UNASSIGNED: Masked hypertension is associated with target organ damage (TOD) and adverse health outcomes, but whether antihypertensive treatment improves TOD in patients with masked hypertension is unproven.
UNASSIGNED: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 15 Chinese hospitals, untreated outpatients aged 30-70 years with an office blood pressure (BP) of <140/<90 mm Hg and 24-h, daytime or nighttime ambulatory BP of ≥130/≥80, ≥135/≥85, or ≥120/≥70 mm Hg were enrolled. Patients had ≥1 sign of TOD: electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) ≥1400 cm/s, or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥3.5 mg/mmol in women and ≥2.5 mg/mmol in men. Exclusion criteria included secondary hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥176.8 μmol/L, and cardiovascular disease within 6 months of screening. After stratification for centre, sex and the presence of nighttime hypertension, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive antihypertensive treatment or placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to group assignment. Active treatment consisted of allisartan starting at 80 mg/day, to be increased to 160 mg/day at month 2, and to be combined with amlodipine 2.5 mg/day at month 4, if the ambulatory BP remained uncontrolled. Matching placebos were used likewise in the control group. The primary endpoint was the improvement of TOD, defined as normalisation of baPWV, ACR or LVH or a ≥20% reduction in baPWV or ACR over the 48-week follow-up. The intention-to-treat analysis included all randomised patients, the per-protocol analysis patients who fully adhered to the protocol, and the safety analysis all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02893358.
UNASSIGNED: Between February 14, 2017, and October 31, 2020, 320 patients (43.1% women; mean age ± SD 53.7 ± 9.7 years) were enrolled. Baseline office and 24-h BP averaged 130 ± 6.0/81 ± 5.9 mm Hg and 136 ± 8.6/84 ± 6.1 mm Hg, and the prevalence of elevated baPWV, ACR and LVH were 97.5%, 12.5%, and 7.8%, respectively. The 24-h BP decreased on average (±SE) by 10.1 ± 0.9/6.4 ± 0.5 mm Hg in 153 patients on active treatment and by 1.3 ± 0.9/1.0 ± 0.5 mm Hg in 167 patients on placebo. Improvement of TOD occurred in 79 patients randomised to active treatment and in 49 patients on placebo: 51.6% (95% CI 43.7%, 59.5%) versus 29.3% (22.1, 36.5%; p < 0.0001). Per-protocol and subgroup analyses were confirmatory. Adverse events were generally mild and occurred in 38 (25.3%) and 43 (26.4%) patients randomised to active treatment and placebo, respectively (p = 0.83).
UNASSIGNED: Our results suggest that antihypertensive treatment improves TOD in patients with masked hypertension, highlighting the need of treatment. However, the long-term benefit in preventing cardiovascular complications still needs to be established.
UNASSIGNED: Salubris China.

Introduction Hypertension is a leading risk factor for the development of cardiovascular and metabolic derangements. In patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), hypertension is one of the cornerstones showing high variability which is detected in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Fragmented ventricular complexes on ECG are seen as hypertensives and are a viable and easy measure of myocardial fibrosis even in the absence of obvious hypertrophy. Aim The present study was undertaken to study the blood pressure variability in patients of MetS with fragmented QRS (fQRS) versus normal ventricular complexes (QRS). Results Out of 100 patients, 22 (22%) had fQRS complexes. Hypertension and diabetes were the most prevalent associated in both groups but a difference was seen with coronary artery disease, which was significantly associated in the fQRS group (8.97% vs 95.45%, p<0.001) as compared to the non-fQRS group. Significant differences were observed in waist circumference (p=0.019), triglyceride (p=0.006) and left ventricular ejection fraction (p<0.001) between the two groups. There was a marked difference (p<0.05) between heart rate variability during day and night time between normal and fQRS sub-groups, being higher in the latter. A similar pattern of change was observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressures and associated dipping. Conclusion Significant differences exist between heart rate and blood pressure changes in patients with fQRS of MetS, thus making fQRS a potent indicator of cardiovascular status.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines suggest similar blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with and without diabetes and recommend ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to diagnose and classify hypertension. It was explored whether different levels of ambulatory and office BP and different hypertension phenotypes associate with differences of risk in diabetes and no diabetes.
