propensity score analysis

倾向得分分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于手术治疗与事件发生时间终点的比较研究为临床实践提供了大量证据,但是生存数据分析的准确使用和混杂偏差的控制仍然是巨大的挑战。
    方法:这是对2021年发表在四本普通医学期刊和五本普通外科期刊上的具有生存结果的外科研究的调查。对两个最关心的统计问题进行了评估,包括通过倾向评分分析(PSA)或多变量分析以及Cox模型中比例风险(PH)假设的混淆控制。
    结果:共纳入74项研究,包括63项观察性研究和11项随机对照试验。在观察性研究中,在外科肿瘤学和非肿瘤学研究中使用PSA的研究比例相似(40.9%对36.8%,P=0.762)。然而,前者报告的PH假设评估比例明显低于后者(13.6%对42.1%,P=0.020)。25项观察性研究(25/63)使用PSA方法,但其中三分之二(17/25)显示PSA后基线数据的平衡不清楚.PSA后的PH假设测试比例略低于PSA前,但差异无统计学意义(24.0%对28.0%,P=0.317)。对生存分析中的混杂控制以及不遵守PH假设的替代解决方案提出了全面建议。
    结论:本研究强调了PSA前后观察性手术研究中PH假设评估的次优报告。在统计方法的基本假设方面需要努力和达成共识。
    BACKGROUND: Comparative studies on surgical treatments with time-to-event endpoints have provided substantial evidence for clinical practice, but the accurate use of survival data analysis and the control of confounding bias remain big challenges.
    METHODS: This was a survey of surgical studies with survival outcomes published in four general medical journals and five general surgical journals in 2021. The two most concerned statistical issues were evaluated, including confounding control by propensity score analysis (PSA) or multivariable analysis and testing of proportional hazards (PH) assumption in Cox model.
    RESULTS: A total of 74 studies were included, comprising 63 observational studies and 11 randomized controlled trials. Among the observational studies, the proportion of studies utilizing PSA in surgical oncology and non-oncology studies was similar (40.9 % versus 36.8 %, P = 0.762). However, the former reported a significantly lower proportion of PH assumption assessments compared to the latter (13.6 % versus 42.1 %, P = 0.020). Twenty-five observational studies (25/63) used PSA methods, but two-thirds of them (17/25) showed unclear balance of baseline data after PSA. And the proportion of PH assumption testing after PSA was slightly lower than that before PSA, but the difference was not statistically significant (24.0 % versus 28.0 %, P = 0.317). Comprehensive suggestions were given on confounding control in survival analysis and alternative resolutions for non-compliance with PH assumption.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights suboptimal reporting of PH assumption evaluation in observational surgical studies both before and after PSA. Efforts and consensus are needed with respect to the underlying assumptions of statistical methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    英夫利昔单抗抢救急性重度溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)患者的最佳方案仍存在争议。这项研究旨在比较中国ASUC患者的加速和标准英夫利昔单抗诱导,并探索危险因素和具体加速方案。
    回顾性地收集了在中国7个三级中心接受英夫利昔单抗作为抢救治疗的激素难治性ASUC患者的数据。在接受加速和标准英夫利昔单抗诱导的患者之间,使用针对潜在混杂因素的倾向评分校正,比较了结果,包括结肠切除术和临床缓解率(Mayo评分≤2,第14天时每个子评分≤1)。通过绘制有限的三次样条来探索剂量-反应关系。进行Logistic回归和Cox比例风险回归分析以确定不良结局的危险因素。还进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
    共分析了76例患者:29例接受标准诱导,47例接受加速诱导。加速组的90天结肠切除率更高(17.8%vs0%,P=0.019)和较低的临床缓解率(27.7%vs65.5%,P=0.001)。在调整倾向评分和机构后,结肠切除术和临床缓解率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。剂量-效应曲线显示,5天内,英夫利昔单抗累积剂量较高,结肠切除术风险降低,在28天内未观察到增加英夫利昔单抗累积剂量的改善。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,英夫利昔单抗开始时C反应蛋白>10mg/L(比值比=5.00,95%置信区间:1.27-24.34)是无临床缓解的独立危险因素。Meta分析也显示3个月时结肠切除率无显著差异(P=0.54)。
    调整混杂因素后,在ASUC患者中,加速和标准英夫利昔单抗诱导的结肠切除术或临床缓解率无显著差异.在5天内早期给予强化剂量可能是有益的。英夫利昔单抗开始时C反应蛋白升高表明需要强化治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: The optimal regimen of infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare accelerated and standard infliximab induction in Chinese ASUC patients, and to explore risk factors and concrete accelerated regimens for them.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were retrospectively collected from steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving infliximab as rescue therapy at seven tertiary centers across China. Outcomes including colectomy and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 2 and every subscore ≤ 1 at Day 14) rates were compared between patients receiving accelerated and standard infliximab induction using propensity score adjustment for potential confounders. The dose-response relationship was explored by plotting restricted cubic splines. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was also performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 76 patients were analysed: 29 received standard and 47 received accelerated induction. The accelerated group had a higher 90-day colectomy rate (17.8% vs 0%, P = 0.019) and lower clinical remission rate (27.7% vs 65.5%, P = 0.001). After adjusting for propensity score and institution, there was no significant difference in colectomy or clinical remission rates (both P > 0.05). Dose-effect curves showed decreased colectomy hazard with higher cumulative infliximab dosage within 5 days, with no improvement observed for increasing cumulative infliximab dosage within 28 days. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed C-reactive protein of >10 mg/L at infliximab initiation (odds ratio = 5.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-24.34) as an independent risk factor for no clinical remission. Meta-analysis also revealed no significant difference in colectomy rates at 3 months (P = 0.54).
