Airway Management

气道管理
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    头颈部创伤可导致困难的气道管理。一名25岁的男性在发生摩托车事故后到达急诊室时需要紧急气管插管。尽管存在正常的二氧化碳图,但计算机断层扫描显示气管开放,气管导管远端的气管外位置,和广泛的皮下气肿。将管重新定向到气管中,并通过手术修复气管损伤。这种情况突出表明,正常二氧化碳描记器的存在并不一定意味着气管导管的远端位于气道内。
    Head and neck trauma can result in difficult airway management. A 25-year-old male required emergency tracheal intubation on arrival to the emergency department following a motorbike accident. Despite the presence of a normal capnography a computed tomography scan demonstrated a tracheal opening, an extra-tracheal position of the distal end of the tracheal tube, and extensive subcutaneous emphysema. The tube was re-directed into the trachea and the tracheal injury was surgically repaired. This case highlights that the presence of a normal capnograph does not necessarily mean that the distal end of the tracheal tube resides within the airway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了头部旋转对i-gel插入的首次尝试成功率的影响,旨在减轻重力对舌头的影响,并减少设备和舌头之间的阻力。
    方法:将成人手术患者随机分为标准组和头部旋转技术组。在头部旋转技术组中,在插入i-gel之前,患者的头部最大限度地向左旋转。主要终点是首次尝试成功率。次要终点包括两次尝试中的成功率(使用分配的技术),在两次尝试内成功放置i-gel所需的时间,以及第三次尝试的成功率(使用相反的技术)。
    结果:在158名患者中,头部旋转技术组的首次尝试成功率(60/80,75.0%)明显高于标准技术组(45/78,57.7%;P=0.021).两组之间的两次尝试成功率相似(95.0%vs.91.0%,P=0.326)。在头部旋转技术中,成功放置i-gel所需的时间明显较短(平均值[SD],13.4[3.7]svs.16.3[7.8]s;P=0.030)。当磁头旋转技术失败时,标准技术在所有情况下也失败了(n=4),而头部旋转技术在标准技术失败的7名患者中有5名成功。
    结论:头部旋转技术显着提高了首次尝试的成功率,并减少了成功插入i-gel所需的时间。当标准技术失败时,这是有效的。头部旋转技术可以是用于i-gel插入的有效的主要或替代方法。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05201339)。
    BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of head rotation on the first-attempt success rate of i-gel insertion, aiming to alleviate the effect of gravity on the tongue and reduce resistance between the device and the tongue.
    METHODS: Adult surgical patients were randomized to standard and head rotation technique groups. In the head rotation technique group, patients\' heads were maximally rotated to the left before i-gel insertion. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt success rate. Secondary endpoints included the success rate within two attempts (using the allocated technique), time required for successful i-gel placement within two attempts, and success rate at the third attempt (using the opposite technique).
    RESULTS: Among 158 patients, the head rotation technique group showed a significantly higher first-attempt success rate (60/80, 75.0%) compared to the standard technique group (45/78, 57.7%; P = 0.021). The success rate within two attempts was similar between the groups (95.0% vs. 91.0%, P = 0.326). The time required for successful i-gel placement was significantly shorter in the head rotation technique (mean [SD], 13.4 [3.7] s vs. 16.3 [7.8] s; P = 0.030). When the head rotation technique failed, the standard technique also failed in all cases (n = 4), whereas the head rotation technique succeeded in five out of the seven patients where the standard technique failed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The head rotation technique significantly improved the first-attempt success rate and reduced the time required for successful i-gel insertion. It was effective when the standard technique failed. The head rotation technique may be an effective primary or alternative method for i-gel insertion.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05201339).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    显然,了解气道管理状况可能有助于降低风险和改善临床实践。鉴于这些事实,继2016年全国气道调查之后,我们的团队对中国大陆地区的气道管理现状进行了第二次调查.全国调查于2022年11月7日至11月28日进行。一份电子调查被送到新青年麻醉论坛,中国麻醉师通过微信完成问卷。共有3783名受访者完成了调查,有效率为72.14%。到目前为止,2022年,34.84%的麻醉师由于气道困难而取消或推迟了至少一次手术。对于预期的困难气道管理,66.11%的医师会在镇静和局部麻醉下选择清醒插管,而寻求帮助的百分比与2016年的调查相比有所下降。当遇到紧急情况时,74.20%的受访者更喜欢使用针状环切开术,尽管只有不到四分之一的人真正做到了。有困难气道训练经验的麻醉医师达到72.96%,三级医院的参与者与其他级别医院的参与者之间的参与存在显着差异(P<0.001)。视频喉镜,喉罩,灵活的插管范围为97.18%,95.96%,和62.89%,分别。此外,由困难气道引起的脑损伤或死亡的百分比显着降低。该研究可能是了解中国气道管理现状的最佳参考。揭示了当前的进步和不足。未来气道管理的重点仍然是培训和教育。
