antipsychotic agents

抗精神病药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在精神分裂症患者中,丹光孟兴汤配合抗精神病药物是其治疗方法之一。然而,关于电光孟星汤与抗精神病药的治疗效果与其他治疗方法之间的差异,信息很少。进行了系统评价,评价了地康孟兴汤等抗精神病药物的疗效和安全性,用于治疗精神分裂症。
    方法:我们进行了系统评价(PROSPEROID:CRD42023414603)。这需要从各自的建立日期到2023年4月11日对多个研究数据库进行计算机搜索,该数据库收集了地康孟星汤联合抗精神病药的临床随机对照试验。促成这项研究的数据库是PubMed,WebofScience,Embase,EBSCOhost,科克伦,Scopus,谷歌学者。根据确定的纳入和排除标准筛选每个出版物,并提取了适当的文献并进行了质量评估,使用RevMan5.4进行荟萃分析。
    结果:通过对456篇出版物的文献综述,纳入了18项随机对照试验,收集了总共1636例患者的数据。荟萃分析结果显示,与利培酮联合使用,奥氮平,氯丙嗪,氯氮平,齐拉西酮,或阿立哌唑可提高地康孟星汤治疗精神分裂症的总体疗效(P<。00001),其中奥氮平表现出最大的增强作用(Z=3.65,比值比=4.26,95%CI:1.96-9.28,P=.0003).4周/30天治疗(P=.0003)和400mL/d剂量的地康孟兴汤(P=.0004)更有效。此外,阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分普遍下降,PANSS阳性症状评分,PANSS阴性症状评分,一般精神病理学评分(全部P<0.05),以及精神分裂症患者的不良反应发生率(Z=2.79,比值比=0.34,95%CI:0.16-0.73,P=0.005)。
    结论:药方与不同抗精神病药物合用可改善精神分裂症患者的总体预后;药方与奥氮平合用,剂量为400毫升/天,持续时间为4周/30天,在这方面是最好的,通过减轻症状和减少疾病的副作用。在这项工作的基础上,更多的大样本,多中心,未来高质量的临床研究将有助于进一步验证我们的发现.
    BACKGROUND: In patients with schizophrenia, Diankuang Mengxing Decoction with antipsychotics is one of the treatments for it. However, little information is available regarding the difference between the therapeutic effect of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction with antipsychotics and other treatments. Systematic evaluation is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction and other antipsychotics, which are used to treat schizophrenia.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023414603). This entailed a computerized search of several research databases from their respective dates of establishment until April 11, 2023, which collected clinical randomized controlled trials of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction combined with antipsychotics. The databases that contributed to this study were PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCOhost, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Each publication was screened according to defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and appropriate literature was extracted and evaluated for quality, for which meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.
    RESULTS: A literature review of 456 publications resulted in the inclusion of 18 randomized controlled trials with data collected from a total of 1636 patients. Meta-analytical results showed combination with risperidone, olanzapine, chlorpromazine, clozapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole increased the overall effectiveness of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction when treating schizophrenia (P < . 00001), among whom olanzapine demonstrated the greatest enhancement (Z = 3.65, odds ratio = 4.26, 95% CI: 1.96-9.28, P = .0003). The 4-week/30-day treatment (P = .0003) and a dosage of 400 mL/d of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction (P = .0004) were more effective. Also, there were widespread reductions to the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores, PANSS-positive symptom scores, PANSS-negative symptom scores, general psychopathology scores (P < .05 for all), as well as the incidence of adverse effects (Z = 2.79, odds ratio = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, P = .005) in patients with schizophrenia.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction with different antipsychotics can improve the overall prognosis of patients with schizophrenia; Diankuang Mengxing Decoction combined olanzapine, a dosage of 400 mL/d and a duration of 4 weeks/30 days being the best in this regard, by alleviating the symptoms and diminishing the disorder\'s adverse effects. To build on this work, more large-sample, multi-center, and high-quality clinical studies in the future would help to further validate our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大脑活动的复杂性反映了它处理信息的能力,适应环境变化,和国家之间的过渡。