susceptibility testing

敏感性试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:幽门螺杆菌(幽门螺杆菌)感染通常发生在儿童早期。虽然儿童幽门螺杆菌的患病率低于成人,由于耐药性,这种感染在儿童中的根除率相对较低。在这项研究中,我们根据幽门螺杆菌耐药特点分析了个性化治疗策略以达到治疗目标.这项回顾性单中心研究于2019年1月至2022年12月进行,纳入了1,587名出现上消化道症状并接受内窥镜检查的儿童。进行幽门螺杆菌培养和抗菌药物敏感性试验。结果:在535名儿童中获得了幽门螺杆菌的培养阳性结果。对克拉霉素(CLA)的耐药率,甲硝唑(MET),左氧氟沙星(LEV)为39.8%,78.1%,和20.2%,分别。所有分离株对四环素(TET)均无耐药性,阿莫西林(AMO),或呋喃唑酮(FZD)。对CLA+MET的双重耐药率,CLA+LEV,MET+LEV为19.1%,3.0%,和5.8%,分别。值得注意的是,对CLA+MET+LEV的三重抗性为9.7%。根据敏感性试验,对380例幽门螺杆菌对MET和/或CLA敏感的儿童选择个体化三联疗法[质子泵抑制剂(PPI)+AMO+CLA/MET].在155名对CLA和MET有抵抗力的儿童中,推荐以铋为基础的四联疗法;因为无法接受铋,14名儿童(<8岁)推荐合并治疗;141名儿童(>8岁)推荐TET三联疗法,43名儿童(>14岁)需要FZD而不是TET。结论:中国儿童对H.pylori的耐药性相对较差。个性化治疗方案应基于药敏试验并避免与治疗失败相关的因素。
    Background: H. pylori (Helicobacter pylori) infections typically occur in early childhood. Although the prevalence of H. pylori in children is lower than that in adults, the eradication rate of this infection in children is relatively low because of resistance. In this study, we analyzed personalized treatment strategies to achieve treatment goals based on H. pylori resistance characteristics. This retrospective single-center study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2022 and enrolled 1,587 children who presented with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and underwent endoscopy. H. pylori culturing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed. Results: Culture-positive results for H. pylori were obtained in 535 children. The resistance rates to clarithromycin (CLA), metronidazole (MET), and levofloxacin (LEV) were 39.8%, 78.1%, and 20.2%, respectively. None of the isolates were resistant to tetracycline (TET), amoxicillin (AMO), or furazolidone (FZD). Double resistance rates to CLA + MET, CLA + LEV, and MET + LEV were 19.1%, 3.0%, and 5.8%, respectively. Notably, triple-resistant to CLA + MET + LEV was 9.7%. Based on susceptibility tests, individualized triple therapy [proton pump inhibitor (PPI) +AMO + CLA/MET] was selected for 380 children with H. pylori sensitive to MET and/or CLA. In 155 children resistant to CLA and MET, bismuth-based quadruple therapy was recommended; for unable to receive bismuth, concomitant therapy was recommended for 14 children (<8 years of age); triple therapy with TET was recommended for 141 children (>8 years of age), with 43 children (>14 years of age) requiring FZD rather than TET. Conclusion: Resistance to H. pylori in Chinese children was relatively poor. Personalized therapy regimens should be based on susceptibility tests and avoided factors associated with treatment failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    幽门螺杆菌(H.幽门螺杆菌)根除方案。三联疗法(TT),铋四联疗法(BQT),和高剂量双重疗法(HDDT)目前是主要的治疗方案。这些方案在治疗持续时间方面存在差异,利用敏感性测试,酸抑制药物管理,和病人的教育。我们对这些幽门螺杆菌治疗方案进行了全面系统的文献综述。我们的综述旨在为幽门螺杆菌提供标准化治疗建议,降低不同根除方案合并发现的风险。最近的研究表明,TT和BQT的最佳治疗时间可能是14天和10天,分别。选择合适的HDDT治疗持续时间应依赖于区域研究证据,14天可能是最佳持续时间。在TT中加入敏感性测试至关重要。在BQT的情况下,没有敏感性测试可以被认为是一种选择,视成本和可用性而定,应根据当地抗生素耐药性模式和经验治疗方案的疗效确定。抑酸药物的类型和剂量会影响这些方案的疗效。抑酸药物应根据人群和治疗方法合理选择和应用。充分的患者教育在根除幽门螺杆菌中起着关键作用。在有当地研究证据的地区,10天经验性BQT方案可能被认为是根除幽门螺杆菌的首选方案.