    Apparently, understanding airway management status may help to reduce risk and improve clinical practice. Given these facts, our team conducted a second survey on the current status of airway management for mainland China following our 2016 national airway survey. The national survey was conducted from November 7 to November 28, 2022. An electronic survey was sent to the New Youth Anesthesia Forum, where Chinese anesthesiologists completed the questionnaire via WeChat. A total of 3783 respondents completed the survey, with a response rate of 72.14%. So far, in 2022, 34.84% of anesthesiologists canceled or delayed surgery at least once due to difficult airway. For the anticipated difficult airway management, 66.11% of physicians would choose awake intubation under sedation and topical anesthesia, while the percentage seeking help has decreased compared to the 2016 survey. When encountering an emergency, 74.20% of respondents prefer to use the needle cricothyrotomy, albeit less than a quarter have actually performed it. Anesthesiologists with difficult airway training experience reached 72.96%, with a significant difference in participation between participants in Tier 3 hospitals and those in other levels of hospitals (P < 0.001). The videolaryngoscope, laryngeal mask, and flexible intubation scope were equipped at 97.18%, 95.96%, and 62.89%, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of brain damage or death caused by difficult airways was significantly decreased. The study may be the best reference for understanding the current status of airway management in China, revealing the current advancements and deficiencies. The future focus of airway management remains on training and education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Securing an airway enables the oxygenation and ventilation of the lungs and is a potentially life-saving medical procedure. Adverse and critical events are common during airway management, particularly in neonates and infants. The multifactorial reasons for this include patient-dependent, user-dependent and also external factors. The recently published joint ESAIC/BJA international guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants are summarized with a focus on the clinical application. The original publication of the guidelines focussed on naming formal recommendations based on systematically documented evidence, whereas this summary focusses particularly on the practicability of their implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Sicherung der Atemwege ermöglicht die Oxygenierung und Ventilation der Lungen und stellt eine potenziell lebensrettende medizinische Maßnahme dar. Insbesondere bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen kommt es gehäuft zu unerwünschten und kritischen Ereignissen während des Atemwegsmanagements. Die multifaktoriellen Gründe dafür umfassen patientenabhängige, anwenderabhängige, aber auch externe Faktoren. Im Folgenden wird die neu erschienene internationale Leitlinie zur Atemwegssicherung bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen fokussierend auf die klinische Anwendung zusammengefasst. Während die Originalpublikation der Leitlinie darauf fokussiert, auf Basis der systematisch erfassten Evidenz formale Empfehlungen zu benennen, stellt diese Zusammenfassung v. a. die Praktikabilität ihrer Umsetzung in den Fokus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    声门上装置彻底改变了当前的气道管理实践。我们比较了最近推出的BlockBuster™喉罩气道与i-gel®在全身麻醉下的成年患者中的临床性能。
    在机构道德清理之后,本研究是对美国麻醉医师协会的62例患者进行的,这些患者的身体状态为1和2,年龄在20~60岁之间,在全身麻醉下.患者被随机分配到i-gel®(I)和BlockBuster™(B)组(每组31人)。成功插入的时间,插入成功率,易于插入,口咽渗漏压力(OLPs),并对并发症进行了评估。
    I组的器械平均插入时间(13.52±2.58s)少于B组(14.10±2.04s),这既无临床意义也无统计学意义(P=0.330)。发现B组的OLP(24.52±2.77cm的H2O)明显高于I组(20.81±2.56cm的H2O),P<0.001。总体插入和首次尝试成功率相似(i-gel®31/31[100%]和29/31[93.5%],BlockBuster™31/31[100%]和29/31[93.5%],分别)。两种设备的插入容易性(P=0.684)和并发症(P=0.782)具有可比性。
    两种设备对于全身麻醉下的成人气道管理都是有用且有效的。具有较高的OLP和相当的插入时间,与i-gel®相比,使用BlockBuster™可进一步降低误吸风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Supraglottic devices have revolutionized the current practice of airway management. We compared the clinical performance of a recently introduced BlockBuster™ Laryngeal mask airway with i-gel® in adult patients under general anesthesia.