然而,尚不清楚精神分裂症(SZ)如何影响大脑活动的复杂性,尤其是它的动态变化。本研究旨在探讨SZ脑活动复杂性的异常模式,它们与认知缺陷的关系,以及抗精神病药物的影响。包括44例未服用药物的首发(DNFE)SZ患者和30例人口统计学匹配的健康对照(HC)。首次使用基于功能性MRI的滑动窗口分析来计算加权排列熵,以表征SZ患者在利培酮治疗12周之前和之后的脑活动的复杂模式。结果显示尾状部的复杂性降低,壳核,SZ患者基线时的苍白球与HC相比,左尾状叶复杂性降低,与连续表现测试(CPT)和类别流利度测试得分呈正相关。治疗后,左尾状的复杂性增加。具有异常复杂性的区域显示功能连通性降低,复杂性与连接强度呈正相关。我们观察到大脑的动态复杂性表现出自发的特征,经常性的“复杂性下降”,可能反映静息大脑中的瞬态转变。与HC相比,患者表现出范围缩小,强度,复杂性下降的持续时间,所有这些都在治疗后得到改善。持续时间减少与CPT评分呈负相关,与临床症状呈正相关。结果表明,大脑活动复杂性及其动态变化的异常可能是SZ患者认知缺陷和临床症状的基础。抗精神病药物治疗部分恢复了这些异常,强调它们作为个性化治疗疗效指标和生物标志物的潜力。
    The complexity of brain activity reflects its ability to process information, adapt to environmental changes, and transition between states. However, it remains unclear how schizophrenia (SZ) affects brain activity complexity, particularly its dynamic changes. This study aimed to investigate the abnormal patterns of brain activity complexity in SZ, their relationship with cognitive deficits, and the impact of antipsychotic medication. Forty-four drug-naive first-episode (DNFE) SZ patients and thirty demographically matched healthy controls (HC) were included. Functional MRI-based sliding window analysis was utilized for the first time to calculate weighted permutation entropy to characterize complex patterns of brain activity in SZ patients before and after 12 weeks of risperidone treatment. Results revealed reduced complexity in the caudate, putamen, and pallidum at baseline in SZ patients compared to HC, with reduced complexity in the left caudate positively correlated with Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and Category Fluency Test scores. After treatment, the complexity of the left caudate increased. Regions with abnormal complexity showed decreased functional connectivity, with complexity positively correlated with connectivity strength. We observed that the dynamic complexity of the brain exhibited the characteristic of spontaneous, recurring \"complexity drop\", potentially reflecting transient state transitions in the resting brain. Compared to HC, patients exhibited reduced scope, intensity, and duration of complexity drop, all of which improved after treatment. Reduced duration was negatively correlated with CPT scores and positively with clinical symptoms. The results suggest that abnormalities in brain activity complexity and its dynamic changes may underlie cognitive deficits and clinical symptoms in SZ patients. Antipsychotic treatment partially restores these abnormalities, highlighting their potential as indicators of treatment efficacy and biomarkers for personalized therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的研究表明,肝酶异常不仅见于典型的抗精神病药(AP),而且见于非典型抗精神病药(AAP)。在过去的20年里,各种抗精神病药物的肝毒性备受关注。然而,与AP相关的肝毒性的系统评估是有限的。
    方法:从2017年第一季度至2022年第一季度,使用标准化MedDRA查询(SMQ)从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库检索所有与药物相关的肝病病例。评估患者特征和预后。在这项研究中,采用病例/非病例方法计算报告比值比(ROR)和95%置信区间(CIs).我们计算了每个AAP的药物诱导的肝损伤(DILI)ROR。
    结果:研究期间共有408例DILI病例归因于AAP。其中18.6%被指定为严重不良事件(SAE),其中包括死亡(19.74%),住院(68.42%),残疾(2.63%),和危及生命(9.21%)的结果。按降序排列的RORs值为:喹硫平(ROR=0.782),氯氮平(ROR=0.665),阿立哌唑(ROR=0.507),氨磺必利(ROR=0.308),帕潘立酮(ROR=0.212),利培酮(ROR=0.198),齐拉西酮(0.131)。
    结论:在我们的研究中发现,所有AAP与肝毒性增加没有显著相关性。未来结合其他数据源对FAERS数据库进行分析对于持续监测DILI至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that liver enzyme abnormalities were not only seen with typical antipsychotics (APs) but also with atypical antipsychotics (AAPs). During the last 20 years, the hepatotoxicity of various antipsychotics received much attention. However, systematic evaluations of hepatotoxicity associated with APs are limited.
