BACKGROUND: Currently, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulas are commonly being used as adjunctive therapy for ulcerative colitis in China. Network meta-analysis, a quantitative and comprehensive analytical method, can systematically compare the effects of different adjunctive treatment options for ulcerative colitis, providing scientific evidence for clinical decision-making.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of commonly used TCM for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice through a network meta-analysis.
METHODS: Clinical randomized controlled trials of these TCM formulas used for the adjuvant treatment of UC were searched from the establishment of the databases to July 1, 2022. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were screened and evaluated for literature quality and risk of bias according to the Cochrane 5.1 standard. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using ReviewManager (RevMan) 5.4, and a funnel plot was constructed to test for publication bias. ADDIS 1.16 statistical software was used to perform statistical analysis of the treatment measures and derive the network relationship and ranking diagrams of the various intervention measures.
RESULTS: A total of 64 randomized controlled trials involving 5456 patients with UC were included in this study. The adjuvant treatment of UC using five TCM formulations was able to improve the clinical outcome of the patients. Adjuvant treatment with Baitouweng decoction (BTWT) showed a significant effect [mean difference = 36.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.63 to 65.76]. For the reduction of tumor necrosis factor in patients with UC, adjunctive therapy with BTWT (mean difference = -9.55, 95%CI: -17.89 to -1.41), Shenlingbaizhu powder [SLBZS; odds ratio (OR) = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.08 to 0.39], and Shaoyao decoction (OR = -23.02, 95%CI: -33.64 to -13.14) was effective. Shaoyao decoction was more effective than BTWT (OR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.03 to 0.39), SLBZS (OR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.08 to 0. 39), and Xi Lei powder (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.13 to 0.81) in reducing tumor necrosis factor and the recurrence rate of UC.
CONCLUSIONS: TCM combined with mesalazine is more effective than mesalazine alone in the treatment of UC.

BACKGROUND: The benefits and risks of Xileisan (XLS) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of XLS and mesalazine when treating UC.
METHODS: We searched eight databases for clinical trials evaluating the combination of XLS and mesalazine in the treatment of UC, up to January 2024. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed using Revman 5.3 and TSA 0.9.5.10 beta, respectively.
RESULTS: The present study included 13 clinical studies involving 990 patients, of which 501 patients received XLS combined with mesalazine while 489 patients received mesalazine alone. The meta-analysis showed that, in terms of efficacy, the combination of XLS and mesalazine significantly improved the clinical efficacy rate by 22% [risk ratio (RR) = 1.22; 95%CI: 1.15-1.28; P < 0.00001] and mucosal improvement rate by 25% (RR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.12-1.39; P = 0.0001), while significantly reducing the duration of abdominal pain by 2.25 days [mean difference (MD) = -2.25; 95%CI: -3.35 to -1.14; P < 0.0001], diarrhea by 2.06 days (MD = -2.06; 95%CI: -3.92 to -0.20; P = 0.03), hematochezia by 2.32 days (MD = -2.32; 95%CI: -4.02 to -0.62; P = 0.008), tumor necrosis factor alpha by 16.25 ng/mL (MD = -16.25; 95%CI: -20.48 to -12.01; P < 0.00001), and interleukin-6 by 14.14 ng/mL (MD = -14.14; 95%CI: -24.89 to -3.39; P = 0.01). The TSA indicated conclusiveness in the meta-analysis of the efficacy endpoints. In terms of safety, the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of XLS and mesalazine did not increase the occurrence of total and gastrointestinal adverse events, abdominal distension, and erythema (P > 0.05). The TSA showed non conclusive findings in the meta-analysis of the safety endpoints. Harbord\'s test showed no publication bias (P = 0.734).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with XLS alleviated the clinical symptoms, intestinal mucosal injury, and inflammatory response in patients with UC, while demonstrating good safety.