    UNASSIGNED: After adjusting for confounders, there were no significant differences in colectomy or clinical remission rates between accelerated and standard infliximab induction among ASUC patients. Early administration of an intensified dosage within 5 days may be beneficial. Elevated C-reactive protein at infliximab initiation indicated need for intensive treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们调查了具有病理高危因素的I期肺腺癌患者辅助治疗的真实世界疗效。
    方法:研究参与者于2016年11月1日和2020年12月31日入组。通过倾向评分匹配来平衡临床偏倚。通过Kaplan-Meier分析比较无病生存(DFS)结果。Cox比例风险回归用于确定生存相关因素。p≤0.05为统计学意义的阈值。
    结果:总共454名患者,其中134人(29.5%)接受了辅助治疗,参加了这项研究。接受辅助治疗的患者中有118例与非治疗患者非常匹配。治疗组的预后结果明显优于非治疗组,PSM后的Kaplan-Meier分析显示。靶向治疗组和化疗组在预防复发或转移方面差异不显著。发现辅助治疗是积极的预后因素,肿瘤大小和实体生长模式均为阴性.
    结论:辅助治疗可显著改善具有高危因素的I期肺腺癌患者的DFS。应该进行更大的前瞻性临床试验来验证我们的发现。
    BACKGROUND: We investigated the real-world efficacy of adjuvant therapy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with pathological high-risk factors.
    METHODS: Study participants were enrolled from November 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Clinical bias was balanced by propensity score matching. Disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify survival-associated factors. p ≤ 0.05 was the threshold for statistical significance.
    RESULTS: A total of 454 patients, among whom 134 (29.5%) underwent adjuvant therapy, were enrolled in this study. One hundred and eighteen of the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy were well matched with non-treatment patients. Prognostic outcomes of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the non-treatment group, as revealed by Kaplan-Meier analysis after PSM. Differences in prevention of recurrence or metastasis between the targeted therapy and chemotherapy groups were insignificant. Adjuvant therapy was found to be positive prognostic factors, tumor size and solid growth patterns were negative.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy significantly improved the DFS for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with high-risk factors. Larger prospective clinical trials should be performed to verify our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于II期和III期胃癌患者,辅助化疗是否不同尚不清楚。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了辅助化疗对140和256例II期和III期胃癌患者预后的影响,分别,2008年1月至2018年12月化疗被分层为氟嘧啶加铂与单独的氟嘧啶,含有替吉奥/吉马拉西/辛曲(S-1)的方案与不含S-1的方案相比,和S-1加顺铂与S-1单独。
    结果:患者的中位年龄为67.0(范围24.6-98.8)岁。中位随访时间为105个月,32例(22.9%)和130例(50.8%)II期和III期患者复发,分别。68例(48.6%)和73例(28.5%)患者作为氟嘧啶单药治疗给予辅助化疗,氟嘧啶加铂对9例(6.4%)和104例(40.6%)患者,无63例(45.0%)和79例(30.9%)II期和III期胃癌患者,分别。Doublet化疗与更长的无病生存期(DFS)(26.5vs.15.2个月,P=0.001)和总生存期(OS)(41.2vs.22.0个月,P<0.001)比IIIB-IIIC期疾病的氟嘧啶单一疗法。此外,含S-1的方案延长了DFS(57.4vs.21.9个月,P=0.044)和OS(81.4vs.28.6个月,P=0.023)与III期疾病中不含S-1的化疗相比。
    结论:尽管氟嘧啶单药治疗II-IIIA期疾病是可行的,对于IIIB-IIIC期疾病,双重化疗与单药治疗相比具有更长的生存期显著相关.在III期胃癌中,与不含S-1的化疗相比,含S-1的方案可能导致更长的生存期。
    BACKGROUND: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be different for patients with stage II and III gastric cancer is unknown.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the outcomes of 140 and 256 patients with stage II and III gastric cancer, respectively, between January 2008 and December 2018. Chemotherapies were stratified as fluoropyrimidine plus platinum versus fluoropyrimidine alone, tegafur/gimeracil/octeracil (S-1)-containing versus non-S-1-containing regimens, and S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone.
