randomised controlled trial

随机受控试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估数字图画书对术前焦虑的影响,接受心导管插入术的幼儿的疼痛和睡眠质量以及其家庭护理人员的焦虑。
    方法:随机,单盲,双臂,平行组对照试验。
    方法:参与者是2-7岁患有先天性心脏病并计划进行心导管插入术的幼儿及其家庭照顾者。他们于2022年9月至2023年7月在福建医科大学协和医院注册。他们被随机分为接受常规护理的对照组或接受数字图画书课程的干预组。使用标准化量表评估焦虑和疼痛水平,睡眠质量是使用肌动描记术测量的。
    结果:该研究包括64对幼儿和家庭照顾者。数字图画书可显着减少儿童的术前焦虑和绷带去除疼痛以及家庭护理人员的焦虑。然而,干预组与对照组的睡眠质量无统计学差异。
    结论:数字图画书被证明是一种有效的干预措施,可以减轻儿科心导管插入术患者的焦虑和疼痛以及家庭护理人员的焦虑。干预没有影响睡眠质量,建议需要额外的策略来解决这方面的医院经验。
    这项研究证明了数字插图书籍在减轻幼儿术前焦虑和疼痛以及家庭护理人员焦虑方面的有效性。数字图画书提供了一种创造性和引人入胜的方式来帮助儿童及其家庭应对与医疗程序相关的压力和焦虑。该领域的进一步研究可能会导致为儿科患者及其家庭护理人员开发更多创新和有效的干预措施。
    结论:这项研究的影响在于其创新的方法来解决幼儿及其家庭照顾者在心导管插入术的压力过程中面临的心理和情感挑战。通过展示数字图画书在显著减少术前焦虑和术后疼痛方面的功效,这项研究提出了一种非药理学,可访问且引人入胜的干预措施,可以无缝集成到现有的医疗保健实践中。这些发现有可能通过提供安全的儿科护理来改变儿科护理,发展适当和具有成本效益的方法,以支持儿童及其家庭的情感福祉,从而提高患者的整体体验和临床结果。此外,该研究强调家庭护理人员的参与,强调了整体护理方法的重要性,该方法考虑了患者及其支持系统的需求。
    儿童和他们的家庭照顾者被邀请提供宝贵的意见,这对干预措施的发展至关重要。参与者信息表和同意书,以及同意/招聘过程,由试点研究的消费者顾问倡导者审查。
    CONSORT.
    背景:中国临床试验注册:ChiCTR2200063973.2022年9月22日注册,https://www。chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=132833。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of digital picture books on preoperative anxiety, pain and sleep quality in young children undergoing cardiac catheterisation and the anxiety of their family caregivers.
    METHODS: A randomised, single-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group controlled trial.
    METHODS: Participants are young children aged 2-7 years with congenital heart disease scheduled for cardiac catheterisation and their family caregivers. They were enrolled at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between September 2022 and July 2023. They were randomised to either a control group receiving usual care or an intervention group receiving digital picture book sessions. Anxiety and pain levels were assessed using standardised scales, and sleep quality was measured using actigraphy.
    RESULTS: The study included 64 pairs of young children and family caregivers. Digital picture books significantly reduced preoperative anxiety and bandage removal pain in children and anxiety in family caregivers. However, there was no statistical difference in sleep quality between the intervention group and the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Digital picture books prove to be an effective intervention for reducing anxiety and pain in paediatric cardiac catheterisation patients and anxiety of their family caregivers. The intervention did not affect sleep quality, suggesting the need for additional strategies to address this aspect of the hospital experience.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of digitally illustrated books in reducing preoperative anxiety and pain in young children and anxiety in family caregivers. Digital picture books offer a creative and engaging way to help children and their families cope with the stress and anxiety associated with medical procedures. Further research in this area may lead to the development of more innovative and effective interventions for paediatric patients and their family caregivers.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study\'s impact lies in its innovative approach to addressing the psychological and emotional challenges faced by young children and their family caregivers during the stressful experience of cardiac catheterisation. By demonstrating the efficacy of digital picture books in significantly reducing preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain, the research presents a non-pharmacological, accessible and engaging intervention that can be seamlessly integrated into existing healthcare practices. The findings have the potential to transform paediatric care by offering a safe, developmentally appropriate and cost-effective method to support the emotional well-being of children and their families, thereby enhancing the overall patient experience and clinical outcomes. Moreover, the study\'s emphasis on family caregiver involvement underscores the importance of a holistic approach to care that considers the needs of both the patient and their support system.
