Objective: The feasibility of the conduction system pacing (CSP) upgrade as an alternative modality to the traditional biventricular pacing (BiVP) upgrade in patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) remains uncertain. This study sought to compare two modalities of CSP (His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)) with BiVP and no upgrades in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Methods: This retrospective analysis comprised consecutive patients who underwent either BiVP or CSP upgrade for PICM at the cardiac department from 2017 to 2021. Patients with a follow-up period exceeding 12 months were considered for the final analysis. Results: The final group of patients who underwent upgrades included 48 individuals: 11 with BiVP upgrades, 24 with HBP upgrades, and 13 with LBBP upgrades. Compared to the baseline data, there were significant improvements in cardiac performance at the last follow-up. After the upgrade, the QRS duration (127.81 ± 31.89 vs 177.08 ± 34.35 ms, p < 0.001), NYHA class (2.28 ± 0.70 vs 3.04 ± 0.54, p < 0.05), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (54.08 ± 4.80 vs 57.50 ± 4.85 mm, p < 0.05), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (44.46% ± 6.39% vs 33.15% ± 5.25%, p < 0.001) were improved. There was a noticeable improvement in LVEF in the CSP group (32.15% ± 3.22% vs 44.95% ± 3.99% (p < 0.001)) and the BiVP group (33.90% ± 3.09% vs 40.83% ± 2.99% (p < 0.001)). The changes in QRS duration were more evident in CSP than in BiVP (56.65 ± 11.71 vs 34.67 ± 13.32, p < 0.001). Similarly, the changes in LVEF (12.8 ± 3.66 vs 6.93 ± 3.04, p < 0.001) and LVEDD (5.80 ± 1.71 vs 3.16 ± 1.35, p < 0.001) were greater in CSP than in BiVP. The changes in LVEDD (p = 0.549) and LVEF (p = 0.570) were similar in the LBBP and HBP groups. The threshold in LBBP was also lower than that in HBP (1.01 ± 0.43 vs 1.33 ± 0.32 V, p = 0.019). Conclusion: The improvement of clinical outcomes in CSP was more significant than in BiVP. CSP may be an alternative therapy to CRT for patients with PICM. LBBP would be a better choice than HBP due to its lower thresholds.

UNASSIGNED: The prognostic significance of QRS duration (QRSd) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 50% is unclear, resulting in questions regarding eligibility for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This study aimed to explore the prognostic role of QRSd in patients with DCM and a LVEF 30-50% or LVEF < 30.
UNASSIGNED: Patients hospitalised at Fuwai hospital with DCM who had a LVEF ≤ 50% were prospectively included. The primary outcomes were a composite of death, heart transplantation, and rehospitalisation for worsening heart failure.
UNASSIGNED: Among the 633 patients included, 302 (47.7%) had a LVEF of 30-50%. The multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for QRSd ≥ 120 ms was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.11, p < 0.001) for overall DCM patients, 2.8 (95% CI 1.82-4.30, p < 0.001) for patients with LVEF 30-50%, and 1.41 (95% CI 1.02-1.94, p = 0.036) for patients with LVEF < 30%. QRSd ≥ 120 ms tended to be more strongly associated with outcome in patients with LVEF 30-50% than in those with LVEF < 30% despite the non-significant interaction (p = 0.067). DCM patients with QRSd ≥ 120 ms and LVEF 30-50% did not experience a significantly better outcome than those with LVEF < 30% and QRSd < 120 ms after propensity-score matching (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.36, p = 0.645).
UNASSIGNED: QRSd independently predicts prognosis in DCM patients irrespective of LVEF and identifies a group of high-risk patients who may benefit from device implantation despite the absence of severely reduced LVEF.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a nomogram for predicting the responsiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure and verify its predictive efficacy.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 109 patients with chronic heart failure who successfully received CRT from January 2018 to December 2022. According to patients after six months of the CRT preoperative improving acuity in the left ventricular ejection fraction is 5% or at least improve grade 1 NYHA heart function classification, divided into responsive group and non-responsive group. Clinical data of patients were collected, and LASSO regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore relative factors. A nomogram was constructed, and the predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).
RESULTS: Among the 109 patients, 61 were assigned to the CRT-responsive group, while 48 were assigned to the non-responsive group. LASSO regression analysis showed that left ventricular end-systolic volume, diffuse fibrosis, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were independent factors for CRT responsiveness in patients with heart failure (P < 0.05). Based on the above three predictive factors, a nomogram was constructed. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.865 (95% CI 0.794-0.935). The calibration curve analysis showed that the predicted probability of the nomogram is consistent with the actual occurrence rate. DCA showed that the line graph model has an excellent clinical net benefit rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram constructed based on clinical features, laboratory, and imaging examinations in this study has high discrimination and calibration in predicting CRT responsiveness in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The association between paced LVAT and cardiac structure and function at baseline, as well as whether longer LVAT is associated with worse cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) has not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between paced LVAT and baseline echocardiographic parameters and cardiac reverse remodeling at follow-up.
