scientific literature

科学文献
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对中国国内出版物的分析显示,中国与hormesis相关的研究被大大低估了。中国有据可查的与hormesis相关的研究至少跨越了40年,涵盖广泛的研究领域,比以前想象的更丰富。在对hormesis概念的历史评估中应考虑这些发现。此外,类似于国际文学,不同的术语被用来描述相同的现象(hormesis),这阻碍了沟通,发现的概括和知识的积累。因此,我们主张在所有用中文撰写的相关出版物中,应将“hormesis”作为关键词。
    An analysis of China\'s domestic publications revealed that China\'s hormesis-related research was enormously underestimated. China\'s documented hormesis-related research spans at least four decades, covers a broad spectrum of research areas, and is more abundant than previously thought. These findings should be considered in historical assessments of the concept of hormesis. Moreover, similar to the international literature, different terms have been used to describe the same phenomenon (hormesis), which hampers communication, generalization of findings and accumulation of knowledge. Hence, we advocate that \'hormesis\' should be cited as a keyword in all the relevant publications written in Chinese language.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球超过三分之一的hormesis研究是在美国(US)的机构中进行的。尽管美国从中期开始在hormesis出版记录方面排名第一。20世纪80年代到2010年代中后期,中国在2019-2020年成为最大的hormesis出版物生产国。随着中国正在转变为一个强大的hormesis研究,研究领域可能会出现新的机会。
    More than one third of the worldwide hormesis research has been produced at institutions in the United States (US). Although the US ranked first in terms of hormesis publication records from the mid. 1980s to the mid-late 2010s, China became the largest producer of hormesis publications in the years 2019-2020. As China is transforming into a powerhouse of hormesis research, new opportunities might arise for the research field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The monosialoganglioside (GM1) is a popular topic of research but the bibliometric analysis of GM1 over the decades in Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) remains poorly understood.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the global research and to improve the understanding of research trends in the GM1 field from 1942 to 2011.
    METHODS: A bibliometric study.
    METHODS: We performed a bibliometric analysis based on the SCI-E published by the Institute of Scientific Information.
    UNASSIGNED: Articles closely related to GM1 were included. Exclusive criteria: (1) Articles related to gangliosidosis, disialo-ganglioside, trisialo-ganglioside or ganglioside GQIb. (2) Document types such as meeting abstracts, reviews, proceedings papers, notes, and letters.
    METHODS: (1) Type of publication output; (2) number of author outputs; (3) distribution of output in subject categories; (4) publication distribution of countries; (5) distribution of output in journals, and (6) distribution of citations in each decade.
    RESULTS: During 1942 to 2011, there were 10 126 papers on GM1 that were added to the SCI. Articles (8 004) were the most frequently used document type comprising 79.0%, followed by meeting abstracts, reviews and proceedings papers. Research on GM1 could be found in the SCI from 1942, it was developed in the 1970s, greatly increased in the 1980s, and reached a peak in the 1990s, and it was slightly decreased in 2000. The distribution of subject categories showed that GM1 research covered both clinical and basic science research. The USA, Japan, and Germany were the three most productive countries, and the publication numbers in the USA were highest in all decades. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry and Biochemistry were core subject journals in GM1 studies in each decade.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the topics in GM1 research that are being published around the world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探索一种文献计量学方法,以定量评估2002年至2011年的单唾液酸神经节苷脂检测研究。
    方法:基于WebofScience上的出版物的文献计量分析使用关键词,例如“monosialoganglioside”,“胶体金”,“高效液相色谱”和“检测”。