    UNASSIGNED: Children and their family caregivers were invited to provide valuable input which has been critical to the development of the intervention. The participant information sheet and consent form, as well as the consent/recruitment process, were reviewed by a consumer advisor advocate from the pilot study.
    UNASSIGNED: CONSORT.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200063973. Registered on 22 September 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=132833.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:营养不良在住院患者中普遍存在,增加了发病率,死亡率,和医疗费用;然而入院时的营养评估并不是常规的。这项研究评估了使用基于人工智能(AI)的快速营养诊断系统对住院患者进行常规营养筛查的临床和经济效益。
    方法:一项全国性的多中心随机对照试验在10个省的11个中心进行。住院患者被随机分配接受评估使用基于AI的快速营养诊断系统作为常规护理的一部分(实验组),或不(对照组)。计算每个参与者的总体医疗资源成本,并根据意向治疗分析生成决策树,以分析各种治疗方式的成本效益。根据临床特征进行亚组分析,并进行概率敏感性分析以评估参数变化对增量成本效益比(ICER)的影响。
    结果:总计,5763名患者参与了这项研究,实验臂中的2830和控制臂中的2933。实验臂的治愈率明显高于对照臂(23.24%对20.18%;p=0.005)。实验手臂产生了276.52元人民币的增量成本,导致额外的3.06治愈,产生90.37元人民币的ICER。敏感性分析表明,决策树模型相对稳定。
    结论:将基于AI的快速营养诊断系统整合到常规住院护理中,大大提高了住院患者的治愈率,并且具有成本效益。
    背景:NCT04776070(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04776070)。
    OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalised patients, and increases the morbidity, mortality, and medical costs; yet nutritional assessments on admission are not routine. This study assessed the clinical and economic benefits of using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based rapid nutritional diagnostic system for routine nutritional screening of hospitalised patients.
    METHODS: A nationwide multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted at 11 centres in 10 provinces. Hospitalised patients were randomised to either receive an assessment using an AI-based rapid nutritional diagnostic system as part of routine care (experimental group), or not (control group). The overall medical resource costs were calculated for each participant and a decision-tree was generated based on an intention-to-treat analysis to analyse the cost-effectiveness of various treatment modalities. Subgroup analyses were performed according to clinical characteristics and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of parameter variations on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
    RESULTS: In total, 5763 patients participated in the study, 2830 in the experimental arm and 2933 in the control arm. The experimental arm had a significantly higher cure rate than the control arm (23.24% versus 20.18%; p = 0.005). The experimental arm incurred an incremental cost of 276.52 CNY, leading to an additional 3.06 cures, yielding an ICER of 90.37 CNY. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the decision-tree model was relatively stable.
    CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the AI-based rapid nutritional diagnostic system into routine inpatient care substantially enhanced the cure rate among hospitalised patients and was cost-effective.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04776070 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04776070).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    轮状病毒疫苗并未纳入香港政府的儿童免疫计划。这项随机对照试验研究了简单的干预方案是否可以增加香港儿童的轮状病毒疫苗摄入量。
    从香港的两家公立医院招募产后母亲,并使用区组随机化方法随机分为三组,调查人员和研究人员不知道区块大小。对照受试者接受了公共轮状病毒信息。干预组1的受试者还收到:关键轮状病毒信息,并带有指向网页的超链接,该网页显示私人诊所提供轮状病毒疫苗和搜索诊所的指导,疫苗接种提醒。干预组2的受试者接受与第1组相同的干预,并在特定的健康中心接受免费的轮状病毒疫苗。当儿童大约8个月大时收集轮状病毒疫苗接种状态。在招募时和研究结束时评估母亲对轮状病毒疫苗的态度。该试验已在中国临床试验登记册中注册(参考文献:ChiCTR2000039791)。
    从2021年2月16日至7月30日,招募了788名符合条件的母亲,并将其随机分配到对照组(n=263)。干预组1(n=263),和干预组2(n=262)。完整的干预方案(干预组2相对于对照组)使轮状病毒疫苗的摄取增加了1.7倍(95%置信区间[CI]=1.49-1.97)或33个百分点(从48%到81%的摄取)。通过疫苗接种提醒(干预组1相对于对照组)和消除财务障碍(干预组2相对于干预组1)提供关键轮状病毒信息增加了1.17倍(95%CI=0.99-1.38)或8个百分点,和1.46倍(95%CI=1.29-1.66)或25%点,分别。
    多组件干预包,特别是提供免费疫苗,可能会增加香港儿童轮状病毒疫苗的摄入量。一揽子干预措施对低收入家庭的影响最大,强调消除疫苗接种财务障碍以促进公平的重要性。将轮状病毒疫苗纳入常规CIP可以进一步保护更多幼儿免受轮状病毒感染并提高公平性。
    这项工作得到卫生局卫生和医学研究基金的支持,香港特别行政区政府[参考。:19180202]。
    UNASSIGNED: Rotavirus vaccine has not been included in the Hong Kong Government\'s Childhood Immunisation Programme. This randomised controlled trial examined whether a simple intervention package can increase rotavirus vaccine uptake in Hong Kong children.
    UNASSIGNED: Postpartum mothers were recruited from two public hospitals in Hong Kong and randomly allocated into three groups using block randomisation, with block sizes kept unknown to investigators and research staff. Control-subjects received public rotavirus information. Subjects in intervention group 1 additionally received: key rotavirus information with a hyperlink to a webpage showing private clinics providing rotavirus vaccines and guidance on searching the clinics, and vaccination reminders. Subjects in intervention group 2 received the same intervention as group 1, plus tokens to receive free rotavirus vaccines at specific health centres. Rotavirus vaccination status was collected when children were approximately 8 months old. Maternal attitudes towards rotavirus vaccine were assessed at enrolment and at the end of the study. This trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (Ref.:ChiCTR2000039791).
    UNASSIGNED: From 16 February to 30 July 2021, 788 eligible mothers were recruited and randomly allocated to control group (n = 263), intervention group 1 (n = 263), and intervention group 2 (n = 262). The full intervention package (intervention group 2 relative to control group) increased rotavirus vaccine uptake by 1.7 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49-1.97) or by 33 percent-points (from 48% to 81% uptake). Provision of key rotavirus information with vaccination reminders (intervention group 1 relative to control group) and removal of financial barrier (intervention group 2 relative to intervention group 1) increased uptake by 1.17 times (95% CI = 0.99-1.38) or 8 percent-points, and by 1.46 times (95% CI = 1.29-1.66) or 25 percent-points, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: A multiple-component intervention package, and in particular providing free vaccine, could increase the uptake of rotavirus vaccine in Hong Kong children. The impact of the intervention package was greatest in low-income families, emphasising the importance of removing financial barriers to vaccination to promote equity. Incorporating rotavirus vaccine into the routine CIP could further protect more young children from rotavirus infection and improve equity.
