UNASSIGNED: Posttransplant skin cancer is the most common malignancy after patients have undergone renal transplantation. Through comprehensive observation with a large sample size nationwide, understanding the risk factors and outcome of posttransplant skin cancer will help to develop appropriate patient surveillance and disease prevention strategies.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective population-based cohort study was based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data released in March 2021. Characteristics and outcomes, including patient survival and graft survival of recipients, were compared. Risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer, cancer onset momentum, and mortality were determined.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 199,564 renal transplant recipients were included. After renal transplantation, 7,334 (3.68%), 6,093 (3.05%), and 936 (0.47%) were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma, respectively. Skin cancer was the major cause of death (squamous cell carcinoma: 23.8%, basal cell carcinoma: 18%, and melanoma: 41.6%). Five-year survival rates ranked from best to worst were as follows: basal cell carcinoma (96.7 [95% confidence interval: 96.3-97.2]%), squamous cell carcinoma (94.1 [93.5-94.6]%), melanoma (89.7 [87.7-91.6]%), and cancer-free (87.4 [87.2-87.5]%) (p < 0.001 for all except melanoma vs. cancer-free, p = 0.534). Regarding graft survival, death-censored graft survival, posttransplant skin cancer, and melanoma were significantly better than the cancer-free group (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for developing posttransplant skin cancer included older age, male sex, Caucasian race, pretransplant malignancy, polycystic kidney disease-induced end-stage renal disease (ESRD), retransplantation, private health insurance, T-cell depletion induction, and tacrolimus/mycophenolic acid use. Caucasian race and pretransplant malignancy were independent risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer onset momentum. Male sex, Caucasian race, pretransplant malignancy, hypertension- or diabetes-induced ESRD, retransplantation, diabetes history, deceased donor, cyclosporin, and mTOR inhibitor use were independent risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer mortality.
UNASSIGNED: Although posttransplant skin cancer is a major cause of recipient death, information regarding its impact on patient and graft survival is limited. Given the differences regarding risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer incidence, onset momentum, and mortality, personalized approaches to screening may be appropriate to address the complex issues encountered by kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous paricalcitol injection with intravenously administered paricalcitol in treating parathyroid hyperplasia in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT).
METHODS: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution. We retrospectively collected data on patients who received percutaneous paricalcitol injection (24 patients) and intravenously administered paricalcitol (22 patients) based on their intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level. Serum iPTH, calcium, phosphorus, and the volume of the parathyroid gland were measured at several indicated time points after treatment, and adverse events associated with the two treatments were evaluated.
RESULTS: After 6 months of follow-up, we found that patients from the percutaneous injection group had significantly decreased levels of iPTH (from 1887.81 ± 726.81 pg/mL to 631.06 ± 393.06 pg/mL), phosphate (from 1.94 ± 0.36 mmol/L to 1.71 ± 0.34 mmol/L), and volume of the parathyroid gland (from 0.87 ± 0.50 cm3 to 0.60 ± 0.36 cm3), with relief from ostealgia within 48-72 h. In the intravenously administered group, the levels of iPTH decreased from 686.87 ± 260.44 pg/mL to 388.47 ± 167.36 pg/mL; while there was no significant change in phosphate levels, the volume of the parathyroid gland and ostealgia relief were observed at the end of follow-up. The serum calcium level did not significantly change, and no severe complications were observed in both groups. In vitro fluorescence-activated single cell sorting (FACS) analysis indicated that paricalcitol induced parathyroid cell apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous paricalcitol injection is a selective treatment for SHPT in ESRD.

BACKGROUND: WT1 mutations cause a wide spectrum of renal and extrarenal manifestations concerning urogenital development and the development of tumors.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected the information on the genotype and phenotype of WT1 nephropathy from the multicenter registry since 2014 to 2019. All patients were stratified by renal function decline status or by sequence timing. Rapid progressive group was defined as rapidly developing into ERSD within 12 months since disease onset. Early sequencing group was defined as gene mutation identified before ERSD.
RESULTS: Thirty-three (3.5%) cases were identified with a WT1 mutation in patients with steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) 3-5 stage of unknown origin. ESRD developed in twenty patients at a median age of 4.3 years old. Comparing study between the rapid progressive group (n = 8) and non-rapid progressive group (n = 25) showed no significant difference in age of onset, gender, syndrome phenotype, genotype and proteinuria except for initial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p = 0.021) or sequencing timing (p = 0.003). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the delayed sequencing was associated with rapid renal function decline, even after adjusting for established clinical factors including syndromic phenotype, genotype, age onset and eGFR at initial stage (p = 0.019). The renal survival analysis did not show a significantly better outcome in early sequencing group than in delayed sequencing group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for WT1 mutations should be performed in children with Wilms\' tumor, proteinuria/SRNS or CKD. Early diagnosis of WT1 nephropathy through clinical and genetic findings is warranted.

