CT showed comparable lesion detection rate (71.8% vs. 74.4%), sensitivity (85.0% vs. 90.0%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 100.0% vs. 100.0%). However, digital PET/CT detected more lesions (139 vs. 111) and had higher maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax, 14.3 vs. 10.3) and higher kappa index (0.657 vs. 0.502) than analog PET/CT, regardless of serum PSA levels. On both analog and digital PET/CT, lesion detection rates and interrater agreement increased with increasing serum PSA levels. Compared with analog PET/CT, digital PET/CT detected more lesions with a higher SUVmax and better interrater agreement in prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR after prostatectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:68Ga-PSMAPET/CT在检测区域性和远处转移性复发性前列腺癌方面优于标准护理成像。我们研究的目的是评估68Ga-PSMAPET/CT在我们患者人群中的表现,使用新的PSMA-RADS2.0版。
    方法:用PSMA-RADS2.0版对128例患者进行68Ga-PSMAPET/CT扫描以检测RP后复发。为了分析检测率,PSMA-RADS3至5类被认为是“恶性肿瘤阳性”,1-2类被认为是“阴性”。
    结果:根据PSMA-RADSv2.0,我们将患者分类如下:23例无PSMA-RADS患者,因为它们是阴性的;PSMA-RADS1:10例;PSMA-RADS2:4例;PSMA-RADS3A:11例;PSMA-RADS3B:2例;
    结论:68Ga-PSMAPET/CT的总检出率为71%。根据检查前的PSA水平将患者分为四组,我们获得了以下检出率:PSA<0.2ng/mL38%;0.2≤PSA<0.5ng/mL57%;0.5≤PSA≤1ng/mL77%;PSA>1ng/mL95%.
    结论:使用PSMA-RADS2.0版,我们获得了与最近文献相当的绝对和与不同PSA水平相关的检出率值。
    BACKGROUND: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is superior to standard-of-care imaging for detecting regional and distant metastatic recurrent prostate cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in our patient population, using the new PSMA-RADS version 2.0.
    METHODS: A total of 128 patients scanned with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detection of recurrence after RP were analyzed with PSMA-RADS version 2.0. For the analysis of the detection rate, categories PSMA-RADS 3 to 5 were considered as \"positive for malignancy\" and 1-2 as \"negative\".
    RESULTS: According to PSMA-RADS v2.0, we classified patients as follows: 23 patients without PSMA-RADS because they were negative; PSMA-RADS 1: 10 patients; PSMA-RADS 2: 4 patients; PSMA-RADS 3A: 11 patients; PSMA-RADS 3B: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 3C: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 3D: 2 patients; PSMA-RADS 4: 13 patients; PSMA-RADS 5: 61 patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 71%. By dividing the patients into fourgroups according to PSA level before examination, we obtained the following detection rates: PSA < 0.2 ng/mL 38%; 0.2 ≤ PSA < 0.5 ng/mL 57%; 0.5 ≤ PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL 77%; and PSA > 1 ng/mL 95%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using PSMA-RADS version 2.0, we obtained detection rate values comparable with recent literature both in absolute terms and in relation to different PSA levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    [18F]F-氟胆碱(18F-胆碱)PET/CT的低转移患者可以用转移定向治疗(MDT)进行治疗。这项研究的目的是结合从18F-胆碱PET/CT和临床数据中提取的影像组学参数,以建立能够预测MDT疗效的机器学习(ML)模型。
    方法:收集18F-胆碱PET/CT并接受MDT治疗的寡复发患者(≤5个病灶)。进行了每个患者和每个病变的分析,以MDT后2年生化复发(BCR)为参考标准。从18F-胆碱PET/CT提取的临床参数和影像组学特征(RFts)用于训练CT和PET图像的五个ML模型。计算了性能指标(即,曲线下面积-AUC;分类精度-CA)。
    结果:在29例患者中选择并分割了46个转移灶。经过2年的随访,有20例(69%)患者发生了MDT后的BCR。总的来说,从CT和PET数据集中选择了73和33个稳健的RFT,分别。PETML模型在MDT后区分BCR方面比CT模型表现出更好的性能,随机梯度下降(SGD)是最佳模型(AUC=0.95;CA=0.90)。
    结论:使用临床参数以及通过18F-胆碱PET/CT提取的CT和PETRFts建立的ML模型可以准确预测少发PCa患者MDT后的BCR。如果外部验证,ML模型可以改善用于MDT治疗的少复发PCa患者的选择。
    Oligometastatic patients at [18F]F-Fluorocholine (18F-choline) PET/CT may be treated with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). The aim of this study was to combine radiomic parameters extracted from 18F-choline PET/CT and clinical data to build machine learning (ML) models able to predict MDT efficacy.