    UNASSIGNED: This work was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund by the Health Bureau, Government of Hong Kong SAR [Ref.: 19180202].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:充分的肠道准备对于成功的结肠镜检查和息肉切除术至关重要。然而,相当比例的患者仍表现出不理想的肠道准备,从18%到35%不等。肠道制剂的有效性可能受到体积和味道的阻碍,对患者依从性和耐受性产生不利影响。因此,探索减少泻药量并提高患者耐受性和依从性的策略对于确保最佳的肠道准备质量至关重要.
    方法:这项研究是一项双臂研究,单盲,平行组随机对照试验,旨在比较2L聚乙二醇(PEG)联合利那洛肽与4LPEG在肠道清洁中的疗效。总共422名参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配到干预组(2LPEG结合580µg利那洛肽)或对照组(4LPEG)。主要结果指标是肠道清洁功效,这是使用波士顿肠道准备量表进行评估。次要结果包括评估肠道准备方案的耐受性和安全性,肠日记评估,息肉切除术后并发症(如出血和穿孔)以及切除息肉的大小和数量。
    背景:该研究已获得第一附属医院临床研究伦理委员会的批准,浙江大学医学院.通过指导选择适当的肠道准备方案,该试验的结果将为临床医生和接受结肠镜检查息肉切除术的患者提供宝贵的资源。研究结果将传播给参与者,在专业协会会议上提出,并在同行评审的期刊上发表。该试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2300075410。
    BACKGROUND: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy and polypectomy procedures. However, a significant proportion of patients still exhibit suboptimal bowel preparation, ranging from 18% to 35%. The effectiveness of bowel preparation agents can be hampered by volume and taste, adversely affecting patient compliance and tolerance. Therefore, exploring strategies to minimise laxative volume and improve patient tolerance and adherence is imperative to ensure optimal bowel preparation quality.
    METHODS: This study is a two-arm, single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) combined with linaclotide with 4 L PEG in bowel cleansing. A total of 422 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (2 L PEG combined with 580 µg linaclotide) or the control group (4 L PEG). The primary outcome measure is bowel cleansing efficacy, which is assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Secondary outcomes include evaluating the tolerability and safety of the bowel preparation regimens, bowel diary assessments, postpolypectomy complications (such as bleeding and perforation) and the size and number of removed polyps.
    BACKGROUND: The study has received approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The findings of this trial will serve as a valuable resource for clinicians and patients undergoing colonoscopy polypectomy by guiding the selection of appropriate bowel preparation regimens. Study findings will be disseminated to participants, presented at professional society meetings, and published in peer-reviewed journals. This trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2300075410.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性冠脉综合征(ACS)常与抑郁症同时发生,这会对预后产生不利影响并增加医疗费用,但是缺乏有效的治疗模式,特别是在低资源环境中。本研究旨在确定ACS和抑郁症综合护理(IC)模式与常规护理(UC)模式在改善中国农村医院ACS出院患者的抑郁症状和其他健康结局方面的有效性。
    多中心,随机对照试验在中国16家农村县级医院进行,从2014年10月至2017年3月,连续招募所有21岁及以上的ACS患者。患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受IC或UC,按医院和抑郁严重程度分层。分配到IC的患者接受了ACS二级预防计划和抑郁症护理,包括病例筛查。团体咨询,和个人解决问题的疗法。分配到UC的患者接受常规护理。主要结果是患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)从基线到6个月和12个月的变化。主要次要结局包括由全因死亡组成的主要不良事件(MAEs),非致命性心肌梗死和中风,和所有原因的重新住院。参与者被随访到2018年3月。所有数据均由对治疗组不知情的训练有素的评估员亲自收集,并对MAE进行集中裁定。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT02195193。
    在4041名符合条件的患者中(IC:2051;UC:1990),平均年龄为61±10岁,63%为男性.两组在6个月和12个月时,平均PHQ-9评分均降低,但在6个月时(平均差(MD):-0.04,95%置信区间(CI):-0.20,0.11)或12个月时(MD:-0.06,95%CI:-0.21,0.09),与UC相比,IC评分均未降低。除了12个月的二级预防药物外,治疗组的MAE或其他次要结局没有差异(IC为45.2%,UC为40.8%;相对风险:1.21,95%CI:1.05-1.40)。预先指定的亚组分析表明,IC,与UC相比,可能更有效地降低女性的PHQ-9分数,老年患者,和低社会支持的患者,但在中度和重度抑郁症患者中效果较差(所有p为交互作用<0.05)。
    研究发现,心脏病学护士主导的ACS和抑郁症综合护理,与常规护理相比,未改善所有ACS出院患者的抑郁症状。某些亚组的更大益处值得进一步研究。
    R01MH100332国家心理健康研究所。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often co-occurs with depression, which adversely affects prognosis and increases medical costs, but effective treatment models are lacking, particularly in low-resource settings. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of an ACS and depression integrative care (IC) model compared to usual care (UC) in improving depression symptoms and other health outcomes among patients discharged for ACS in Chinese rural hospitals.
