BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (preCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer in older people who were classified as \"fit\" by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).
METHODS: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial was designed. Patients were eligible for this study if they were aged 70 years or above and met the standards of \"fit\" (SIOG1) as evaluated by CGA and of the locally advanced risk category. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Patients were scheduled to receive preCRT (50 Gy) with raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22).
RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients were evaluated by CGA, of whom eighty-six, eleven and twelve were classified into the fit, intermediate and frail category. Sixty-eight fit patients with a median age of 74 years were enrolled. Sixty-four patients (94.1%) finished radiotherapy without dose reduction. Fifty-four (79.3%) patients finished the prescribed raltitrexed therapy as planned. Serious toxicity (grade 3 or above) was observed in twenty-four patients (35.3%), and fourteen patients (20.6%) experienced non-hematological side effects. Within a median follow-up time of 36.0 months (range: 5.9-63.1 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 89.6% (95% CI: 82.3-96.9), 92.4% (95% CI: 85.9-98.9) and 75.6% (95% CI: 65.2-86.0), respectively. Forty-eight patients (70.6%) underwent surgery (R0 resection 95.8%, R1 resection 4.2%), the corresponding R0 resection rate among the patients with positive mesorectal fascia status was 76.6% (36/47).
CONCLUSIONS: This phase II trial suggests that preCRT is efficient with tolerable toxicities in older rectal cancer patients who were evaluated as fit based on CGA.
BACKGROUND: The registration number on ClinicalTrials.gov was NCT02992886 (14/12/2016).

The Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations include a commitment to \"leave no one behind\" as a universal goal. To achieve this in geriatric oncology (GO) worldwide, it is important to understand the current state of GO at an international level. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) has several National Representatives (NRs) who act as SIOG\'s delegates in their respective countries. The NRs took part in this international survey exploring the state of GO practice, identifying barriers and solutions.
The NRs answered open-ended questions by email from February 2020 to October 2022. The questionnaire domains included the demographic information of older adults for their countries, and the NRs\' opinions on whether GO is developing, what the barriers are to developing GO, and proposed actions to remove these barriers. The demographic data of each country reported in the survey was adjusted using literature and database searches.
Twenty-one of thirty countries with NRs (70%) participated in this questionnaire study: 12 European, four Asian, two North American, two South American, and one Oceanian. The proportion of the population aged ≥75 years varied from 2.2% to 15.8%, and the average life expectancy also varied from 70 years to 86 years. All NRs reported that GO was developing in their country; four NRs (18%) reported that GO was well developed. Although all NRs agreed that geriatric assessment was useful, only three reported that it was used day-to-day in their countries\' clinical practice (14%). The major barriers identified were the lack of (i) evidence to support GO use, (ii) awareness and interest in GO, and (iii) resources (time, manpower, and funding). The major proposed actions were to (i) provide new evidence through clinical trials specific for GO patients, (ii) stimulate awareness through networking, and (iii) deliver educational materials and information to healthcare providers and medical students.
This current survey has identified the barriers to GO and proposed actions that could remove them. Broader awareness seems to be essential to implementing GO. Additional actions are needed to develop GO within countries and can be supported through international partnerships.

The proportion of patients diagnosed with cancer has been shown to rise with the increasing aging global population. Advanced age is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in older adults. As individuals experience varying health statuses, particularly with age, it poses a challenge for medical professionals in the cancer field to obtain standardized treatment outcomes. Hence, relying solely on chronological age and disease-related parameters is inadequate for clinical decision-making for elderly patients. With functional, multimorbidity-related, and psychosocial changes that occur with aging, oncologic diseases may develop and be treated differently from younger patients, leading to unique challenges in treatment efficacy and tolerance. To overcome this challenge, personalized therapy using biomarkers has emerged as a promising solution. Various categories of biomarkers, including inflammatory, hematological, metabolic, endocrine, and DNA modification-related indicators, may display features related to both cancer and aging, aiding in the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for patients with cancer in old age. Furthermore, physical functional measurements as non-molecular phenotypic biomarkers are being investigated for their potential complementary role in structured multidomain strategies to combat age-related diseases such as cancer. This review provides insight into the current developments, recent discoveries, and significant challenges in cancer and aging biomarkers, with a specific focus on their application in advanced age.