    RESULTS: The median age of patients was 67.0 (range 24.6-98.8) years. With a median follow-up of 105 months, recurrence occurred in 32 (22.9%) and 130 (50.8%) patients with stage II and III disease, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered as fluoropyrimidine monotherapy to 68 (48.6%) and 73 (28.5%) patients, fluoropyrimidine plus platinum to 9 (6.4%) and 104 (40.6%) patients, and none to 63 (45.0%) and 79 (30.9%) patients with stage II and III gastric cancer, respectively. Doublet chemotherapy was associated with longer disease-free survival (DFS) (26.5 vs. 15.2 months, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (41.2 vs. 22.0 months, P < 0.001) than fluoropyrimidine monotherapy for stage IIIB-IIIC disease. Furthermore, S-1-containing regimens prolonged DFS (57.4 vs. 21.9 months, P = 0.044) and OS (81.4 vs. 28.6 months, P = 0.023) compared with non-S-1-containing chemotherapy in stage III disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is feasible for stage II-IIIA disease, doublet chemotherapy is significantly associated with longer survival than monotherapy for stage IIIB-IIIC disease. S-1-containing regimens might lead to longer survival than non-S-1-containing chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的我们的目的是比较内镜切除与开放手术联合放疗治疗局部晚期鼻窦恶性肿瘤(SNMs)的长期疗效。方法回顾性分析1999年1月至2016年12月在本中心接受手术(内镜下或开放手术)联合放疗的持续鼻窦鳞癌和腺癌患者的资料。进行与倾向评分的1:1匹配。总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),评估局部复发率(LRR)。结果我们确定了267名合格患者,匹配后纳入90例:内镜组45例,开放组45例。中位随访时间为87个月。在内窥镜组中,84.4%的患者接受了调强放疗(IMRT),平均总肿瘤体积(GTV)剂量为68.28Gy;在开放手术组中,64.4%的患者接受了IMRT,平均GTV剂量为64Gy.5年OS,PFS,内镜组LRR分别为69.9、58.6和24.5%,开放手术组为64.6、54.4和31.8%,分别。多因素回归分析显示,手术入路与较低的OS无关,PFS,或LRR。内镜组术后总并发症为13%,而开放组的21.7%。结论对于局部晚期SNM患者,内镜下微创切除术,结合更高的辐射剂量和新的辐射技术,如IMRT,与开放手术联合放疗的生存结局相似.
    Objective  Our objective was to compare the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection versus open surgery in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal malignancies (SNMs). Methods  Data for continuous patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma who received surgery (endoscopic or open surgery) combined with radiotherapy in our center between January 1999 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 matching with propensity scores was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were evaluated. Results  We identified 267 eligible patients, 90 of whom were included after matching: 45 patients in the endoscopy group and 45 in the open group. The median follow-up time was 87 months. In the endoscopic group, 84.4% of patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), with a mean gross tumor volume (GTV) dose of 68.28 Gy; in the open surgery group, 64.4% of patients received IMRT, with a mean GTV dose of 64 Gy. The 5-year OS, PFS, and LRR were 69.9, 58.6, and 24.5% in the endoscopic group and 64.6, 54.4, and 31.8% in the open surgery group, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the surgical approach was not associated with lower OS, PFS, or LRR. The overall postoperative complications were 13% in the endoscopic group, while 21.7% in the open group. Conclusion  For patients with locally advanced SNMs, minimally invasive endoscopic resection, in combination with a higher radiation dose and new radiation techniques such as IMRT, yields survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in combination with radiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    红细胞分布宽度(RDW)和血清钙(Ca)水平是急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院死亡率的预测因子。然而,其敏感性和特异性有限。因此,本研究旨在确定入院时获得的RDW与Ca比值(RCR)是否可用于预测AMI患者的住院死亡率.