    METHODS: All drug related hepatic disorders cases were retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database using standardized MedDRA queries (SMQ) from the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022. Patient characteristics and prognosis were assessed. In this study, a case/non-case approach was used to calculate reporting odds ratio (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We calculated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) RORs for each AAPs.
    RESULTS: A total of 408 DILI cases were attributed to AAPs during the study period. 18.6% of these were designated as serious adverse event (SAE), which include death (19.74%), hospitalization (68.42%), disability (2.63%), and life-threatening (9.21%) outcomes. The RORs values in descending order were: quetiapine (ROR = 0.782), clozapine (ROR = 0.665), aripiprazole (ROR = 0.507), amisulpride (ROR = 0.308), paliperidone (ROR = 0.212), risperidone (ROR = 0.198), ziprasidone (0.131).
    CONCLUSIONS: The result found in our study was that all AAPs didn\'t have a significant correlation with increased hepatotoxicity. Future analysis of the FAERS database in conjunction with other data sources will be essential for continuous monitoring of DILI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神分裂症是一种普遍存在的严重精神障碍,其特征是严重的残疾和高复发率。出院后持续较高的再入院率对治疗该人群提出了严峻的挑战和压力来源。早期识别这种风险对于实施有针对性的干预措施至关重要。本研究旨在开发一种易于使用的预测工具,用于识别中国精神分裂症患者出院后1年内再入院的风险。
    方法:预测模型,基于静态因素,是使用无锡精神卫生中心收治的247名精神分裂症住院患者的数据开发的,中国,2020年7月1日至12月31日。对于内部验证,另有106例患者纳入.多变量Cox回归用于确定独立预测因子,并创建列线图以预测出院后1年内再入院的可能性。使用具有1000个重新采样的自举评估模型在辨别和校准方面的性能。
    结果:多变量cox回归表明非自愿入院(校正风险比[aHR]4.35,95%置信区间[CI]2.13-8.86),重复入院(AHR3.49,95%CI2.08-5.85),抗精神病药复方处方(AHR2.16,95%CI1.34-3.48),病程≥20年(aHR1.80,95%CI1.04-3.12)是精神分裂症患者出院后1年内再入院的独立预测因子.由这四个因子构建的列线图的曲线下面积(AUC)和一致性指数(C指数)在训练集中分别为0.820和0.780,和0.846和0.796的验证集,分别。此外,训练集和验证集的列线图的校准曲线非常接近理想对角线。此外,决策曲线分析(DCA)表明,该模型的净收益明显更好。
    结论:列线图,使用放电前静电因子开发,旨在预测精神分裂症患者出院后1年内再入院的可能性。该工具可以为临床医生提供及时预测和早期管理精神病再入院的准确有效方法。
    BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a pervasive and severe mental disorder characterized by significant disability and high rates of recurrence. The persistently high rates of readmission after discharge present a serious challenge and source of stress in treating this population. Early identification of this risk is critical for implementing targeted interventions. The present study aimed to develop an easy-to-use predictive instrument for identifying the risk of readmission within 1-year post-discharge among schizophrenia patients in China.
    METHODS: A prediction model, based on static factors, was developed using data from 247 schizophrenia inpatients admitted to the Mental Health Center in Wuxi, China, from July 1 to December 31, 2020. For internal validation, an additional 106 patients were included. Multivariate Cox regression was applied to identify independent predictors and to create a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of readmission within 1-year post-discharge. The model\'s performance in terms of discrimination and calibration was evaluated using bootstrapping with 1000 resamples.
    RESULTS: Multivariate cox regression demonstrated that involuntary admission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-8.86), repeat admissions (aHR 3.49, 95% CI 2.08-5.85), the prescription of antipsychotic polypharmacy (aHR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.48), and a course of disease ≥ 20 years (aHR 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.12) were independent predictors for the readmission of schizophrenia patients within 1-year post-discharge. The area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram constructed from these four factors were 0.820 and 0.780 in the training set, and 0.846 and 0.796 for the validation set, respectively. Furthermore, the calibration curves of the nomogram for both the training and validation sets closely approximated the ideal diagonal line. Additionally, decision curve analyses (DCAs) demonstrated a significantly better net benefit with this model.
    CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram, developed using pre-discharge static factors, was designed to predict the likelihood of readmission within 1-year post-discharge for patients with schizophrenia. This tool may offer clinicians an accurate and effective way for the timely prediction and early management of psychiatric readmissions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在精神分裂症(SCZ)中,在静息状态功能MRI(rs-fMRI)期间默认模式网络(DMN)中的连接中断已得到充分证明。杏仁核,SCZ神经生物学的关键组成部分,包括可能对疾病产生不同影响的不同子区域。这项研究旨在研究SCZ个体中不同杏仁核亚区域与DMN之间功能连接(FC)的变化,并探讨治疗对这些连接的影响。56名SCZ患者和51名健康对照者在静息状态下进行了FC分析和问卷调查。选择杏仁核作为感兴趣区域(ROI)并细分为四个部分。检查了FC的变化,并探讨问卷得分与大脑活动的相关性。预处理,与HC相比,SCZ患者的杏仁核和DMN之间的FC降低。治疗后,右内侧杏仁核持续存在显著差异,而其他区域与对照组无显著差异.此外,PANSS评分与右侧内侧杏仁核和左侧SMFC之间的FC呈正相关(r=.347,p=.009),而RBANS5A评分显示左侧杏仁核和右MTG之间与FC呈正相关(rho=-.347,p=.009)。杏仁核和DMN之间的rsFC在SCZ的治疗机制中起着至关重要的作用。这可以为理解治疗和症状改善背后的神经机制提供有希望的预测指标。
    Disrupted connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) during resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) is well-documented in schizophrenia (SCZ). The amygdala, a key component in the neurobiology of SCZ, comprises distinct subregions that may exert varying effects on the disorder. This study aimed to investigate variations in functional connectivity (FC) between distinct amygdala subregions and the DMN in SCZ individuals and explore the effects of treatment on these connections. Fifty-six SCZ patients and 51 healthy controls underwent FC analysis and questionnaire surveys during resting state. The amygdala was selected as the region of interest (ROI) and subdivided into four parts. Changes in FC were examined, and correlations between questionnaire scores and brain activity were explored. Pre-treatment, SCZ patients exhibited reduced FC between the amygdala and DMN compared to HCs. After treatment, significant differences persisted in the right medial amygdala, while other regions did not differ significantly from controls. In addition, PANSS scores positively correlated with FC between the Right Medial Amygdala and the left SMFC (r = .347, p = .009), while RBANS5A scores showed a positive correlation with FC between the Left Lateral Amygdala and the right MTG (rho = -.347, p = .009). The rsFC between the amygdala and the DMN plays a crucial role in the treatment mechanisms of SCZ. This could provide a promising predictive indicator for understanding the neural mechanisms behind treatment and symptomatic improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在通过对FAERS数据库中的不良事件报告进行全面的统计分析,来全面评估Asenapine的安全性,特别关注与其治疗精神疾病相关的潜在不良反应。
    方法:收集并分析了2009年第一季度至2023年第三季度的事件报告。详细的性别检查,年龄,记者身份,等方面揭示了阿塞奈平相关不良事件的基本特征.采用信号挖掘技术来系统地评估与Asenapine相关的各种不良反应。
    结果:研究发现,涉及阿塞奈平的不良事件报告在女性患者中更为常见,年龄组主要分布在18-45岁之间。医生是不良事件的主要报告者,和精神疾病,神经系统疾病,胃肠道疾病是最常见的不良反应。除了已知的不良反应,确定了药物标签中未提及的潜在风险,比如失认症,注意漂移,和心理补偿障碍。
    结论:阿塞那平除了具有治疗作用外,还具有各种不良反应的风险。在临床实践中,医生应密切监测神经系统疾病的发生,精神疾病,和胃肠道系统疾病。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to comprehensively assess the safety of Asenapine by conducting an comprehensive statistical analysis of adverse event reports in the FAERS database, with a particular focus on potential adverse reactions related to its use in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
    METHODS: Event reports from the first quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2023 were collected and analyzed. Detailed examinations of gender, age, reporter identity, and other aspects were conducted to reveal the fundamental characteristics of Asenapine-related adverse events. Signal mining techniques were employed to systematically evaluate various adverse reactions associated with Asenapine.
