subclavian artery

锁骨下动脉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脑灌注可能根据动脉插管部位而变化,并可能影响心脏切开术后体外生命支持(ECLS)中神经系统不良事件的发生率。当前的研究将患者的神经系统结局与三种常用的动脉插管策略进行了比较(主动脉与锁骨下/腋窝vs.股动脉),以评估每种ECLS配置是否与神经系统并发症的不同发生率相关。
    方法:本回顾性研究,多中心(34个中心),观察性研究纳入了2000年1月至2020年12月期间需要进行心脏切开术后ECLS的成年人,该研究出现在心脏切开术后体外生命支持(PELS)研究数据库中.主动脉患者,比较锁骨下/腋下和股骨插管在复合神经系统终点(缺血性卒中,脑出血,脑水肿)。次要结局是总体住院死亡率,神经系统并发症是院内死亡的原因,和术后轻微的神经系统并发症(癫痫发作)。通过线性混合效应模型研究了插管与神经系统结局之间的关联。
    结果:这项研究包括1897名患者,其中主动脉占26.5%(n=503),20.9%锁骨下/腋下(n=397)和52.6%股骨(n=997)插管。锁骨下/腋下组的高血压病史更为频繁,吸烟,糖尿病,以前的心肌梗塞,透析,外周动脉疾病和既往卒中。神经监测在所有组中都很少使用。在混合效应模型调整后,锁骨下/腋下的主要神经系统并发症更为常见(主动脉:n=79,15.8%;锁骨下/腋下:n=78,19.6%;股骨:n=118,11.9%;p<0.001)(OR1.53[95%CI1.02-2.31],p=0.041)。癫痫发作在锁骨下/腋下(n=13,3.4%)比主动脉(n=9,1.8%)和股骨插管(n=12,1.3%,p=0.036)。主动脉插管后住院死亡率更高(主动脉:n=344,68.4%,锁骨下/腋下:n=223,56.2%,股骨:n=587,58.9%,p<0.001),如Kaplan-Meier曲线所示。总之,神经系统死亡原因(主动脉:n=12,3.9%,锁骨下/腋下:n=14,6.6%,股骨:n=28,5.0%,p=0.433)相似。
    结论:在PELS研究的分析中,锁骨下/腋下插管与较高的主要神经系统并发症和癫痫发作率相关。主动脉插管后住院死亡率较高,尽管这些患者的神经系统死亡原因发生率没有显着差异。这些结果鼓励对ECLS患者的神经系统并发症和神经监测使用保持警惕,尤其是锁骨下/腋下插管。
    BACKGROUND: Cerebral perfusion may change depending on arterial cannulation site and may affect the incidence of neurologic adverse events in post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The current study compares patients\' neurologic outcomes with three commonly used arterial cannulation strategies (aortic vs. subclavian/axillary vs. femoral artery) to evaluate if each ECLS configuration is associated with different rates of neurologic complications.
    METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter (34 centers), observational study included adults requiring post-cardiotomy ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020 present in the Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS) Study database. Patients with Aortic, Subclavian/Axillary and Femoral cannulation were compared on the incidence of a composite neurological end-point (ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, brain edema). Secondary outcomes were overall in-hospital mortality, neurologic complications as cause of in-hospital death, and post-operative minor neurologic complications (seizures). Association between cannulation and neurological outcomes were investigated through linear mixed-effects models.
