community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

社区获得性细菌性肺炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Omadacycline是FDA批准的用于社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)的药物。本研究的目的是评估omadacycline治疗感染金黄色葡萄球菌的CABP患者的有效性。包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA),使用药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)分析。蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)通过利用omadacycline药代动力学(PK)参数,最小抑制浓度(MIC)数据,和体内PK/PD目标,以计算CABP患者针对MRSA和MSSA的不同剂量方案的目标达标率(PTA)和累积反应分数(CFR)值。PTA或CFR期望值大于90%的给药方案被认为是最佳的。对于所有推荐的剂量方案,第1、4和7天MRSAMIC≤1和MSSAMIC≤4的PTA值大于90%。基于金黄色葡萄球菌的MIC分布,所有剂量方案的MRSA和MSSA的CFR值均大于90%.在PK/PD目标值小于40的范围内,不同细菌菌株的CFR值仍大于90%,尽管它们随着PK/PD目标值的增加而逐渐降低。PK/PD模型表明,所有推荐剂量的omadacycline方案对感染MRSA和MSSA的CABP患者均高度有效。该研究为奥马环素在不同剂量方案中的疗效提供了理论支持。
    Omadacycline is an FDA-approved agent for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of omadacycline for treating CABP patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed by utilizing omadacycline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, and in vivo PK/PD targets to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) values for different dose regimens against MRSA and MSSA in CABP patients. A dosage regimen with a PTA or CFR expectation value greater than 90% was considered optimal. For all recommended dose regimens, PTA values for MRSA MIC ≤1 and MSSA MIC ≤4 on days 1, 4, and 7 were greater than 90%. Based on the MIC distribution of Staphylococcus aureus, all dose regimens had CFR values greater than 90% for both MRSA and MSSA. CFR values for different bacterial strains were still greater than 90% within the range of PK/PD target values less than 40, although they gradually decreased with increasing PK/PD target values. PK/PD modeling demonstrated that all recommended dose regimens of omadacycline are highly effective against CABP patients infected with MRSA and MSSA. The study provides theoretical support for the efficacy of omadacycline in different dose regimens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:奥马环素是一种新型的氨甲基环素抗生素,具有广谱抗菌的.但是中国人群的药代动力学特征和安全性仍然未知。目前还不清楚美国批准的治疗方案是否适用于中国人群。方法:在一个随机的,双盲,安慰剂对照剂量递增试验,奥马环素的药代动力学通过非房室和房室模型进行评估.使用来自中国人群的药代动力学数据进行MonteCarlo模拟,以评估美国FDA批准的剂量方案的目标达成概率(PTA)和累积反应分数(CFR)。结果:三室模型成功地描述了静脉输注(i.v.)后奥马环素的快速分布和缓慢消除。通过具有两个吸收隔室的两室模型解释了口服吸收(p.o.)的双峰浓度-时间曲线。100mgomadacyclinei.v.和300mgomadacyclinep.o.的稳态AUC为12.1和19.4mgh/L,分别。药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)分析显示,奥马环素给药方案采用负荷剂量(200mgi.v.q24h,100毫克静脉注射q12小时,450mgp.o.q24h×2天或300mgp.o.q12h)和维持剂量(100mgi.v.q24h或300mgp.o.q24h)可以涵盖急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)和社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)的主要病原体:葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎。此外,奥马环素在中国人群中表现出良好的安全性。结论:根据所提供的证据,奥马环素可能是中国ABSSSI和CABP患者的新治疗选择。
    Objective: Omadacycline is a new type of aminomethylcycline antibiotic, having a broad antibacterial spectrum. But the pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety profile of the Chinese population remain unknown. It is also unclear whether the US-approved treatment regimen is applicable for the Chinese population. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled dose-escalated trial, the pharmacokinetics of omadacycline was evaluated by a non-compartmental and compartmental model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the pharmacokinetic data from the Chinese population to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of the US FDA-approved dose regimen. Results: The three-compartment model successfully described the rapid distribution and slow elimination of omadacycline after the intravenous infusion (i.v.). The double-peak concentration-time curve of the oral absorption (p.o.) was explained by the two-compartment model with two absorption compartments. The steady-state AUC of 100 mg omadacycline i.v. and 300 mg omadacycline p. o. were 12.1 and 19.4 mg h/L, respectively. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) analysis showed that the omadacycline dosing regimen with a loading dose (200 mg i.v. q24 h, 100 mg i.v. q12 h, 450 mg p. o. q24 h × 2 days or 300 mg p. o. q12 h) and maintenance dose (100 mg i.v. q24 h or 300 mg p. o. q24 h) could cover the main pathogens of the indications acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Also, omadacycline had showed a good safety profile in the Chinese population. Conclusions: With the evidence provided, omadacycline could be a novel treatment option to Chinese patients with ABSSSI and CABP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Lefamulin是美国食品和药物管理局于2019年批准用于治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)的新型抗生素。在这项研究中,我们评估了lefamulin的体外抗菌活性,以更好地了解其抗菌作用。
