UNASSIGNED: Numerous cases of long coronavirus disease (long COVID) have been reported in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Despite the reviews on clinical manifestations of long COVID in the general population, systematic reviews on ARD patients are scarce. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients.
UNASSIGNED: We searched the literature in PubMed and Embase as of 27 December 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies relevant to long COVID in ARD patients were collected. Stratification based on the severity of COVID infection and subtypes of rheumatic diseases [systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) vs non-autoimmune rheumatic disease (NARD)] was also undertaken. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 15 relevant studies were identified from the literature. The prevalence of long COVID was 56% (95% CI 34, 76) in 2995 patients. Hospitalized COVID patients had a higher proportion of long COVID than non-hospitalized patients. The prevalence of long COVID was similar between SARD and NARD patients. In terms of symptoms, fatigue, arthralgia and pain were commonly reported in long COVID patients with ARDs.
UNASSIGNED: The characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients are generally similar to those in the general population despite a higher prevalence and a higher proportion of arthralgia and pain.

OBJECTIVE: Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is increasingly substituted by multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBA) and line-blot immunoassay (LIA). This study is to compare the diagnostic performance of MBA and LIA ANA assays on clinically characterized patient samples.
METHODS: A total of 728 serum samples from 385 patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), 204 patients with non-SARD diseases, and 139 apparently healthy subjects were tested with the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen and EuroLine ANA Profile 3 as the representative MBA and LIA technologies and HEp-2 ANA IFA. Clinical data were collected independent of laboratory analysis and later related to the ANA test results. The clinical diagnostic performances were analyzed using Analyse-it software.
RESULTS: The MBA demonstrated higher area under curve (AUC) compared to LIA (0.814 vs 0.761, p = 0.002) and HEp-2 IFA (0.814 vs 0.771, p = 0.008). The MBA and LIA ANA methods showed higher specificity (83.8% and 77.0% vs 67.6%, p < 0.001 and p = 0.005) but lower sensitivity (79.0% and 75.3% vs 86.5%, p < 0.001) compared to HEp-2 IFA. The MBA and LIA ANA revealed substantial to excellent agreements on specific antinuclear antibodies except anti-dsDNA, with the total agreement from 92.3 to 99.9% and Cohen\'s kappa from 0.71 to 0.98. The MBA demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (58.1% vs 19.8%, p < 0.001) and comparable specificity (95.9% vs 97.5%, p = 0.221) on anti-dsDNA assay for the diagnosis of SLE compared to LIA.
CONCLUSIONS: The MBA and LIA ANA assays have higher specificity but lower sensitivity compared to HEp-2 IFA. There are good agreements between MBA and LIA ANA for the specific antinuclear antibodies except for anti-dsDNA. The MBA ANA demonstrated better assay performance compared to LIA as the MBA possesses higher sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of SARD. Key Points • The multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBA) ANA outperformed line-blot immunoassay (LIA) and traditional HEp-2 IFA. • There are good agreements between the MBA BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen and LIA EuroLine ANA Profile 3 for the most of specific antinuclear antibodies except anti-dsDNA. • Additional anti-dsDNA testing is suggested when EuroLine ANA Profile 3 is used for the aid of SLE diagnosis and management. • The positive predictive value of both multiplex ANA assays can be substantially increased without significantly affecting negative predictive value by using at least two specific antinuclear antibodies for reporting a positive ANA result.

Anti-DFS70 antibodies correlating with the nuclear dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern in the HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) are less common in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) than in healthy subjects and their clinical associations remain elusive. We hosted a multi-center HEp-2 IFA training program to improve the ability of clinical laboratories to recognize the DFS pattern and to investigate the prevalence and relevance of anti-DFS70 antibodies.
DFS pattern sera identified by HEp-2 IFA in 29 centers in China were redirected to a central laboratory for anti-DFS70 testing by line immunoblot assay (LIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and IFA with HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70-KO substrate. Anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies were measured by LIA and the clinical relevance was examined in adult and pediatric patients.
HEp-2 IFA positive rate and DFS pattern in positive sera were 36.2% (34,417/95,131) and 1.7% (582/34,417) in the patient cohort, and 10.0% (423/4,234) and 7.8% (33/423) in a healthy population, respectively. Anti-DFS70 prevalence among sera presenting the DFS pattern was 96.0, 93.7, and 49.6% by ELISA, LIA, and HEp-2 ELITE, respectively. 15.5% (52/336) of adult and 50.0% (20/40) of pediatric anti-DFS70 positive patients were diagnosed with SARD. Diseases most common in anti-DFS70 positive patients were spontaneous abortion (28.0%) in adults and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (22.5%) in pediatric patients.
Accurate DFS pattern identification increased the detection rate of anti-DFS70 antibodies by ELISA and LIA. Anti-DFS70 antibodies are remarkably high in cases of spontaneous abortion and in pediatric SARD patients, but not prevalent in adult SARD patients.