    UNASSIGNED: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial was conducted in sixteen rural county hospitals in China, from October 2014 to March 2017, to recruit consecutively all ACS patients aged 21 years and older after the disease stablised and before discharge. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the IC or UC, stratified by hospital and depression severity. Patients allocated to IC received an ACS secondary prevention program and depression care including case screening, group counselling, and individual problem-solving therapy. Patients allocated to UC received usual care. The primary outcome was change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from baseline to 6 and 12 months. Main secondary outcomes included major adverse events (MAEs) composed of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke, and all-cause re-hospitalisation. Participants were followed up till March 2018. All data were collected in person by trained assessors blinded to treatment group and MAEs were adjudicated centrally. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02195193.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 4041 eligible patients (IC: 2051; UC: 1990), the mean age was 61 ± 10 years and 63% were men. The mean PHQ-9 score lowered at both 6 and 12 months in both groups but was not lower in IC compared to UC at 6 months (mean difference (MD): -0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.20, 0.11) or 12 months (MD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.21, 0.09). There were no treatment group differences for MAEs or other secondary outcomes except for secondary prevention medications at 12 months (45.2% in IC vs 40.8% in UC; relative risk: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.40). Pre-specified subgroup analyses showed that IC, compared to UC, may be more effective in lowering PHQ-9 scores in women, older patients, and patients with low social support, but less effective in moderately and severely depressed patients (all p for interaction <0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The study found that the cardiology nurse-led ACS- and depression-integrated care, compared to usual care, did not improve depression symptoms in all patients discharged with ACS. Greater benefits in certain subgroups warrants further studies.
    UNASSIGNED: R01MH100332 National Institute of Mental Health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管通过旨在降低术后谵妄发生率的随机试验进行了大量研究,但术后谵妄仍然普遍存在。了解与干预措施有效性相关的试验特征有助于数据解释。
    方法:从通过两个系统文献检索确定的合格试验中提取试验特征。多变量meta回归用于研究与使用比值比估计的有效性相关的试验特征。Meta分析用于调查综合有效性。
    结果:我们确定了201项符合条件的试验。与中国相比,来自美国/加拿大的试验(比值比,1.89;95%置信区间,1.45-2.45)和欧洲/澳大利亚/新西兰(1.67;1.29-2.18)的赔率比分别高出89%和67%,分别,表明有效性降低。当术后谵妄的发生率增加(0.85;0.79-0.92,每增加10%)时,有效性增强。与预期干预措施的偏差相关的关注试验报告与低风险试验相比,有效性提高(0.69;0.53-0.90)。与平时护理相比,在低风险试验中,某些干预措施似乎降低了术后谵妄的发生率,证据确定性为低至中度.然而,这些发现应该被认为是不确定的,因为在分组异质干预措施方面存在挑战,符合条件的审判数量有限,小规模研究的普遍性,和潜在的出版偏见。
    结论:术后谵妄试验的有效性因试验来源地区而异,谵妄的发生率,以及偏见的风险。这些限制警告不要从不同的证据中得出明确的结论。这些发现凸显了在全球范围内提高研究质量的迫切需要。
    PROSPERO(CRD42023413984)。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium remains prevalent despite extensive research through randomised trials aimed at reducing its incidence. Understanding trial characteristics associated with interventions\' effectiveness facilitates data interpretation.
