BACKGROUND: Induction of labor with mechanical methods or pharmacological agents is used in about 20-30% of all pregnant women. We specialized in comparing the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone versus transcervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in term pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix with adequate samples.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone versus transcervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in term pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix.
METHODS: This is a parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial in two maternal centers in Shanghai, China between October 2019 and July 2022. Women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at term and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6) scheduled for induction of labor were eligible. 1,860 women were randomly allocated to cervical ripening with either a dinoprostone vaginal insert (10mg) or a 60cc Foley catheter for up to 24 hours. The primary outcomes were vaginal delivery rate and time to vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes included time to delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Analysis was done from an intention-to-treat perspective. The trial was registered with the China trial registry (CTR2000038435).
RESULTS: The vaginal birth rates were 72.8% (677/930) vs. 69.9% (650/930) in vaginal dinoprostone and Foley catheter, respectively (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.10, risk difference: 0.03). Time to vaginal delivery was not significantly different between the two groups (sub-distribution hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.24). Vaginal dinoprostone was more likely complicated with hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes (5.8% vs. 2.8%, aRR 2.09, 95% CI 1.32-3.31) and placenta abruption (0.9% vs. 0.1%, aRR: 8.04, 95% CI 1.01-64.15), while Foley catheter was more likely complicated with suspected intrapartum infection (5.1% vs. 8.2 %, aRR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.88) and postpartum infection (1.4% vs. 3.7%, aRR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72). The composite of poor neonatal outcomes was not significantly different between the two groups (4.5% vs. 3.8%, aRR 1.21, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.88), while more neonatal asphyxia occurred in the dinoprostone group (1.2% vs. 0.2%, aRR 5.39, 95% CI 1.22 to 23.92). In a subgroup analysis, vaginal dinoprostone decreased vaginal birth rate slightly in multiparous women (90.6% vs. 97.0%, aRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: In term pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix, induction of labor with vaginal dinoprostone or Foley catheter has similar effectiveness. Foley catheter leads to better safety for neonates, while it may result in a higher risk of maternal infection. Furthermore, Foley catheter should be preferred in multiparous women.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies had found that the mechanical methods were as effective as pharmacological methods in achieving vaginal delivery. However, whether balloon catheter induction is suitable for women with severe cervical immaturity and whether it will increase the related risks still need to be further explored.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter balloon for labor induction at term in primiparas with different cervical scores.
METHODS: A total of 688 primiparas who received cervical ripening with a Foley catheter balloon were recruited in this study. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (Bishop score ≤ 3) and Group 2 (3 < Bishop score < 7). Detailed medical data before and after using of balloon were faithfully recorded.
RESULTS: The cervical Bishop scores of the two groups after catheter placement were all significantly higher than those before (Group 1: 5.49 ± 1.31 VS 2.83 ± 0.39, P<0.05; Group 2: 6.09 ± 1.00 VS 4.45 ± 0.59, P<0.05). The success rate of labor induction in group 2 was higher than that in group 1 (P<0.05). The incidence of intrauterine infection in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 2 (18.3% VS 11.3%, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The success rates of induction of labor by Foley catheter balloon were different in primiparas with different cervical conditions, the failure rate of induction of labor and the incidence of intrauterine infection were higher in primiparas with severe cervical immaturity.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of misoprostol administered orally and vaginally in obese pregnant women at term with either gestational hypertension or diabetes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 264 pregnant women were enrolled and categorized into two groups based on their primary condition: hypertension (134 cases) or diabetes mellitus (130 cases) and were further divided into subgroups for misoprostol administration: orally (Oral group) or vaginally (Vaginal group). The primary outcomes measured were changes in the Bishop score following treatment, induction of labor (IOL) success rates, requirement for oxytocin augmentation, duration of labor, mode of delivery, and cesarean section rates.
UNASSIGNED: Significant enhancements in Bishop scores, decreased cesarean section rates and increased success rates of IOL were noted in both administration groups. The incidence of vaginal delivery within 24 h was significantly higher in the Vaginal group compared to the Oral group. Adverse effects, including nausea, uterine overcontraction, hyperfrequency of uterine contraction and uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate deceleration, were significantly more prevalent in the Vaginal group than in the Oral group.
UNASSIGNED: Misoprostol administration, both orally and vaginally, proves effective for labor induction in obese pregnant women with hypertension or diabetes. However, the oral route presents a lower risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, suggesting its preference for safer labor induction in this demographic.

