UNASSIGNED: To compare perioperative adverse events between general anesthesia with endotracheal tube (ETT) and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
UNASSIGNED: This was a large sample retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) study. We collected the data of 6739 female patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2016 and June 2021 in our hospital, China. Patients were divided into two groups (ETT group and LMA group) according to different airway management modes. Data on all perioperative adverse events were collected. PSM analysis was performed to control confounding factors and differences in baseline values between the two groups. Finally, 4150 female patients were recruited after PSM.
UNASSIGNED: The total number of patients taking intraoperative vasoactive drugs during surgery was higher in the ETT group than in the LMA group (P = 0.04). The LMA group had a higher incidence of vomiting (51 [2.46%]) and somnolence (165 [7.95]) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ETT group (71 [3.42%] and 102 [4.92%], respectively) (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001). Hypothermia was significantly higher in the LMA group (183 [10.36%]) than in the ETT group (173 [8.34%]) in the PACU (P = 0.03). The number of patients with sore throat was significantly higher in the ETT group (434 [20.02%]) than in the LMA group (299 [14.41%]) in the ward (P < 0.001). Other variables such as hypoxemia, moderate to severe pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, sleep disorders, wound bleeding, and skin itch were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The ETT group had more incidences of vomiting, sore throat, and cough complications and needed more drug treatment than the LMA group. LMA is a better airway management mode and LMA general anesthesia can be safely used in patients undergoing laparoscopic nonemergency hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: It is challenging for anesthetists to determine the optimal tracheal intubation depth in children. We hypothesize that a measure three times the length of the middle finger can be used for predicting tracheal tube depth in children.
METHODS: Eighty-six children (4-14 years of age) were included in this study. After the children were anesthetized, a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) was inserted into the trachea, the lengths from the upper incisor teeth to carina and vocal cords were measured, and a suitably sized cuffed tracheal tube was inserted into the trachea. Age-based and middle finger length-based formulas were used to determine the tracheal intubation depth.
RESULTS: All 86 children enrolled were included in this study. Compared with the age-based intubation, the rate of appropriate tube placement was higher for middle finger length-based intubation (88.37% vs 66.28%, P = 0.001). The proximal intubation rate was lower in middle finger length-based intubation (4.65% vs 32.56%, P < 0.001). There was only weak evidence for a difference in the distal intubation rate between the two methods (6.97% vs 1.16%, P = 0.054). The correlation coefficient between middle finger length and optimal tracheal tube depth was larger than that between age and optimal tracheal tube depth (0.883 vs 0.845).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the appropriate tube placement rate can be improved by using three times the middle finger length as the tracheal intubation depth in children.