    RESULTS: This study included 1897 patients comprising 26.5% Aortic (n = 503), 20.9% Subclavian/Axillary (n = 397) and 52.6% Femoral (n = 997) cannulations. The Subclavian/Axillary group featured a more frequent history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, dialysis, peripheral artery disease and previous stroke. Neuro-monitoring was used infrequently in all groups. Major neurologic complications were more frequent in Subclavian/Axillary (Aortic: n = 79, 15.8%; Subclavian/Axillary: n = 78, 19.6%; Femoral: n = 118, 11.9%; p < 0.001) also after mixed-effects model adjustment (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.02-2.31], p = 0.041). Seizures were more common in Subclavian/Axillary (n = 13, 3.4%) than Aortic (n = 9, 1.8%) and Femoral cannulation (n = 12, 1.3%, p = 0.036). In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation (Aortic: n = 344, 68.4%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 223, 56.2%, Femoral: n = 587, 58.9%, p < 0.001), as shown by Kaplan-Meier curves. Anyhow, neurologic cause of death (Aortic: n = 12, 3.9%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 14, 6.6%, Femoral: n = 28, 5.0%, p = 0.433) was similar.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the PELS Study, Subclavian/Axillary cannulation was associated with higher rates of major neurologic complications and seizures. In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation, despite no significant differences in incidence of neurological cause of death in these patients. These results encourage vigilance for neurologic complications and neuromonitoring use in patients on ECLS, especially with Subclavian/Axillary cannulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的探讨颅外主动脉瘤的外科治疗效果,并总结经验。方法收集2019年5月至2023年11月在首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院血管外科接受手术治疗的10例颅外上主动脉瘤患者的临床资料。10例患者包括5例颈内动脉瘤患者,2例锁骨下动脉瘤,2例椎动脉动脉瘤,1例颈内动脉瘤合并同侧锁骨下动脉瘤。手术适应症,手术方案,临床疗效,并对并发症进行回顾性分析。结果10例患者均顺利完成手术,手术持续时间为60-420min,中位手术持续时间为180.0(121.5,307.5)min。术中出血量在30-400mL内变化,中位数为90(50,125)mL。颈动脉阻断和椎动脉阻断的时间在10-20分钟和20-30分钟的范围内变化。中位数为15.0(11.5,16.3)min和25.0(15.0,22.5)min,分别。没有心脏病,脑梗塞,或围手术期发生脑出血。10例患者随访3~58个月,中位随访时间为8.5(5.3,17.0)个月。一名锁骨下动脉瘤患者在手术后20个月出现人工血管闭塞。1例颈内动脉瘤患者术后6个月出现颈动脉远端狭窄。结论颅外主动脉瘤应积极采取手术治疗。应根据患者情况设计个性化的手术方案。
    Objective To evaluate the effect of surgical treatment on extracranial supra-aortic aneurysms and summarize the experience. Methods The clinical data of 10 patients undergoing surgical treatment of extracranial supra-aortic aneurysms from May 2019 to November 2023 in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Beijing Tiantan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University were collected.The 10 patients included 5 patients with internal carotid artery aneurysm,2 patients with subclavian artery aneurysm,2 patients with vertebral artery aneurysm,and 1 patient with internal carotid artery aneurysm combined with ipsilateral subclavian artery aneurysm.The surgical indications,surgical regimens,clinical efficacy,and complications were retrospectively analyzed. Results All the 10 patients underwent surgery successfully,with the surgery duration range of 60-420 min and the median surgery duration of 180.0 (121.5,307.5) min.Intraoperative bleeding volume varied within 30-400 mL,with a median of 90 (50,125) mL.The time of carotid artery blocking and vertebral artery blocking varied within the ranges of 10-20 min and 20-30 min,with the medians of 15.0 (11.5,16.3) min and 25.0 (15.0,22.5) min,respectively.No cardiac accident,cerebral infarction,or cerebral hemorrhage occurred during the perioperative period.The 10 patients were followed up for 3-58 months,with the median follow-up time of 8.5 (5.3,17.0) months.One patient with subclavian artery aneurysm developed artificial vessel occlusion 20 months after surgery.One patient with internal carotid artery aneurysm developed distal carotid artery stenosis 6 months after surgery. Conclusion Surgical treatment should be actively adopted for extracranial supra-aortic aneurysms,and individualized surgical regimens should be designed according to patient conditions.