    Current global variations exist in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens. Triple therapy (TT), bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT), and high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) currently represent the predominant regimens. These regimens diverge in terms of treatment duration, the utilization of susceptibility testing, acid-inhibiting drug administration, and patient education. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review on these H. pylori treatment regimens. Our review aims to provide standardized treatment recommendations for H. pylori, reducing the risk of amalgamating findings from diverse eradication regimens. Recent research suggests that the optimal treatment duration for TT and BQT may be 14 and 10 days, respectively. Selecting the appropriate treatment duration for HDDT should rely on regional research evidence, and 14 days may be the optimal duration. The incorporation of susceptibility testing in TT is of paramount importance. In the case of BQT, the absence of susceptibility testing may be considered as an option, contingent upon cost and availability, and should be determined based on local antibiotic resistance patterns and the efficacy of empirical regimens. The type and dosage of acid-inhibiting drug would affect the efficacy of these regimens. Acid-inhibiting drugs should be selected and applied reasonably according to the population and therapies. Adequate patient education plays a pivotal role in the eradication of H. pylori. In regions with accessible local research evidence, the 10-day empirical BQT regimen may be considered a preferred choice for H. pylori eradication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺炎克雷伯菌,革兰氏阴性细菌,对公众健康构成严重危害,许多细菌宿主在临床上对大多数抗生素产生了耐药性。这项研究的目的是研究对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药性的发展。包括亚胺培南和美罗培南,在表达新型肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶-2(KPC-2)变体的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株中,称为KPC-49。
    K1在含有头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(MIC=16/4mg/L)的琼脂上孵育1天后,回收第二个产生KPC的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株(K2)。抗菌药物敏感性试验,克隆试验,进行全基因组测序以分析和评估抗生素抗性表型和基因型。
    K.肺炎菌株(K1),产生KPC-2的,对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦敏感,但对碳青霉烯类耐药。K2分离株含有一种新的blaKPC-49变体,它与BLAKPC-2的区别在于一个核苷酸(C487A),并且导致在氨基酸位置163(R163S)处的精氨酸-丝氨酸取代。突变的K2菌株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和碳青霉烯类均具有抗性。我们证明了KPC-49水解碳青霉烯类的能力,这可能归因于高KPC-49表达或外排泵的存在和/或K2中不存在膜孔蛋白。此外,blaKPC样在TnAs1-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27结构内的IncFII(pHN7A8)/IncR型质粒上进行。blaKPC样基因侧翼有各种插入序列和转座子元件,包括Tn3家族转座子,例如TnAs1、TnAs3、IS26和IS481-ISKpn27。
    由于持续暴露于抗微生物剂和其氨基酸序列的修饰,新的KPC变体正在出现。我们通过实验全基因组测序结合生物信息学分析,证明了新突变株的耐药机制。增强对新型KPC亚型肺炎克雷伯菌感染的实验室和临床特征的了解是早期和准确抗感染治疗的关键。
    UNASSIGNED: Klebsiella pneumoniae, a gram-negative bacterium, poses a severe hazard to public health, with many bacterial hosts having developed resistance to most antibiotics in clinical use. The goal of this study was to look into the development of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems, including imipenem and meropenem, in a K. pneumonia strain expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-2 (KPC-2) variant, referred to as KPC-49.
    UNASSIGNED: After 1 day of incubation of K1 on agar containing ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC = 16/4 mg/L), a second KPC-producing K. pneumoniae strain (K2) was recovered. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays, cloning assays, and whole genome sequencing were performed to analyse and evaluate antibiotic resistance phenotypes and genotypes.
    UNASSIGNED: K. pneumoniae strain (K1), that produced KPC-2, was susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam but resistant to carbapenems. The K2 isolate harboured a novel bla KPC-49 variant, which differs from bla KPC-2 by a single nucleotide (C487A), and results in an arginine-serine substitution at amino acid position 163 (R163S). The mutant K2 strain was resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. We demonstrated the ability of KPC-49 to hydrolyse carbapenems, which may be attributed to high KPC-49 expression or presence of an efflux pump and/or absence of membrane pore proteins in K2. Furthermore, blaKPC-like was carried on an IncFII (pHN7A8)/IncR-type plasmid within a TnAs1-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-orf-ISKpn6-bla KPC-ISKpn27 structure. The bla KPC-like gene was flanked by various insertion sequences and transposon elements, including the Tn3 family transposon, such as TnAs1, TnAs3, IS26, and IS481-ISKpn27.