    METHODS: Oligorecurrent patients (≤5 lesions) at 18F-choline PET/CT and treated with MDT were collected. A per-patient and per-lesion analysis was performed, using 2-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) after MDT as the standard of reference. Clinical parameters and radiomic features (RFts) extracted from 18F-choline PET/CT were used for training five ML Models for both CT and PET images. The performance metrics were calculated (i.e., Area Under the Curve-AUC; Classification Accuracy-CA).
    RESULTS: A total of 46 metastases were selected and segmented in 29 patients. BCR after MDT occurred in 20 (69%) patients after 2 years of follow-up. In total, 73 and 33 robust RFTs were selected from CT and PET datasets, respectively. PET ML Models showed better performances than CT Models for discriminating BCR after MDT, with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) being the best model (AUC = 0.95; CA = 0.90).
    CONCLUSIONS: ML Models built using clinical parameters and CT and PET RFts extracted via 18F-choline PET/CT can accurately predict BCR after MDT in oligorecurrent PCa patients. If validated externally, ML Models could improve the selection of oligorecurrent PCa patients for treatment with MDT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Aurora激酶A(AURKA)和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)都在肿瘤发生中起重要作用。然而,AURKA和TILs在甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)中的表达和预后价值尚未研究。收集
    137例MTC患者的手术标本和临床资料。通过免疫组织化学和苏木精-伊红染色定量AURKA表达和TIL浸润。随后,评估了MTC中AURKA表达和TIL浸润的预后价值。
    AURKA在多灶性肿瘤患者中高表达,颈淋巴结转移,和先进的TNM阶段,表明复发的可能性很高。AURKA还与TILs呈正相关(R=0.44,P<0.001)。AURKA的高表达和低数量的TIL(AURKAhigh/TILslow)被确定为生化复发(比值比:4.57,95%置信区间:1.54-14.66,P<0.01)和无复发生存(风险比:3.64,95%置信区间:1.52-8.71,P<0.001)的独立预后因素。AURKA和TILs的组合明显改善了MTC的生化复发(曲线下面积:0.751)和结构复发(曲线下面积:0.836)的预后价值。值得注意的是,AURKAhigh/TILslow对预测远处或不可切除的局部复发具有很高的价值,总体准确率为86.9%。
    AURKAhigh与MTC恶性肿瘤相关。AURKAhigh/TILslow的组合被确定为MTC的新的独立预后标志物,预测不治之症复发具有较高的准确性。
    UNASSIGNED: Aurora kinase A (AURKA) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are both known to play an essential role in tumorigenesis. However, the expression and prognostic value of the AURKA and TILs in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) have not yet been investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical specimens and clinical data of 137 patients diagnosed with MTC were collected. AURKA expression and TILs infiltration were quantified by immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin-eosin staining. Subsequently, the prognostic value of AURKA expression and TIL infiltration in MTC was evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: AURKA was highly expressed in patients with multifocal tumor, cervical lymph node metastasis, and an advanced TNM stage, indicating a high probability of recurrence. AURKA further exhibited a positive correlation with TILs (R = 0.44, P < 0.001). High expression of AURKA combined with a low numbers of TILs (AURKAhigh/TILslow) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence (odds ratio: 4.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-14.66, P < 0.01) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 3.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-8.71, P < 0.001). The combination of AURKA and TILs apparently improves the prognostic value for biochemical recurrence (area under the curve: 0.751) and structural recurrence (area under the curve: 0.836) of MTC. Notably, AURKAhigh/TILslow demonstrated a high value for prediction of distant or unresectable locoregional recurrence, with an overall accuracy of 86.9%.