(1) Background: The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with gastric cancer after D2-gastrectomy is unclear. This study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. (2) Methods: A real-world population-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥65 with stage II/III gastric cancer (n = 2616; median age: 73.5; 12.2% aged >80 years) treated between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2020 were included. All data was retrieved from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Clinical Management System (CMS). Clinical characteristics of those patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment were balanced after propensity score matching (PSM). In total, 732 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were matched with 732 patients treated with surgery alone. Hazard ratios (HRs) estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the two patient groups. (3) Results: Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS (37 vs. 25 months; HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75-0.84; p < 0.001) than surgery alone. The OS benefit was observed in both the 65-80 (44 vs. 27 months; HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74-0.84; p < 0.001) and >80 (14 vs. 11 months; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96; p < 0.001) age groups. A better CSS was observed in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy than those who only had surgery (5-year CSS: 64.1% vs. 61.1%, HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.79-0.93; p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS and CSS in older patients with stage II/III gastric cancer.

Cancer is mostly a disease of aging, and older patients with cancer are generally frailer. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes and explore factors associated with duration, cost, and mortality during first hospitalization, in older patients with cancer admitted to a top-ranked hospital in China.
Data on patients with solid cancer ≥65 years consecutively hospitalized in 2016-2020 were retrieved from the electronic medical records of Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai, China. Baseline characteristics, duration, cost, and mortality during hospitalization were described. Factors associated with duration, cost, and mortality during first hospitalization were explored using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.
20,650 eligible patients with male proportion of 59% and median age of 70 years were analyzed. 45% of the patients underwent resection in our hospital. Upon first admission, 49% of patients had hypertension, 19% diabetes, 22% weight loss, and 28% risks of malnutrition. The median duration and cost of first hospitalization were 9 days and 32,000 RMB, respectively. 118 (0.6%) and 228 (1.1%) deaths occurred during first and any hospitalization, respectively. For first hospitalization, longer duration and higher cost were positively associated with older ages, male gender, emergency admission, certain tumor locations and histology, histories of diabetes, cirrhosis, and anticoagulant intake, higher body mass index, weight loss, reduced food intake, risk of falling, and worse self-care ability; in-hospital mortality was positively associated with age ≥85 years, emergency admission, certain cancer types, histories of hypertension and psychotropic intake, reduced food intake, and worse self-care ability.
This study identified certain baseline patient and tumor characteristics, medical and medication histories, changes of weight and food intake, diet, and self-care ability which were independently associated with in-hospital outcomes among older patients with cancer admitted to our hospital and which should be paid special attention to. While the factors might not be easily modifiable, our study can help identify patients at higher risks of inferior in-hospital outcomes.