    UNASSIGNED: New KPC variants are emerging owing to sustained exposure to antimicrobials and modifications in their amino acid sequences. We demonstrated the drug resistance mechanisms of the new mutant strains through experimental whole genome sequencing combined with bioinformatics analysis. Enhanced understanding of laboratory and clinical features of infections due to K. pneumoniae of the new KPC subtype is key to early and accurate anti-infective therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:评估五种广泛的商业产品在中国的粘菌素和多粘菌素B敏感性试验中对mcr阳性和阴性大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的性能。
    UNASSIGNED:共收集了132个大肠杆菌和83个肺炎克雷伯菌菌株(包括68个mcr-1阳性大肠杆菌和28个mcr-8阳性肺炎克雷伯菌)。我们分析了粘菌素敏感性的表现(用Vitek2和PhoenixM50)和多粘菌素B敏感性的表现(用DL-96II,MA120和多粘菌素B敏感性测试条;POLE-条)。肉汤微量稀释用作金标准。分类协议(CA),基本协议(EA),主要错误(ME),并计算了非常大的误差(VME)进行比较。
    未经批准:对于大肠杆菌,总CA,EA,我,VME对粘菌素的影响如下:Vitek2,98.5%/98.5%/0%/2.9%;凤凰城M50,98.5%/97.7%/0%/2.9%。总CA,EA,我,和VME对多粘菌素B的影响如下:POLE-条,99.2%/63.6%/1.6%/0%;MA120,70.0%/-/0%/58.8%;和DL-96II,80.2%/-/1.6%/36.8%。只有Vitek2和PhoenixM50对mcr-1阳性大肠杆菌表现令人满意。对于肺炎克雷伯菌,总CA,EA,我,VME对粘菌素的影响如下:Vitek2,73.2%/72.0%/61.6%;凤凰城M50,74.7%/74.7%/0%/58.3%。总CA,EA,我,和VME对多粘菌素B的影响如下:POLE-条,91.6%/74.7%/2.1%/16.7%;MA120、92.8%/-/2.1%/13.9%;DL-96II、92.2%/-/2.1%/8.3%。所有系统对于mcr-8阳性肺炎克雷伯菌均不令人满意。当检测mcr阴性菌株的敏感性时,所有系统都表现出卓越的性能。
    UNASSIGNED:Vitek2和PhoenixM50对大肠杆菌的粘菌素显示出可接受的性能,无论mcr-1表达如何,而DL-96II,MA120和POLE试条对mcr-1阳性菌株的表现更差。此外,mcr-8极大地影响了粘菌素和多粘菌素B对肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的所有系统的性能。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the performance of five widespread commercial products for colistin and polymyxin B susceptibility testing in China for mcr-positive and -negative Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 132 E. coli and 83 K. pneumoniae strains (including 68 mcr-1-positive E. coli and 28 mcr-8-positive K. pneumoniae) were collected. We analysed the performance of colistin susceptibility (with Vitek 2 and Phoenix M50) and the performance of polymyxin B susceptibility (with DL-96II, MA120, and a Polymyxin B Susceptibility Test strip; POL E-strip). Broth microdilution was used as the gold standard. Categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were calculated for comparisons.
    UNASSIGNED: For E. coli, the total CA, EA, ME, and VME to colistin were as follows: Vitek 2, 98.5%/98.5%/0%/2.9%; and Phoenix M50, 98.5%/97.7%/0%/2.9%. The total CA, EA, ME, and VME to polymyxin B were as follows: POL E-strip, 99.2%/63.6%/1.6%/0%; MA120, 70.0%/-/0%/58.8%; and DL-96II, 80.2%/-/1.6%/36.8%. Only Vitek 2 and Phoenix M50 presented satisfactory performances for mcr-1-positive E. coli. For K. pneumoniae, the total CA, EA, ME, and VME to colistin were as follows: Vitek 2, 73.2%/72.0%/0%/61.6%; and Phoenix M50, 74.7%/74.7%/0%/58.3%. The total CA, EA, ME, and VME to polymyxin B were as follows: POL E-strip, 91.6%/74.7%/2.1%/16.7%; MA120, 92.8%/-/2.1%/13.9%; and DL-96II, 92.2%/-/2.1%/8.3%. All systems were unsatisfactory for mcr-8-positive K. pneumoniae. When the susceptibility of mcr-negative strains was tested, all systems presented excellent performance.
