extended pelvic lymph node dissection

扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较标准盆腔淋巴结清扫术(sPLND)和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)中的围手术期结局差异,并评估其生存结局。回顾性收集2016年1月至2020年12月在南京鼓楼医院接受RARC治疗的患者的临床资料。根据盆腔淋巴结清扫范围分为sPLND组和ePLND组。最后,通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)获得的两组患者80对,分析其围手术期及生存结果。PSM后清扫淋巴结(LN)的中位数在sPLND组为13,在ePLND组为16(P=0.004)。两组围手术期并发症相似。PSM之后,ePLND改善了所有患者的5年RFS和OS(85.74vs.61.94%,P=0.004;82.80vs.67.50%,P=0.033),≥T3疾病的患者(73.66vs.23.86%;P=0.007;68.20vs.36.20%;P=0.032)和LN转移患者(67.70vs.7.33%;P=0.004;60.60vs.16.67%;P=0.045)与sPLND相比。与sPLND相比,延长的PLND显着增加淋巴结产量而不增加并发症,并改善了RFS和OS。
    To compare the difference in perioperative outcomes between standard pelvic lymph node dissection (sPLND) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and evaluate the survival outcomes. The clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent RARC between January 2016 and December 2020 in Nanjing Drum Hospital. The patients were divided into sPLND and ePLND group according to the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection. Finally, 80 pairs of patients obtained for two groups by propensity score matching (PSM) and their perioperative and survival outcomes were analyzed. The median number of dissected lymph nodes (LN) after PSM was 13 in sPLND group and 16 in ePLND group (P = 0.004). Perioperative complications were similar between 2 groups. After PSM, ePLND improved 5-year RFS and OS in all patients (85.74 vs. 61.94%, P = 0.004; 82.80 vs. 67.50%, P = 0.033), patients with ≥ T3 disease (73.66 vs. 23.86%; P = 0.007; 68.20 vs. 36.20%; P = 0.032) and patients with LN metastasis (67.70 vs. 7.33%; P = 0.004; 60.60 vs. 16.67%; P = 0.045) compared to sPLND. Extended PLND significantly increased lymph node yield without increasing complication and improved RFS and OS compared to sPLND.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    在根治性前列腺切除术(RP)之前,多西他赛为基础的新辅助化学激素治疗(NCHT)的益处仍然未知。我们探讨了基于多西他赛的NCHT是否比局部晚期前列腺癌的新辅助激素治疗(NHT)带来病理益处并改善生化无进展生存期(bPFS)。
    设计了一项随机试验,招募了141名本地高级人员,高危前列腺癌患者以2:1的比例随机分为NCHT组(每3周75mg/m2体表面积加6个周期雄激素剥夺治疗)和NHT组(24周雄激素剥夺治疗).主要终点为3年bPFS。次要终点是病理反应,包括病理降级和微小残留病率。
    与NHT组相比,NCHT组在3年bPFS中显示出显着的益处(29%vs9.5%,P=.002)。中位随访53个月,NCHT组的中位bPFS时间明显长于NHT组(17个月vs14个月).2组之间在病理降级和微小残留病率方面没有发现显着差异。
    NCHT加RP与NHT加RP相比,在高风险中取得了显着的bPFS收益,局部晚期前列腺癌.在进一步的调查中,更大的队列和更长的随访时间是必不可少的。
    UNASSIGNED: Benefits of docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) remain largely unknown. We explored whether docetaxel-based NCHT would bring pathological benefits and improve biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) over neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in locally advanced prostate cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized trial was designed recruiting 141 locally advanced, high-risk prostate cancer patients who were randomly assigned at the ratio of 2:1 to the NCHT group (75 mg/m2 body surface area every 3 weeks plus androgen deprivation therapy for 6 cycles) and the NHT group (androgen deprivation therapy for 24 weeks). The primary end point was 3-year bPFS. Secondary end points were pathological response including pathological downstaging and minimal residual disease rates.
    UNASSIGNED: The NCHT group showed significant benefits in 3-year bPFS compared to the NHT group (29% vs 9.5%, P = .002). At a median follow-up of 53 months, the NCHT group achieved a significantly longer median bPFS time than the NHT group (17 months vs 14 months). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in pathological downstaging and minimal residual disease rates.
    UNASSIGNED: NCHT plus RP achieved significant bPFS benefits when compared with NHT plus RP in high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer. A larger cohort with longer follow-up duration is essential in further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Docetaxel has been shown to be an effective chemotherapy agent when combined with androgen deprivation therapy for hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (CaP). Since very high risk CaP has a high rate of occult metastatic disease and early recurrence, we hypothesize that patients with very high risk locally advanced CaP may benefit from docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT). Thus, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the outcome of these patients treated with NCHT followed by radical prostatectomy (RP).
    We retrospectively analyzed data from 177 consecutive patients who had very high risk locally advanced CaP between March 2014 and July 2017. Patients received 3 different therapies: (i) 60 men in NCHT group, (ii) 73 men in neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) group, and (iii) 44 men received immediate RP without neoadjuvant therapy (No-NT group). Surgical outcomes were analyzed and survival differences were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method.
    The NCHT group had statistically significant higher preoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) (P < 0.002), higher Gleason score (P < 0.002), and more advanced clinical stage (P < 0.001) than other groups. After RP, 81% (42/52) of patients in NCHT group, 73% (51/70) of patients in NHT group, and 48% (21/44) of patients in No-NT group achieved an undetectable PSA (P < 0.001). A total of 14% (6/42) patients achieving a postoperative undetectable PSA experienced biochemical recurrence in the NCHT group, with median biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) time of 19 months; 47% (24/51) experienced biochemical recurrence in the NHT group, with median bPFS time of 13 months; 81% (17/21) experienced biochemical recurrence in the No-NT group, with median bPFS time of 9 months (P < 0.001). The median follow-up time of 3 groups was 12.5 months in the NCHT group, 18.3 months in the NHT group, and 22.8 months in the No-NT group (P = 0.01).
    Despite having poorer prognostic factors, the NCHT group had better bPFS time after surgery compared to NHT and No-NT groups. Randomized controlled investigations are needed to validate these results and further follow-up is required for survival endpoints.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号