referral

Referral
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非侵入性评估纤维化风险至关重要。脂肪变性相关纤维化评估(SAFE)评分显示出希望,但需要验证。
    方法:这是一项由三部分组成的研究。在第1部分中,我们将SAFE评分与全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)队列(2017-2020)中的纤维化-4(FIB-4)和NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS)进行了比较,使用瞬时弹性成像(TE)作为筛查参考。在第2部分中,我们检查了2018年至2020年在亚洲中心接受肝活检的患者,以评估这些模型在各种肝病中的应用。在第3部分中,将SAFE评分应用于NHANES队列(1999-2016)中的成年人,以评估与死亡率的相关性。
    结果:在第一部分中,我们研究了6,677名患者,包括595个筛查阳性(TE≥8kPa)。SAFE(截止100)显示的假阳性比例(10.4%)低于FIB-4(截止1.3)和NFS(截止-1.455)(22.1%和43.6%),同时保留了低比例的假阴性(5.5%)。在第2部分中,SAFE在NAFLD中分期显着纤维化(≥S2)方面优于FIB-4(P=0.04)和NFS(P=0.04),并且在其他病因中具有相似的准确性。在第3部分中,FIB-4,NFS,SAFE评分与一般人群的全因死亡率相关,c-统计数据分别为0.738、0.736和0.759。
    结论:与FIB-4相比,SAFE评分更有效地减少了无效转诊,而未增加TE≥8kPa的漏诊率。它与普通人群中的全因死亡率相关,并且在NAFLD中的显着纤维化分期方面表现出色。
    OBJECTIVE: Assessing fibrosis risk noninvasively is essential. The steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator (SAFE) score shows promise but needs validation.
    METHODS: This was a three-part study. In part 1, we compared the SAFE score with the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort (2017-2020), using transient elastography (TE) as screening reference. In part 2, we examined patients who underwent liver biopsies at an Asian center between 2018 and 2020 to assess these models in various liver diseases. In part 3, the SAFE score was applied to adults in the NHANES cohort (1999-2016) to assess the correlation with mortality.
    RESULTS: In part 1, we studied 6,677 patients, comprising 595 screening positive (TE ≥8 kPa). SAFE (cutoff 100) displayed a lower proportion of false positives (10.4 %) than FIB-4 (cutoff 1.3) and NFS (cutoff -1.455) (22.1 % and 43.6 %) while retaining a low proportion of false negatives (5.5 %). In part 2, SAFE outperformed FIB-4 (P = 0.04) and NFS (P = 0.04) in staging significant fibrosis (≥S2) in NAFLD and had similar accuracies in other etiologies. In part 3, the FIB-4, NFS, and SAFE score were associated with all-cause mortality in the general population, with c-statistics of 0.738, 0.736, and 0.759, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SAFE score reduced futile referrals more effectively than FIB-4 without raising the missed TE ≥ 8 kPa rate. It correlated with all-cause mortality in the general population and excelled in staging significant fibrosis in NAFLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然学校筛查发现有视力问题的儿童,并在眼科医院转诊,这种方法的有效性仍未得到证实。
    目的:探讨眼科临床服务对患有视力障碍的学龄前儿童近视发生和发展的影响。
    方法:使用来自上海儿童和青少年大规模眼科研究(SCALE)的数据,这项回顾性队列研究评估了来自静安三个地区的儿童的视觉发育,闵行,和浦东-代表了上海17个地区的地理多样性和经济差距。最初,2015年,这项研究涵盖了14572名4-6岁的儿童,其中5917人需要转诊。我们的队列由5,511名儿童组成,他们在2015年1月至2020年12月的随访期内进行了两次或更多次视力筛查和完整的个人信息。我们根据这些儿童的初始球面当量(SE)将其分为两组:高风险组(SE>-0.5D)和近视组(SE≤-0.5D)。在这些群体中,我们进一步将儿童分类为“从不”,迟钝,并根据其转诊依从性及时分组比较近视发生和进展的差异。Cox比例模型用于估计高危人群中每人每年随访的近视发生率的风险比(HR)。使用广义累加模型(GAM)来计算所有儿童的年度球形等效变化的进展。
    结果:在5,511名学龄前儿童中(平均年龄,5.25岁;52.24%男性)接受转诊推荐,1327人(24.08%)在一家眼科医院寻求临床服务。经过六年的随访,65.53%的儿童发展为近视。Never中近视眼的六年累计发病率,迟钝,及时组为64.76%,69.31%,和57.14%,分别。这些百分比对应于延迟组的1.31(95%CI,1.10-1.55)和及时组的0.55(95%CI,0.33-0.93)的风险比(HR),与Never组相比。HR根据年龄进行了调整,性别,和SE在研究进入。有趣的是,及时组的SE进展明显少于其他组(P<0.001),高危人群的SE进展(-0.33±0.37D/年)高于近视儿童(-0.08±0.55D/年)。
    结论:在学校视力筛查失败的4至6岁儿童中,及时使用眼科临床服务可以显着降低近视的发生率并减缓SE的进展。
    BACKGROUND: Although school screenings identify children with vision problems and issue referrals for medical treatment at an ophthalmic hospital, the effectiveness of this approach remains unverified.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of ophthalmic clinical services on the onset and progression of myopia in preschool children identified with vision impairment.
