health coaching

健康辅导
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我国农村地区尚未广泛开展高血压患者自我管理教育。我们的研究旨在研究健康教练干预对高血压病史≤6个月的农村居民控制血压和提高自我管理能力的影响。共有102名参与者参加了RCT。对照组采用常规健康指导和随访管理;实验组采用健康辅导和随访管理。主要结果是血压变化和平均自我管理得分的差异。次要结果包括腰围,体重指数(BMI),和药物素养。实验组的参与者在收缩压和舒张压方面分别显示出明显更大的改善(133.85±4.74mmHgvs127.96±5.42mmHg;80.94±5.52mmHgvs77.37±4.44mmHg,P<0.05)和BMI(24.66±2.19kg/m2vs23.44±2.05kg/m2,P<0.05)与对照组比较。在3个月和6个月时,实验组和对照组在自我管理和用药素养方面也观察到了显着差异(P<0.05)。然而,两组腰围变化无显著差异(22.6%vs38.8%)。总之,对于在过去6个月内诊断为高血压的患者,健康教练可能是控制血压,提高用药素养和自我管理能力的有效方法。
    The self-management education for patients with hypertension has not been widely provided in rural areas of China. Our study aimed to examine the effect of health coaching intervention on controlling BP and improving self-management skills among rural resident of ≤6 month-history of hypertension. A total of 102 participants were enrolled in the RCT. The control group received usual health guidance and follow-up management; the experimental group received health coaching and follow up management. The primary outcomes were the difference in changes of BP and mean self-management scores. The secondary outcomes included waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and medication literacy. Participants in the experimental group showed a significantly greater improvement with respect to systolic BP and diastolic BP respectively (133.85 ± 4.74 mmHg vs 127.96 ± 5.42 mmHg;80.94 ± 5.52 mmHg vs 77.37 ± 4.44 mmHg, P < 0.05) and BMI (24.66 ± 2.19 kg/m2 vs 23.44 ± 2.05 kg/m2, P < 0.05) compared with the control group. A significant difference was also observed between the experimental and control groups in terms of self-management and medication literacy at both 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in changes of waist circumferences between the two groups (22.6% vs 38.8%). In conclusion, for patients with diagnosed with hypertension within the last 6 months, health coaching maybe is an effective approach to control blood pressure and improve medication literacy and self-management skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:探讨卒中幸存者的观点,在医院到家庭的过渡护理期间,护理人员和护士教练参与健康教练计划。
    背景:中风是严重影响中国人民健康和安全的重大公共卫生问题。护士主导的健康指导是一个很有前途的支持选择,可以为中风幸存者和家庭护理人员提供顺利的医院到家庭过渡。定性研究对于深入了解他们对使用该程序的看法很有价值。
    方法:探索性,描述性定性过程评估与前一项随机对照试验同时进行.数据来自26名中风幸存者,33名护理人员和4名护士教练进行半结构化访谈。采用感应反身主题分析方法进行数据分析。报告本研究时遵循COREQ检查表。
    结果:从数据中产生了七个主题:(1)个性化健康教练课程的适用性,(2)培养自我效能感,建立自我护理技能,(3)护士教练员的关键作用,(4)过渡期间医疗团队之间的协调,(5)充分的社区和社会支持,(6)出院后康复服务不足,(7)护士教练的工作量增加。
    结论:这项研究捕捉到了由护士主导的健康指导计划对中风幸存者医院到家庭过渡护理的观点,护理人员和护士教练。个性化的健康指导课程和驾驶自我效能感被认为是增强中风幸存者和护理人员自我护理技能的促进者。护士教练在协调医疗团队以及适当的社区和社会支持方面的关键作用被认为是该计划实施的动力框架。然而,卫生系统障碍,例如康复服务不足和护士工作量大,仍然需要解决,以确保过渡护理中健康教练干预的可持续性。
    结论:该研究表明,实施护士主导的健康指导以促进卒中后医院到家庭的过渡性护理的可行性。研究结果还强调了在医疗保健中实施循证干预措施时进行定性过程评估的重要性。
    背景:该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ID:ACTRN12619000321145)。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspectives of stroke survivors, caregivers and nurse coaches on a health coaching program during hospital-to-home transitional care.
    BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major public health problem that seriously affects the health and safety of people in China. Nurse-led health coaching is a promising support option in enabling smooth hospital-to-home transition for stroke survivors and family caregivers. A qualitative study is valuable for gaining insight into their perspectives on using this program.
    METHODS: An exploratory, descriptive qualitative process evaluation was conducted parallel with a former randomised controlled trial. Data were obtained from 26 stroke survivors, 33 caregivers and four nurse coaches with semi-structured interviews. The inductive reflexive thematic analysis approach was used for data analysis. The COREQ checklist was followed in reporting this study.
