UNASSIGNED: Even with significant advancements, treating multiple myeloma (MM) remains difficult. At present, the main treatment methods include combined treatment of stem cell transplantation, drug treatment, etc. With the clarification of the molecular biological mechanism of MM, as well as the in-depth study of the internal signal of myeloma cells and the microenvironment of MM patients, more and more new drugs targeting myeloma and microenvironment are gradually used in clinical maintenance treatment, such as inhibit the proteosome: ixazomib, bortezomib and carfilzomib, immune - modulators: thalidomide and lenalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, etc. have made great progress in MM maintenance treatment. With the continuous development of proteasome inhibitor maintenance treatment in MM, the prognosis of the disease has been significantly improved. Our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse reactions of proteasome inhibitors in maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma, providing new ideas for clinical medication.
UNASSIGNED: Four databases containing randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitors in the maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma are retrieved by the computer. Once the quality of the literature has been thoroughly evaluated, run the data via the RevMan 5.3 software.
UNASSIGNED: Eventually 8 studies were added in this systematic review. Compared with the placebo group, proteasome inhibitor in maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma patients with prolonged the survival without progression and overall existence. 5 studies reported the peripheral neuropathy of multiple myeloma in the treatment group compared to placebo group, which was remarkably greater (OR: 1.98; 95 % Cl: 1.35, 2.92; P < 0.001) compared to placebo group, Serious adverse events (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01), Rash (OR: 2.23; 95 % Cl: 1.62, 3.05; P < 0.001) and Vomiting (OR: 5.12; 95 % Cl: 3.36, 7.80; P < 0.001). The Serious adverse events of the treatment group were remarkably greater compared with the untreated group (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: The study results proposed that proteasome inhibitors are effective in the multiple myeloma maintenance treatment compared with the placebo group. Bortezomib has certain advantages in prolonging PFS, followed by ixazomib and carfilzomib in terms of efficacy. Bortezombib may be superior to carfilzombib in extending OS. However, the adverse reactions caused by proteasome inhibitors, such as Peripheral neuropathy, Serious adverse events, Rash, Vomiting, etc., should be paid enough attention.

UNASSIGNED: Pre-HSCT disease control, suboptimal long-term prognosis, and a high recurrence incidence (RI) continue to pose significant challenges for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) patients.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study assessed the effectiveness of a decitabine (DAC)-based protocol in JMML patients undergoing HSCT. The pre-HSCT treatment includes initial and bridging treatment. The efficacy of DAC monotherapy versus DAC combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy(C-DAC) as initial treatment was compared, followed by DAC plus FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and GCSF) as bridging treatment. The HSCT regimens were based on DAC, fludarabine, and busulfan. Post-HSCT, low-dose DAC was used as maintenance therapy. The study endpoints focused on pretransplantation simplified clinical response and post-HSCT survival.
UNASSIGNED: There were 109 patients, including 45 receiving DAC monotherapy and 64 undergoing C-DAC treatment. 106 patients completed bridging treatment. All patients were administered planned HSCT regimens and post-HSCT treatment. The initial treatment resulted in 88.1% of patients achieving clinical remission without a significant difference between the DAC and C-DAC groups (p=0.769). Clinical remission rates significantly improved following bridging treatment (p=0.019). The 5-year overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and RI were 92.2%, 88.4%, and 8.0%, respectively. A poor clinical response to pre-HSCT treatment emerged as a risk factor for OS (hazard ratio: 9.8, 95% CI: 2.3-41.1, p=0.002).
UNASSIGNED: Implementing a DAC-based administration strategy throughout the pre-HSCT period, during HSCT regimens, and in post-HSCT maintenance significantly reduced relapse and improved survival in JMML patients. Both DAC monotherapy and the DAC plus FLAG protocol proved effective as pre-HSCT treatments.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by non-specific inflammation. Managing UC presents significant challenges due to its chronic nature and high recurrence rates. Indigo naturalis has emerged as a potential therapeutic agent in clinical UC treatment, demonstrating advantages in alleviating refractory UC and maintaining remission periods compared to other therapeutic approaches.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of indigo naturalis in UC treatment, assess its clinical efficacy, advantages, and limitations, and provide insights into methods and strategies for utilizing indigo naturalis in UC management.
METHODS: Comprehensive data on indigo naturalis were collected from reputable online databases including PubMed, GreenMedical, Web of Science, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, and National Intellectual Property Administration.
RESULTS: Clinical studies have demonstrated that indigo naturalis, either alone or in combination with other drugs, yields favorable outcomes in UC treatment. Its mechanisms of action involve modulation of the AHR receptor, anti-inflammatory properties, regulation of intestinal flora, restoration of the intestinal barrier, and modulation of immunity. Despite its efficacy in managing refractory UC and prolonging remission periods, indigo naturalis treatment is associated with adverse reactions, quality variations, and inadequate pharmacokinetic investigations.
CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic effects of indigo naturalis in UC treatment are closely linked to its ability to regulate the AHR receptor, exert anti-inflammatory effects, mcodulate intestinal flora, restore the intestinal barrier, and regulate immunity. Addressing the current shortcomings, including adverse reactions, quality control issues, and insufficient pharmacokinetic data, is crucial for optimizing the clinical utility of indigo naturalis in UC management. By refining patient-centered treatment strategies, indigo naturalis holds promise for broader application in UC treatment, thereby alleviating the suffering of UC patients.