METHODS: This analysis assessed outcome data from the Spanish ABPM Registry in 59 124 patients with complete available data. The associations between office, mean, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP with the risk in patients with or without diabetes were explored. The effects of diabetes on mortality in different hypertension phenotypes, i.e. sustained hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and masked hypertension, compared with normotension were studied. Analyses were done with Cox regression analyses and adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 59 124 patients were recruited from 223 primary care centres in Spain. The majority had an office systolic BP >140 mmHg (36 700 patients), and 23 128 (40.6%) patients were untreated. Diabetes was diagnosed in 11 391 patients (19.2%). Concomitant cardiovascular (CV) disease was present in 2521 patients (23.1%) with diabetes and 4616 (10.0%) without diabetes. Twenty-four-hour mean, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were associated with increased risk in diabetes and no diabetes, while in office BP, there was no clear association with no differences with and without diabetes. While the relative association of BP to CV death risk was similar in diabetes compared with no diabetes (mean interaction P = .80, daytime interaction P = .97, and nighttime interaction P = .32), increased event rates occurred in diabetes for all ABPM parameters for CV death and all-cause death. White-coat hypertension was not associated with risk for CV death (hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.03) and slightly reduced risk for all-cause death in no diabetes (hazard ratio 0.89; confidence interval 0.81-0.98) but without significant interaction between diabetes and no diabetes. Sustained hypertension and masked hypertension in diabetes and no diabetes were associated with even higher risk. There were no significant interactions in hypertensive phenotypes between diabetes and no diabetes and CV death risk (interaction P = .26), while some interaction was present for all-cause death (interaction P = .043) and non-CV death (interaction P = .053).
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes increased the risk for all-cause death, CV, and non-CV death at every level of office and ambulatory BP. Masked and sustained hypertension confer to the highest risk, while white-coat hypertension appears grossly neutral without interaction of relative risk between diabetes and no diabetes. These results support recommendations of international guidelines for strict BP control and using ABPM for classification and assessment of risk and control of hypertension, particularly in patients with diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Not applicable.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure variability is an emerging risk factor for dementia, independent and oftentimes beyond mean blood pressure levels. Recent evidence from interventional cohorts with rigorously controlled mean blood pressure levels suggest blood pressure variability over months to years remains a risk for dementia, but no prior studies have investigated relationships with blood pressure variability over shorter time periods.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential effect of ambulatory blood pressure variability on the rate of cognitive outcomes under intensive vs standard blood pressure lowering.
METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the randomized, controlled, open-label Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial clinical trial.
METHODS: Multisite Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.
METHODS: 793 participants at increased risk for cardiovascular disease and without history of dementia at study randomization.
METHODS: Standard (<140 mmHg systolic blood pressure target) vs intensive (<120 mmHg systolic blood pressure target) lowering of mean blood pressure.
METHODS: 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 27 months after treatment randomization (standard vs intensive) and follow-up cognitive testing. Intraindividual blood pressure variability was calculated as the average real variability over 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods. Participants were categorized into 3 adjudicated clinical outcomes: no cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, probable dementia. Cox proportional hazards models examined the potential effect of ambulatory blood pressure variability on the rate of cognitive outcomes under intensive vs standard blood pressure lowering. Associations with mean blood pressure were also explored.
RESULTS: Higher systolic 24-hour blood pressure variability was associated with increased risk for probable dementia in the standard group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.56 [95% CI 1.16, 5.62], p = 0.019) but not in the intensive group (HR: 0.54 [95% CI 0.24, 1.23], p = 0.141). Similar findings were observed with daytime systolic blood pressure variability but not nighttime blood pressure variability. Mean blood pressure was not associated with cognitive outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher systolic 24-hour and daytime blood pressure variability via ambulatory monitoring is associated with risk for dementia under standard blood pressure treatment. Findings support prior evidence that blood pressure variability remains a risk for dementia despite strict control of mean blood pressure levels.