    UNASSIGNED: Vitek 2 and Phoenix M50 with colistin for E. coli showed acceptable performance regardless of mcr-1 expression, while DL-96II, MA120, and the POL E-strip performed worse for mcr-1-positive strains. Furthermore, mcr-8 greatly affected the performance of all systems with both colistin and polymyxin B for K. pneumoniae isolates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:目前推荐的抗脓肿分枝杆菌复合物(MABC)治疗方案的疗效不令人满意,导致了对抗MABC感染的新药的开发。在这项研究中,我们评估了bedaquiline(BDQ)和四种恶唑烷酮对MABC分离株的体外抗菌活性。
    UNASSIGNED:进行刃天青微板测定以确定BDQ和四种恶唑烷酮的最低抑制浓度(MIC),包括替迪唑胺(TZD),sutezolid(SZD),德帕唑啉(DZD),利奈唑胺(LZD),针对65个MABC分离株。使用棋盘法研究各种抗微生物药物组合的功效。
    未经鉴定:MABC分离株的BDQMIC范围为<0.031至1µg/mL,而MIC50和MIC90值分别为0.125µg/mL和0.25µg/mL,分别。MABC分离株的TZDMIC50和MIC90值分别为1µg/mL和4µg/mL,分别,比相应的LZD值低四倍(P<0.001)。MABC分离株的DZDMIC90值为8微克/毫升,比相应的LZD值低0.5倍(P<0.01)。BDQ的MIC,SZD,脓肿亚种分离株的LZD和LZD显着低于脓肿亚种分离株的相应MIC(P<0.05)。值得注意的是,使用恶唑烷酮(DZD,SZD,LZD,或TZD)与BDQ对MABC分离物的作用导致恶唑烷酮的中位MIC范围从4至0.125µg/mL降低至1-0.031µg/mL。
    UNASSIGNED:这些结果证明了对MABC分离株的优异BDQ抑制活性。与DZD的功效相比,TZD对MABC分离株表现出更强的抗微生物功效,SZD,还有LZD.重要的是,恶唑烷酮与BDQ联用时,其MIC显著降低,因此表明BDQ和恶唑烷酮的组合可能是MABC感染的有效治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Unsatisfactory efficacies of currently recommended anti-Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) treatment regimens have led to development of novel drugs to combat MABC infections. In this study, we evaluated in vitro antimicrobial activities of bedaquiline (BDQ) and four oxazolidinones against MABC isolates.
    UNASSIGNED: The resazurin microplate assay was performed to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of BDQ and four oxazolidinones, including tedizolid (TZD), sutezolid (SZD), delpazolid (DZD), and linezolid (LZD), against 65 MABC isolates. A checkerboard method was used to investigate efficacies of various antimicrobial drug combinations.
    UNASSIGNED: BDQ MICs for MABC isolates ranged from <0.031 to 1 µg/mL, while MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.125 µg/mL and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively. TZD MIC50 and MIC90 values for MABC isolates were 1 µg/mL and 4 µg/mL, respectively, which were fourfold lower than corresponding LZD values (P < 0.001). DZD MIC90 values for MABC isolates was 8 µg/mL, which were 0.5-fold lower than corresponding LZD values (P < 0.01). MICs of BDQ, SZD, and LZD for M. abscessus subspecies massiliense isolates were significantly lower than corresponding MICs for M. abscessus subspecies abscessus isolates (P < 0.05). Notably, use of oxazolidinones (DZD, SZD, LZD, or TZD) with BDQ against MABC isolates led to reduction of the oxazolidinone median MIC range from 4 to 0.125 µg/mL to 1-0.031 µg/mL.