BACKGROUND: The comparison between prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and oxytocin and for induction of labor (IOL) remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of these two agents in IOL.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. from the establishment of the database to April 23, 2023.
METHODS: A search was conducted with keywords \"labor, induction, prostaglandin E2/PGE2/dinoprostone, and oxytocin\". Only randomized clinical trials comparing oxytocin and vaginal dinoprostone in women who were at least late preterm (gestational age [GA] ≥34 weeks), singleton pregnant, and had intact membranes were enrolled for further meta-analysis.
METHODS: We conducted both a descriptive analysis and a meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, we utilized the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model to analyze dichotomous data, employing the relative risk (RR) as the effect measure along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study quality was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration\'s risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2). A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: After screening 3303 articles from five databases, a total of nine randomized controlled studies composed of 1071 patients were included. Our analysis included 534 patients in the PGE2 group and 537 patients in the oxytocin group. The pooled estimate of vaginal deliveries following PGE2 induction stood at 84.2%, while after oxytocin induction, it was 79.8%. The meta-analysis showed no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the rate of vaginal delivery (pooled RR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.95-1.16; P value for Q, 0.001; I2, 71.14%), cesarean section (pooled RR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.52-1.35; P value for Q, 0.007; I2, 61.69%) and induction-delivery interval (pooled standard mean difference, 0.09; 95% CI: -0.67 to 0.85; P value for Q, 0.000; I2, 96.45%). Since the results for fetal distress and uterine hyperstimulation were consistent across all enrolled studies, no further meta-analysis was conducted.
CONCLUSIONS: When amalgamating the available literature, it implies that oxytocin was found to have similar effects as PGE2 on delivery outcomes and safety concerns in pregnant women with GA ≥36 weeks. Although the uterine cervix was unfavorable, both low and high doses of oxytocin were feasible for IOL.

BACKGROUND: Dinoprostone vaginal insert is the most common pharmacological method for induction of labor (IOL); however, studies on assessing the time to vaginal delivery (DT) following dinoprostone administration are limited.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the primary factors influencing DT in women from central China, at or beyond term, who underwent IOL with dinoprostone vaginal inserts.
METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data of 1562 women at 37 weeks 0 days to 41 weeks 6 days of gestation who underwent dinoprostone-induced labor between January 1st, 2019, and December 31st, 2021. The outcomes of interest were vaginal or cesarean delivery and factors influencing DT, including maternal complications and neonatal characteristics.
RESULTS: Among the enrolled women, 71% (1109/1562) delivered vaginally, with median DT of 740.50 min (interquartile range 443.25 to 1264.50 min). Of the remaining 29% (453/1562), who delivered by cesarean section, 11.9% (54/453) were multiparous. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that multiparity, advanced maternal age, fetal macrosomia, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and daytime insertion of dinoprostone were the factors that significantly influenced DT. Time to vaginal delivery increased with advanced maternal age and fetal macrosomia and decreased with multiparity, PROM, and daytime insertion of dinoprostone. A mathematical model was developed to integrate these factors for predicting DT: Y = 804.478 - 125.284 × multiparity + 765.637 × advanced maternal age + 411.511 × fetal macrosomia-593.358 × daytime insertion of dinoprostone - 125.284 × PROM.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may help obstetricians estimate the DT before placing a dinoprostone insert, which may improve patient management in busy maternity wards and minimize potential risks.