    UNASSIGNED: AURKAhigh is associated with the MTC malignancy. The combination of AURKAhigh/TILslow was identified as novel independent prognostic marker in MTC, predicting incurable disease recurrence with high accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:考虑到前列腺癌(PCa)的年龄相关性以及cGAS-STING途径在衰老和癌症中的参与,我们旨在将PCa分类为不同的分子亚型,并从cGAS-STING通路的新角度鉴定关键基因.基于遗传学证据指导肿瘤靶向治疗的个性化干预具有重要意义。
    方法:纳入来自TCGA数据库的430例PCa患者。我们整合了29个参与cGAS-STING通路的关键基因,并分析了差异表达基因和无生化复发(BCR)生存相关基因。对肿瘤干性和异质性以及肿瘤微环境(TME)进行评估以揭示潜在的机制。
    结果:使用AURKB将PCa患者分为两种不同的亚型,TREX1、STAT6和亚型1的预后比亚型2差(HR:21.19,p<0.001)。这些发现在MSKCC2010队列中得到了验证。在亚型1和亚型2中,前十位的突变基因是MUC5B,DNAH9,SLC5A10,ZNF462,USP31,SIPA1L3,PLEC,HRAS,MYOM1和ITGB6。基因集变异分析显示E2F靶标在亚型1中高度富集,基因集富集分析显示碱基切除修复显著富集,细胞周期,和亚型1的DNA复制。TME评估表明,与亚型2相比,亚型1的T细胞滤泡辅助细胞水平明显更高,浆细胞水平更低。
    结论:由cGAS-STING途径介导的分子亚型和遗传风险评分可能有助于识别潜在的高危PCa患者,这些患者可能受益于针对cGAS-STING途径的药物治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Considering the age relevance of prostate cancer (PCa) and the involvement of the cGAS-STING pathway in aging and cancer, we aim to classify PCa into distinct molecular subtypes and identify key genes from the novel perspective of the cGAS-STING pathway. It is of significance to guide personalized intervention of cancer-targeting therapy based on genetic evidence.
    METHODS: The 430 patients with PCa from the TCGA database were included. We integrated 29 key genes involved in cGAS-STING pathway and analyzed differentially expressed genes and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival-related genes. The assessments of tumor stemness and heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment (TME) were conducted to reveal potential mechanisms.
    RESULTS: PCa patients were classified into two distinct subtypes using AURKB, TREX1, and STAT6, and subtype 1 had a worse prognosis than subtype 2 (HR: 21.19, p < 0.001). The findings were validated in the MSKCC2010 cohort. Among subtype 1 and subtype 2, the top ten mutation genes were MUC5B, DNAH9, SLC5A10, ZNF462, USP31, SIPA1L3, PLEC, HRAS, MYOM1, and ITGB6. Gene set variation analysis revealed a high enrichment of the E2F target in subtype 1, and gene set enrichment analysis showed significant enrichment of base excision repair, cell cycle, and DNA replication in subtype 1. TME evaluation indicated that subtype 1 had a significantly higher level of T cells follicular helper and a lower level of plasma cells than subtype 2.
    CONCLUSIONS: The molecular subtypes mediated by the cGAS-STING pathway and the genetic risk score may aid in identifying potentially high-risk PCa patients who may benefit from pharmacologic therapies targeting the cGAS-STING pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:17基因基因组前列腺评分(GPS)测试已在临床上用于预测前列腺癌的不良预后。在这个荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估17基因GPS在前列腺癌患者中的预后价值.
    方法:通过搜索PubMed,WebofScience,Embase数据库从成立到2023年12月1日。如果他们评估了17基因GPS与远处转移的关联,则认为这些研究是合格的。生化复发,或前列腺癌患者的前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)。为了估计预后价值,我们将高与低GPS组或每增加20个单位的GPS的校正风险比(HR)与95%置信区间(CI)合并.