    UNASSIGNED: These results demonstrated excellent BDQ inhibitory activity against MABC isolates. TZD exhibited stronger antimicrobial efficacy against MABC isolates as compared to efficacies of DZD, SZD, and LZD. Importantly, MICs of oxazolidinones were markedly decreased when they were combined with BDQ, thus suggesting that combinations of BDQ and oxazolidinones may be effective treatments for MABC infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)可引起肺部和肺外疾病。Tedizolid(TZD)是一种新型的恶唑烷酮,具有针对NTM的体外活性,例如鸟分枝杆菌复合物(MAC),偶发分枝杆菌,和脓肿分枝杆菌复合体。这项研究的目的是评估NTM临床分离株的TZD敏感性曲线。
    UNASSIGNED:微量稀释方法用于鉴定133种临床NTM分离株的TZD和利奈唑胺(LZD)的最低抑制浓度(MIC)。肉汤微量稀释方格试验用于研究TZD和三种抗生素对两种参考分离株和11种NTM临床分离株的协同作用。
    未经证实:脓肿分枝杆菌复合物的TZDMIC50和MIC90分别为2和4μg/mL,16和>32μg/mL的MAC,分别。对于大多数NTM,TZD的MIC低于LZD,呈正相关。由于TZD对MAC的MIC值很高,有必要在TZD给药前进行药敏试验。TZD-克拉霉素组合对8株中的3株脓肿分枝杆菌复合物具有协同反应,只持续了3-5天。TZD-头孢西丁对所有五个M.fortuitum分离株均具有协同作用。
    UNASSIGNED:我们的研究表明,TZD比LZD具有更大的体外效力,协同研究表明,TZD可能是多药治疗方案的重要组成部分。
    UNASSIGNED: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause pulmonary and extrapulmonary diseases. Tedizolid (TZD) is a new oxazolidinone with in vitro activity against NTM such as Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Mycobacterium fortuitum, and Mycobacterium abscessus complex. The aim of this study was to evaluate the TZD susceptibility profiles of clinical isolates of NTM.
    UNASSIGNED: The microdilution method was used to identify the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of TZD and linezolid (LZD) for 133 clinical NTM isolates. Broth microdilution chequerboard assays were used to investigate the synergistic effects of TZD and three antibiotics on two reference isolates and eleven clinical isolates of NTM.
    UNASSIGNED: The TZD MIC50 and MIC90 for M. abscessus complex were 2 and 4 μg/mL, 16 and >32 μg/mL for MAC, respectively. TZD exhibited lower MICs than that of LZD for most NTM, which were positively correlated. Due to the high MIC values of TZD against MAC, it is necessary to conduct drug sensitivity tests before TZD administration. TZD-clarithromycin combination had synergistic response on M. abscessus complex in 3 of the 8 isolates, which lasted only 3-5 days. TZD-cefoxitin had synergistic effect against all five M. fortuitum isolates.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrates that TZD had greater in vitro potency than LZD, and synergy studies suggested that TZD may be an important component of multi-drug treatment regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA),一种新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,对碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌(CRE)产生A类和C类以及某些D类碳青霉烯酶具有良好的抗菌活性,但近年来,CZA耐药肠杆菌的出现越来越多。因此,快速,准确,及时检测CZA是临床抗感染治疗的必要条件。在这项研究中,开发了快速ResaCef他啶-阿维巴坦肠杆菌NP试验;其原理是代谢活性细菌(CZA耐药菌株)可以改变刃天青-PrestoBlue,一种生存力着色剂,在有CZA的情况下,从蓝色到紫色或粉红色,而CZA敏感菌株不能。我们使用了178株肠杆菌分离物来评估该测试的性能。该测试允许在4.5小时内检测到肠杆菌对CZA的敏感性,总体表现为96%类别一致性(CA),7%的主要错误(ME),和0%非常大的错误(VME)。大肠杆菌的性能包括100%CA和0%ME和VME。肺炎克雷伯菌的表现包括99%CA和2%MEs和0%VMEs。阴沟肠杆菌的表现包括87%CA,25%的MEs,和0%的中小微企业。此外,此测试既经济又方便(每个隔离物1.0106美元),因为它只需要基本的实验室设备。一句话,瑞沙头孢他啶-阿维巴坦肠杆菌NP快速检测是快速可行的,为临床上CZA耐药菌株的快速筛选和及时治疗提供一定的后盾。
    Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has good antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) producing class A and C and some class D carbapenemases, but in recent years, the emergence of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria is growing. Therefore, rapid, accurate, and timely detection of CZA is necessary for clinical anti-infection treatment. In this study, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test was developed; its principle is that metabolically active bacteria (CZA-resistant strains) can change resazurin-PrestoBlue, a viability colorant, from blue to purple or pink in the presence of CZA, whereas CZA-susceptible strains cannot. We used 178 Enterobacterales isolates to evaluate the performance of this test. This test allowed