    方法:(1)单唾液酸神经节苷脂检测研究文章;(2)人和动物基础研究,临床试验和病例报告;(3)文章类型:文章,review,诉讼文件,注意,信,编辑材料,讨论,本书章节;(4)出版年份:2002-2011年。
    方法:(1)无关文章;(2)文章类型:更正;(3)来自以下数据库的文章:排除了WebofScience中与社会科学和艺术与人文科学相关的所有数据库。
    方法:(1)主题领域的分布;(2)每年的出版物数量;(3)文献类型和出版物的语言;(4)机构的分布;(5)期刊产出的分布;(6)文章发表的国家数量;(7)被引用最多的论文。
    结果:在研究期间,总体人口为1880篇研究文章,涉及在WebofScience中检测单唾液酸神经节苷脂。文章(1599)是最常用的文件类型,占85.05%,其次是会议摘要,审查和程序文件。学科类别的分布表明,单唾液酸神经节苷脂研究涵盖了临床和基础科学研究。美国,Japan,意大利是生产力最高的三个国家,美国的发表数量最高,有559篇论文。米兰大学,名古屋大学,和近基大学是检测单唾液酸神经节苷脂最有成效的机构。在美国人发表的559篇文章中,佐治亚州医学院以30篇文章排名第一,其次是新泽西医学和牙科大学(28篇文章),康奈尔大学(24篇文章)和约翰霍普金斯大学(24篇文章)。在日本发表的442篇文章中,名古屋大学以40篇文章排名第一,其次是近基大学(36篇),和独京大学(31篇)。尽管日本人的出版物总数少于美国人,排名前三的机构出版的出版物比美国机构多。2004年,有关单唾液酸神经节苷脂主题检测的出版物数量显着增加,在过去10年中达到顶峰。该主题的谷底出现在2005年。总的来说,研究随着时间的延长而增加。神经化学杂志,生物化学杂志和神经免疫学杂志是单唾液酸神经节苷脂研究的核心主题期刊。
    结论:本研究突出了世界各地发表的单唾液酸神经节苷脂检测研究的主题。
    OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to explore a bibliometric approach to quantitatively assess the research on detection of monosialoganglioside from 2002 to 2011.
    METHODS: A bibliometric analysis based on the publications on Web of Science was performed using key words such as \"monosialoganglioside\", \"colloidal gold\", \"high performance liquid chromatography\" and \"detection\".
    METHODS: (1) Research articles on the detection of monosialoganglioside; (2) researches on human and animal fundamentals, clinical trials and case reports; (3) article types: article, review, proceedings paper, note, letter, editorial material, discussion, book chapter; (4) Publication year: 2002-2011.
    METHODS: (1) unrelated articles; (2) type of articles: correction; (3) articles from following databases: all databases related to social science and arts & humanities in Web of Science were excluded.
    METHODS: (1) distribution of subject areas; (2) number of publications annually; (3) document type and language of publications; (4) distribution of institutions; (5) distribution of output in journals; (6) the number of countries in which the article is published; (7) top cited paper.
    RESULTS: Overall population stands at 1 880 research articles addressing detection of monosialoganglioside in Web of Science during the study period. Articles (1 599) were the most frequently used document type comprising 85.05%, followed by meeting abstracts, reviews and proceedings papers. The distribution of subject categories showed that monosialoganglioside research covered both clinical and basic science research. The USA, Japan, and Italy were the three most productive countries, and the publication numbers in the USA were highest with 559 papers. The University of Milan, Nagoya University, and Kinki University are the most productive institutions regarding detection of monosialoganglioside. In 559 articles published by Americans, Medical College of Georgia ranked the first with 30 articles, followed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (28 articles), Cornell University (24 articles) and Johns Hopkins University (24 articles). In 442 articles published by Japanese, Nagoya University ranked the first with 40 articles, followed by Kinki University (36 articles), and Dokkyo University (31 articles). Though the total number of publications by Japanese is smaller than Americans, the top three institutions published more publications than American institutions. There is a markedly increase in the number of publications on the subject detection of monosialoganglioside in 2004, which the peak in the past 10 years. The valley bottom of the subject appeared in 2005. In total, the research is increased with time prolonged. Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroimmunology were core subject journals in monosialoganglioside studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the topics in detection of monosialoganglioside research that are being published around the world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号