    METHODS: Using data from the Shanghai Child and Adolescent Large-scale Eye Study (SCALE), this retrospective cohort study evaluated the visual development of children from three districts-Jing\'an, Minhang, and Pudong-which are representative of geographic diversity and economic disparity in Shanghai\'s 17 districts. Initially, in 2015, the study encompassed 14,572 children aged 4-6 years, of whom 5,917 needed a referral. Our cohort consisted of 5,511 children who had two or more vision screenings and complete personal information over the follow-up period from January 2015 to December 2020. We divided these children into two groups based on their initial spherical equivalent (SE): a High-risk group (SE > -0.5 D) and a Myopia group (SE ≤ -0.5 D). Within each of these groups, we further categorized children into Never, Tardily, and Timely groups based on their referral compliance to compare the differences in the occurrence and progression of myopia. Cox proportional models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for myopia incidence per person-years of follow-up in High-risk group. Generalized additive models(GAM) was used to calculating the progression for annual spherical equivalent changes in all children.
    RESULTS: Of the 5,511 preschool children (mean age, 5.25 years; 52.24% male) who received a referral recommendation, 1,327 (24.08%) sought clinical services at an ophthalmic hospital. After six years of follow-up, 65.53% of children developed myopia. The six-year cumulative incidence of myopia in the Never, Tardily, and Timely groups was 64.76%, 69.31%, and 57.14%, respectively. These percentages corresponded to hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.10-1.55) for the Tardily group and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33-0.93) for the Timely group, compared with the Never group. The HRs were adjusted for age, sex, and SE at study entry. Interestingly, the Timely group showed significantly less SE progression than the other groups (P < 0.001), and SE progression was higher in the High-risk group (-0.33 ± 0.37D/year) than in children with myopia (-0.08 ± 0.55D/year).
    CONCLUSIONS: Timely utilization of ophthalmic clinical services among children aged 4 to 6 years who fail school vision screenings can significantly reduce the incidence of myopia and slow SE progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:提供者对CR和转诊(PACRR)量表的态度被翻译成简体中文,随后进行了心理测量验证。
    方法:应用Brislin的翻译模型,有两个独立的正向翻译,然后是反向翻译。专家评估了面部,项目的内容和跨文化有效性,然后进行项目分析。对于验证,来自中国14个省医院的227名医生完成了PACRR-C。通过探索性和验证性因子分析评估结构效度。评估了内部和半分裂可靠性。
    结果:一些项目被改写,一个项目被删除。总量表的内容效度指数为0.965。18个项目与总量表之间的相关系数在0.28和0.76之间。与英文版一致,通过因子分析提取了四个因子(克朗巴赫的α范围为0.671-0.959),占总方差的71.21%。分裂半可靠性为0.945。影响医生CR态度的最大因素是转诊过程的不便(3.93±0.65/5);缺乏标准转诊表格(3.92±0.66),将转诊视为另一名临床医生的责任(3.89±0.67),并需要支持填写转诊表(3.89±0.64)。
    结论:可靠性,以及内容,脸,跨文化,和18项的结构有效性,4分量表PACRR-C,得到了支持。
    BACKGROUND: The Provider Attitudes toward CR and Referral (PACRR) scale was translated into Simplified Chinese and psychometric validation ensued.
    METHODS: Brislin\'s Translation Model was applied, with two independent forward translations followed by back-translation. Experts assessed the face, content and cross-cultural validity of items, and item analysis followed. For validation, 227 physicians from hospitals in 14 Chinese provinces completed the PACRR-C. Structural validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal and split-half reliability were assessed.