    UNASSIGNED: Following Institutional ethical clearance, the present study was conducted on 62 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 of either sex in the age group of 20-60 years under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to i-gel® (I) and BlockBuster™ (B) groups (31 per group). Time for successful insertion, insertion success rate, ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressures (OLPs), and complications were assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean insertion time of device was less in Group I (13.52 ± 2.58 s) than that of Group B (14.10 ± 2.04 s), which was neither clinically nor statistically significant (P = 0.330). OLP in Group B (24.52 ± 2.77 cm of H2O) was found to be significantly higher compared to Group I (20.81 ± 2.56 cm of H2O) with P < 0.001. Overall insertion and first attempt success was similar (i-gel® 31/31 [100%] and 29/31 [93.5%] and BlockBuster™ 31/31 [100%] and 29/31 [93.5%], respectively). Ease of insertion (P = 0.684) and complications (P = 0.782) of both the devices were comparable.
    UNASSIGNED: Both the devices are useful and effective for airway management in adult under general anesthesia. Having a high OLP and comparable insertion time, risk of aspiration may be further reduced with the use of BlockBuster™ in comparison to i-gel®.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    路德维希心绞痛是一种严重的威胁生命的颌面部感染状况,由于牙源性原因,临床上通过其临床体征和症状进行诊断。气道管理和早期手术减压是主要的停留管理。路德维希心绞痛的死亡率仍然是多变量。关于这种疾病的死亡率的文献很少。
    这项回顾性研究的目的是描述其特征,急诊(ED)合并疾病患者的可能死亡原因和死亡率,这些患者随后被确诊为路德维希心绞痛。
    研究于2011年1月至2022年12月在三级护理教学医院的颌面外科进行。该研究纳入了17例临床诊断为路德维希心绞痛患者的数据。合并症,牙本质原因的来源,评估插管方式和疾病的结局。
    使用Fishers精确检验对分类变量进行比较。P值<0.7被认为是统计学上显著的。结果表明,在17例患者中,有12例患者(70.5%),男性7例,女性5例,有合并症,死亡并发症4例(23.5%),都有合并症。
    得出的结论是,相关的合并症在疾病的进展和结果中具有重要作用,并且死亡发生率在具有相关合并症的病例中更为常见。
    UNASSIGNED: Ludwig\'s angina is a serious life-threatening infective condition of maxillofacial region due to odontogenic origin which is clinically diagnosed by its clinical signs and symptoms. Airway management and early surgical decompression is the main stay of management. The mortality rates in Ludwig\'s angina remains multivariate. There is a paucity in literature regarding the mortality rates of this disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Aim of this retrospective study is to describes the characteristics, probable cause of death and mortality rates of patients with co-morbidities presenting to the emergency department (ED) who were subsequently admitted with a primary diagnosis of Ludwig\'s angina.
    UNASSIGNED: Study was conducted in the department of maxillofacial surgery in a tertiary care teaching hospital from Jan 2011 to Dec 2022. Data of 17 patients who were clinically diagnosed as Ludwig\'s angina were included in the study. The comorbidity, source of odontongenic cause, mode of intubation and the outcome of the disease were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: Comparison of categorical variables was done using Fishers exact test. A p-value of <0.7 was considered statistically significant. The results suggested that Out of 17 patients 12 patients (70.5%), 7 male and 5 females had comorbidities and four cases (23.5%) had complication of death, all having co-morbidities.