METHODS: Patients with HF and LBBB receiving successful left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) from June 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled and grouped based on paced LVAT. NT-proBNP and echocardiographic parameters were recorded during routine follow-up. The relationships between paced LVAT and echocardiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up were analyzed.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled (48 males, aged 65 ± 9.8, mean LVEF 32.1 ± 7.5%, mean LVEDD 63.0 ± 8.5 mm, median NT-proBNP 1057[513-3158] pg/mL). The paced QRSd was significantly decreased (177 ± 17.9 vs. 134 ± 18.5, p < .001) and median paced LVAT was 80[72-88] ms. After a median follow-up of 12[9-29] months, LVEF increased to 52.1 ± 11.2%, LVEDD decreased to 52.6 ± 8.8 mm, and NT-proBNP decreased to 215[73-532]pg/mL. Patients were grouped based on paced LVAT: LVAT < 80 ms (n = 39); 80 ≤ LVAT < 90 ms (n = 24); LVAT ≥ 90 ms (n = 20). Patients with longer LVAT had larger LVEDD and lower LVEF (LVEDDbaseline: p < .001; LVEFbaseline: p = .001). The difference in LVEF6M was statistically significant among groups (p < .001) and patients with longer LVAT had lower LVEF6M, while the difference in LVEF1Y was not seen (p = .090). There was no significant correlation between ΔLVEF6M-baseline, ΔLVEF1Y-6M and LVAT respectively (ΔLVEF6M-baseline: p = .261, r = -.126; ΔLVEF1Y-6M: p = .085, r = .218).
CONCLUSIONS: Long paced LVAT was associated with worse echocardiographic parameters at baseline, but did not affect the cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with HF and LBBB. Those with longer LVAT required longer time to recover.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, despite the presence of left bundle branch block, whether cardiac substrate may influence the effect between the 2 strategies is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the association of septal scar on reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes of LBBAP compared with BVP.
METHODS: We analyzed patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who had CRT indications undergoing preprocedure cardiac magnetic resonance examination. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and echocardiographic response (ER) (≥5% absolute LVEF increase) were assessed at 6 months. The clinical outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or major ventricular arrhythmia.
RESULTS: There were 147 patients included (51 LBBAP and 96 BVP). Among patients with low septal scar burden (below median 5.7%, range: 0% to 5.3%), LVEF improvement was higher in the LBBAP than the BVP group (17.5% ± 10.9% vs 12.3% ± 11.8%; P = 0.037), with more than 3-fold increased odds of ER (OR: 4.35; P = 0.033). In high sepal scar subgroups (≥5.7%, range: 5.7%-65.9%), BVP trended towards higher LVEF improvement (9.2% ± 9.4% vs 6.4% ± 12.4%; P = 0.085). Interaction between septal scar burden and pacing strategy was significant for ER (P = 0.002) and LVEF improvement (P = 0.011) after propensity score adjustment. During median follow-up of 33.7 (Q1-Q3: 19.8-42.1) months, the composite clinical outcome occurred in 34.7% (n = 51) of patients. The high-burden subgroups had worse clinical outcomes independent of CRT method.
CONCLUSIONS: Remodeling response to LBBAP and BVP among nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients is modified by septal scar burden. High septal scar burden was associated with poor clinical prognosis independent of CRT methods.

BACKGROUND: The segment of the latest mechanical contraction (LMC) does not always overlap with the site of the latest electrical activation (LEA). By integrating both mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony, this proof-of-concept study aimed to propose a new method for recommending left ventricular (LV) lead placements, with the goal of enhancing response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
METHODS: The LMC segment was determined by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) phase analysis. The LEA site was detected by vectorcardiogram. The recommended segments for LV lead placement were as follows: (1) the LMC viable segments that overlapped with the LEA site; (2) the LMC viable segments adjacent to the LEA site; (3) If no segment met either of the above, the LV lateral wall was recommended. The response was defined as ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) 6-months after CRT. Patients with LV lead located in the recommended site were assigned to the recommended group, and those located in the non-recommended site were assigned to the non-recommended group.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised of 76 patients, including 54 (71.1%) in the recommended group and 22 (28.9%) in the non-recommended group. Among the recommended group, 74.1% of the patients responded to CRT, while 36.4% in the non-recommended group were responders (P = .002). Compared to pacing at the non-recommended segments, pacing at the recommended segments showed an independent association with an increased response by univariate and multivariable analysis (odds ratio 5.00, 95% confidence interval 1.73-14.44, P = .003; odds ratio 7.33, 95% confidence interval 1.53-35.14, P = .013). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that pacing at the recommended LV lead position demonstrated a better long-term prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that pacing at the recommended segments, by integrating of mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony, is significantly associated with an improved CRT response and better long-term prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a simple tool for assessing the nutritional status of the aging population. This study aims to explore the clinical implication of GNRI on treatment response and long-term clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
METHODS: Patients who underwent CRT implantation or upgrade at our hospital were retrospectively included. The association of GNRI and its tertiles with the echocardiographic response, all-cause mortality or heart transplantation, and the first hospitalization due to HF were investigated.