OBJECTIVE: Maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy is of particular significance in patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of maintenance therapy (MT) on the survival prognosis of individuals with recurrent or metastatic NPC.
METHODS: The databases Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched in a comprehensive manner. Prospective studies of MT for recurrent or metastatic NPC are required. Study endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Two randomized controlled clinical trials, with a total of 294 participants, were analyzed. The maintenance therapy group consisted of 140 participants, while the remaining participants were in the non-maintenance therapy (non-MT) group. The MT group showed a notable enhancement in PFS compared to the non-MT group, with a hazard ratio(HR) of 0.44 and a 95% Confidence interval [CI] of 0.34-0.58 (p < 0.0001). Overall survival was also significantly improved (HR0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58; p < 0.0001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 side effects in the MT group was leukopenia (2.9%), thrombocytopenia (0.7%), and anemia (4.3%), hand-foot syndrome (5.8%), and thrombocytopenia (0.7%). oral mucositis (1.5%), and nausea and vomiting (2.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance therapy with S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oltiracetam) or capecitabine following first-line chemotherapy significantly enhanced OS and PFS in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, while exhibiting minimal incidence of grade 3-4 side effects.

Background: Evidence comparing the efficacy of different treatments for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) receiving first-line or maintenance therapy is sparse. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of these treatments, with a distinct focus on evaluating first-line and maintenance treatments separately. Methods: We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses, sourcing English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through July 2023 from databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and key conference proceedings. Phase Ⅱ or Ⅲ trials that assessed two or more therapeutic regimens were included. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events graded as 3 or above (SAE), and R0 liver resection rate. Hazards Ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effect size for OS and PFS, Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were used for ORR, SAEs and R0 resection rate. Subgroup and sensitive analyses were conducted to analysis the model uncertainty (PROSPERO: CRD42023420498). Results: 56 RCTs were included (50 for first-line treatment, six for maintenance therapies), with a total of 21,323 patients. Regarding first-line, for OS, the top three mechanisms were: local treatment + single-drug chemotherapy (SingleCT), Targeted therapy (TAR)+SingleCT, and TAR + multi-drug chemotherapy (MultiCT). Resection or ablation (R/A)+SingleCT, S1, and Cetuximab + intensified fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy (ICTFU) were identified as the best treatments. For PFS, the top three mechanisms were: Immune therapy + TAR + MultiCT, multi-targeted therapy (MultiTAR), TAR + SingleCT. The top three treatments were: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy (CTFU), TAS-102+bevacizumab, Bevacizumab + ICTFU. Cetuximab + CTFU was the best choice for RAS/RAF wild-type patients. Regarding maintenance treatment, Bevacizumab + SingleCT and Adavosertib were the best options for OS and PFS, respectively. For safety, MultiCT was the safest, followed by local treatment + MultiCT, TAR + MultiCT caused the most SAEs. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was found to be the safest among all targeted combination therapies. Conclusion: In first-line, local treatment or targeted therapsy plus chemotherapy are the best mechanisms. R/A + SingleCT or CTFU performed the best for OS, Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + ICTFU was the best option regarding PFS. For RAS/RAF wild-type patients, Cetuximab + CTFU was the optimal option. Monotherapy may be preferred choice for maintenance treatment. Combination therapy resulted in more SAEs when compared to standard chemotherapy.