clinical trials dedicated to the older patients with cancer are essential to help to define optimal cancer therapy for this rapidly growing population. Our study aimed to analyse the characteristics and the evolution of older-patient-specific oncological trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.
a dataset of 61,120 oncological trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov between 2000 and 2019 was downloaded. Characteristics of older-patient-specific trials were compared with characteristics of age-unspecified trials. Chronological shifts in older-patient-specific trials were also analysed.
of the 49,273 interventional trials eligible for analysis, only 490 (1.0%) were older-patient-specific. More than half of the older-patient-specific trials were phase 2 and enrolled less than 100 patients. Compared with age-unspecified trials, older-patient-specific trials were less likely to be funded by industry (26.9 vs 37.1%), and more likely to be conducted in Europe (44.5 vs 28.3%). During the two time periods between 2000 and 2009, and 2010 and 2019, the proportion of supportive care-oriented trials increased from 1.9 to 13.9%. Concerningly, the use of clinically meaningful end points in older patients such as disease-specific survival, patient-reported outcomes and functional status as a primary end point was uncommon (0.4, 8.1 and 7.3%, respectively). There was no correlation between the number of trials for a given cancer type and relative incidence and mortality. 196/490 (40.0%) of the trials were conducted for patients with haematological cancer.
our study helps us to better understand the current state of older-patient-specific oncological trials and provide insights for future development, resulting in the improvement of the care of older patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Symptom and functional assessment is challenging in geriatric oncology care. This multicenter cross-sectional study examined the use of a multiple-symptom assessment tool, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), on Chinese patients with cancer aged 65 years and older.
METHODS: Patient-rated symptoms and functioning were assessed using MDASI and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire.
RESULTS: The most severe symptoms were fatigue and poor appetite. The older group (75-84 years old, n = 224) reported a more severe difficulty remembering (effect size [ES] 0.32; P<.001), shortness of breath (ES 0.20; P=.020), and interference with general activity (ES 0.14; P=.027), with significantly worse physical functioning (ES -0.33; P<.001) and cognitive functioning on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (ES 0.20; P<.001) than the younger group (65-74 years old, n = 555). For MDASI measures of the core symptoms and total interference with daily activity, Cronbach α coefficients were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively, for the younger group; and 0.93 and 0.94 for the older group, respectively. Moderate to severe (score ≥4) interference with general activity and walking on MDASI accurately indicated poor performance status (area under the curve 0.8089 and 0.7969, respectively) and lack of independence status of Activities of Daily Living (area under the curve 0.7993 and 0.8304, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: MDASI is psychometrically reliable, valid, and clinically sensitive for the measuring symptom burden and functional status of Chinese patients with cancer aged 65 years and older. MDASI could be adopted to measure multiple symptoms and physical functioning outcomes in geriatric oncology practice as well as for research on treatment benefits.

The safety and efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE in older patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NET) are not well understood.
Patients ≥70 years of age and treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE were included. Toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The relationship between baseline characteristics and PFS and OS was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
In total, 71 patients were included (76.1% midgut primary). The median age at diagnosis and age at 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment were 70 and 74 years, respectively. The majority (78.9%) of patients completed 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. Clinically significant myelosuppression was rare (2.8%). There was no deterioration in HRQoL and \'disease-specific worries\' significantly improved (P = 0.029). Radiological response assessment was available in 66 patients. Partial response, stable disease and progression of disease were found in 10 (15.2%), 52 (78.8%) and 4 patients (6.1%), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 36.0 and 47.0 months, respectively. Increased baseline alkaline phosphatase was associated with poorer PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.006).
Patients ≥70 years of age with advanced NET treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE have efficacy and toxicity profiles similar to the wider NET population, without deterioration of HRQoL.

暂无摘要。

Palliative care in geriatric cancer patient is a severely under investigated and stigmatized topic. Presumptions and lack of clinical, validated data, lead to a poor or at least not optimal care for this specific and vulnerable population. The nihilism in the field of palliative geronto-oncology is a major contributor to a reduced quality of life among elderly with cancer and their families. Assumptions towards their compliance, accessibility to the treatment and their outcomes often lead to an undertreatment in terms of palliation, which is mostly falsely equalized with end-of-life and hospice care. However, an early palliative management of geriatric patients should always be aimed first-for symptomatic treatment, but also potentially including interventions and active anti-tumor therapies. Nevertheless, gerontopalliation should also assure comfort, closeness, hope and security for relatives. This review illustrates the stand of the knowledge, relevant problems, chances, necessary developments, perspectives and research directions on the area of geriatric palliative care, especially in terms of the outcomes and improved quality of life for this specific population, with applicability for not only oncologists, but any involved physicians, such as internists, palliative and geriatric care specialists. With the rapid progress in precision and personalized medicine, there are new perspectives opening for geriatric cancer patients.