There are conflicting research results about the survival differences between hemodialysis(HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). The present study estimated the survival and the relative mortality hazard for incident HD and PD patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) in eastern China.
This study examined a cohort of patients with ESRD who initiated dialysis therapy in Zhejiang province between Jan of 2010 and Dec of 2014, followed up until the end of 2015. PD patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion with HD patients, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to explore the survival of them. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied to identify the factors that predict survival by treatment modality. Subgroup analyses were conducted by stratifying patients according to gender, age, causes of ESRD and comorbidities.
Among a total of 22,379 enrolled patients (17,029 HD patients and 5350 PD patients), 5350 matched pairs were identified, and followed for a median of 29 months (3 ~ 72 months). Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed that overall mortality rate was significantly higher in HD patients than in PD patients (log-rank test, P < 0.001), after adjusting by gender, age, primary causes of ESRD and comorbidities. HD was consistently associated with an increased risk for morality compared with PD in the matched cohort (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.140, 95%CI: 1.023 ~ 1.271). In subgroup analyses, male, younger patients, or nondiabetic patients aged less than 65 years after adjustment of covariates, initiating with PD was associated with a significantly lower mortality compared with HD. In the multivariate Cox proportional risks model, age, diabetic nephropathy (DN), other/unknown causes of ESRD, and patients with a history of cardiovascular disease or cancer showed statistical significance in explaining survival of incident ESRD patients.
ESRD patients who initiated dialysis with PD yielded superior survival rates compared to HD. Increased use of PD as initial dialysis modality in ESRD patients could be encouraged in Chinese population.

Nearly all the enzymes that mediate the metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are present in the kidney. However, the correlation of renal dysfunction with PUFAs metabolism in uremic patients remains unknown.
To test whether the alterations in the metabolism of PUFAs reflect the renal dysfunction in uremic patients.
LC-MS/MS-based oxylipin profiling was conducted for the plasma samples from the uremic patients and controls. The data were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the correlation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the key markers were evaluated. Furthermore, qPCR analysis of the whole blood cells was conducted to investigate the possible mechanisms. In addition, a 2nd cohort was used to validate the findings from the 1st cohort.
The plasma oxylipin profile distinguished the uremic patients from the controls successfully by using both PCA and OPLS-DA models. 5,6-Dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (5,6-DHET), 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (5-HETE), 9(10)-epoxyoctadecamonoenoic acid [9(10)-EpOME] and 12(13)-EpOME were identified as the key markers to discriminate the patients from controls. The excellent predictive performance of these four markers was validated by ROC analysis. The eGFR significantly correlated with plasma levels of 5,6-DHET and 5-HETE positively but with plasma 9(10)-EpOME and 12(13)-EpOME negatively. The changes of these markers may account for the inactivation of cytochrome P450 2C18, 2C19, microsome epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1), and 5-lipoxygenase in the patients.
The alterations in plasma metabolic profile reflect the renal dysfunction in the uremic patients.

A working group on the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) recently reported that crescents detected in kidney tissue predicted a worse renal outcome. However, this finding must be validated in independent cohorts before it can be widely applied to clinical practice.
Biopsy-proven IgAN patients were continuously recruited from two large renal centers in China from 1989 to 2014. All patients were followed for more than 1 year unless end stage renal disease (ESRD) occurred within 12 months. Crescents were defined as focal cellular or fibrocellular crescent formations. IgAN patients without detectable crescents were recruited to the C0 group. Patients with crescents in less than or more than 1/4 of all glomeruli were recruited to the C1 or C2 group, respectively. Primary outcome was defined as the time to ESRD, and the secondary outcome was defined as the time to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline equal to or greater than 50% or to ESRD.
In total, 1152 IgAN patients were recruited in this study. Among all patients, 53.7% were in the C0 group, 38.8% were in the C1 group, and 7.5% were in the C2 group. Compared to patients in the C0 group, patients in the C1 or C2 group were younger, had more urinary protein excretion and lower eGFR, and presented with more severe mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary proliferation or tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. After 45 months of follow-up, ESRD had occurred in 80 (12.9%), 46 (10.3%) and 18 (20.9%) of patients in the C0, C1 and C2 groups, respectively. By multivariable Cox regression analysis, inclusion in the C1 (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.71-1.63), C2 (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.41-1.73), or C1 or C2 group (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.68-1.52) was not associated with a higher rate of ESRD than inclusion in the C0 group after adjusting for age, gender, eGFR, mean arterial pressure (MAP), MEST scores, and immunosuppressive treatment. However, in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria, patients in either the C1 or C2 group had a higher rate of the primary outcome, ESRD (HR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.14-5.66) after adjusting for age, gender, eGFR, MAP, MEST scores, and immunosuppressive treatment. Similar results were found when we evaluated the association between crescents and the secondary outcome.
IgAN patients with crescents had more severe clinical and pathological manifestations than those without crescents. However, we failed to replicate the association between crescents and renal function progression in Chinese IgAN patients followed for more than 1 year.

OBJECTIVE: Although increased serum fibrinogen level was often observed in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), its association with DN severity and progression remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the serum fibrinogen levels and clinicopathological features and renal prognosis in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and DN.
METHODS: A total of 174 patients with T2DM and biopsy-proven DN were enrolled. Patients were stratified by the quartiles of serum fibrinogen levels; Q1: <3.30 g/L; Q2: between 3.30 and 4.00 g/L; Q3: between 4.00 and 4.74 g/L; Q4:≥4.74 g/L. The renal outcomes were defined by reaching end stage renal disease (ESRD). The influence of serum fibrinogen levels on renal outcomes was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: The factors associated with higher level of fibrinogen (Q3 and Q4) were diabetic retinopathy, low e-GFR, high proteinuria and severe glomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions. Importantly, in adjusted analysis, higher levels of fibrinogen were independently related with a greater risk of reaching ESRD with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.64 per standard deviation (SD) of the natural log-transformed fibrinogen concentration (95%CI, 1.22-2.20; p = 0.001). In reference to the Q1, the risk of renal failure increased by quartiles of the serum fibrinogen level: the HRs were 7.12 for the Q2 (95%CI, 2.29-22.16; p = 0.001), 5.77 for Q3 (95%CI, 1.99-16.75; p = 0.001), and 8.81 for Q4 (95%CI, 2.79-27.80; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that the elevated serum levels of fibrinogen were associated with diabetic ESRD in patients with T2DM.