    METHODS: Trial characteristics were extracted from eligible trials identified through two systematic literature searches. Multivariable meta-regression was used to investigate trial characteristics associated with effectiveness estimated using odds ratios. Meta-analysis was used to investigate pooled effectiveness.
    RESULTS: We identified 201 eligible trials. Compared with China, trials from the USA/Canada (ratio of odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.45) and Europe/Australia/New Zealand (1.67; 1.29-2.18) had an 89% and 67% higher odds ratio, respectively, suggesting reduced effectiveness. The effectiveness was enhanced when the incidence of postoperative delirium increased (0.85; 0.79-0.92, per 10% increase). Trials with concerns related to deviations from intended interventions reported increased effectiveness compared with those at low risk (0.69; 0.53-0.90). Compared with usual care, certain interventions appeared to have reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium in low-risk trials with low-to-moderate certainty of evidence. However, these findings should be considered inconclusive because of challenges in grouping heterogeneous interventions, the limited number of eligible trials, the prevalence of small-scale studies, and potential publication bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of postoperative delirium trials varied based on the region of trial origin, the incidence of delirium, and the risk of bias. The limitations caution against drawing definitive conclusions from different bodies of evidence. These findings highlight the imperative need to improve the quality of research on a global scale.
    UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO (CRD42023413984).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:恐惧记忆消失与失眠密切相关。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗失眠症(ID)安全有效,它被证明是调节恐惧灭绝的有效方法。然而,rTMS是否可以改善ID患者的恐惧消退记忆仍有待研究。在这项研究中,我们的目标是(1)显示1HzrTMS刺激可以改善ID患者的恐惧消退记忆,(2)检查睡眠变化是否介导了这种影响.
    方法:我们提出一项包含62名符合纳入标准的ID参与者的平行组随机对照试验。参与者将被分配到真正的rTMS组或假rTMS组。分配比例为1:1,每组31名受试者。干预措施将在4周内每周进行5次。评估将在基线(第0周)进行,干预后(第4周),8周随访(第8周)。这项研究的主要结果指标是匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分从基线到第4周干预后的平均变化。次要结果指标包括皮肤电导反应(SCR)的平均变化,恐惧灭绝期间的恐惧期望,失眠严重程度指数(ISI),Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS),和Zung抑郁自评量表(SDS)。
    结论:这项研究将是首次检查rTMS对ID患者恐惧记忆消退的影响。
    背景:中国临床试验注册ChiCTR2300076097。2021年9月25日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Fear memory extinction is closely related to insomnia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is safe and effective for treating insomnia disorder (ID), and it has been shown to be an efficient method for modulating fear extinction. However, whether rTMS can improve fear extinction memory in ID patients remains to be studied. In this study, we specifically aim to (1) show that 1 Hz rTMS stimulation could improve fear extinction memory in ID patients and (2) examine whether changes in sleep mediate this impact.
    METHODS: We propose a parallel group randomised controlled trial of 62 ID participants who meet the inclusion criteria. Participants will be assigned to a real rTMS group or a sham rTMS group. The allocation ratio will be 1:1, with 31 subjects in each group. Interventions will be administered five times per week over a 4-week period. The assessments will take place at baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 4), and 8-week follow-up (week 8). The primary outcome measure of this study will be the mean change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores from baseline to post-intervention at week 4. The secondary outcome measures include the mean change in skin conductance response (SCR), fear expectation during fear extinction, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study will be the first examination of the impact of rTMS on fear memory extinction in ID patients.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trials Register ChiCTR2300076097. Registered on 25 September 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:苹果酸奈莫沙星是一种新型的非氟化喹诺酮类药物,用于口服和静脉内(IV)给药。这个阶段3多中心,随机化,双盲,双假人,平行对照临床试验(NCT02205112)评价了静脉内诺沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗成年患者社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的疗效和安全性.