Purpose: Current pharmacological treatments for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) have limitations. Therefore, it is important to elucidate any available alternative or complementary treatment, and Chinese herbal medicine shows the potential for such treatment. As a traditional Chinese herbal medicine, Danshen-related preparations have been reported to be beneficial for UC by improving coagulation function and inhibiting inflammatory responses. In spite of this, the credibility and safety of this practice are incomplete. Therefore, in order to investigate whether Danshen preparation (DSP) is effective and safe in the treatment of UC, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and CQVIP Database were searched for this review.The main observation indexes were the effect of DSP combined with mesalazine or DSP on the effective rate, platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of UC. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The selected studies were evaluated for quality and data processing using RevMan5.4 and Stata17.0 software. Results: A total of 37 studies were included. Among them, 26 clinical trials with 2426 patients were included and 11 animal experimental studies involving 208 animals were included. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with mesalazine alone, combined use of DSP can clearly improve the clinical effective rate (RR 0.86%, 95% CI:0.83-0.88, p < 0.00001) of UC. Furthermore it improved blood coagulation function by decreasing serum PLT and increasing MPV levels, and controlled inflammatory responses by reducing serum CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 levels in patients. Conclusion: Combining DSP with mesalazine for UC can enhance clinical efficacy. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results of this review due to its flaws, such as allocation concealment and uncertainty resulting from the blinding of the study. Systematic Review Registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero.php, identifier PROSPERO: CRD42022293287.

BACKGROUND: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare disease of unknown etiology. The optimal treatment for CCS remains unknown. Treatment with corticosteroids is considered the mainstay treatment because of its high efficacy, but the therapeutic strategy for steroid-resistant CCS is not yet established.
METHODS: This is the case of an 81-year-old woman who was diagnosed with CCS. Given her severe diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and hypoproteinemia, hormone therapy (40 mg/d) was administered, and the symptoms improved within 1 wk. After 3 mo, the patient had no obvious symptoms. The polyps were significantly reduced on review gastroscopy and colonoscopy, thus hormone reduction gradually began. The hormone level was maintained at 10 mg/d after 6 mo. Despite the age of the patient and the side effects of hormones, the patient had no obvious discomfort. However, hormone drugs were discontinued, and mesalazine was administered orally at 3 g/d. The patient\'s symptoms continued to improve after a follow-up of 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids and mesalazine are potential treatment options for CCS.

This case report describes the clinical course of a 64-year-old male with intermittent abdominal pain attributed to recurrent ulcers at the appendiceal orifice. Initial investigations in November 2019 revealed chronic gastritis and ulcers at the appendiceal orifice, prompting consideration of ulcerative colitis (UC). The patient responded well to mesalazine therapy, experiencing relief from symptoms and improved colonoscopy findings in May 2020. Despite discontinuing medication, a recurrence of symptoms in August 2021 led to a repeat colonoscopy showing renewed ulcers. Mesalazine was reinstated, resulting in symptom resolution and improved colonoscopy findings by December 2021. However, in May 2023, a subsequent recurrence of abdominal pain and colonoscopy-confirmed mucosal changes at the appendiceal orifice prompted reintroduction of mesalazine. The patient remains under regular monitoring on mesalazine therapy. This case highlights the challenges in managing recurrent appendiceal ulcers and the importance of long-term therapeutic vigilance in suspected UC cases.

A key challenge for the effective treatment of intestinal diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is to develop an oral drug delivery system that can resist gastric acid erosion and efficiently release drugs after rapid entry into the intestine. In the present work, we developed oral composite nanoparticles (MSZ@PRHS) consisting of a rough mesoporous silica (RHS) loaded with Mesalazine (MSZ) and a CAP polymer membrane for targeted relief of inflammation in colitis. At the pH values of the simulated stomach and small intestine, the release rate of MSZ from MSZ@PRHS was low, while at the pH values of the simulated colon, the release rate of MSZ was high. In dextran sulfate sodium salt (DSS)-induced acute colitis mouse model, compared with oral administration of the drug Mesalazine in the equivalent solution form, oral administration of PRHS loaded with drug-loaded nanoparticles can significantly alleviate the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease, and improve the therapeutic effect. We propose that the intestinal microenvironment provides an interface for nanocomposites switch and a promising drug delivery platform for the management and treatment of many intestinal diseases, where controlled drug release and prolonged residence time are required.