UNASSIGNED: At present, the double balloon represented by the COOK Cervix Ripening Balloon and the single balloon represented by the Foley catheter are the commonly used intrauterine balloons. The application of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening has evolved over 100 years. Although intrauterine balloons have been widely used in cervical ripening, the effect of labor induction in clinical practice does not satisfy all clinicians, especially patients with poor cervical maturity.
UNASSIGNED: The research in this review is about intrauterine balloons and cervical ripening.
UNASSIGNED: This article reviews the historical evolution and different application methods of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening, such as application range, placement method and placement duration of intrauterine balloons, volume and temperature of the solution fillings, and whether to apply traction to the catheter. We aim to better understand the principle of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening and make this method more effective.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the values of transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and Bishop score (BS) for predicting outcomes of induction of labor (IOL).
METHODS: The BS and TVU were assessed before IOL. TVU parameters included cervical length (CL) and E-Cervix comprising the cervical hard ratio (HR) and the mean strain level of internal os (IOS). Study end-points included the duration of the latent phase within 15 or 18 h and delivery within 24 h.
RESULTS: In multivariable logistic regression models, at the first two end-points, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for CL with HR were 0.733 and 0.777, and the AUCs for CL with IOS were 0.754 and 0.787, respectively, The AUC for HR was 0.750 at the third end-point. With receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the best cut-off value for CL was ≤1.38 cm and that for IOS was ≥0.35. The AUCs of the TVU scoring system by the cut-off values for CL and IOS for the three end-points were 0.784, 0.833, and 0.855, respectively. The predicting values of both methods were better than those of the BS (AUC = 0.672, 0.694, and 0.687, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical length along with E-Cervix showed better predictive values for successful induction compared with the BS.

The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter (DBC) and dinoprostone as labor-inducing agents just for multipara at term.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted among multipara at term with a Bishop score < 6 who needed planned labor induction from January 1, 2020, to December 30, 2020 in Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. They were divided into DBC group and dinoprostone group, respectively. Baseline maternal data, maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Total vaginal delivery rate, rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h, rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal fetal heart rate(FHR) were regarded as the primary outcome variables. The difference between groups was considered statistically significant when p value < 0.05.
A total of 202 multiparas was included for analysis (95 women in DBC group vs 107 women in dinoprostone group). There were no significant differences in total vaginal delivery rate and rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h between groups. Uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal FHR occurred exclusively in dinoprostone group.
DBC and dinoprostone seem to be equally effective, while, DBC seems to be safer than dinoprostone.

To identify whether infection, cervical laceration and perineal laceration are associated with postpartum hemorrhage in the setting of vaginal delivery induced by Cook balloon catheter.
The retrospective study included 362 women who gave birth vaginally at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage between February 2021 to May 2022, of which including 216 women with induction of labor (Cook balloon catheter followed by oxytocin or oxytocin) and 146 women with spontaneous delivery. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were collected and compared.
362 women were divided into three groups, group 1 with spontaneous delivery, group 2 with oxytocin, group 3 with Cook balloon catheter followed by oxytocin. There was no significant difference in incidence of infection within three groups (P > 0.05). The rate of cervical laceration and perineal laceration was significantly higher in group 3 compared with groups 2 and 1 (P < 0.05); Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that compared with group 1, either group 3 or group 2 was associated with increased risks of cervical laceration and perineal laceration (P < 0.05), and compared with group 2, group 3 was not associated with increased risks of cervical laceration and perineal laceration (P > 0.05).
Infection, cervical laceration and perineal laceration are identified not to be independent risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage for women undergoing labor with Cook balloon catheter; Cervical laceration and perineal laceration increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage in women with labor induction.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara.
METHODS: A total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 80 mL and removed after 12 h. In the study group, a modified method was used. The uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 120 mL and 40 mL respectively. Light traction was given to help CCRB to be discharged after 12 h placement. Oxytocin was administered in both groups after CCRB was discharged before labor starting. The improved Bishop scores, duration of labor, and spontaneous delivery rate were evaluated in the two groups.
RESULTS: The improved Bishop scores in the study group were 3.06 ± 0.97 at 12 h placement of CCRB and 4.37 ± 0.87 when CCRB was discharged, which were significantly higher compared to the control group (2.52 ± 0.79, p < 0.05). Duration of the first stage of labor and the full labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group ((6.17 ± 2.85) h vs. (7.27 ± 2.90) h, p = 0.010; (7.07 ± 3.18) h vs. (8.09 ± 3.11) h, p = 0.028). No difference in spontaneous delivery rate between the two groups was observed. But the delivery rate within 24 h between the two groups was significantly different (79.79% vs. 55.91%, p < 0.05). For the cases with initial Bishop scores ≤ 3, the improved score was significantly increased, the first stage of labor and the full labor were significantly shorter in the study group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Those results were not observed in cases with initial Bishop scores of 4-6.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified application of CCRB could benefit cervical ripening, shorten the duration of labor, especially for cases with poor cervical maturity, and improve the delivery rate within 24 h.
BACKGROUND: Retrospectively registered: ChiCTR2200058270. Registered 04/04/2022.