the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to CZA to be detected within 4.5 h with an overall performance of 96% category agreement (CA), 7% major errors (MEs), and 0% very major errors (VMEs). Performance for Escherichia coli included 100% CA and 0% MEs and VMEs. Performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae included 99% CA and 2% MEs and 0% VMEs. Performance for Enterobacter cloacae included 87% CA, 25% MEs, and 0% VMEs. Moreover, this test is both economical ($1.0106 per isolate) and convenient, as it only requires basic laboratory equipment. In a word, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test is rapid and feasible, which may provide certain backing for the rapid screening and timely treatment of CZA-resistant strains in the clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    副杆菌属(Av。)鸡是家禽的机会致病菌,which,然而,也与人类疾病有关。目前尚无批准的这种病原体的抗菌素敏感性测试方法,因此,本研究旨在开发一种用于Av的协调肉汤微量稀释方法。gallinarum,适用于诊断实验室。为此,Av.收集了鸡CCUG12391T型菌株和42个田间分离株,并通过使用物种特异性PCR测定和生化反应确认了它们的物种。选择流行病学无关的分离株,进行ApaI宏观限制性分析。用六种培养基进行了初步的生长实验,根据结果,选择4种培养基编制4种分离株的生长曲线.然后进行MIC测定的独立重复以评估值的再现性。最初选择阳离子调节的Mueller-Hinton肉汤(CAMHB)作为肉汤培养基,但没有显示出足够的MIC均匀性。因此,选择CAMHB加1%鸡血清和0.0025%NADH,在35±2°C孵育20小时和24小时后显示出良好的MIC均匀性。这反映在96%至100%的基本MIC协议中。测试更大的Av。gallinarum收集(n=43)表明,可以为类型菌株和所有分离株获得易于读取的MIC。一些Av。胆量显示恩诺沙星的MIC升高(n=35),萘啶酸(n=35),青霉素(n=2),四环素(n=19),和/或甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(n=1)。通过使用PCR分析,检测到以下抗菌素抗性基因:blaTEM,dfrA14,sul2,tet(B),tet(H)。研究表明,拟议的培养基适用于Av的统一肉汤微量稀释敏感性测试。
    Avibacterium (Av.) gallinarum is an opportunistic pathogen in poultry, which, however, has also been associated with human disease. There is currently no approved method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of this pathogen, so this study aimed at developing a harmonized broth microdilution method for Av. gallinarum that is suitable for diagnostic laboratories. For this, the Av. gallinarum CCUG 12391T type strain and 42 field isolates were collected and their species was confirmed by using a species-specific PCR assay and biochemical reactions. To select epidemiologically unrelated isolates, ApaI macrorestriction analysis was performed. Preliminary growth experiments were conducted with six culture media, and based on the results, four media were selected to compile growth curves with four isolates. Independent repetitions of MIC determinations were then performed to evaluate the reproducibility of the values. Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) was initially selected as broth medium, but did not show sufficient homogeneity of MICs. Therefore, CAMHB plus 1% chicken serum and 0.0025% NADH was selected and showed a good homogeneity of MICs after 20 h and 24 h of incubation at 35 ± 2°C. This was reflected in essential MIC agreements ranging between 96% and 100%. Testing of a larger Av. gallinarum collection (n = 43) revealed that easily readable MICs could be obtained for the type strain and all isolates. Some Av. gallinarum showed elevated MICs of enrofloxacin (n = 35), nalidixic acid (n = 35), penicillin (n = 2), tetracycline (n = 19), and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (n = 1). By using PCR analyses, the following antimicrobial resistance genes were detected: blaTEM, dfrA14, sul2, tet(B), tet(H). The study demonstrated that the proposed medium is suitable for a harmonized broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Av. gallinarum with a recommended incubation time of 20 to 24 h.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    用于阳性血培养物(PBC)鉴定(ID)和抗微生物药敏试验(AST)的常规周转时间(TAT)为2-3天。我们使用直接来自PBC瓶的临床和接种样品以不同的商业方法评估了TAT和ID/AST性能:(1)ID/AST的AcceleratePheno®系统(Pheno);(2)ID的BioFire®FilmArray®血液培养鉴定(BCID)面板和/或BCID2;(3)通过VITEK®2直接进行直接AST(直接®);