    结果:7项队列研究报告了8篇文章,包括1,962名患者,符合资格标准。Meta分析显示GPS每增加20个单位与远处转移显著相关(HR2.99;95%CI1.97-4.53),生化复发(HR2.18;95%CI1.64-2.89),和PCSM(HR3.14;95%CI1.86-5.30)。此外,高GPS(>40分)患者发生远处转移的风险增加(HR5.22;95%CI3.72-7.31),生化复发(HR4.41;95%CI2.29-8.49),和PCSM(HR3.81;95%CI1.74-8.33)比GPS低(≤40点)。
    结论:较高的17基因GPS可显著预测远处转移,生化复发,和PCSM在男性临床局限性前列腺癌中的应用。然而,需要大规模多中心前瞻性研究来进一步验证这些发现.
    BACKGROUND: The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) test has been clinically employed to predict adverse prognosis in prostate cancer. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the 17-gene GPS in patients with prostate cancer.
    METHODS: Potentially relevant studies were obtained by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase databases from their inception to December 1, 2023. Studies were considered eligible if they evaluated the association of the 17-gene GPS with distant metastases, biochemical recurrence, or prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in prostate cancer patients. To estimate the prognostic value, we pooled the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the high versus low GPS group or per 20-unit increase in GPS.
    RESULTS: Seven cohort studies that reported on 8 articles comprising 1,962 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis showed that per 20-unit increase in GPS was significantly associated with distant metastases (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.97-4.53), biochemical recurrence (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.64-2.89), and PCSM (HR 3.14; 95% CI 1.86-5.30). Moreover, patients with high GPS (> 40 points) had an increased risk of distant metastases (HR 5.22; 95% CI 3.72-7.31), biochemical recurrence (HR 4.41; 95% CI 2.29-8.49), and PCSM (HR 3.81; 95% CI 1.74-8.33) than those with low GPS (≤ 40 points).
    CONCLUSIONS: A higher 17-gene GPS significantly predicts distant metastases, biochemical recurrence, and PCSM in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, large-scale multicenter prospective studies are necessary to further validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    18F-rhPSMA-7.3(18F-flotufolastat)是一种高亲和力前列腺特异性膜抗原靶向诊断放射性药物,用于前列腺癌患者的PET成像。这里,我们报告了SPOTLIGHT研究(NCT04186845)的发现,评估18F-flofufolastatPET/CT在鉴别经真实标准(SoT)证实的前列腺特异性膜抗原阳性病变方面的表现,治疗基线时前列腺癌生化复发且常规成像阴性的男性患者.方法:生化复发的男性静脉接受296MBq的18F-氟尿司他,然后在50-70分钟后进行PET/CT检查。18F-flotufolastatPET/CT检查结果由3名蒙面的中央阅读器进行评估,并使用组织病理学或随访证实的影像学检查(CT,MRI,骨扫描,或18F-fluciclovinePET/CT)作为SoT。本分析评估了所有基线常规影像学检查阴性的患者,接受18F-flofuolastatPET/CT,并通过组织病理学或随访证实性成像进行SoT验证以报告检出率(DR),即至少有1个PET阳性病灶的患者数量,除以可评估患者的数量,和验证DR(VDR),这是由SoT验证的至少1个真阳性病变的患者比例,所有患者扫描(PET阳性和PET阴性扫描)。根据治疗前计算DR和VDR并分层。报告多数阅读数据(≥2个读者之间的协议)。结果:总的来说,通过组织病理学或PET证实后成像对171例基线常规成像和SoT阴性的患者进行了评估。大多数人阅读,这些患者的总体18F-flofufolastatDR为95%(163/171;95%CI,91.0%-98.0%),171例患者中的110例至少有1例真阳性病变(VDR,64%;95%CI,56.7%-71.5%)。在前列腺切除术后组(133/171),8.3%的患者在前列腺床上有至少1个真阳性病变,28%在盆腔淋巴结,35%在其他网站。在接受放射治疗的人中(36/171),50%的患者前列腺检测结果为真阳性,8.3%在盆腔淋巴结,其他网站占36%。结论:在常规影像学检查阴性的患者中,18F-flofufolastat经常能识别真阳性前列腺癌病变。18F-flotufolastat可能有助于更好地定义疾病复发的部位,并告知抢救治疗决策比传统成像,可能导致结果的改善。
    18F-rhPSMA-7.3 (18F-flotufolastat) is a high-affinity prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted diagnostic radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging in patients with prostate cancer. Here, we report findings from the SPOTLIGHT study (NCT04186845), assessing the performance of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT for identifying prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive lesions confirmed by standard of truth (SoT) in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and negative conventional imaging at baseline. Methods: Men with biochemical recurrence received 296 MBq of 18F-flotufolastat intravenously and then underwent PET/CT 50-70 min later. 