    方法:符合条件的患者通过静脉输注随机接受500毫克奈莫沙星或左氧氟沙星,每天一次,持续7-14天。主要终点是改良意向治疗(mITT)人群中治愈测试(TOC)就诊时的临床治愈率。在次要疗效和安全性终点方面,还比较了奈莫沙星和左氧氟沙星之间的疗效和安全性。
    结果:总体而言,525例患者被随机分配并接受奈莫沙星(n=349)或左氧氟沙星(n=176)治疗。mITT人群的临床治愈率为91.8%(279/304),左氧氟沙星为85.7%(138/161)(P>0.05)。奈莫沙星治疗CAP的临床疗效不劣于左氧氟沙星。Nemonoxacin取得微生物成功率88.8%(95/107),在细菌学mITT人群中,左氧氟沙星在TOC访视时达到87.8%(43/49)(P>0.05)。药物相关不良事件(AEs)发生率在奈莫沙星组为37.1%,左氧氟沙星组为22.2%,主要是输液部位的局部反应,恶心,ALT/AST升高,和QT间期延长。与奈莫沙星相关的AE大多是轻度的,并且在奈莫沙星停药后得以解决。
    结论:奈莫沙星500mg,每天一次,连续7-14天,是有效和安全的,并且不劣于左氧氟沙星治疗成人患者的CAP。
    BACKGROUND: Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.
    METHODS: Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin.
    RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (n = 349) or levofloxacin (n = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (P > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (P > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7-14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂治疗早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的长期安全性仍然存在担忧。RAINBOW是一项开放标签的随机试验,比较玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(0.2mg和0.1mg剂量)与激光治疗在极低出生体重(<1500g)ROP婴儿中的治疗。
    在完成彩虹的201名婴儿中,180人参加了RAINBOW延伸研究。在5年,儿童接受眼科检查,发展和健康评估。主要结果是视力更好的眼睛的视力。这项研究在ClinicalTrial.gov注册,NCT02640664。
    在2016年16月6日至2022年21月4日之间,在5岁时对156名儿童(87%)进行了评估。在32名没有视力测试结果的儿童中,25有一个优先的测试,对于4名儿童,调查人员报告每只眼睛视力低下,在另外3名儿童中,没有获得视力测量。124名儿童完成了视力评估,雷珠单抗0.2mg后,三个试验组的最小二乘均值(95%CI)字母得分相似-66.8(62.9-70.7),雷珠单抗0.1mg后64.6(60.6-68.5),激光治疗后62.1(57.8-66.4);均值差异:雷珠单抗0.2mgv激光:4.7(95%CI:-1.1,10.5);0.1mgv激光:2.5(-3.4,8.3);0.2mgv0.1mg:2.2(-3.3,7.8)。在4/52(8%)儿童服用雷珠单抗0.2mg后,至少一只眼睛出现高度近视(比-5屈光度更差),雷珠单抗0.1mg后8/55(15%),激光治疗后11/45(24%)(0.2mg与激光:比值比:3.99(1.16-13.72))。眼部和全身次要结局和不良事件在每个试验组中分布相似。
    5年的结果证实了最初的RAINBOW试验和2年计划的中期分析的结果,包括雷珠单抗治疗后高度近视的频率降低。未检测到治疗对非眼部结果的影响。
    诺华制药公司。
    UNASSIGNED: Concerns remain over the long-term safety of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors to treat retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). RAINBOW is an open label randomised trial comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (in 0.2 mg and 0.1 mg doses) with laser therapy in very low birthweight infants (<1500 g) with ROP.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 201 infants completing RAINBOW, 180 were enrolled in the RAINBOW Extension Study. At 5 years, children underwent ophthalmic, development and health assessments. The primary outcome was visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. The study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02640664.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 16-6-2016 and 21-4-2022, 156 children (87%) were evaluated at 5 years. Of 32 children with no acuity test result, 25 had a preferential looking test, for 4 children investigators reported low vision for each eye, and in 3 further children no vision measurement was obtained. 