    目的 探讨手术治疗颅外段弓上动脉瘤的临床疗效并总结其治疗经验。方法 收集首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院血管外科2019年5月至2023年11月收治的10例颅外段弓上动脉瘤患者的临床资料,其中颈内动脉瘤5例、锁骨下动脉瘤2例、椎动脉瘤2例、颈内动脉瘤合并同侧锁骨下动脉瘤1例。回顾性分析颅外段弓上动脉瘤的手术指征、手术策略、临床疗效及相关并发症。结果 10例患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间60~420 min,中位手术时间180.0(121.5,307.5) min。术中出血30~400 mL,中位出血量90(50,125) mL。颈动脉阻断时间10~20 min,中位阻断时间15.0(11.5,16.3) min。椎动脉阻断时间20~30 min,中位阻断时间25.0(15.0,22.5) min。围手术期均无心脏意外、脑梗死及脑出血发生。10例患者获随访3~58个月,中位随访时间8.5(5.3,17.0)个月。1例锁骨下动脉瘤患者术后20个月出现人工血管闭塞。1例颈内动脉瘤患者术后6个月出现远端颈内动脉狭窄。结论 颅外段弓上动脉瘤应积极采取手术治疗,需根据不同的病变情况采取个体化的手术策略。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)是一种用于治疗B型主动脉夹层的微创技术。在治疗累及LSA的患者时,需要重建左锁骨下动脉(LSA)。LSA重建后的最佳抗血小板治疗目前尚不确定。
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了245例在TEVAR期间接受左锁骨下动脉血运重建的B型主动脉夹层患者。245名患者中,单抗血小板治疗(SAPT)组159例(64.9%),只接受阿司匹林,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)组86例(35.1%),接受阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗。在6个月的随访中,主要终点包括出血事件(一般出血和出血性中风),而次要终点包括缺血事件(左上肢缺血,缺血性卒中,和血栓形成事件),以及死亡和泄漏事件。对出血和缺血事件进行单变量和多变量Cox回归分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法生成生存曲线。
    结果:在六个月的随访中,DAPT组的出血性事件发生率较高(8.2%vs.30.2%,P<0.001)。在缺血事件中没有观察到显著差异,死亡,或不同抗血小板治疗方案中的渗漏事件。多因素Cox回归分析显示,DAPT(HR:2.22,95%CI:1.07-4.60,P=0.032)和既往慢性病(HR:3.88,95%CI:1.24-12.14,P=0.020)显著影响出血性事件的发生。这项研究中的慢性病包括抑郁症,白癜风,和胆囊结石症.颈动脉锁骨下旁路术(CSB)组(HR:0.29,95%CI:0.12-0.68,P=0.004)和单分支支架(SBSG)组(HR:0.26,95%CI:0.13-0.50,P<0.001)的缺血事件发生率低于开窗TEVAR(F-TEVAR)。超过6个月的生存分析显示出血性事件期间与SAPT相关的出血风险较低(P=0.043)。
    结论:在接受同步TEVAR术后LSA血流重建的B型主动脉夹层患者中,SAPT方案的出血风险显着降低,6个月内无明显缺血代偿。既往有慢性疾病的患者出血风险较高。与F-TEVAR组相比,CSB组和SBSG组的缺血风险较低。
    BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat type B aortic dissections. Left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction is required when treating patients with involvement of LSA. The best antiplatelet therapy after LSA reconstruction is presently uncertain.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 245 type B aortic dissection patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during TEVAR. Out of 245 patients, 159 (64.9%) were in the single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) group, receiving only aspirin, and 86 (35.1%) were in the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group, receiving aspirin combined with clopidogrel. During the 6-month follow-up, primary endpoints included hemorrhagic events (general bleeding and hemorrhagic strokes), while secondary endpoints comprised ischemic events (left upper limb ischemia, ischemic stroke, and thrombotic events), as well as death and leakage events. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on hemorrhagic and ischemic events, with the Kaplan-Meier method used to generate the survival curve.
    RESULTS: During the six-month follow-up, the incidence of hemorrhagic events in the DAPT group was higher (8.2% vs. 30.2%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in ischemic events, death, or leakage events among the different antiplatelet treatment schemes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that DAPT (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-4.60, P = 0.032) and previous chronic conditions (HR:3.88, 95% CI: 1.24-12.14, P = 0.020) significantly affected the occurrence of hemorrhagic events. Chronic conditions in this study encompassed depression, vitiligo, and cholecystolithiasis. Carotid subclavian bypass (CSB) group (HR:0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.68, P = 0.004) and single-branched stent graft (SBSG) group (HR:0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.50, P < 0.001) had a lower rate of ischemic events than fenestration TEVAR (F-TEVAR). Survival analysis over 6 months revealed a lower risk of bleeding associated with SAPT during hemorrhagic events (P = 0.043).