    UNASSIGNED: It concludes that associated comorbidity has a significant role in progress and outcome of the disease and incidence of death is more common in cases having associated comorbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然医疗急救小组(MET)已经被广泛引入,缺乏关于专门的强化人员配备对MET的重要性的研究。进行单中心回顾性前后研究。本研究包括需要通过MET在普通病房进行紧急气道管理的恶化患者。我们根据MET中专门的强化人员的存在来划分研究期:(1)非人员期间(从2016年1月到2018年2月,n=971)和(2)人员期间(从2018年3月到2019年12月,n=651),并比较了两个时期之间的紧急气道管理相关变量和结果。在1622名患者中,平均年龄为63.0岁,男性患者占64.2%(n=1042).在员工期间,首次通过成功率显着提高(非员工为85.9%,员工为89.2%;P=.047)。在人员配备期间,对快速顺序插管的依从性增加(9.4%vs34.4%;P<.001),声带更明显开放(P<.001)。SpO2/FiO2比值(中位数[四分位数间距],125[113-218]vs136[116-234];P=.007)和ROX指数(4.6[3.4-7.6]vs5.1[3.6-8.5];P=.013)在插管期间较高,这表明插管的决定是早些时候做出的。插管后低氧血症较少发生在工作人员期间(7.2%vs4.2%,P=.018)。在多变量分析中,操作者的等级是首过成功的强预测因子(调整后的OR[95%CI],2.280[1.639-3.172];P<.001对于研究员和5.066[1.740-14.747];P<.001对于员工,相对于居民)。在我们的医院里,为MET配备专门的重症医师与普通病房改善紧急气道管理相关.需要鼓励为MET配备重症医师,以提高MET的性能和患者的安全性。
    Although medical emergency teams (METs) have been widely introduced, studies on the importance of a dedicated intensivist staffing to METs are lacking. A single-center retrospective before-and-after study was performed. Deteriorating patients who required emergency airway management in general wards by MET were included in this study. We divided the study period according to the presence of a dedicated intensivist staff in MET: (1) non-staffed period (from January 2016 to February 2018, n = 971) and (2) staffed period (from March 2018 to December 2019, n = 651), and compared emergency airway management-related variables and outcomes between the periods. Among 1622 patients included, mean age was 63.0 years and male patients were 64.2% (n = 1042). The first-pass success rate was significantly increased in the staffed period (85.9% in the non-staffed vs 89.2% in the staffed; P = .047). Compliance to rapid sequence intubation was increased (9.4% vs 34.4%; P < .001) and vocal cords were more clearly open (P < .001) in the staffed period. The SpO2/FiO2 ratio (median [interquartile range], 125 [113-218] vs 136 [116-234]; P = .007) and the ROX index (4.6 [3.4-7.6] vs 5.1 [3.6-8.5]; P = .013) at the time of intubation was higher in the staffed period, suggesting the decision on intubation was made earlier. The post-intubation hypoxemia was less commonly occurred in the staffed period (7.2% vs 4.2%, P = .018). In multivariate analysis, the rank of operator was a strong predictor of the first-pass success (adjusted OR [95% CI], 2.280 [1.639-3.172]; P < .001 for fellow and 5.066 [1.740-14.747]; P < .001 for staff, relative to resident). In our hospital, a dedicated intensivist staffing to MET was associated with improved emergency airway management in general wards. Staffing an intensivist to MET needs to be encouraged to improve the performance of MET and the patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腺样体扁桃体切除术是全世界最常见的外科手术之一。在进行腺样体扁桃体切除术的患者中固定气道的当前标准是气管内导管(ETT)插管。一些研究已经调查了喉罩气道(LMA)在此过程中的使用。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较LMA和ETT在腺扁桃体切除术中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:从开始到2022年检索数据库中的随机对照试验和比较研究。遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。主要结果是围手术期呼吸不良事件(PRAEs)的发生率。次要结果包括转换为ETT的比率,去饱和,恶心/呕吐,和手术时间。亚组分析,偏见的风险,出版偏见,和建议评估的分级,发展,还进行了评估(GRADE)。
    结果:12项研究纳入分析(4176例患者)。ETT的平均总转化率为8.36%[95%置信区间(CI)=8.17,8.54],儿科组为8.27%(95%CI=8.08,8.47)。继发于并发症的ETT的平均转化率为2.89%(95%CI=2.76,3.03),其余患者来自手术入路不良。总的来说,PRAE没有显着差异[比值比(OR)1.16,95%CI=0.60,2.22],去饱和(OR0.79,95%CI=0.38,1.64),或轻微并发症(OR0.89,95%CI=0.50,1.55)。使用LMA可显著缩短手术时间(平均差-4.38分钟,95%CI=-8.28,-0.49)和出现时间(平均差-4.15分钟,95%CI=-5.63,-2.67)。
    结论:对于腺样体扁桃体切除术,LMA是ETT的安全替代品,需要更少的手术时间。仔细的病人选择和外科医生和麻醉师的判断是必要的,特别是考虑到8%的ETT转化率。
    BACKGROUND: Adenotonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. The current standard for securing the airway in patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy is endotracheal tube (ETT) intubation. Several studies have investigated the use of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in this procedure. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of the LMA versus ETT in adenotonsillectomy.
