ace inhibitors

ACE 抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑制ACE被认为是降低高血压的主要策略之一。来自碱蓬的ACE抑制剂(S.莎莎)提出了一种新型的抗高血压药来源。本研究采用3D-QSAR药效团,代谢组学,基于对接的筛选,和分子动力学模拟,以鉴定S.salsa的ACE抑制剂。一组53种已知分子在化学上是多样化的,以构建用于预测目的的3D-QSAR模型。使用UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS和UPLC-Q-TOF-LC-MS技术对S.鉴定出211种和586种生物活性代谢产物,分别。共收集到680个化合物用于数据库构建和虚拟筛选。进行ADMET评估以评估药物相似度和药代动力学参数。此外,分子对接结果表明,六个顶级化合物与ACE紧密结合。特别是,地奥司明可以通过氢键与ACE相互作用,Pi-阳离子键,和金属键。随后采用分子动力学(MD)模拟和MMPBSA计算来阐明复杂的稳定性以及地奥司明与ACE之间的相互作用。表明它有很强的ACE抑制活性。总之,这项研究表明,莎莎草是抗高血压药物的潜在来源.
    在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s40203-024-00233-0获得。
    Inhibition of ACE is considered as one of the main strategies to reduce hypertension. ACE inhibitors derived from Suaeda salsa (S. salsa) present a novel antihypertensive agent source. This study employed 3D-QSAR pharmacophore, metabolomics, docking-based screening, and molecular dynamics simulations to identify ACE inhibitors from S. salsa. A set of 53 known molecules was chemically diverse to construct a 3D-QSAR model for predictive purposes. S. salsa was characterized using UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS and UPLC-Q-TOF-LC-MS techniques, 211 and 586 kinds of bioactive metabolites were identified, respectively. A total of 680 compounds were collected for database construction and virtual screening. An ADMET assessment was conducted to evaluate drug-likeness and pharmacokinetics parameters. Moreover, molecular docking results show that six top hit compounds bind to ACE tightly. Specially, diosmin could interact with ACE by hydrogen bond, Pi-cation bond, and metal bond. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and MMPBSA calculations were subsequently employed to elucidate complex stability and the interaction between diosmin and ACE, indicating it a strong ACE inhibitory activity. In conclusion, this study suggests that S.salsa represents a potential source of antihypertensive agents.
    UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-024-00233-0.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结直肠癌(CC)是导致疾病和死亡的第四常见癌症。像ACE抑制剂和ARBs这样的药物,通常用于心脏问题,已经表明它们可能有助于CC的成长和发展。
    背景:在这篇全面综述中对ACE抑制剂和结肠癌进行了分析。主要目标是了解ACEI/ARBs如何影响CC患者患癌症和死亡的机会。
    方法:进行了系统的文献检索以确定相关研究。纳入标准包括评估在CC患者中使用ACEI/ARBs的研究,并报告与新癌症发病率和死亡率相关的结果。使用适当的统计方法提取和分析来自选定研究的数据。
    结果:研究表明,与未服用ACEI/ARB的患者相比,服用ACEI/ARB的患者发生的癌症病例较少(RR0.962,95%CI0.934-0.991,p=0.010)。此外,与未使用ACEI/ARBs的患者相比,使用ACEI/ARBs的CC患者的死亡率降低(HR0.833,95%CI0.640-1.085,p=0.175).
    结论:这篇综述表明,使用ACEI/ARBs药物可以帮助CC患者寿命更长,降低死亡几率。这些结果突出了在CC管理中使用ACE抑制剂的潜在益处。在临床实践中需要进一步的调查和考虑。
    BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CC) is the fourth most common type of cancer that causes illness and death. Medicines like ACE inhibitors and ARBs, usually used for heart problems, have shown they might help with the growth and development of CC.
    BACKGROUND: An analysis of ACE inhibitors and colon cancer is conducted in this comprehensive review. The main goal is to see how ACEIs/ARBs affect the chances of getting cancer and dying in patients with CC.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies that evaluated the use of ACEIs/ARBs in patients with CC and reported outcomes related to new cancer incidence and mortality. Data from selected studies were extracted and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.
    RESULTS: The study showed that fewer cancer cases occurred in patients who took ACEIs/ARBs compared to those who did not (RR 0.962, 95% CI 0.934-0.991, p = 0.010). Furthermore, patients with CC who utilized ACEIs/ARBs exhibited a decreased mortality rate compared to non-users (HR 0.833, 95% CI 0.640-1.085, p = 0.175).
    CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that using ACEIs/ARBs medicine could help people with CC live longer and lower their chances of dying. These results highlight the potential benefits of utilizing ACE inhibitors in the management of CC, warranting further investigation and consideration in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:沙巴必曲-缬沙坦,血管紧张素受体脑啡肽(ARNi)的抑制剂,据称在诊断为心力衰竭的个体中表现出优于血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的优势。
    目的:本文提供了最新的荟萃分析,比较了沙库巴曲缬沙坦与标准治疗不同类型心力衰竭的疗效和安全性。
    结果:荟萃分析共包括9项随机对照试验(RCT),纳入来自15939名患者的大量样本量的数据。该研究观察到,用沙库巴曲-缬沙坦治疗的射血分数降低(HFrEF)类型的心力衰竭患者的总死亡率和与心血管原因相关的死亡率降低。然而,在射血分数和HFmrEF保留的心力衰竭患者中,这一结局无统计学差异.服用沙库巴曲-缬沙坦的患者出现低血压的可能性显着升高。然而,在其他不良事件方面,各治疗组没有观察到显著差异.
    结论:目前的荟萃分析支持使用沙库巴曲-缬沙坦降低HFrEF患者的死亡率。然而,与ACE抑制剂和ARB的标准治疗相比,使用沙库巴曲-缬沙坦相关的其他益处需要更多的研究得出明确的结论.
    BACKGROUND: Sacubitril-valsartan, an inhibitor of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin (ARNi), has been purported to exhibit superiority over angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in individuals diagnosed with heart failure.
    OBJECTIVE: This paper gives an updated meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan to that of standard treatment for different types of heart failure.
    RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised a total of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), incorporating data from a substantial sample size of 15 939 patients. The study observed a decrease in overall mortality and mortality related to cardiovascular causes among patients in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) category who were treated with sacubitril-valsartan. However, no statistically significant variation in this outcome was seen among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and HFmrEF. Patients who were administered sacubitril-valsartan had a notably elevated likelihood of experiencing hypotension. Nevertheless, no significant disparities were observed in terms of other adverse events among the various treatment groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current meta-analysis provide support for use of sacubitril-valsartan in decreasing mortality in patients with HFrEF. However, more numbers of studies are required to draw a definite conclusion on other benefits associated with sacubitril-valsartan use over standard treatment of ACE inhibitors and ARBs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    研究表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)在心脏病死亡率和发病率的一级和二级预防方面优于血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)。ACEI的常见副作用之一是干咳。本系统综述的目的,和网络荟萃分析是对不同ACEI诱导的咳嗽风险以及ACEI和安慰剂之间进行排名,ARB或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)。我们进行了系统的审查,和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析,对每种ACEI引起的咳嗽风险进行排名,以及ACEI和安慰剂之间,ARB或CCB。总共135个RCTs和45,420个接受11个ACEI治疗的患者被包括在分析中。ACEI和安慰剂之间的汇总估计相对风险(RR)为2.21(95%CI:2.05-2.39)。ACEI的咳嗽发生率高于ARB(RR3.2;95%CI:2.91,3.51),ACEI和CCB之间的RR汇总估计为5.30(95%CI:4.32-6.50),莫西普利在诱发咳嗽方面排名第一(SUCRA80.4%),而螺普利则排名最低(SUCRA12.3%)。其余ACEI的顺序如下:雷米普利(SUCRA76.4%),福辛普利(SUCRA72.5%),赖诺普利(SUCRA64.7%),贝那普利(SUCRA58.6%),喹那普利(SUCRA56.5%),培多普利(SUCRA54.1%),依那普利(SUCRA49.7%),trandolapril(SUCRA44.6%)和,卡托普利(SUCRA13.7%)。所有ACEI都有类似的咳嗽风险。有咳嗽风险的患者应避免使用ACEI,ARB或CCB是基于患者合并症的替代方案。
    Studies have shown that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are superior in primary and secondary prevention for cardiac mortality and morbidity to angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs). One of the common side effects from ACEI is dry cough. The aims of this systematic review, and network meta-analysis are to rank the risk of cough induced by different ACEIs and between ACEI and placebo, ARB or calcium channel blockers (CCB). We performed a systematic review, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to rank the risk of cough induced by each ACEI and between ACEI and placebo, ARB or CCB. A total of 135 RCTs with 45,420 patients treated with eleven ACEIs were included in the analyses. The pooled estimated relative risk (RR) between ACEI