This research examines the association between blood pressure variability (BPV) and renal damage in a cohort of 129 primary aldosteronism (PA) patients, employing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for comparative analysis with individuals diagnosed with essential hypertension (EH). The study reveals that PA patients exhibited significantly elevated levels of cystatin C and urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio (UACR). Additionally, a higher prevalence of non-dipping blood pressure patterns in PA patients suggests an increased risk of circadian blood pressure regulation disturbances. Notably, while most BPV indices were comparable between the two groups, the standard deviation of 24-h weighted diastolic blood pressure was markedly lower in the PA cohort, distinguishing it as a unique variable. Through multiple linear regression analysis, the duration of hypertension, angiotensin II concentrations, and daytime systolic blood pressure standard deviation emerged as significant determinants of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in PA patients. Furthermore, UACR was significantly influenced by variables including the 24-h weighted standard deviation (wSD) of systolic BP, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, nocturnal systolic BP peaks, aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR), and total cholesterol, with the most pronounced association observed with the 24-h wSD of systolic BP (β = 0.383).The study also found significant correlations between the 24-h wSD of systolic BP, ARR, HbA1c, serum potassium levels, and 24-h urinary microalbumin, underscoring the critical role of the 24-h wSD of systolic BP (β = 0.267). These findings underscore the imperative of an integrated management strategy for PA, addressing the intricate interconnections among metabolic abnormalities, blood pressure variability, and renal health outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There have been few studies evaluating the control of hypertension (HT) in children. This study aimed to assess the control of HT using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and to compare the parameters between the uncontrolled HT and controlled HT groups.
METHODS: Hypertensive patients aged ≥ 5 years who underwent ABPM to assess the control of HT were enrolled. Demographics, office blood pressure (BP), ABPM, and echocardiographic data were collected. Controlled HT was defined using a BP goal recommended by the 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines.
RESULTS: There were 108 patients (64.8% males) with a mean age of 14.3 years and 51.9% had primary HT. Controlled HT was detected in 41.1% and 33.3% by office BP and ABPM, respectively. Based on ABPM, there was a greater prevalence of controlled HT in the primary HT than the secondary HT group (44.6% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.01). In the primary HT group, BMI z-score at the last follow-up had a significant decrease in the controlled HT than the uncontrolled HT group (-0.39 vs. 0.01, P = 0.032). Primary HT was negatively associated with uncontrolled HT by ABPM. In addition, ABPM showed greater sensitivity (77.8% vs. 55.8%) and negative predictive value (80.9% vs. 70.8%) to predict LVH than those of office BP measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: Only one-third of patients achieved the BP goal by ABPM and most were in the primary HT group. Weight reduction is an important measure of BP control in patients with primary HT to attenuate the risk of LVH.

UNASSIGNED: Abnormal diurnal patterns of blood pressure (BP) on ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), defined by reduced BP dipping or elevated nighttime BP, are associated with increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Psychological stress is associated with abnormal diurnal patterns of BP. Exposure to an acute stressor (e.g., mental stress task) normally increases urinary sodium excretion. However, some individuals have sodium retention after stress provocation, revealing substantial between-person variability in the degree of stress-induced sodium excretion. Prior research suggests urinary sodium excretion that does not occur during the daytime may shift toward the nighttime, accompanied by an increase in nighttime BP. Associations between psychological stress and the diurnal patterns of sodium excretion and BP are not yet fully understood.
UNASSIGNED: The study is conducted in both the laboratory and naturalistic environment with a multi-racial/ethnic sample of 211 healthy adults. In the laboratory, change in urinary sodium excretion in response to mental stress tasks is examined with pre-/post-stress assessments of sodium excretion. Changes in angiotensin-II, catecholamines, BP, heart rate, endothelin-1, and cortisol are also assessed. In the 24-hour naturalistic environment, the diurnal patterns of sodium excretion and systolic BP are assessed as daytime-to-nighttime ratio of sodium excretion and ABPM, respectively. Ecological momentary assessments of perceived stress are also collected.
UNASSIGNED: The SABRE study investigates previously unexplored associations between stress-induced urinary excretion in the laboratory, diurnal patterns of sodium excretion and BP in the naturalistic environment, and ecological stress. It has high potential to advance our understanding of the role of psychological stress in hypertension.