    这项回顾性队列研究从密集IV医疗信息市场(MIMIC-IV)数据库中提取了通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)招募的2,910名AMI患者的临床信息。使用多变量逻辑模型和三种PSM方法评估预后值。基于分层变量和性别之间的相互作用进行分析,年龄,种族,贫血,肾脏疾病,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),心房颤动,充血性心力衰竭,痴呆症,糖尿病,截瘫,高血压,脑血管疾病,和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。
    共分析了4105例ICU收治的AMI患者。住院死亡率RCR的最佳临界值为1.685。进行PSM以识别1,455对(2,910)得分匹配的患者,几乎所有变量都表现出平衡差异。患者的平均年龄为72岁(范围,63-82岁)和60.9%为男性。院内死亡发生率的风险随着RCR水平的增加而增加。在调整了混杂因素后,在PSM队列中,与低RCR相关的风险比相比,高RCR的院内死亡率发生率为1.75[95%置信区间(CI):1.60~1.94,P=0.0113].在加权队列中,高RCR也与住院死亡率有关[比值比(OR)=1.76,95%CI:1.62-1.94,P=0.0129]。三组的RCR评估显示,与调整模型中的RCR患者相比,高RCR患者的院内死亡率更高(OR=3.04;95%CI,2.22-4.16;P<0.0001)。在敏感性分析中,原始组和加权组均显示相似的结果.
    入院时的RCR可用于预测ICU住院AMI患者的住院死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED: Red cell distribution width (RDW) and serum calcium (Ca) levels are predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. However, their sensitivity and specificity are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether the RDW to Ca ratio (RCR) acquired on admission can be used to predict the in-hospital mortality of AMI patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study extracted clinical information from the Medical Information Market for Intensive IV (MIMIC-IV) database on 2,910 AMI patients enrolled via propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic values were assessed using a multivariate logistic model and three PSM approaches. Analysis was performed based on stratified variables and interactions among sex, age, ethnicity, anemia, renal disease, percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, dementia, diabetes, paraplegia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4,105 ICU-admitted AMI patients were analyzed. The optimal cut-off value of the RCR for in-hospital mortality was 1.685. The PSM was performed to identify 1,455 pairs (2,910) of score-matched patients, with balanced differences exhibited for nearly all variables.The patients\' median age was 72 years (range, 63-82 years) and 60.9% were male. The risk of in-hospital mortality incidence increased with increasing RCR levels. After adjusting for confounders, the risk ratio for the incidence of in-hospital mortality for high RCR was 1.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.60-1.94, P = 0.0113] compared to that associated with low RCR in the PSM cohort. High RCR was also substantially implicated in in-hospital mortality incidence in the weighted cohorts [odds ratio (OR) = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.62-1.94, P = 0.0129]. Assessment of RCR in three groups showed that patients with high RCR also had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 3.04; 95% CI, 2.22-4.16; P < 0.0001) than in patients with RCR in the adjusted model. In the sensitivity analysis, both the original and weighted groups showed similar results.