    RESULTS: The study found that adverse event reports involving Asenapine were more common among female patients, with the age group mainly distributed between 18 and 45 years. Physicians were the primary reporters of adverse events, and psychiatric disorders, neurological disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders were the most common areas affected by adverse reactions. In addition to known adverse reactions, potential risks not mentioned in the drug label were identified, such as anosognosia, attentional drift, and psychogenic compensation disorder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Asenapine carries the risk of various adverse reactions alongside its therapeutic effects. In clinical practice, physicians should closely monitor the occurrence of neurological disorders, psychiatric disorders, and gastrointestinal system disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用不同的抗精神病药物治疗可导致精神病患者的各种代谢副作用,影响长期预后。本研究旨在比较奥氮平和齐拉西酮治疗患者胰岛素抵抗的变化和临床疗效。
    方法:对80例精神分裂症患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。将患者分为奥氮平治疗组和齐拉西酮治疗组。包括体重在内的参数,体重指数(BMI),空腹血糖(FPG),空腹血浆胰岛素(FPI),胆固醇(CHO),甘油三酯(TG),高密度脂蛋白(HDL),低密度脂蛋白(LDL),胰岛素抵抗指数,记录并比较治疗前后的阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分。
    结果:BMI,FPG,FPI,胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR),CHO,两组TG、LDL均较治疗前显著升高(p<0.05)。奥氮平组的这些参数显著高于齐拉西酮组(p<0.05)。两组患者治疗后HDL水平均显著下降,奥氮平组治疗后HDL水平明显低于齐拉西酮组(p<0.05)。治疗后,两组治疗后PANSS总分及评分均显著低于治疗前(p<0.05)。治疗后,两组总评分和PANSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。奥氮平组胰岛素抵抗(IR)的发生率明显高于齐拉西酮组(χ2=4.021,p<0.05)。在IR组中,BMI,FPG,FPI,TG,LDL水平高于非IR组(p<0.05)。多变量分析表明,BMI,FPG,FPI,TG,LDL是IR的独立危险因素(奇数比值(OR)>1,p<0.05)。
    结论:奥氮平和齐拉西酮治疗可改善精神分裂症患者的临床症状,但是增加了胰岛素抵抗的风险。奥氮平的代谢副作用更为明显。
    BACKGROUND: Treatment with different antipsychotics can lead to various metabolic side effects in patients with psychosis, impacting long-term prognosis. This study aimed to compare the changes and clinical efficacy of insulin resistance in patients treated with olanzapine and ziprasidone.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 80 patients with schizophrenia. The patients were divided into olanzapine treatment group and ziprasidone treatment group. Parameters including body weight, body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), cholesterol (CHO), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), insulin resistance index, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores were recorded and compared before and after treatment.
    RESULTS: BMI, FPG, FPI, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), CHO, TG and LDL in both groups were significantly higher than before treatment (p < 0.05). These parameters were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the ziprasidone group (p < 0.05). The level of HDL in both groups was significantly decreased after treatment, and the level of HDL in the olanzapine group was significantly lower than that in the ziprasidone group after treatment (p < 0.05). After treatment, the total score and score of PANSS in both groups were significantly lower than before treatment (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference in total score and PANSS score between both groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of insulin resistance (IR) was significantly higher in the olanzapine group compared to the ziprasidone group (χ2 = 4.021, p < 0.05). In the IR group, BMI, FPG, FPI, TG, and LDL levels were higher than in the non-IR group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that BMI, FPG, FPI, TG, and LDL were independent risk factors for IR (odd ratio (OR) >1, p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with olanzapine and ziprasidone improves clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, but increases the risk of insulin resistance. The metabolic side effects of olanzapine are more pronounced.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神分裂症是一种具有多种认知障碍的衰弱性精神障碍。胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白1(IGFBP-1),普遍存在的IGF信号的负调节因子,外周合成后穿过血脑屏障。鉴于IGF信号在认知功能中的关键作用,我们推断,血清IGFBP-1浓度的改变可能与精神分裂症的认知障碍有关.为了检验这个假设,我们研究了药物治疗和治疗抵抗型精神分裂症(TRS)患者血清IGFBP-1水平与认知能力之间的关系.