    在该评价中包括总共141个PBC样品。使用MALDI-TOF(BrukerMALDIBiotyper)作为ID的参考方法,整体抗菌ID敏感性/特异性如下:Pheno97.9/99.9%;BCID100/100%;和BCID2100/100%,分别。对于AST性能,肉汤微量稀释(BMD)用作参考方法。对于革兰氏阴性,每种方法的总体分类和基本协议(CA/EA)为:Pheno90.3/93.2%;直接AST92.6/88.5%;菌落AST94.4/89.5%,分别。对于革兰氏阳性,总体CA/EA如下:Pheno97.2/98.89%;直接AST97.2/100%;菌落AST97.2/100%,分别。BCID/BCID2和直接ASTTAT约为9-20小时(具有抗性标记/AST的ID为1/9-19小时),15分钟/样品动手时间。相比之下,PhenoTAT约为8-10小时(ID/AST为1.5/7小时),2分钟/样品动手时间,保持抗生素最小抑制浓度(MIC)的临床相关快速报告,并允许更少的TAT和动手时间。
    总之,据我们所知,这是在亚洲进行的第一项研究;所有研究的方法都取得了令人满意的性能,TAT等因素,在不同实验室环境中选择合适的PBC快速ID和AST方法时,应考虑抗生素选择和操作时间。
    Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2-3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches: (1) Accelerate Pheno® system (Pheno) for ID/AST; (2) BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel and/ or BCID2 for ID; (3) direct AST by VITEK® 2 (direct AST); and (4) overnight culture using VITEK® 2 colony AST.
    A total of 141 PBC samples were included in this evaluation. Using MALDI-TOF (Bruker MALDI Biotyper) as the reference method for ID, the overall monomicrobial ID sensitivity/specificity are as follows: Pheno 97.9/99.9%; BCID 100/100%; and BCID2 100/100%, respectively. For AST performance, broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. For gram-negatives, overall categorical and essential agreements (CA/EA) for each method were: Pheno 90.3/93.2%; direct AST 92.6/88.5%; colony AST 94.4/89.5%, respectively. For gram-positives, the overall CA/EAs were as follows: Pheno 97.2/98.89%; direct AST 97.2/100%; colony AST 97.2/100%, respectively. The BCID/BCID2 and direct AST TATs were around 9-20 h (1/9-19 h for ID with resistance markers/AST), with 15 min/sample hands-on time. In comparison, Pheno TATs were around 8-10 h (1.5/7 h for ID/AST) with 2 min/sample hands-on time, maintains a clinically relevant fast report of antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows for less TAT and hands-on time.
    In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted as such in Asia; all studied approaches achieved satisfactory performance, factors such as TAT, panel of antibiotics choices and hands-on time should be considered for the selection of appropriate rapid ID and AST of PBC methods in different laboratory settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Dermatophytes are the most common fungal pathogens causing superficial infections in humans with a high prevalence worldwide. The treatment of these infections is based on the use of topical and systemic antifungal agents. A convenient method with a high predictive value for testing the susceptibilities of dermatophytes is necessary.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the Sensititre YeastOne® in testing the activity of nine antifungal agents against dermatophytes.
    METHODS: We compared Sensititre® with reference procedure for anidulafungin (ANID), micafungin sodium (MCF), caspofungin acetate (CAS), 5-fluorocytosine (5FC), posaconazole (PCZ), voriconazole (VCZ), itraconazole (ITZ), fluconazole (FLZ) and amphotericin B (AMB) against 79 dermatophyte isolates, the essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between the two methods were obtained.
    RESULTS: The MICs or MECs obtained by the Sensititre® were usually lower than those obtained by the M38-A2. The overall EA between the two methods of nine antifungals was best for 5FC (100%), followed by MCF (94.9%), PCZ (84.8%), AMB (67.1%), FLZ (65.8%), VCZ (63.3%), ANID (29.1%), ITZ (20.3%) and CAS (2.5%). The overall CA between the two methods for all drugs was 100% except for ANID (97.4%), MCF (95%) and PCZ (92.5%). Substantial discrepancies were observed with all drugs except for VCZ and 5FC. The results of M38-A2 in terms of GMIC (or GMEC) and MIC90 (or MEC90) were, in increasing order, as follows: MCF, PCZ, VCZ, ANID, ITZ, CAS, AMB, FLZ and 5FC.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Sensititre YeastOne® shows poor EA with the reference method for dermatophytes; therefore, M38-A2 should remain the reference procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing against dermatophytes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号