    UNASSIGNED: The RCR at admission may be useful for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU-admitted AMI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)方法通常用于倾向评分分析,以推断回归模型中的因果效应。由于过大的IPTW权重和与倾向得分估计相关的误差,IPTW方法可能会低估因果效应的标准误差。为了补救这一点,建议使用引导标准错误来代替IPTW标准错误,但是,由于其效率低下的重采样方案和未经处理的过大权重,普通的引导(OB)程序仍可能导致对标准误差的低估。在本文中,我们开发了一种广义自举(GB)程序,用于估计IPTW方法的标准误差和置信区间。与OB程序相比,其他三个程序相比,GB程序具有最高的精度,并产生保守的标准误差估计。因此,GB程序产生具有最高覆盖率的短置信区间。我们通过两项模拟研究和国家教育纵向研究-1988(NELS-88)的数据集证明了GB程序的有效性。
    The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach is commonly used in propensity score analysis to infer causal effects in regression models. Due to oversized IPTW weights and errors associated with propensity score estimation, the IPTW approach can underestimate the standard error of causal effect. To remediate this, bootstrap standard errors have been recommended to replace the IPTW standard error, but the ordinary bootstrap (OB) procedure might still result in underestimation of the standard error because of its inefficient resampling scheme and untreated oversized weights. In this paper, we develop a generalized bootstrap (GB) procedure for estimating the standard error and confidence intervals of the IPTW approach. Compared with the OB procedure and other three procedures in comparison, the GB procedure has the highest precision and yields conservative standard error estimates. As a result, the GB procedure produces short confidence intervals with highest coverage rates. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the GB procedure via two simulation studies and a dataset from the National Educational Longitudinal Study-1988 (NELS-88).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨转移影响50%至70%的乳腺癌(BC)患者,并且死亡率很高。脂肪组织丢失在癌症的进展中起着关键作用。
    目的:本研究旨在评估脂肪组织对BC患者骨转移的预后价值。
    方法:对517例BC患者进行回顾性研究。收集手术前患者的特征。在第11胸椎水平进行皮下脂肪指数(SFI)的定量测量。为了调整低SFI和高SFI组之间的异质性,使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)。Kaplan-Meier方法用于估计5年的骨转移发生率。采用Cox回归模型进行预后分析。
    结果:与无骨转移患者相比,骨转移患者SFI水平降低。此外,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,低SFI患者更容易发生骨转移。Cox回归分析证实SFI对骨转移的独立预测价值。在PSM后以1:1的比例重复生存分析,结果相似(P<0.05)。
    结论:SFI是BC患者骨转移的独立预测因子。
    BACKGROUND: Bone metastases affect 50% to 70% of breast cancer (BC) patients and have a high mortality rate. Adipose tissue loss plays a pivotal role in the progression of cancer.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of adipose tissue for bone metastasis in BC patients.
    METHODS: 517 BC patients were studied retrospectively. Patients\' characteristics before the surgery were collected. Quantitative measurements of the subcutaneous fat index (SFI) were performed at the level of the eleventh thoracic vertebra. In order to adjust for the heterogeneity between the low SFI and high SFI groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-year bone metastatic incidence. The prognostic analysis was performed with the Cox regression models.
    RESULTS: Compared with the patients without bone metastasis, the patients with bone metastasis had reduced SFI levels. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with low SFI were more likely to develop bone metastases. The independent predictive value of SFI for bone metastases was confirmed by Cox regression analysis. The survival analysis was repeated after PSM with a 1:1 ratio, yielding similar results (P< 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: SFI is an independent predictor of bone metastasis in BC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在不同的Forrest分类中,联合治疗是否比肾上腺素单药治疗具有更高的止血功效尚不清楚。这项研究旨在比较基于不同Forrest分类的肾上腺素注射液单药治疗(MT)和联合治疗(CT)之间的止血效果。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年3月至2022年6月在我们中心接受内镜下肾上腺素注射或肾上腺素注射联合第二治疗的消化性溃疡出血(PUB)患者。将患者分为MT组和CT组。随后,我们进行了倾向评分匹配分析(PSM),并通过分层分析根据Forrest分类计算再出血率.
    结果:总体而言,纳入符合纳入标准的605例患者,在PSM之后,纳入CT组和MT组各173例患者。对于具有非出血可见血管(FIIa)的PUB患者,PSM后第3、7、14和30天的再出血率为8.8%,17.5%,19.3%,在MT集团中占19.3%,分别,比率为0%,4.1%,5.5%,CT组为5.5%,分别,在第3、7、14和30天观察到两组之间存在显着差异(分别为P=0.015,P=0.011,P=0.014和P=0.014)。然而,对于有渗出性出血(FIb)的PUB患者,PSM后第3、7、14和30天的再出血率为14.9%,16.2%,17.6%,在MT组中占17.6%,分别,率为13.2%,14.7%,14.7%,CT组为16.2%,分别,到第3、7、14和30天,两组之间没有显着差异(P=0.78,P=0.804,P=0.644和P=0.825)。
    结论:联合治疗对PUB患者可见血管(FIIa)溃疡的止血效果优于单用肾上腺素注射液。然而,对于有渗血(FIb)溃疡的PUB患者,肾上腺素单药治疗与联合治疗同样有效。
    Whether combination therapy has higher hemostatic efficacy than epinephrine injection monotherapy in different Forrest classifications is not clear. This study aimed to compare hemostatic efficacy between epinephrine injection monotherapy (MT) and combination therapy (CT) based on different Forrest classifications.
    We retrospectively analyzed peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) patients who underwent endoscopic epinephrine injections or epinephrine injections combined with a second therapy between March 2014 and June 2022 in our center, and the patients were divided into MT group or CT group. Subsequently, a propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was performed and rebleeding rates were calculated according to Forrest classifications via a stratified analysis.