    RESULTS: Seven themes were generated from the data: (1) the applicability of individualised health coaching sessions, (2) driving self-efficacy to establish self-care skills, (3) the key role of nurse coaches, (4) coordination among healthcare teams during the transition, (5) adequate community and social support, (6) insufficient rehabilitative services after discharge and (7) perceived extra workload for nurse coaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study captured perspectives on a nurse-led health coaching program towards hospital-to-home transition care from stroke survivors, caregivers and nurse coaches. Individualised health coaching sessions and driving self-efficacy were perceived as facilitators for empowering the self-care skills of stroke survivors and caregivers. The key role of nurse coaches in coordinating healthcare teams and adequate community and social support were detected as the power frame of the program\'s implementation. However, health system obstacles, such as insufficient rehabilitative services and the high workload of nurses, still need to be addressed to ensure the sustainability of health coaching intervention in transitional care.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested the feasibility of implementing nurse-led health coaching to smooth post-stroke hospital-to-home transitional care. The findings also highlighted the importance of qualitative process evaluation when implementing evidence-based interventions in health care.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID: ACTRN12619000321145).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估护士主导的健康指导计划在医院到家庭过渡护理中对中风幸存者和家庭护理人员的影响。
    方法:共招募140位二位卒中幸存者及其家庭照顾者,并随机分配到干预组(接受为期12周的护士主导的健康指导计划)或常规护理组。主要结果是自我效能感,次要结局是生活质量(QoL),中风相关知识,和照顾者相关的负担。结果在基线测量,12和24周。
    结果:与常规护理组相比,干预组的卒中幸存者在12周时(x:24.9,95CI:20.2-29.6,p<0.001)和24周时(x:23.9,95CI:19.2-28.6,p<0.001)的自我效能感明显改善。研究结果还表明,中风幸存者的QoL显著增加,中风相关知识,减少计划外的住院再入院和照顾者相关负担。两组之间的其他结果没有统计学上的显着变化。
    结论:护士主导的健康指导计划改善了卒中幸存者及其照顾者的健康状况。
    这项研究的结果表明,护士主导的健康指导应纳入到医院到家庭的常规实践中,为中风幸存者及其护理人员提供过渡护理。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a nurse-led health coaching programme for stroke survivors and family caregivers in hospital-to-home transition care.
    METHODS: A total of 140 dyads of stroke survivors and their family caregivers were recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (received a 12-week nurse-led health coaching programme) or the usual care group. The primary outcome was self-efficacy, and secondary outcomes were quality of life (QoL), stroke-related knowledge, and caregiver-related burden. The outcomes were measured at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks.
    RESULTS: Stroke survivors in the intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement in self-efficacy at 12 weeks (x̅: 24.9, 95%CI: 20.2-29.6, p < 0.001) and at 24 weeks (x̅: 23.9, 95%CI: 19.2-28.6, p < 0.001) compared to the usual care group. Findings also demonstrated significant increases in stroke survivors\' QoL, stroke-related knowledge, and reduction in unplanned hospital readmissions and caregiver-related burden. There were no statistically significant changes in other outcomes between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-led health coaching programme improved health outcomes for both stroke survivors and their caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings from the study suggest that nurse-led health coaching should be incorporated into routine practice in hospital-to-home transitional care for stroke survivors and their caregivers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    系统分析过渡护理中的健康教练策略,并综合这些策略对中风幸存者的医疗保健结果的影响。
    对两种语言的9个数据库进行了系统搜索。在有数据的情况下进行Meta分析。
    25项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,过渡护理干预措施中的健康指导策略显着改善了生活质量(QoL)(p<0.001),3个月时卒中幸存者的日常生活活动(ADL)(p=0.002)和抑郁减轻(p=0.001)。进一步的亚组分析表明,在3个月时,使用更多数量的健康教练策略的过渡护理干预措施对QoL(SMD=1.15)和ADL(SMD=1.177)的影响大小更大。和中等效应大小(SMD=0.674)对抑郁症的减少。然而,健康教练策略对再入院的影响,卒中幸存者的死亡率和跌倒仍无定论.
    这篇综述提供了证据,证明在过渡护理中纳入健康指导策略可以改善中风幸存者的健康结果。
    需要更多的健康教练干预试验,以通过严格的研究设计来改善过渡护理,以解决在这一关键护理时期对中风幸存者及其护理人员缺乏支持的问题。
    To systematically analyse health coaching strategies in transition care and synthesise the effect of these strategies on health care outcomes for stroke survivors.
    A systematic search of nine databases in two languages was conducted. Meta-analysis was conducted when data were available.