    METHODS: Databases were searched from inception to 2022 for randomized controlled trials and comparative studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The primary outcome is the rate of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs). Secondary outcomes included the rate of conversion to ETT, desaturations, nausea/vomiting, and surgical time. A subgroup analysis, risk of bias, publication bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments were also performed.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the analysis (4176 patients). The mean overall conversion to ETT was 8.36% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.17, 8.54], and for the pediatric group 8.27% (95% CI = 8.08, 8.47). The mean rate of conversion to ETT secondary to complications was 2.89% (95% CI = 2.76, 3.03) while the rest was from poor surgical access. Overall, there was no significant difference in PRAEs [odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI = 0.60, 2.22], desaturations (OR 0.79, 95% CI = 0.38, 1.64), or minor complications (OR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.50, 1.55). The use of LMA yielded significantly shorter operative time (mean difference -4.38 minutes, 95% CI = -8.28, -0.49) and emergence time (mean difference -4.15 minutes, 95% CI = -5.63, -2.67).
    CONCLUSIONS: For adenotonsillectomy surgery, LMA is a safe alternative to ETT and requires less operative time. Careful patient selection and judgment of the surgeon and anesthesiologist are necessary, especially given the 8% conversion to ETT rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气管内插管(ETI)是气道管理的基石。ETI的黄金标准装置仍然是直接喉镜(DL)。然而,视频喉镜(VL)现在也广泛可用,并有几个证明的优点。VL技术已包括在主要的气道管理指南中。在COVID-19大流行期间,供应链中断增加了对3D打印医疗设备的需求,包括3D打印的VL。然而,关于绩效的研究只有很少的可用;因此,我们旨在将3D打印的VL与DL和其他采用传统制造技术制造的VL进行比较。方法:招募48名医学生作为新手用户。简短之后,规范化培训,学生用DL执行ETI,KingVision®(KV),VividTrac®(VT),AirAngelBlade®(AAB),在正常和困难的气道情况下,Laerdal®气道管理训练器上的定制3D打印VL(3DVL)。我们评估了成功插管的时间和比例,声门的最佳视野,食管插管,牙齿创伤,和用户满意度。结果:在两种情况下,KV和VT均优于DL(p<0.05)。在两种情况下,与KV和VT相比,3DVL的表现相似(p>0.05)或明显优于DL,并且主要是非劣等(p>0.05)。不管场景如何,在大多数变量中,AAB甚至低于DL(p<0.05)。在困难的气道情况下,设备之间的差异更为明显。用户满意度得分与上述范围的表现一致。结论:根据我们的结果,我们不能推荐DL上的AAB,KV,或VT。然而,正如3DVL所显示的,3D打印确实可以提供有用甚至卓越的VL,但是在临床使用之前,建议进行细致的评估。
    Background: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a cornerstone of airway management. The gold standard device for ETI is still the direct laryngoscope (DL). However, video laryngoscopes (VLs) are now also widely available and have several proven advantages. The VL technique has been included in the major airway management guidelines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption has raised demand for 3D-printed medical equipment, including 3D-printed VLs. However, studies on performance are only sparsely available; thus, we aimed to compare 3D-printed VLs to the DL and other VLs made with conventional manufacturing technology. Methods: Forty-eight medical students were recruited to serve as novice users. Following brief, standardized training, students executed ETI with the DL, the King Vision® (KV), the VividTrac® (VT), the AirAngel Blade® (AAB), and a custom-made 3D-printed VL (3DVL) on the Laerdal® airway management trainer in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We evaluated the time to and proportion of successful intubation, the best view of the glottis, esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and user satisfaction. Results: The KV and VT are proved to be superior (p < 0.05) to the DL in both scenarios. The 3DVL\'s performance was similar (p > 0.05) or significantly better than that of the DL and mainly non-inferior (p > 0.05) compared to the KV and VT in both scenarios. Regardless of the scenario, the AAB proved to be inferior (p < 0.05) even to the DL in the majority of the variables. The differences between the devices were more pronounced in the difficult airway scenario. The user satisfaction scores were in concordance with the aforementioned performance of the scopes. Conclusions: Based upon our results, we cannot recommend the AAB over the DL, KV, or VT. However, as the 3DVL showed, 3D printing indeed can provide useful or even superior VLs, but prior to clinical use, meticulous evaluation might be recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号