Some patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) experience relapse after rituximab (RTX) treatment. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the recurrence-related clinical features, laboratory investigation results, and dosing protocol of 30 female patients with relapsing NMOSD with immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 and relapses during repeated 0.5 g RTX infusions as maintenance treatment. The median follow-up period was 6.62 years. Thirty-five episodes were observed, with myelitis being the most frequent. The median expanded disability status scale change score was 0.50. The recurrence rate decreased by 44.23%/year with RTX infusion. Approximately 85.71% of the patients showed relapse without RTX infusion within 10 months. Overall, RTX may be effective for relapsing NMOSD cases.

For patients with advanced gastric cancer after chemotherapy, the optimal mode of maintenance therapy is not yet clear. This research aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of S-1 maintenance therapy and follow-up observation in patients with advanced gastric cancer without disease progression after first-line combined chemotherapy. This study retrospectively analyzed 106 patients from January 2018 to December 2021. The primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, the secondary endpoint was chemotherapy-related toxicity, and the curative effects and baseline characteristics of the patients were analyzed. Longer progression-free survival and overall survival were observed in the S-1 maintenance treatment group than in the follow-up observation group (p < 0.001). No obvious differences existed in the subgroup results regarding progression-free survival or overall survival (p > 0.05). In the maintenance treatment group, the occurrence of thrombocytopenia and hand-foot syndrome was significantly increased (p < 0.001). No toxicity-related deaths occurred. The included patients without disease progression after first-line combined chemotherapy can achieve significant survival benefits by receiving S-1 maintenance therapy. The patient\'s tolerance to S-1 maintenance therapy was good.

BACKGROUND: Durvalumab is a check-point inhibitor against programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and anlotinib is a new orally administered multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Both agents have been approved in China. Preclinical and clinical trials have suggested that antiangiogenic therapy has the potential to alleviate immunosuppression and showed synergetic effect when combined with ICIs. However, it is unclear that whether this combination is effective when initiated as maintenance treatment in ES-SCLC patients.
METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, phase II study. A total of 64 eligible patients who do not experience disease progression after four cycles platinum-based chemotherapy combined with durvalumab will be randomized to durvalumab with anlotinib or durvalumab alone until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is PFS (from randomization); secondary endpoint was OS and PFS (from diagnosis), objective response rate (ORR); disease control rate (DCR) and duration of response (DOR), safety and tolerability assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
CONCLUSIONS: We conduct a phase II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab combined with anlotinib as maintenance treatment in ES-SCLC patients.

UNASSIGNED: No standard maintenance treatment has been obtained to prolong the response duration of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a maintenance treatment after chemotherapy in STS.
UNASSIGNED: In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with advanced STS who achieved partial response or stable disease after first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2019 and January 2022. All patients received anlotinib as a maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) of anlotinib maintenance treatment. Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03890068.
UNASSIGNED: At the data cut-off date (August 8, 2022), 49 patients were enrolled, including 17 with liposarcoma (35%) and 15 with leiomyosarcoma (31%). After a median follow-up of 17.1 months (IQR 9.0-27.2), the median PFS from the beginning of maintenance treatment was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.7-12.5), and the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate for anlotinib maintenance treatment was 98.0%. The best ORR and DCR were 16% (8/49, 95% CI 7-30) and 94% (46/49, 95% CI 83-99), respectively. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2. Of the grade 3-4 adverse events, the most common were hypertension (10%) and hand-foot syndrome reaction (6%).
UNASSIGNED: Postchemotherapy maintenance treatment with anlotinib exhibits promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced STS.
UNASSIGNED: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., the National Key Research and Development Program of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

The issue of antipsychotic (dis)continuation has been a long-standing clinical dilemma. While the routine usage of antipsychotic is associated with side effects and stigma, short-term evidence suggest that the risk of relapse is heightened following antipsychotics withdrawal. Clinical guidelines therefore propose a one to two years duration of maintenance treatment upon remission in first episode psychosis (FEP), but guidance beyond which remains unclear. Only two controlled studies have addressed the long-term consequences of antipsychotic discontinuation. While Wunderink et al. concluded that dose reduction is associated with a higher rate of recovery, Hui et al. found discontinuation to be associated with better clinical outcomes. Data from Hui et al.\'s study further suggests that treatment should be maintained for at least the first three years upon remission in FEP in order reduce the risk of relapse, as well as subsequent poor long-term outcome. It is noted that the two studies not only differ in outcome measures, but also in their strategies of \"antipsychotic discontinuation\". Considering that discontinuation is a more compelling option to most patients, it may therefore be more clinically relevant. More long-term follow-up discontinuation studies are needed to provide further evidence in the development of treatment guidelines for FEP.