目的:本研究旨在评估方仓收容所医院(FSHs)中患者志愿者的志愿者动机和压力负荷,检查他们的协会,探讨志愿者动机的潜在影响因素。
方法:2022年4月21日至5月20日进行的横断面在线调查。
方法:采用随机整群抽样的方法从上海FSH的患者志愿者中收集问卷,中国。
方法:197名符合纳入标准的患者是在FSH中无症状或表现为轻度症状的患者,他们自愿在隔离环境下协助常规工作。
方法:我们调查了社会人口统计信息,通过使用志愿者功能清单和压力过载量表进行在线调查,压力负荷和志愿者动机。通过应用t检验或方差分析进行组间比较。采用Pearson相关性分析志愿者动机与压力的相关性。通过多元线性回归模型确定志愿者动机的影响因素。p<0.05的值用于声明统计学意义。
结果:患者志愿者的志愿者动机平均得分为73.24(SD12.00),而应力载荷为46.08(SD21.28)。个人脆弱性(PV)和事件负荷(EL)的平均得分,应力载荷的两个维度,分别为26.99(SD12.46)和19.09(SD9.63),分别。大多数参与者(136,69.04%)被分组在低(PV)-低(EL)压力类别中。参与者的志愿者动机与压力负荷呈负相关(r=-0.238,p<0.001),以及PV(r=-0.188,p<0.01)和EL(r=-0.283,p<0.001)。多元线性回归分析发现志愿者动机的潜在影响因素为职业(B=1.100,95%CI0.037~2.164,p=0.043),健康状况(B=-3.302,95%CI-5.287至-1.317,p<0.001)和EL(B=-0.434,95%CI-0.756至-0.111,p=0.009)。在公共部门工作的参与者,健康状况较好,EL较低的人更有可能有更高的志愿者动机。
结论:我们的研究表明,在FSH背景下,减少压力负荷可能是鼓励和维持志愿服务的可能途径。从我们的发现中可以得出对未来患者志愿者招募和管理研究的启示和建议。
This study aims to assess the volunteer motivation and stress load of patient volunteers in the Fangcang shelter hospitals (FSHs), examine their associations, and explore the potential influence factors of volunteer motivation.
Cross-sectional online survey conducted from 21 April to 20 May 2022.
Questionnaires were collected from patient volunteers selected by random cluster sampling in the FSHs in Shanghai,
China.
197 participants who met the inclusion criteria as patients who were asymptomatic or presenting with mild symptoms in the FSHs and who volunteered to assist with routine work under quarantined settings.
We investigated sociodemographic information, stress load and volunteer motivation through an online survey using the Volunteer Function Inventory and the Stress Overload Scale. Comparisons between groups were conducted by applying t-tests or analysis of variance. The correlation between volunteer motivation and stress was analysed by Pearson correlation. Influencing factors of volunteer motivation were determined by multivariable linear regression models. A value of p<0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.
The mean score of volunteer motivation of patient volunteers was 73.24 (SD 12.00), while that of stress load was 46.08 (SD 21.28). The mean scores of the personal vulnerability (PV) and event load (EL), two dimensions of stress load, were 26.99 (SD 12.46) and 19.09 (SD 9.63), respectively. The majority of the participants (136, 69.04%) were grouped in the low (PV)-low (EL) stress category. Participants\' volunteer motivation was negatively correlated with stress load (r=-0.238, p<0.001), as well as PV (r=-0.188, p<0.01) and EL (r=-0.283, p<0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis identified that the potential influencing factors of volunteer motivation were occupation (B=1.100, 95% CI 0.037 to 2.164, p=0.043), health condition (B=-3.302, 95% CI -5.287 to -1.317, p<0.001) and EL (B=-0.434, 95% CI -0.756 to -0.111, p=0.009). Participants who worked in the public sector, had better health conditions and had lower EL were more likely to have higher volunteer motivation.
Our study suggested that reducing stress load might be a possible pathway to encourage and maintain volunteerism in the FSH context. Implications and suggestions for future research on patient volunteer recruitment and management could be drawn from our findings.