■尚不清楚多个维度的接触会产生什么影响(例如，数量和质量)是精神疾病的耻辱。
■为了探讨家庭成员（FM）中接触的多个维度与精神疾病的污名之间的关系，香港的精神卫生工作者（MHW）和社区居民（CR）。
■污名，用FM测量接触和知识，MHW和CR在香港。使用多元回归分析。
■MHW（n=141）具有更高的知识，与CR（n=95）或FM（n=62）相比，精神疾病的接触更多，污名更低。在三组中，知识和接触质量与较低的精神疾病病耻感显着相关。然而,接触水平和接触数量与大多数柱头成分没有显着相关。在FM和CR中，接触水平与精神疾病的耻辱呈正相关。
■这项研究的结果突出了知识的差异，不同利益相关者群体对精神疾病的接触和污名化。这项研究表明，积极的接触(例如平等，支持,自愿和愉快的接触)减少精神疾病的污名，而负面接触(例如不友好，不支持,不愉快的接触)可能会增加污名。增强接触模型（ECM）应在未来的反污名干预措施中进行测试。
UNASSIGNED: It remains unknown what the impacts of multiple dimensions of contact (e.g. level, quantity and quality) are on the stigma of mental illness.
UNASSIGNED: To explore the relationship between the multiple dimensions of contact and stigma of mental illness among family members (FM), mental health workers (MHW) and community residents (CR) in Hong Kong.
UNASSIGNED: The stigma, contact and knowledge were measured in FM, MHW and CR in Hong Kong. Multiple regression analyses were used.
UNASSIGNED: MHW (n = 141) had higher knowledge, more contact and lower stigma of mental illness than CR (n = 95) or FM (n = 62). Knowledge and contact quality were significantly associated with lower stigma of mental illness in the three groups. However, contact level and contact quantity were not significantly associated with most stigma components. The contact level was positively associated with stigma of mental illness among FM and CR.
UNASSIGNED: The results of this study highlight the differences in knowledge, contact and stigma of mental illness among different stakeholder groups. This study suggests that positive contact (e.g. equal, supportive, voluntary and pleasant contact) reduces stigma of mental illness, while negative contact (e.g. unfriendly, unsupportive, unpleasant contact) may increase stigma. The Enhancing Contact Model (ECM) should be tested in future anti-stigma interventions.
PDF(Sci-hub)