    方法:试验菌株来自2017年至2019年中国各地的患者,其中呼吸道病原体菌株634株。通过肉汤微量稀释法测定lefamulin和比较剂的最低抑制浓度(MIC)。
    结果:Lefamulin对肺炎链球菌和葡萄球菌表现出有效的活性,在0.25mg/L时具有100%的抑制作用,和对肺炎链球菌有利的MIC50/90(0.125/0.125mg/L)(青霉素MIC≥2mg/L),MIC50/90(≤0.015/0.125mg/L)对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,和MIC50/90(≤0.015/0.06mg/L)对耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌。Lefamulin还对化脓性链球菌和无乳链球菌具有良好的活性(MIC50/90:≤0.015/≤0.015mg/L),产β-内酰胺酶的流感嗜血杆菌(MIC50/90:0.5/1mg/L),β-内酰胺酶阴性流感嗜血杆菌(MIC50/90:1/1mg/L),粘膜炎莫拉菌(MIC50/90:0.25/0.25mg/L),和肺炎支原体(MIC50/90:0.03/0.03mg/L),无论对阿奇霉素的耐药性如何。Lefamulin通常比对比剂对测试菌株更有活性。
    结论:总之,lefamulin对呼吸道病原体(甲氧西林敏感和耐药葡萄球菌,肺炎链球菌,β-溶血性链球菌,流感嗜血杆菌,粘膜炎支原体和肺炎支原体)。体外活性支持在中国使用lefamulin治疗CABP。
    OBJECTIVE: Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). In this study we evaluated the in vitro antimicrobial activity of lefamulin in order to better understand its antibiogram.
    METHODS: The test strains were isolated from patients across China during the period from 2017 to 2019, including 634 strains of respiratory pathogens. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of lefamulin and comparators were determined by broth microdilution method.
    RESULTS: Lefamulin showed potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus evidenced by 100% inhibition at 0.25 mg/L, and favorable MIC50/90 (0.125/0.125 mg/L) against S. pneumoniae (penicillin MIC ≥ 2 mg/L), MIC50/90 (≤0.015/0.125 mg/L) against methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and MIC50/90 (≤0.015/0.06 mg/L) against methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. Lefamulin also had good activity against Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactia (MIC50/90: ≤0.015/≤0.015 mg/L), β-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90: 0.5/1 mg/L), β-lactamase-negative H. influenzae (MIC50/90: 1/1 mg/L), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90: 0.25/0.25 mg/L), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MIC50/90: 0.03/0.03 mg/L) regardless of resistance to azithromycin. Lefamulin was generally more active than the comparators against the test strains.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, lefamulin has good and broad-spectrum coverage of respiratory pathogens (methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus, S. pneumoniae, β-hemolytic Streptococcus, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and M. pneumoniae). In vitro activity supports the use of lefamulin in the treatment of CABP in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Erythromycin was long viewed as a bacteriostatic agent. The erythromycin derivatives, 9-oxime ketolides have a species-specific bactericidal profile. Among them, the 3\'-allyl version of the 9-oxime ketolide 1 (Ar=3-quinolyl; 17a) is bactericidal against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes. In contrast, the 2-fluoro analogs of 1, 13a (Ar=6-quinolyl), 13b (Ar=3-quinolyl) and 24a (Ar=4-isoquinolyl), show bactericidal activities against S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Moraxella catarrhalis, while the 2-fluoro analogs 13c (Ar=3-aminopyridyl) and 24b (Ar=3-carbamoylpyridyl) are only bactericidal against S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. Reduction of the ketolides led to novel epiacylides, the 3-O-epimers of the acylides. Alteration of linker length (30b vs. 30a), 2-fluorination (33 vs. 30a) and incorporation of additional spacers at the 9-oxime or 6-OH (35, 40 vs. 30a) did not restore the epiacylides back to be as active as the acylide 31. Molecular docking suggested that epimerization at the 3-position reshapes the orientation of the 3-O-sidechain and leads to considerably weaker binding with bacterial ribosomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号