    RESULTS: Some items were rephrased and one item was deleted. The content validity index for the total scale was 0.965. The correlation coefficients between the 18 items and the total scale ranged between 0.28 and 0.76. Consistent with the English version, four factors were extracted (Cronbach\'s alpha ranged from 0.671-0.959) through the factor analysis, accounting for 71.21% of the total variance. Split-half reliability was 0.945. The greatest factors impacting physician\'s CR attitudes were inconvenience of the referral process (3.93 ± 0.65/5); lack of standard referral forms (3.92 ± 0.66), perceiving referral as the responsibility of another clinician (3.89 ± 0.67), and need for support in completing the referral form (3.89 ± 0.64).
    CONCLUSIONS: The reliability, as well as content, face, cross-cultural, and structural validity of the 18-item, 4-subscale PACRR-C, were supported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    荨麻疹(定义为荨麻疹的存在,血管性水肿,或两者)可能由多种病因引起,从更常见的疾病如慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)到罕见的疾病如遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)。在严重荨麻疹或HAE的情况下,专家转诊可能是必要的,但是在某些地区,获得专业服务的机会仍然有限,例如中国的大湾区(GBA)。为了解决这个问题,香港-澳门重症荨麻疹和血管性水肿转诊路径(SHARP)由香港过敏研究所和澳门皮肤病学会发起,旨在促进重症荨麻疹诊断和治疗方面的多学科合作和区域专业知识交流.
    由治疗严重荨麻疹患者的皮肤科医生和免疫学家组成的指定工作组使用德尔菲法制定了共识声明(CS)。共识先验定义为≥80%的协议。
    共配制了24CS,包括关于分类和定义的四个陈述,关于诊断的七项声明,以及13项关于管理和转介的声明。阐述了急性/慢性荨麻疹和严重CSU的定义。不鼓励进行不必要的调查和不适当的药物治疗。指定了可疑缓激肽能血管性水肿的特征和推荐方法。使用第二代抗组胺药的逐步治疗方案,奥马珠单抗,或环孢菌素用于CSU患者的治疗,强调了获得HAE特异性药物的重要性.此外,为严重荨麻疹和血管性水肿患者建立了综合转诊途径.
    SHARP为香港和澳门严重荨麻疹和血管性水肿患者的管理和专科转诊提供指导。
    UNASSIGNED: Urticaria (defined as the presence of hives, angioedema, or both) can be caused by a variety of etiologies ranging from more common conditions such as chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) to rarer conditions such as hereditary angioedema (HAE). Specialist referral may be necessary in cases of severe urticaria or HAE, but access to specialist services remains limited in certain regions, such as the Greater Bay Area (GBA) of China. To address this, the Hong Kong-Macau Severe Hives and Angioedema Referral Pathway (SHARP) was initiated by the Hong Kong Institute of Allergy and Macau Society of Dermatology to promote multidisciplinary collaboration and regional exchange of expertise in the diagnosis and management of severe urticaria.
    UNASSIGNED: A nominated task force of dermatologists and immunologists who manage patients with severe urticaria formulated the consensus statements (CS) using the Delphi method. The consensus was defined a priori as an agreement of ≥80%.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 24 CS were formulated, including four statements on classifications and definitions, seven statements on diagnosis, and 13 statements on management and referral. The definitions for acute/chronic urticaria and severe CSU were stated. Unnecessary investigations and inappropriate medications were discouraged. The characteristics and recommended approach to suspected bradykinergic angioedema were specified. Stepwise treatment options using second-generation antihistamines, omalizumab, or cyclosporin for patients with CSU were addressed, and the importance of access to HAE-specific medications was emphasized. Furthermore, an integrated referral pathway for patients with severe hives and angioedema was constructed.