124 children completed the acuity assessment, the least square mean (95% CI) letter score in the better seeing eye was similar in the three trial arms-66.8 (62.9-70.7) following ranibizumab 0.2 mg, 64.6 (60.6-68.5) following ranibizumab 0.1 mg and 62.1 (57.8-66.4) following laser therapy; differences in means: ranibizumab 0.2 mg v laser: 4.7 (95% CI: -1.1, 10.5); 0.1 mg v laser: 2.5 (-3.4, 8.3); 0.2 mg v 0.1 mg: 2.2 (-3.3, 7.8). High myopia (worse than -5 dioptres) in at least one eye occurred in 4/52 (8%) children following ranibizumab 0.2 mg, 8/55 (15%) following ranibizumab 0.1 mg and 11/45 (24%) following laser therapy (0.2 mg versus laser: odds ratio: 3.99 (1.16-13.72)). Ocular and systemic secondary outcomes and adverse events were distributed similarly in each trial arm.
    UNASSIGNED: 5-year outcomes confirm the findings of the original RAINBOW trial and a planned interim analysis at 2 years, including a reduced frequency of high myopia following ranibizumab treatment. No effects of treatment on non-ocular outcomes were detected.
    UNASSIGNED: Novartis Pharma AG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)仍缺乏特异性治疗,针灸可以缓解症状。我们打算研究电针(EA)在减轻糖尿病患者DPN相关症状方面的有效性和安全性。
    方法:这个多中心,三臂,参与者-和评估者-盲,随机化,假对照试验将招募来自中国四家医院的240名符合条件的参与者,并将他们随机分配(1:1:1)到EA,假针刺(SA)或常规护理(UC)组。EA和SA组的参与者将在8周内接受24次EA或SA治疗,随后是8周的随访期,而UC组的参与者将接受16周的随访。该试验的主要结果是DPN症状从基线到第8周的变化,如使用总症状评分进行评估。该量表评估了四种症状:疼痛,燃烧,感觉异常和麻木,通过评估每个的频率和严重程度。所有结果将与意向治疗人群进行分析。
    背景:该方案已获得北京中医药大学伦理委员会的批准(标识符:2022BZYLL0509)。在签署知情同意书之前,每位参与者都将被告知有关研究的详细信息。这项试验的结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上。
    背景:ChiCTR2200061408。
    BACKGROUND: Specific treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is still lacking, and acupuncture may relieve the symptoms. We intend to investigate the efficacy and safety of electro-acupuncture (EA) in alleviating symptoms associated with DPN in diabetes.
    METHODS: This multicentre, three-armed, participant- and assessor-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial will recruit 240 eligible participants from four hospitals in China and will randomly assign (1:1:1) them to EA, sham acupuncture (SA) or usual care (UC) group. Participants in the EA and SA groups willl receive either 24-session EA or SA treatment over 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up period, while participants in the UC group will be followed up for 16 weeks. The primary outcome of this trial is the change in DPN symptoms from baseline to week 8, as rated by using the Total Symptom Score. The scale assesses four symptoms: pain, burning, paraesthesia and numbness, by evaluating the frequency and severity of each. All results will be analysed with the intention-to-treat population.
    BACKGROUND: The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (Identifier: 2022BZYLL0509). Every participant will be informed of detailed information about the study before signing informed consent. The results of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2200061408.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号