    Overall, 605 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included, and after PSM, 173 patients in each of the CT and MT groups were included. For PUB patients with nonbleeding visible vessels (FIIa), the rebleeding rates by Days 3, 7, 14, and 30 after PSM were 8.8%, 17.5%, 19.3%, and 19.3% in the MT group, respectively, and rates were 0%, 4.1%, 5.5%, and 5.5% in the CT group, respectively, with significant differences observed between the two groups by Days 3, 7, 14, and 30 (P = 0.015, P = 0.011, P = 0.014, and P = 0.014, respectively). However, for PUB patients with oozing bleeding (FIb), the rebleeding rates by Days 3, 7, 14, and 30 after PSM were 14.9%, 16.2%, 17.6%, and 17.6% in the MT group, respectively, and rates were 13.2%, 14.7%, 14.7%, and 16.2% in the CT group, respectively, with no significant differences observed between the two groups by Days 3, 7, 14, and 30 (P = 0.78, P = 0.804, P = 0.644 and P = 0.825).
    Combined therapy has higher hemostatic efficacy than epinephrine injection monotherapy for PUB patients with visible blood vessel (FIIa) ulcers. However, epinephrine injection monotherapy is equally as effective as combined therapy for PUB patients with oozing blood (FIb) ulcers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全面评估和验证外周血白细胞(PBLs)中胰岛素样生长因子2(IGF2)基因甲基化与结直肠癌(CRC)风险和预后之间的关系。
    PBLs中IGF2甲基化与CRC风险之间的关联最初在病例对照研究中进行评估,然后在嵌套病例对照研究和双胞胎病例对照研究中进行验证。分别。同时,最初的CRC患者队列用于评估IGF2甲基化对CRC预后的影响,然后在EPIC-意大利CRC队列和TCGA数据集上验证了这一发现.进行了倾向评分(PS)分析,以控制混杂因素,我们进行了广泛的敏感性分析,以评估我们研究结果的稳健性.
    在初始研究中,PBLIGF2高甲基化与CRC风险增加相关(ORPS调整,2.57,95%CI:1.65~4.03,P<0.0001),并使用两个独立的外部数据集(ORPS调整,2.21,95%CI:1.28至3.81,P=0.0042,经ORPS调整,10.65,95%CI:分别为1.26~89.71,P=0.0295)。与IGF2低甲基化的患者相比,PBLs中IGF2高甲基化的CRC患者的总体生存率显着提高(HRPS调整,0.47,95%CI:0.29~0.76,P=0.0019)。在EPIC-意大利CRC队列中也观察到了预后特征,虽然HR没有达到统计学意义(HRPS校正,0.69,95%CI:0.37~1.27,P=0.2359)。
    IGF2超甲基化可作为潜在的基于血液的预测性生物标志物,用于鉴定处于发展为CRC的高风险的个体和CRC预后。
    UNASSIGNED: To comprehensively assess and validate the associations between insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene methylation in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: The association between IGF2 methylation in PBLs and CRC risk was initially evaluated in a case-control study and then validated in a nested case-control study and a twins\' case-control study, respectively. Meanwhile, an initial CRC patient cohort was used to assess the effect of IGF2 methylation on CRC prognosis and then the finding was validated in the EPIC-Italy CRC cohort and TCGA datasets. A propensity score (PS) analysis was performed to control for confounders, and extensive sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of our findings.
    UNASSIGNED: PBL IGF2 hypermethylation was associated with an increased risk of CRC in the initial study (ORPS-adjusted, 2.57, 95% CI: 1.65 to 4.03, P<0.0001), and this association was validated using two independent external datasets (ORPS-adjusted, 2.21, 95% CI: 1.28 to 3.81, P=0.0042 and ORPS-adjusted, 10.65, 95% CI: 1.26 to 89.71, P=0.0295, respectively). CRC patients with IGF2 hypermethylation in PBLs had significantly improved overall survival compared to those patients with IGF2 hypomethylation (HRPS-adjusted, 0.47, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.76, P=0.0019). The prognostic signature was also observed in the EPIC-Italy CRC cohort, although the HR did not reach statistical significance (HRPS-adjusted, 0.69, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.27, P=0.2359).
    UNASSIGNED: IGF2 hypermethylation may serve as a potential blood-based predictive biomarker for the identification of individuals at high risk of developing CRC and for CRC prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号