    UNASSIGNED: The SHARP provides guidance for the management and specialist referral of patients with severe hives and angioedema in Hong Kong and Macau.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺动脉高压(PH)曾经是一种毁灭性的致命疾病,随着医疗算法的不断进步,其前景得到了显著改善。然而,尽管接受了最大程度的药物治疗,但一些患者最终仍未能获得足够的临床反应。历史上,肺移植(LTx)是唯一有效的治疗选择,可以带来令人满意的结果并挽救这些晚期患者的生命.然而,在移植等待名单上,PH患者的死亡率往往最高;特别是在综合治疗后,它们继续迅速恶化,最终缺少最佳移植窗口。在PH患者的LTx中,平衡优化的药物治疗与适当的转诊和上市时机一直存在很大争议。2021年国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)选择肺移植候选人的共识文件更新了基于客观风险分层的PH患者LTx转诊和上市时间的具体建议。在这里,我们回顾了不断发展的PH相关概念,并强调了PH患者的LTx转诊和列表的优化,以及他们在等待名单上的管理层。
    Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was once a devastating and fatal disease entity, the outlook of which has been significantly improved by the continued progress of medical treatment algorithms. However, some patients still ultimately fail to achieve an adequate clinical response despite receiving maximal medical treatment. Historically, lung transplantation (LTx) has been the only effective therapeutic option that could lead to satisfactory outcomes and save these advanced patients\' lives. However, patients with PH tend to have the highest mortality rates on the transplant waiting list; especially after comprehensive medical treatment, they continue to deteriorate very rapidly, eventually missing optimal transplantation windows. Balancing optimized medical treatment with the appropriate timing of referral and listing has been highly controversial in LTx for patients with PH. The 2021 consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) updated the specific recommendations for the LTx referral and listing time for patients with PH based on objective risk stratification. Herein, we review the evolving PH-related concepts and highlight the optimization of LTx referral and listing for patients with PH, as well as their management on the waiting list.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨常规管理与个案管理对慢性病患者社会支持和自我效能的影响,并评估新的护士主导的医疗协作模式。
    方法:这是一项经安徽医科大学生物医学伦理委员会批准的前瞻性研究。选取2020年1月至2021年12月在合肥市第一人民医院接受治疗和护理的100例慢性病患者作为研究对象,按照数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。在对照组中,实行常规管理,虽然观察得到了护士主导的医疗保健协作护理,其中包括提供治疗服务的社区医生和签约管理护理的家庭医生。比较两组患者的自我效能,自我管理能力,社会支持,和他们的出席。
    结果:干预前,自我效能感差异无统计学意义,两组患者的依从性和生活质量评分比较(P>0.05)。干预之后,自我效能感,观察组患者的依从性和生活质量评分明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。并对两组病人由社区转院至医院的情况进行统计评估,结果发现,手术后观察组患者从社区转移到医院的比例明显高于对照组,在医院成本的统计上有显著差异,两组住院天数和再入院率比较(P<0.05)。从医院转院到疗养院的患者比例增加了72.2%,而对照组只有35.5%,观察组出院率(家庭护理)明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:本研究为慢性病患者的有效管理提供了参考。通过比较常规护理和病例护理管理模式的数据,可以发现,使用护士主导的医疗保健协作模式满足了老年人的紧急医疗和护理服务需求,改善对医疗和护理资源的及时访问,并有效提高自我效能感,慢性疾病患者的依从性和生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of routine management compared to case management on social support and self-efficacy of patients with chronic diseases and assess the new nurse-led healthcare collaborative model.
    METHODS: This is a prospective study which was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University. A total of 100 patients with chronic diseases who received treatment and care in Hefei First People\'s Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects and divided into a control group and an observation group according to the numerical table method, with 50 cases in each group. In the control group, conventional management was implemented, while the observation received a nurse-led healthcare collaborative care, which included community doctors providing treatment services and family doctors contracting to manage care. The patients in the two groups were compared in terms of self-efficacy, self-management ability, social support, and their attendance.