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT findings were evaluated by 3 masked central readers and verified using histopathology or follow-up confirmatory imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan, or 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT) as the SoT. The present analysis evaluated all patients who had negative conventional imaging at baseline, underwent 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT, and had SoT verification by histopathology or follow-up confirmatory imaging to report detection rate (DR), which is the number of patients with at least 1 PET-positive lesion, divided by the number of evaluable patients, and verified DR (VDR), which is the proportion of patients with at least 1 true-positive lesion as verified by SoT, of all patients scanned (PET-positive and PET-negative scans). DR and VDR were calculated and stratified according to prior therapy. Majority read data (agreement between ≥2 readers) are reported. Results: In total, 171 patients with negative baseline conventional imaging and SoT by histopathology or post-PET confirmatory imaging were evaluated. By majority read, the overall 18F-flotufolastat DR among these patients was 95% (163/171; 95% CI, 91.0%-98.0%), and 110 of 171 of these patients had at least 1 true-positive lesion identified (VDR, 64%; 95% CI, 56.7%-71.5%). In the postprostatectomy group (133/171), 8.3% of patients had at least 1 true-positive lesion in the prostate bed, 28% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 35% in other sites. Among those who had received radiotherapy (36/171), 50% of patients had true-positive detections in the prostate, 8.3% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 36% in other sites. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat frequently identified true-positive prostate cancer lesions in patients with negative conventional imaging. 18F-flotufolastat may help to better define sites of disease recurrence and inform salvage therapy decisions than does conventional imaging, potentially leading to improved outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    卵巢癌是女性生殖系统常见的恶性肿瘤,经常保持隐藏,直到它达到一个高级阶段。标准治疗方案包括卵巢癌细胞减灭术加术后巩固化疗和维持治疗,尽管它有很高的复发率。在治疗期间,化疗会导致骨髓抑制,一种称为化疗诱导的骨髓抑制(CIM)的疾病。这种抑制可能需要剂量减少或化疗治疗周期延迟。在严重的情况下,CIM会导致感染,发烧,以及对患者生命的潜在危害。这里,我们报道了1例卵巢恶性肿瘤生化复发的女性患者,该患者接受了化疗联合Trilaciclib治疗,先前的围手术期化疗后发生严重的M。化疗前静脉注射Trilaciclib,这显著减轻了化疗的副作用,减少严重CIM的发生,提高患者的生活质量,减轻了住院的经济负担。我们希望该病例的回顾性分析可以为某些恶性肿瘤患者在化疗期间预防和治疗严重的M提供参考。最终使更多的肿瘤患者受益。
    Ovarian cancer is a prevalent malignant tumor of the female reproductive system, often remaining concealed until it reaches an advanced stage. The standard treatment protocol includes cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer plus postoperative consolidation chemotherapy and maintenance therapy, although it carries a high recurrence rate. During the treatment period, chemotherapy can lead to bone marrow suppression, a condition known as Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression (CIM). This suppression may necessitate dose reduction or chemotherapy treatment cycle delay. In severe cases, CIM can result in infection, fever, and potential harm to the patient\'s life. Here, we report a case of a female patient with ovarian malignant tumor of biochemical recurrence who treated with chemotherapy combined with Trilaciclib, following previous perioperative chemotherapy with occurrence of severe CIM. It involves an intravenous injection of Trilaciclib before chemotherapy, which significantly abates the side effects of chemotherapy, reduces the occurrence of severe CIM, improves the patients\' quality of life, and decreases the economic burden of hospitalization. We hope that this retrospective analysis of the case may serve as a reference in preventing and treating severe CIM during chemotherapy in some patients with malignant tumors, ultimately benefiting more patients with tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号