    CONCLUSIONS: In type B aortic dissection patients undergoing LSA blood flow reconstruction after synchronous TEVAR, the bleeding risk significantly decreases with the SAPT regimen, and there is no apparent ischemic compensation within 6 months. Patients with previous chronic conditions have a higher risk of bleeding. The CSB group and SBSG group have less ischemic risk compared to F-TEVAR group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    右主动脉弓和异常左锁骨下动脉(ALSA)与Kommerel憩室(KD)的组合很少与主动脉弓下方的左无名静脉(LINV)共存。这无疑增加了手术风险,并增加了临床手术的难度。我们报告1例经超声和计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)诊断的病例。
    The combination of the right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) with Kommerell\'s diverticulum (KD) is rare to coexist with the left innominate vein (LINV) beneath the aortic arch. It escalates the surgical risk undoubtedly and increases the difficulty of clinical procedures. We report one case diagnosed by Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨经皮血管内成形术(PEA)联合选择性支架置入术治疗锁骨下动脉严重狭窄或闭塞的疗效和安全性。我们对接受PEA治疗的重度狭窄≥70%或锁骨下动脉闭塞患者进行回顾性研究.对其临床资料进行分析。回顾性研究了222例患者,其中男性151人(68.0%),女性71人(32.0%),年龄48-86(平均63.9±9.0)岁。47例(21.2%)患者有合并症。201例(90.5%)患者存在锁骨下动脉狭窄≥70%,21例(9.5%)患者存在完全锁骨下闭塞。所有(100%)患者均成功进行了血管成形术。190例(85.6%)使用球囊扩张支架,20例(9.0%)患者使用自膨式支架。仅12例(5.4%)仅接受球囊扩张治疗。在接受支架血管成形术治疗的210例患者中,71例(33.8%或71/210例)进行了球囊预扩张,139(66.2%或139/210)直接展开球囊扩张支架,和2(1.0%或2/210)经历了球囊扩张后。5例(2.3%或5/222)使用远端栓塞保护装置。3例(1.4%)患者发生围手术期并发症,其中主动脉夹层2例(0.9%),右侧大脑中动脉栓塞1例(0.5%)。无出血发生。182例(82.0%)患者随访6个月,1例(0.5%)患者发生再狭窄>70%,在接受12个月随访的68例(30.6%)患者中,11例(16.2%)患者发生了>70%的再狭窄。经皮血管内成形术可以安全有效地治疗严重狭窄≥70%或锁骨下动脉闭塞。
    To investigate the effect and safety of percutaneous endovascular angioplasty (PEA) with optional stenting for the treatment of severe stenosis or occlusion of subclavian artery, patients with severe stenosis ≥ 70% or occlusion of subclavian artery treated with PEA were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data were analyzed. A total of 222 patients were retrospectively enrolled, including 151 males (68.0%) and 71 females (32.0%) aged 48-86 (mean 63.9 ± 9.0) years. Forty-seven (21.2%) patients had comorbidities. Subclavian artery stenosis ≥ 70% was present in 201 (90.5%) patients and complete subclavian occlusion in 21 (9.5%) cases. Angioplasty was successfully performed in all (100%) patients. Balloon-expandable stents were used in 190 (85.6%) cases, and self-expandable stents in 20 (9.0%) cases. Only 12 (5.4%) cases were treated with balloon dilation only. Among 210 patients treated with stent angioplasty, 71 (33.8% or 71/210) cases underwent balloon pre-dilation, 139 (66.2% or 139/210) had direct deployment of balloon-expandable stents, and 2 (1.0% or 2/210) experienced balloon post-dilation. Distal embolization protection devices were used in 5 (2.3% or 5/222) cases. Periprocedural complications occurred in 3 (1.4%) patients, including aortic dissection in 2 (0.9%) cases and right middle cerebral artery embolism in 1 (0.5%). No hemorrhage occurred. Among 182 (82.0%) patients with 6-month follow-up, restenosis > 70% occurred in 1 (0.5%) patient, and among 68 (30.6%) patients with 12-month follow-up, restenosis > 70% took place in 11 (16.2%) patients. Percutaneous endovascular angioplasty can be safely and efficiently performed for the treatment of severe stenosis ≥ 70% or occlusion of subclavian artery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在单个患者中,肺栓塞(PE)和动脉血栓形成并存很少。此类病例的管理具有挑战性,因为在如何治疗此类疾病方面没有统一的标准。我们在此报告一例,涉及一名73岁的男子,他因2天的胸闷病史而入院。肺计算机断层扫描血管造影显示主肺动脉和双侧分支的充盈缺损以及左锁骨下动脉栓塞。AngioJet机械血栓切除术(波士顿科学,马尔伯勒,MA,美国)用于治疗PE,结合左肱动脉切开取栓治疗左锁骨下动脉栓塞。手术后病人恢复得很好。经过9个月的定期随访,预后良好。AngioJet机械取栓联合左臂动脉切口取栓可能是PE合并左锁骨下动脉栓塞的可行治疗方案。
    Coexistence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and arterial thrombosis in a single patient is rare. Management of such cases is challenging because there is no unified standard on how to treat this type of disease. We herein report a case involving a 73-year-old man who was admitted to the hospital because of a 2-day history of chest tightness. Pulmonary computed tomography angiography revealed a filling defect of the main pulmonary artery and bilateral branches as well as a left subclavian artery embolism. AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) was used to treat the PE, and this was combined with left brachial artery incision and thrombectomy for treatment of the left subclavian artery embolism. The patient recovered well after the operation. The prognosis was good after 9 months of regular follow-up. AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy combined with left brachial artery incision thrombectomy may be a feasible treatment option for cases of PE combined with left subclavian artery embolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在验证多普勒超声对无名,锁骨下,和颈总动脉狭窄.