    RESULTS: Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in self-efficacy, compliance and quality of life scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, self-efficacy, compliance and quality of life scores were significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). A statistical assessment of the transfer of patients from the community to the hospital was also conducted for both groups, and it was found that the proportion of patients transferred from the community to the hospital was significantly higher in the observation group compared to that in the control group after surgery, with statistically significant differences in hospital costs, hospital days and readmission rates between the two groups (P<0.05). The proportion of patients transferred from the hospital to nursing home increased by 72.2% in the observation group compared to only 35.5% in the control group, and the discharge rate (home care) was significantly higher in the observation group (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides some references for the effective management of patients with chronic diseases. By comparing the data from the conventional and case care management models, it can be found that the use of a nurse-led healthcare collaborative model meets the acute medical and nursing service needs of older people, improves timely access to medical and nursing resources, and effectively improves self-efficacy, compliance and quality of life in patients with chronic diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:及时筛查和转诊可以改善围产期抑郁症(PND)的结局。然而,在中国,PND筛查后转诊的吸收率较低,原因尚不清楚.本文的目的是探讨在中国初级孕产妇保健系统中转诊PND筛查结果阳性的妇女的障碍和促进因素。
    方法:从位于中国四个不同省份的四个初级卫生中心收集了定性数据。从2020年5月至8月,四名研究人员分别在初级卫生中心进行了30天的参与者观察。数据是通过参与者观察和半结构化的深度访谈收集的,这些访谈对PND筛查结果呈阳性的新妈妈进行了访谈。他们的家庭成员,和初级保健提供者。两名研究人员独立分析了定性数据。进行了专题分析,使用社会生态模型构建数据。
    结果:共进行了870小时的观察和46次访谈。确定了五个主题:个人(新妈妈对PND的了解,感知到需要寻求帮助),人际关系(新母亲对提供者的态度,家庭支持),机构(提供者对PND的感知,缺乏培训,时间限制),社区(获得精神卫生服务,实际因素),和公共政策(政策要求,污名)。
    结论:新妈妈接受PND转诊的可能性与五个方面的因素有关。可以围绕这些主题制定干预策略,可能包括对新妈妈及其家人进行PND教育,培训初级保健提供者,以提高他们对病情和转诊指征的认识,在常规产后家庭访视中建立心理健康支持,并通过移动技术提供支持。
    BACKGROUND: Timely screening and referral can improve the outcomes of perinatal depression (PND). However, uptake rates of referral after PND screening are low in China and the reasons are unclear. The aim of this article is to explore the barriers and facilitators for referring women with positive results of PND screening in the Chinese primary maternal health care system.
    METHODS: Qualitative data were collected from four primary health centers located in four different provinces of China. Each of the four investigators conducted 30 days of participant observations in the primary health centers from May to August 2020. Data were collected via participant observations and semi-structured in-depth interviews with new mothers who had positive results of PND screening, their family members, and primary health providers. Two investigators analyzed qualitative data independently. A thematic analysis was conducted, and data were framed using the social ecological model.
    RESULTS: A total of 870 hours of observation and 46 interviews were carried out. Five themes were identified: individual (new mothers\' knowledge of PND, perceived need to seek help), interpersonal (new mothers\' attitudes towards providers, family support), institutional (providers\' perception of PND, lack of training, time constraints), community (accessibility to mental health services, practical factors), and public policy (policy requirements, stigma).
    CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of new mothers accepting PND referral is related to factors in five areas. Intervention strategies can be developed around these themes and may include educating new mothers and their families about PND, training primary health providers to improve their awareness of condition and indication for referral, building mental health support in routine postpartum home visits, and providing support through mobile technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    应考虑提供早期肺移植转诊服务,以降低晚期疾病患者的移植前死亡率。本研究旨在探讨患者肺移植转诊决策的原因,为开展移植转诊服务提供依据。这是一个定性的,回顾性,以及涉及常规内容分析的描述性研究。患者在评估中,上市,和移植后阶段进行了访谈。总共采访了35名参与者(25名男性和10名女性)。确定了四个主要主题:(1)对肺移植的期望导致决定(为一线希望而赌博,恢复正常生活,和职业);(2)面对不确定的结果(个人运气安排一切;对成功的信念;导致“当时决定”的事件;由于恐惧而做出决定时的犹豫);(3)面对同龄人的各种信息,医生,等等;(4)复杂的政策和社会支持(较早提供移植转诊服务,家庭依恋和口头批准答复有助于推荐决定,等等)。这项研究的结果可能会丰富现有的转介服务,包括对家庭成员和医疗保健提供者的培训,患者肺移植转诊决策过程中的关键事件清单和包,基于行为角色的精准服务,以及提高患者决策自我效能感的课程。