    方法:测定31例TRS患者血清IGFBP-1,49例慢性药物精神分裂症(CMS)患者,和53个健康对照。使用阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)评估临床症状严重程度,并使用可重复的神经心理状态评估电池(RBANS)评估认知功能。
    结果:与健康对照相比,TRS和CMS患者均表现出认知障碍(p<0.05)。血清IGFBP-1浓度在各组之间显著不同(F=36.805,p<0.001),并且事后测试显示与对照组相比在两个精神分裂症组中显著更高的浓度(p<0.001)。Further,TRS组血清IGFBP-1浓度高于CMS组(p=0.048)。相关分析发现TRS组血清IGFBP-1与注意力之间存在显著关系(r=0.411,p=0.021),CMS组的即时记忆(r=-0.417,p=0.003),CMS组RBANS总分(r=-0.368,p=0.009)。校正混杂因素的多元回归分析显示,血清IGFBP-1与TRS患者的注意力独立相关(p=0.016,95CI。0.002-0.015)和CMS患者的即时记忆(p=0.022,95CI-0.012至-0.001)。
    结论:血清IGFBP-1浓度升高可作为TRS和CMS患者明显认知缺陷的预测生物标志物。需要进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a debilitating psychiatric disorder with diverse cognitive impairments. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1), a ubiquitous negative regulator of IGF signaling, crosses the blood-brain barrier after peripheral synthesis. Given the crucial role of IGF signaling in cognitive function, we reasoned that altered serum IGFBP-1 concentrations might be associated with cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. To test this hypothesis, we examined the relationship between serum IGFBP-1 levels and cognitive performance in both medicated and treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) patients.
    METHODS: Serum IGFBP-1 was measured in 31 TRS patients, 49 chronic medicated schizophrenia (CMS) patients, and 53 healthy controls. Clinical symptom severity was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and cognitive functions using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
    RESULTS: Both TRS and CMS patients exhibited cognitive deficits compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). Serum IGFBP-1 concentration differed significantly among groups (F=36.805, p < 0.001) and post hoc tests demonstrated significantly higher concentrations in both schizophrenia groups compared to controls (p < 0.001). Further, serum IGFBP-1 concentration was higher in the TRS group than the CMS group (p = 0.048). Correlation analysis identified a significant relationship between serum IGFBP-1 and attention in the TRS group (r = 0.411, p = 0.021), immediate memory in the CMS group (r = -0.417, p = 0.003), and RBANS total score in the CMS group (r = -0.368, p = 0.009). Multiple regression analysis adjusting for confounding factors revealed that serum IGFBP-1 was independently associated with attention in TRS patients (p = 0.016, 95 %CI. 0.002-0.015) and immediate memory in CMS patients (p = 0.022, 95 %CI-0.012 to -0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum IGFBP-1 concentration may serve as a predictive biomarker for distinct cognitive deficits in TRS and CMS patients. Further investigations are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:许多文章表明,氯氮平与新发糖尿病的高发病率密切相关,这个问题仍然没有解决。许多文章将氯氮平与FGA进行了比较,但很少有人将氯氮平与SGAs进行比较。我们旨在比较使用氯氮平和其他SGA治疗的成年精神分裂症患者新发糖尿病的风险。
    方法:我们从数据库开始到2023年8月26日对数据库进行了全面搜索。具体的数据库包括PubMed、Embase和其他人。我们纳入了涉及使用SGAs如氯氮平的非随机对照试验,奥氮平,利培酮,喹硫平,氨磺必利,和zotepine,重点关注新发糖尿病的结局。我们使用95%可信区间(95%CI)的比值比作为我们的效应大小度量。研究方案在PROSPERO注册,编号CRD42024511280。
    结果:我们纳入了7项研究,这些研究的数据足以纳入荟萃分析。共有8项研究,641,48名参与者符合资格标准。氯氮平和奥氮平新发糖尿病发病率的OR为0.95(95%CI:[0.82-1.09]),氯氮平和利培酮之间为1.25(95%CI:[1.09-1.44]),氯氮平和喹硫平之间为1.44(95%CI:[0.92-2.25]).