Background: Mesalazine, a preparation of 5-aminosalicylic acid, is a medication widely used in clinical practice as a first-line therapy in the treatment of mild and moderate inflammatory bowel disease. However, the long-term safety of mesalazine in large sample population was unknown. The current study was to assess mesalazine -related adverse events of real-world through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms were employed to quantify the signals of mesalazine -associated AEs. Results: Out of 14,149,980 reports collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database, 24,284 reports of mesalazine -associated AEs were identified. A total of 170 significant disproportionality preferred terms conforming to the four algorithms simultaneously were retained. The most common AEs included colitis ulcerative, diarrhoea, condition aggravated, crohn\'s disease, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, haematochezia, which were corresponding to those reported in the specification and clinical trials. Unexpected significant AEs as dizziness, drug ineffective, drug hypersensitivity, infection, off label use, weight decreased, decreased appetite, arthralgia, rash might also occur. The median onset time of mesalazine -related AEs was 1,127 days (interquartile range [IQR] 1,127-1,674 days), and most of the cases occurred 2 years later (n = 610, 70.93%) and within the first 1 month (n = 89, 10.35%) after mesalazine initiation. Conclusion: Results of our study were consistent with clinical observations. We also found potential new and unexpected AEs signals for mesalazine, suggesting prospective clinical studies were needed to confirm these results and illustrate their relationship. Our results could provide valuable evidence for further safety studies of mesalazine.

Mesalazine (MSZ) suppositories are a first-line medication for the localized treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the frequent defecation of patients with UC influences the retention of the suppository in the rectum and multiple doses have to be applied. Here, a mesalazine hollow suppository (MHS) is developed using three-dimensional (3D) printing. The MHS is composed of an inner supporting spring and an outer MSZ-loaded curved hollow shell. Springs were prepared using fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing with thermoplastic urethane filaments, followed by splitting. The optimal parameters, including elasticity, filament diameter, spring inner diameter, and filament distance, were screened. The shell was prepared by FDM 3D printing utilizing MSZ, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyethylene glycol, which were assembled with springs to obtain FDM 3D-printed MHS (F-MHS); if 3D-printed metal molding was used in preparing shell, mold-formed MHS (M-MHS) was obtained. The F-MHS exhibited faster MSZ release than the M-MHS; therefore, the molding method is preferable. The inserted M-MHS was retained in the rat rectum for 5 h without affecting defecation. M-MHS alleviated tissue damage of UC rats and reduced inflammation with low levels of myeloperoxidase and proinflammatory cytokines. Personalized MHS is a promising medication for the localized treatment of UC.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a systematic chronic disease characterized by insufficient intestinal absorption, and mesalazine is a common medical treatment. In the present study, 20 normal healthy controls (NC group), 10 unmedicated UC patients (UC group), and 20 mesalazine-responsive and 20 mesalazine-nonresponsive UC patients were recruited. A total of 42 serum BA metabolites, including 8 primary bile acids and 34 secondary bile acids (SBAs), were quantitatively measured. Compared with the NC group, serum SBAs in the UC patients were significantly lower but increased after mesalazine therapy. Differences in the serum TDCA, DCA, GDCA-3S, 12-keto LCA, and GCDCA-3S metabolites were found between the UC and NC groups, with AUC values of 0.777, 0.800, 0.815, 0.775, and 0.740, respectively. Furthermore, we identified 12-keto LCA as a specific BA marker of UC and BA biomarkers of mesalazine responsiveness. It was concluded that serum SBAs were decreased in UC patients, and TDCA, DCA, GDCA-3S, 12-keto LCA, and GCDCA-3S might aid in the diagnosis of UC. The abundance of SBAs increased after the mesalazine therapy, and serum 12-keto LCA was identified as an alternative invasive biomarker associated with UC diagnosis and therapeutic response, thereby providing a new approach for the prediction of response to mesalazine therapy in UC patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of mesalazine combined with probiotics on inflammation and immune function of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 116 patients with IBD treated in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from September 2018 to September 2021 were enrolled and divided into a control group (n=55, treated with mesalazine alone) and a research group (n=61, treated with mesalazine combined with probiotics) according to the treatment regimen. The two groups were compared in the levels of inflammatory factors, immune factors, adverse reactions, clinical efficacy and improvement of patients\' disease condition before and after treatment. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors of infection in patients with IBD at 6 months after admission.
RESULTS: The research group showed a significantly higher the total effective rate than the control group (P<0.05), and there was no notable difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse reactions (P>0.05). In addition, compared with the control group, the research group showed significantly lower levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M (IgM), Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and had significantly lower scores of clinical activity index (CAI) and endoscopic activity index (EAI) after treatment (all P<0.05). Higher IgG, IgM, IL-6, CRP and EAI levels at admission were independent risk factors for infection in patients with IBD.
CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine combined with probiotics can substantially improve the disease condition of patients with IBD, improve their immune ability and reduce their inflammation level, with a good safety profile.