    方法:这项回顾性多中心研究在2013年至2022年期间纳入了636例接受颈动脉多普勒超声检查和随后的数字减影血管造影的患者。58个无名动脉狭窄,147颈总动脉狭窄,包括154例锁骨下动脉狭窄。无名时的收缩期峰值速度,锁骨下,和颈总动脉,无名动脉与颈总动脉的速度比,锁骨下动脉无名动脉,测量或计算颈总动脉至颈内动脉。使用接收器操作特性分析确定阈值。
    结果:无名动脉狭窄的阈值为收缩期峰值速度>206cm/s(灵敏度:82.8%;特异性:91.4%)预测≥50%狭窄和>285cm/s(灵敏度:89.2%;特异性:94.9%)预测≥70%狭窄。颈总动脉狭窄的阈值为收缩期峰值速度>175cm/s(敏感性:78.2%;特异性:91.9%)预测≥50%狭窄和>255cm/s(敏感性:87.1%;特异性:87.2%)预测≥70%狭窄。锁骨下动脉狭窄的阈值为收缩期峰值速度>200cm/s(敏感性:68.2%;特异性:84.4%)以预测≥50%的狭窄和>305cm/s(敏感性:57.9%;特异性:91.4%)以预测≥70%的狭窄。
    结论:无名动脉超声参数≥206cm/s的症状患者,颈总动脉速度≥175cm/s,或锁骨下动脉的速度≥200cm/s需要考虑进一步验证以及是否需要血运重建。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the efficiency of Doppler ultrasonography for predicting the innominate, subclavian, and common carotid artery stenosis.
    METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study between 2013 and 2022 enrolled 636 patients who underwent carotid Doppler ultrasonography and subsequent digital subtraction angiography. And 58 innominate artery stenosis, 147 common carotid artery stenosis, and 154 subclavian artery stenosis were included. The peak systolic velocity at innominate, subclavian, and common carotid artery, and velocity ratios of innominate artery to common carotid artery, innominate artery to subclavian artery, and common carotid artery to internal carotid artery were measured or calculated. The threshold values were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    RESULTS: The threshold values of innominate artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >206 cm/s (sensitivity: 82.8%; specificity: 91.4%) to predict ≥50% stenosis and >285 cm/s (sensitivity: 89.2%; specificity: 94.9%) to predict ≥70% stenosis. The threshold values of common carotid artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >175 cm/s (sensitivity: 78.2%; specificity: 91.9%) to predict ≥50% stenosis and >255 cm/s (sensitivity: 87.1%; specificity: 87.2%) to predict ≥70% stenosis. The threshold values of subclavian artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >200 cm/s (sensitivity: 68.2%; specificity: 84.4%) to predict ≥50% stenosis and >305 cm/s (sensitivity: 57.9%; specificity: 91.4%) to predict ≥70% stenosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic patients with ultrasonic parameters of velocity at innominate artery ≥206 cm/s, velocity at common carotid artery ≥175 cm/s, or velocity at subclavian artery ≥200 cm/s need to be considered for further verification and whether revascularization is necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To observe the short-and mid-term efficacy of left subclavian artery(LSA) laser in situ fenestration combined with arch debranching surgery for aortic arch reconstruction in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection aged 60 years and above. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 41 Stanford type A aortic dissection patients aged 60 years and above who received combined surgery in Department of Endovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 25 males and 16 females, aged (67.3±5.9)years(range: 60 to 75 years). Among them, 19 patients underwent LSA laser in situ fenestration combined with arch debranching surgery(combined surgery group) and 22 patients underwent hybrid aortic arch debranching surgery(non-combined surgery group). Independent sample t test, χ2 test and Fisher exact probability method were used to compare the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the 5-year survival rate of the two groups was compared by Log-rank test. Results: Body mass index in the combined operation group was significantly higher than that in the non-combined operation group ((27.1±1.6)kg/m2 vs.