    结论:在精神分裂症患者中,与利培酮相比,发现氯氮平的新发糖尿病发生率更高。然而,氯氮平与奥氮平和喹硫平的发病率无显著差异.这些发现可以帮助临床医生平衡这些药物的风险和益处。
    BACKGROUND: Many articles suggest that clozapine was strongly associated with a higher incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus, and the issue has remained unsettled. Many articles have compared clozapine with FGAs, but few have compared clozapine with SGAs. We aimed to compare the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in adults with schizophrenia treated with clozapine and other SGAs.
    METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases from their inception up until August 26, 2023. The specific databases include PubMed, Embase and others. We included non-randomized controlled trials involving the use of SGAs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, amisulpride, and zotepine, with a focus on new-onset diabetes mellitus as an outcome. We utilized odds ratio with 95 % credible intervals (95 % CI) as our effect size measures. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42024511280.
    RESULTS: We included 7 studies with sufficient data to include in the meta-analysis. A total of eight studies with 641,48 participants met the eligibility criteria. The OR of the incidence rates of new-onset diabetes between clozapine and olanzapine was 0.95 (95 % CI:[0.82-1.09]), between clozapine and risperidone was 1.25 (95 % CI: [1.09-1.44]), between clozapine and quetiapine was 1.44 (95 % CI: [0.92-2.25]).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with schizophrenia, clozapine has been found to have a higher rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to risperidone. However, there was no significant difference in incidence rate between clozapine versus olanzapine and quetiapine. These findings can assist clinicians in balancing the risks and benefits of those drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多巴胺D2受体(DRD2)是治疗神经精神疾病的治疗干预的关键目标。包括精神分裂症,双相情感障碍,和帕金森病。许多有效的DRD2抑制剂的成功发现导致了它们的临床应用和在各种临床试验中的持续评估。这篇综述探讨了已经获得批准或正在进行临床试验的原型小分子DRD2抑制剂的合成方法和临床应用。强调他们的治疗潜力和挑战。这些抑制剂的合成采用各种化学策略,包括酚噻嗪和丁苯酮结构的修饰,产生了大量抗精神病药,如氯丙嗪和氟哌啶醇。此外,较新种类的抑制剂,比如阿立哌唑,在DRD2处表现出部分激动剂活性,提供独特的治疗概况。临床上,DRD2抑制剂在控制精神分裂症的阳性症状方面表现出功效,双相情感障碍的躁狂发作,帕金森病的多巴胺能失衡。然而,不利影响的出现,包括迟发性运动障碍,锥体外系症状和代谢综合征,提出了重大挑战。第二代抗精神病药的开发进展旨在通过靶向其他神经递质受体来平衡疗效与更好的副作用。这篇综述旨在概述代表性小分子DRD2抑制剂在不同临床阶段的合成和临床应用。从而为推进DRD2抑制剂的开发提供战略见解。
    The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) represents a pivotal target for therapeutic intervention in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson\'s disease. The successful discovery of numerous effective DRD2 inhibitors has led to their clinical application and ongoing evaluation in various clinical trials. This review explores the synthetic approaches and clinical applications of prototypical small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors that have received approval or are currently undergoing clinical trials, highlighting their therapeutic potential and challenges. The synthesis of these inhibitors employs various chemical strategies, including modifications of phenothiazine and butyrophenone structures, which have yielded significant antipsychotic agents like chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Additionally, newer classes of inhibitors, such as aripiprazole, exhibit partial agonist activity at DRD2, offering a unique therapeutic profile. Clinically, DRD2 inhibitors demonstrate efficacy in managing positive symptoms of schizophrenia, manic episodes in bipolar disorder, and dopaminergic imbalance in Parkinson\'s disease. However, the emergence of adverse effects, including tardive dyskinesia, extrapyramidal symptoms and metabolic syndrome, presents substantial challenges. Advances in the development of second-generation antipsychotics aim to balance efficacy with a better side effect profile by targeting additional neurotransmitter receptors. This review aims to deliver an overview of the synthesis and clinical applications of representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors across various clinical phases, thereby offering strategic insights for the advancement of DRD2 inhibitor development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号