    Twenty-five randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that health coaching strategies in transition care interventions significantly improve quality of life (QoL) (p < 0.001), activities of daily living (ADL) (p = 0.002) and reduce depression (p = 0.001) for stroke survivors at 3 months. Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that transition care interventions with a greater number of health coaching strategies are associated with a larger effect size on QoL (SMD=1.15) and ADL (SMD=1.177) at 3 months, and a medium effect size (SMD=0.674) on depression reduction. However, the effects of health coaching strategies on readmission, mortality and falls in stroke survivors remain inconclusive.
    This review provides evidence that incorporating health coaching strategies in transitional care improves health outcomes of stroke survivors.
    More trials of health coaching interventions to improve transition care with a rigorous study design are much needed to address the lack of support for stroke survivors and their caregivers in this crucial care period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:确定健康教练干预对血糖控制管理的影响,以及生理,2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的心理和自我护理结果,与平时的护理相比。方法:2011年8月至2013年12月在北京市丰台区开展语用群聚RCT。41个社区卫生站(CHSs)被随机分组(按地理分层,1:1比例)且符合条件,随机选择的T2DM患者依次接受CHSs.对照参与者根据中国糖尿病预防和管理指南接受常规护理。干预参与者根据动机性访谈(MI)和常规护理的原则接受了18个月的健康指导。两组均免除医疗和病理费用。结果评估在基线时进行,6、12和18个月。主要结局是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c);次要结局包括一系列生理,心理和自我护理措施。结果:HbA1c在18个月时未发现差异治疗效果(调整。差异-0.07,95%CI-0.53至0.39,p=0.769)或任何指定的次要结局。有趣的是,两组在18个月时HbA1c均显示出统计学和临床上显著的组内改善,幅度相同(干预:平均变化-3.65,95%CI-3.92~-3.37;对照:平均变化-3.38,95%CI-3.67~-3.08).结论:观察到的差异治疗效果的缺乏表明,在中国推荐基于MI原则的健康教练干预措施的常规交付可能为时过早。然而,大,平均HbA1c的可比组内改善促进了免费的建立,定期对中国2型糖尿病患者进行临床健康评估。
    背景:ISRCTN注册表-ISRCTN01010526(https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN01010526)。
    Aim: To determine the effect of a health coach intervention for the management of glycemic control, as well as physiological, psychological and self-care outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compared with usual care. Methods: This pragmatic cluster RCT was conducted in the Fengtai district of Beijing from August 2011 to December 2013. Forty-one community health stations (CHSs) were cluster randomized (stratified geographically, 1:1 ratio) and eligible, randomly selected T2DM patients were sequentially contacted by CHSs. Control participants received usual care according to the Chinese Guideline for Diabetes Prevention and Management. Intervention participants received 18-months of health coaching based on principles of Motivational Interviewing (MI) plus usual care. Medical and pathology fees were waived for both groups. Outcome assessment was performed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18-months. The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); secondary outcomes encompassed a suite of physiological, psychological and self-care measures. Results: No differential treatment effect was found at 18-months for HbA1c (adj. difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.39, p = 0.769) or any specified secondary outcomes. Interestingly, both groups displayed a statistically and clinically significant within-group improvement of the same magnitude at 18-months for HbA1c (intervention: mean change -3.65, 95% CI -3.92 to -3.37; control: mean change -3.38, 95% CI -3.67 to -3.08). Conclusions: The lack of differential treatment effects observed indicate that it may be premature to recommend the routine delivery of health coach interventions based on MI principles for the management of T2DM in China. However, the large, comparable within-group improvement in mean HbA1c promotes the establishment of free, regular clinical health assessments for individuals with T2DM in China.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN registry - ISRCTN01010526 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN01010526).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述COPD患者参与健康教练自我管理计划的经验。
    有目的地选择20名参加了为期6个月的健康教练自我管理计划干预的患者,使用半结构化访谈对该计划进行定性评估。访谈采用归纳定性内容分析进行分析。
    出现了四个类别和13个子类别,描述了该计划的参与者体验。他们的经验被表达为深入了解知识和个人责任在COPD管理中的重要性。采取行动保持健康的生活方式,感觉受到程序的支持,并受到个人和程序限制的阻碍。
    患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的迭代互动以及计划的内容被描述为对发展管理COPD的技能很重要。然而,在未来的自我管理计划中,应考虑对个人先决条件的更多认识。
    To describe the experiences of patients with COPD participating in a health coaching self-management program.
    Twenty patients who had participated in a 6-month health coaching self-management program intervention were purposefully selected for a qualitative evaluation of the program using semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis.
    Four categories and 13 subcategories emerged describing the participants\' experiences of the program. Their experiences were expressed as gaining insight into the importance of knowledge and personal responsibilities in the management of COPD, taking action to maintain a healthy lifestyle, feeling supported by the program, and being hindered by individual and program limitations.
    Iterative interactions between patients and health care professionals together with the content of the program are described as important to develop skills to manage COPD. However, in future self-management programs more awareness of individual prerequisites should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号