Many individuals have different blood pressure (BP) values in the office setting compared to that outside the office setting. Therefore, confirming hypertension based on office BP (OBP) measurement alone can lead to misdiagnosis and mistreatment. The limitations of OBP measurement have led to the complementary use of out-of-office BP measurements, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). This review aims to describe when and how ABPM or HBPM can be used to accurately diagnose and treat hypertension. Both methods should be performed using validated automated oscillometric devices. To minimize user errors, ABPM should be performed using standard techniques, whereas HBPM requires patient education regarding proper BP measurements. ABPM provides short-term comprehensive information on BP, including daytime, nighttime, morning, and 24-h BP. Therefore, ABPM is recommended for the initial diagnosis of hypertension, assessment of BP phenotypes and circadian patterns, and detection of nocturnal hypertension, Furthermore, ABPM plays a critical role in confirming true resistant hypertension thereby excluding pseudo-resistant hypertension. However, it is not suitable for long-term follow-up of patients with hypertension. In contrast, HBPM involves multiple BP readings taken at specific times during the day and evening over a long period. Therefore, HBPM is recommended for diagnosing hypertension and assessing BP phenotypes. However, this method has limitations in measuring nocturnal BP and circadian BP patterns. HBPM is preferred over ABPM for the long-term follow-up of patients with hypertension. This approach improves patient adherence to treatment and ultimately enhances the rate of control of hypertension. Additionally, both methods play an important role in diagnosing and treating white coat hypertension during pregnancy. Consequently, out-of-office BP measurement is essential to prevent the misdiagnosis and mistreatment of hypertension. However, these two methods offer different information regarding the BP status of an individual, and they indeed show discrepancies in the diagnosis of hypertensive phenotypes. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the advantages and limitations of both ABPM and HBPM to ensure their appropriate use in clinical practice.

Although changes in dietary sodium intake alter blood pressure (BP) in salt-sensitive individuals, pathophysiological mechanisms are still unknown. It has been reported that uromodulin is involved in sodium tubular transport, and genome-wide association studies pointed to UMOD gene as one of the most important gene candidates for arterial hypertension. Our aim was to analyze urinary uromodulin, salt intake and BP in 326 young middle-aged subjects (mean age 36±8 years, 49.4% male). In a subgroup of 175 individuals, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiogram were performed. Uromodulin was determined by ELISA. According to the JNC-7 criteria, subjects were classified as optimal BP (n=103, men 72%), prehypertension (PHT) (n=143, men 43%) and hypertension (HT) (n= 80, men 38%). There were no differences in age, salt intake, estimated glomerular filtration rate, sodium excretion and uromodulin among BP groups. However, in PHT subjects, uromodulin was positively associated with fractional sodium excretion and negatively with 24-h sodium excretion and diastolic BP dip. These findings point to the effect of uromodulin on sodium reabsorption along the nephron and consequently circadian BP alteration in prehypertensives.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether short-term blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with target organ damage in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS: A cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted among 3442 non-dialysis CKD patients hospitalized in the department of Nephrology of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from November 2017 to July 2022 and collected the demographic, laboratory, clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure data, and short-term BPV assessed by the weighted standard deviation (wSD) derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Multivariate logistic analyses were used to evaluate the independent effects between short-term BPV and subclinical target organ damage, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), abnormal carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and albuminuria.
RESULTS: The average age of the participants was 47.53 ± 14.06 years and 56% of participants were male. The baseline eGFR was 69 mL/min/1.73 m2. Based on the tertile distribution of wSD according to equal numbers, patients were divided into three categories with T1(< 9.66 mmHg), T2(9.66-12.23 mmHg), and T3(> 12.23 mmHg) of SBPV; T1(< 8.17 mmHg), T2(8.17-9.93 mmHg), and T3(> 9.93 mmHg) of DBPV. The participants with the higher wSD group had a higher prevalence of target organ damage than their counterparts (P-trend < 0.05). An increasing trend in short-term variability was present with advancing CKD stages (P-trend < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analyses results showed that the odds ratio (OR) of SBP wSD was (1.07 [1.03,1.11], P < 0.001) for LVH, (1.04 [1.01,1.07, P = 0.029) for abnormal CIMT, (1.05 [1.02,1.08], P = 0.002) for low eGFR, and (1.06 [1.02,1.09], P = 0.002) for albuminuria; The OR of DBP wSD was (1.07 [1.02,1.12], P = 0.005) for LVH, (1.05 [1.01,1.09], P = 0.028) for abnormal CIMT, (1.05 [1.01,1.09], P = 0.022) for low eGFR, and (1.05 [1.01,1.10], P = 0.025) for albuminuria when adjusted for confounding factors and mean BP.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, short-term BPV is associated with target organ damage, and irresponsible of average blood pressure levels, in Chinese non-dialysis CKD participants.