    Providing early lung transplantation referral services should be considered to reduce pre-transplant mortality in patients with advanced disease. This study aimed to explore the reasons for lung transplantation referral decisions in patients and provide evidence for the development of transplantation referral services. This was a qualitative, retrospective, and descriptive study involving conventional content analysis. Patients in evaluation, listing, and post-transplant stages were interviewed. A total of 35 participants (25 male and 10 female) were interviewed. Four main themes were defined: (1) expectations for lung transplantation leading to the decision (a gamble for a silver lining, a return to normal life, and occupation); (2) facing uncertain outcomes (personal luck arranging everything; belief in success; incidents leading to \"It\'s decided then\"; hesitation when making a decision due to fear); (3) facing various information from peers, doctors, and so on; (4) complex policy and societal support (providing transplantation referral services earlier, family attachment and oral approval responses contribute to the referral decision, and so on). The findings of this study might enrich existing referral services, including training for family members and healthcare providers, a checklist and package of critical events in the patient lung transplantation referral decision-making process, precision services based on behavioral personas, and a curriculum to enhance patient decision self-efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鉴于婴幼儿血管瘤(IH)的高发病率,迫切需要一个全面合理的转诊评估量表。这项研究比较了血管瘤严重程度量表(HSS)和婴儿血管瘤转诊评分(IHReS)对婴儿血管瘤患者治疗决策的影响。
    目的:我们旨在建立一种可靠有效的转诊评估方法。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,旨在确定在使用HSS和IHReS评估后是否需要对IH患者进行治疗。
    结果:总共对266名连续转诊的IH患者进行了IH风险评估,治疗率为80.8%。在HSS转诊后,受试者接受治疗决策的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.703(95%CI:0.634-0.772),IHReS转诊后为0.892(95%CI:0.824-0.960)。
    结论:这是一项单中心研究。
    结论:关于IH患者治疗的决定,IHReS比HSS具有更高的效率和灵敏度。然而,IHReS的特异性低于HSS。
    BACKGROUND: In view of the high incidence of infantile hemangioma (IH) in infants and young children, a comprehensive and reasonable evaluation scale for referral is urgently needed. This study compared the influence of the Hemangioma Severity Scale (HSS) and the Infantile Hemangioma Referral Score (IHReS) on treatment decisions for infantile hemangioma patients.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish a reliable and effective evaluation method for referral.
    METHODS: This was a prospective study to determine whether treatment was needed for IH patients after evaluation with the HSS and IHReS.
    RESULTS: A total of 266 consecutive referred IH patients were evaluated for the risk of IH, and the treatment rate was 80.8%. The area under the curve (AUC) of the subject receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of treatment decision making after referral by the HSS was 0.703 (95% CI: 0.634-0.772), and after referral by the IHReS was 0.892 (95% CI: 0.824-0.960).
    CONCLUSIONS: This was a single-center study.
    CONCLUSIONS: For decisions regarding the treatment of IH patients, the IHReS has a higher efficiency and sensitivity than the HSS. However, the specificity of the IHReS is lower than that of the HSS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过培训同龄人作为禁毒大使(ADAs)来开发基于社区的网络是识别隐藏药物滥用者的可行策略。问,警告,建议,戒烟推荐和再做(AWARD)模式有助于增强人们对推荐给禁毒服务的信心。这项研究通过检查知识的变化来评估这种网络的有效性,在我们培训六个月之前和之后,对198名13-18岁的ADA的态度和做法(KAP)。使用一组测试前和重复的测试后设计。单向重复测量方差分析用于评估KAP的变化,p值通过Bonferroni校正进行调整。结果表明,与基线相比,在六个月的随访中,ADAs在药物滥用方面的KAP在统计学上显着改善。所有认识吸毒者(n=3)的ADA都将他们转介给基于AWARD模型的服务。共进行了154项反药物滥用活动,4561人。根据结果,我们得出的结论是,以社区为基础的网络有效地改善了ADA关于药物滥用的KAP,以及指隐藏的吸毒者。未来的研究应该考虑在更大的范围内实施网络,从而最大限度地提高其禁毒能力。
    Developing a community-based network by training peers as anti-drug ambassadors (ADAs) is a feasible strategy to identify hidden drug abusers. The Ask, Warn, Advise, Refer and Do-it-again (AWARD) model of smoking cessation is useful for enhancing people\'s confidence in making referrals to anti-drug services. This study evaluated the effectiveness of such a network by examining the change in knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of 198 ADAs aged 13-18 before and after six months of our training. A one-group pre-test and repeated post-test design was used. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was applied to assess the changes in KAP, with p-values adjusted by Bonferroni correction. The results showed that the ADAs statistically significantly improved their KAP regarding drug abuse at the six-month follow-up compared to baseline. All ADAs who knew drug abusers (n = 3) had referred them to services based on the AWARD model. A total of 154 anti-drug abuse activities were conducted, reaching 4561 people. Based on the results, we concluded that the community-based network was effective in improving the KAP of ADAs regarding drug abuse, as well as referring hidden drug abusers. Future studies should consider implementing the network on a larger scale, thus maximizing its anti-drug capacity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号