RESULTS: Totally, 647 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 [Interquartile Range (IQR): 52-67] years and mean score of GNRI at 107.9 ± 23.7. Super-response rates increased significantly among the GNRI T1, T2, and T3 groups (25.1%, 29.8% vs. 41.1%, P = 0.002). Patients with higher GNRI were more likely to have better LVEF improvement after multiple adjustments (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23, P = 0.010). Higher GNRI was independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality or heart implantation (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96, P < 0.001) and HF hospitalization (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98, P < 0.001). The inclusion of GNRI enhanced the predictability of all-cause mortality based on traditional model, including sex, New York Heart Association functional class, left bundle branch block, QRS reduction, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level (C statistics improved from 0.785 to 0.813, P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher GNRI was associated with better treatment response and long-term prognosis in HF patients with CRT. Evaluation of nutritional status among CRT population is necessary for individualized choice of potential responders.

UNASSIGNED: The outcomes of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) in patients with heart failure remain to be learned.
UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to assess the echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of LBBP, LVSP, and deep septal pacing (DSP).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included patients who met the criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and underwent attempted LBBP in 5 Mayo centers. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 91 consecutive patients were included in the study. A total of 52 patients had LBBP, 25 had LVSP, and 14 had DSP. The median follow-up duration was 307 (interquartile range 208, 508) days. There was significant left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement in the LBBP and LVSP groups (from 35.9 ± 8.5% to 46.9 ± 10.0%, P < .001 in the LBBP group; from 33.1 ± 7.5% to 41.8 ± 10.8%, P < .001 in the LVSP group) but not in the DSP group. A unipolar paced right bundle branch block morphology during the procedure in lead V1 was associated with higher odds of CRT response. There was no significant difference in heart failure hospitalization and all-cause deaths between the LBBP and LVSP groups. The rate of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause deaths were increased in the DSP group compared with the LBBP group (hazard ratio 5.10, 95% confidence interval 1.14-22.78, P = .033; and hazard ratio 7.83, 95% confidence interval 1.38-44.32, P = .020, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: In patients undergoing CRT, LVSP had comparable CRT outcomes compared with LBBP.

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device-based therapy used to treat patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In both randomized clinical trials and real-life studies, CCM has been shown to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life, reverse left ventricular remodeling, and reduce hospitalization in patients with HFrEF. In this case report, we describe for the first time the use of CCM combined with left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation therapy in a female with a 22-year history of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. With the optimal medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) strategies, the patient\'s quality of life initially recovered to some extent, but began to deteriorate in the past year. Additionally, heart transplantation was not considered due to economic reasons and late stage systolic heart failure. This is the first case of CCM implantation in Fujian Province and the first report of a combined CCM and left bundle branch pacing CRT-P implantation strategy in a patient with non-ischemic etiology dilated cardiomyopathy in China.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for advanced heart failure (HF) with prolonged QRS duration. However, 30% of patients have shown no benefit from the treatment.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the value of left atrial (LA) mechanics by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to predict response to CRT and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 163 CRT recipients with preimplantation CMR examination were retrospectively recruited. CMR feature tracking was used to evaluate LA size and function. The end points include (1) improvement of at least 5% in left ventricular ejection fraction combined with a reduction of at least 1 New York Heart Association functional class at 6-month follow-up and (2) any all-cause death or HF hospitalization during follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall, 82 (50.3%) were CRT responders. CRT nonresponders had larger LA and worse LA reservoir and booster pump function than did responders (P < .001 for all). LA structural (maximum volume index < 47 mL/m2) and functional (booster pump strain > 8.5%) criteria were incremental to traditional indicators in detecting CRT response (χ2, 40.83 vs 9.98; P < .001). During follow-up (median 41 months), survival free from death or HF hospitalization increased with the number of positive LA criteria (log-rank, P < .001). After adjustment for clinical confounders, the absence of the 2 criteria remained associated with a considerably increased risk of death or HF hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio 6.2; 95% confidence interval 2.15-17.88; P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The preprocedure LA mechanics evaluated using CMR may be useful to predict response to CRT and improve risk stratification in CRT recipients.