(26.9±1.9)kg/m2; t=2.766,P=0.006), and the difference was statistically significant. There was no statistical significance in the comparison of other general data (all P>0.05). The operation time ((321.3±11.4) minutes vs. (329.6±7.3)minutes; t=-2.733, P=0.010) and LSA reconstruction time ((32.4±3.0)minutes vs. (42.4±6.0)minutes; t=-6.842, P<0.01) in the combined operation group were significantly shortened, and the difference was statistically significant. The rate of LSA reconstruction in the combined operation group (100% vs. 72.7%; P=0.023) was significantly higher than that in the non-combined operation group, and the difference was statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the incidence of pulmonary infection, unplanned second operation, continuous renal replacement therapy, neurological complications and the in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Compared with the non-combined surgery group, the total complication rate related to LSA reconstruction was significantly lower in the combined surgery group (0 vs. 27.3%; P=0.023). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no difference in 5-year survival rate between the combined operation group and the non-combined operation group (84.2% vs. 77.3%; χ2=0.310, P=0.578). Conclusion: Laser in situ fenestration of the LSA combined with arch debranching surgery to reconstruct the aortic arch can significantly shorten the operation and LSA reconstruction time in patients aged 60 years and above with Stanford type A aortic dissection, improve the success rate of LSA reconstruction, and reduce the occurrence rate of LSA reconstruction complications.
    目的: 探讨60岁及以上Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者行左锁骨下动脉激光原位开窗联合弓部去分支技术重建主动脉弓的近中期效果。 方法: 本研究为回顾性队列研究。回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月于郑州大学第一附属医院腔内血管外科行手术治疗的41例60岁及以上Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者的临床资料。男性25例,女性16例,年龄(67.3±5.9)岁(范围:60~75岁)。其中行左锁骨下动脉激光原位开窗联合弓部去分支技术重建主动脉弓患者19例(联合手术组),单纯去分支杂交手术患者22例(非联合手术组)。采用独立样本t检验、χ2检验和Fisher确切概率法比较两组患者临床特征的差异,并采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,Log-rank检验比较两组的5年生存率。 结果: 联合手术组患者体重指数高于非联合手术组[(27.1±1.6)kg/m2 比(26.9±1.9)kg/m2,t=2.766,P=0.006],差异有统计学意义;其他一般资料的差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。与非联合手术组相比,联合手术组手术时间[(321.3±11.4)min比(329.6±7.3)min,t=-2.733,P=0.010]、锁骨下动脉重建时间[(32.4±3.0)min 比(42.4±6.0)min,t=-6.842,P<0.01]明显缩短,差异有统计学意义;联合手术组LSA重建率高于非联合手术组(100%比72.7%,P=0.023),差异有统计学意义。两组患者出现肺部感染、非计划二次手术、连续性肾脏替代治疗、神经系统并发症的比例及院内病死率的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);与非联合手术组相比,联合手术组锁骨下动脉重建相关并发症发生率较低(0比27.3%,P=0.023),差异有统计学意义。Kaplan-Meier生存分析结果显示,联合手术组与非联合手术组5年生存率(84.2%比77.3%,χ2=0.310,P=0.578)无差异。 结论: 左锁骨下动脉激光原位开窗联合弓部去分支技术重建主动脉弓可缩短60岁及以上Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者手术时间,提高锁骨下动脉重建成功率,降低锁骨下动脉重建并发症发生率。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号