OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of slow-coagulation continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) in post-keratoplasty glaucoma refractory to medical therapy.
METHODS: Medical records of 47 patients (mean age of 70.7 ± 15.7 years and follow-up of 13.9 ± 7.1 months) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients had the diagnosis of secondary glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP; n = 28) or Descemet\'s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK; n = 19) with no previous history of incisional glaucoma or TSCPC surgeries. Study participants underwent slow-coagulation CW-TSCPC (1250-milliwatt power and 4-second duration).
RESULTS: A statically significant reduction of IOP from 31.8 ± 8.0 mmHg preoperatively to 16.9 ± 9.0 mmHg postoperatively was noted (p < 0.001). Similarly, the number of glaucoma medications decreased from 4.0 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 1.4 (p < 0.001). The overall success rates at 12 and 24 months were 68.1% and 66.0%, respectively, with no difference in success rates between post-PKP and post-DSAEK subgroups (p = 0.836). No significant changes in VA or central corneal thickness (CCT) were observed (p = 0.345 and 0.311, respectively). One (3.3%) patient had a graft rejection. The majority of the complications noted during this study were mild and transient.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that slow-coagulation TSCPC may be a safe and efficient surgical glaucoma treatment modality in patients with medically uncontrolled post-keratoplasty glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on indications and outcomes of DSAEK/DSEK and DMEK for the treatment of failed penetrating keratoplasty.
METHODS: This is a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Prospective and retrospective studies reporting DSAEK/DSEK or DMEK after failed penetrating keratoplasty were included. Primary outcome measures are graft survival and detachment rates, as well as postoperative visual outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 25 studies with 970 patients/989 eyes were included, comprising 735 patients with 746 eyes which underwent DSAEK/DSEK surgery and 235 patients with 243 eyes which underwent DMEK surgery, all of them following a previously failed PK. There were no randomized controlled studies. In all of the DSAEK-PK studies, the graft failure rate was 18% (10%, 26%), the detachment rate was 15% (9%, 22%) and the rejection rate was 7% (3%, 12%) by the time of the last follow-up. And in all of the DMEK-PK studies, the graft failure rate was 14% (4%, 27%), the detachment rate was 42% (28%, 56%) and the rejection rate was 7% (2%, 16%). The mean visual acuity of the DSAEK-PK and DMEK-PK groups is 0.65 ± 0.18 and 0.43 ± 0.23 logMAR, respectively, at 6 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial keratoplasty for treatment of failed penetrating keratoplasty led to improved vision and graft clarity in most recipients. Though graft survival rates and rejection rates were comparable between the two groups, the DMEK-PK group showed better visual outcomes with higher detachment rate.

The purpose of this study was to review the published incidence, etiology, clinical features and management of patients who developed infectious interface keratitis (IIK) following lamellar keratoplasty.
This study is a systematic literature review.
We conducted a systematic review of published Chinese and English report through a PubMed search with the medical subject headings using the following terms: corneal transplantation, keratoplasty, anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), infectious interface keratitis (IIK), fungal keratitis, and bacterial keratitis. Data collected included patient demographics, surgical technique, clinical signs, treatment, outcomes, and donor rim cultures. A review of the relevant literatures was also undertaken.
From 2007 to Feb. 2018, we identified 62 cases of IIK following lamellar corneal surgery. The mean age was 26.95 ± 8.80 years with a male/female ratio of 11:8 in DALK/ALK group and 69.65 ± 8.00 years with a male/female ratio of 17:16 in DSAEK/DSEK/DMEK group (no gender information for 10 cases). Of the 62 cases, 46 cases (75.41%) were fungal, 9 cases (14.75%) were bacterial, 2 cases (3.28%) were Actinomyces species, 1 case (1.64%) was acanthamoeba, and 4 cases (6.56%) were indeterminant. The mean onset of symptoms was postoperative day (POD) 49.47 ± 48.56 in DALK/ALK group, and 53 ± 112.01 in EK group, and 62.44 ± 50.07 for the bacterial keratitis, and 51.5 ± 102.42 for fungal keratitis. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 10.10 ± 9.36 months in DALK/ALK group and 12.37 ± 12.28 months in DSAEK/DSEK/DMEK group. Of the total 62 cases, 1 case (1.61%) with a Klebsiella pneumoniae positive donor rim cultures was associated with the same pathogen in the IIK, and 16 cases (25.81%) of fungal positive donor rim cultures were associated with the same pathogen in the IIK. Clinical signs included conjunctival injection, interface opacity, stromal edema for bacterial keratitis, and dense white infiltrates at the interface with endothelial plaques in some cases of fungal keratitis. Medical treatment included topical and oral antimicrobial agents. Surgical interventions included therapeutic keratoplasty. In 15 cases (24.19%), medical management was successful. Of the remaining 47 cases, 8 (12.90%) were managed with a repeat lamellar keratoplasty (LK) and 39 (62.90%) were unresponsive to conservative medical treatment and underwent a therapeutic keratoplasty (TKP). Post infectious best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was logMAR 0 in 7 eyes (11.29%), better than or equal to logMAR 0.4 in 20 eyes (32.26%), less than logMAR 0.4 in 22 eyes (35.48%) and logMAR 0.7 or worse in 13 eyes (20.97%). In the rim culture negative group(n = 19), the average BCVA was logMAR 0.59 ± 0.68, with was logMAR 0.44 ± 0.74 in rim culture positive group (n = 15). There were three recurrence cases were reported after DMEK during the postoperative follow-up period.
Infectious interface keratitis (IIK) is an uncommon complication of lamellar keratoplasty, but it can result in a substantial loss of vision or permanent blindness. Although graft infection can occur at any time following surgery, it most commonly (87%) occurred during the first 3 months postoperatively (54/62 cases). The most commonly reported causative organism of IIK following lamellar keratoplasty was C. albicans. Positive rim culture results can provide more rapid and appropriate treatment directed to the identified organism. Therapeutic keratoplasty (TKP) was the most common surgical procedure for the management of IIK. Visual outcomes post TKP are fair with 32.26% (20/62) of patients obtaining LogMAR 0.4 or better.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) compared with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
METHODS: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to find studies that compared DSAEK and DMEK outcomes. Efficacy parameters were the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spherical equivalent (SE). Safety parameters were postoperative endothelial cell loss (ECL), air injection (rebubbling), graft failure, graft rejection, and high intraocular pressure (IOP). Results from last visit were pooled for the analyses because the follow-up ranged from 3 to 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 7 trials including 433 eyes were selected for this meta-analysis. BCVA was reported in all 7 studies, ECL% and rebubbling rate were reported in 6, and the remaining outcomes were reported in only 3 or 2 studies. Postoperative logMAR BCVA was significantly better for DMEK than that for DSAEK (P < 0.00001). More patients achieved the postoperative BCVA ≥ 20/25 and 20/20 in DMEK group than that in DSAEK (P > 0.001), whereas the proportion of patients whose postoperative BCVA ≥ 20/40 and the amount of SE did not differ statistically (P = 0.32 and P = 0.50, respectively). The DSAEK group has a significantly lower frequency of rebubbling than the DMEK group (P < 0.0001). The postoperative ECL%, graft failure, graft rejection, and high IOP were comparable between the 2 groups (all P values >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that DMEK provided better visual outcomes with similar safety when compared to DSAEK. Given the limited sample size, further investigations are needed to validate these findings.