and placebo was 2.21 (95% CI: 2.05-2.39). ACEI had more incidences of cough than ARB (RR 3.2; 95% CI: 2.91, 3.51), and pooled estimated of RR between ACEI and CCB was 5.30 (95% CI: 4.32-6.50) Moexipril ranked as number one for inducing cough (SUCRA 80.4%) and spirapril ranked the least (SUCRA 12.3%). The order for the rest of the ACEIs are as follows: ramipril (SUCRA 76.4%), fosinopril (SUCRA 72.5%), lisinopril (SUCRA 64.7%), benazepril (SUCRA 58.6%), quinapril (SUCRA 56.5%), perindopril (SUCRA 54.1%), enalapril (SUCRA 49.7%), trandolapril (SUCRA 44.6%) and, captopril (SUCRA 13.7%). All ACEI has the similar risk of developing a cough. ACEI should be avoided in patients who have risk of developing cough, and an ARB or CCB is an alternative based on the patient\'s comorbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)通过受体血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)和共受体跨膜丝氨酸蛋白酶2(TMPRSS2)进入细胞。然而,接受ACE1抑制剂治疗的SARS-CoV-2感染患者的ACE2表达较高,预后结局更差.直到现在,ACE1,ACE2和TMPRSS2在人子宫内膜组织中的表达信息,ACE抑制剂对胚胎着床的影响有限。我们发现人子宫内膜表达ACE1,ACE2和TMPRSS2转录本和蛋白质。分泌的ACE1较低,但ACE2转录物高于增生性子宫内膜。ACE1蛋白在子宫内膜上皮细胞和基质细胞中弱表达,而ACE2和TMPRSS2蛋白在管腔和腺上皮细胞中高表达。然而,ACE1和TMPRSS4在人子宫内膜上皮(Ishikawa和RL95-2)细胞中高表达,但不在非接受性AN3CA和HEC1-B细胞中。用ACE1治疗人子宫内膜上皮细胞(卡托普利,Enalaprilat,和佐芬普利)或ACE2(DX600)抑制剂在体外不会显着改变ACE1,ACE2和TMPRSS2转录本和球体(胚泡替代物)附着在Ishikawa细胞上的表达。一起来看,我们的数据表明,在分泌中期子宫内膜中发现了更高的ACE2表达,使用ACE抑制剂并没有改变子宫内膜对胚胎着床的容受性.
    The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enters cells via receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and co-receptor transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2). However, patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection receiving ACE1 inhibitors had higher ACE2 expression and were prone to poorer prognostic outcomes. Until now, information on the expression of ACE1, ACE2, and TMPRSS2 in human endometrial tissues, and the effects of ACE inhibitors on embryo implantation are limited. We found human endometria expressed ACE1, ACE2, and TMPRSS2 transcripts and proteins. Lower ACE1, but higher ACE2 transcripts were found at the secretory than in the proliferative endometria. ACE1 proteins were weakly expressed in endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, whereas ACE2 and TMPRSS2 proteins were highly expressed in luminal and glandular epithelial cells. However, ACE1 and TMPRSS4 were highly expressed in receptive human endometrial epithelial (Ishikawa and RL95-2) cells, but not in non-receptive AN3CA and HEC1-B cells. Treatment of human endometrial epithelial cells with ACE1 (Captopril, Enalaprilat, and Zofenopril) or ACE2 (DX600) inhibitors did not significantly alter the expression of ACE1, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 transcripts and spheroid (blastocyst surrogate) attachment onto Ishikawa cells in vitro. Taken together, our data suggest that higher ACE2 expression was found in mid-secretory endometrium and the use of ACE inhibitors did not alter endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂(DHPCCB)广泛用于治疗高血压和慢性冠状动脉疾病。DHPCCBs的一个常见不良反应是外周水肿,尤其是下肢。副作用可能导致药物的剂量减少或停药。与DHPCCBs单一疗法相比,DHPCCBs和肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂的组合已显示出降低DHPCCBs相关外周水肿的风险。我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了当前的系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以评估DHPCCBs作为一类,单个DHPCCBs的外周水肿发生率以及外周水肿减少的排名。建立肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂对DHPCCBs影响的Meta分析网络,分析外周水肿减轻程度排序。共有3312篇出版物被确定,71篇研究涉及56,283名患者。硝苯地平在诱导外周水肿方面排名最高(SUCRA81.8%),拉西地平(SUCRA12.8%)排名最低。与安慰剂相比,除拉西地平外,所有DHPCCB均导致较高的外周水肿相对风险(RR)。硝苯地平加血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(SUCRA:92.3%)不能减轻外周水肿,氨氯地平加血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(SUCRA:16%)减轻外周水肿最多。在用于心血管适应症时,硝苯地平在DHPCCB中排名最高,拉西地平在发生外周水肿方面排名最低。与单一DHPCCB治疗相比,第二代或更高代DHPCCB与ACEI或ARB或利尿剂的组合降低了外周水肿发展的机会。
    Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHPCCBs) are widely used to treat hypertension and chronic coronary artery disease. One common adverse effect of DHPCCBs is peripheral edema, particularly of the lower limbs. The side effect could lead to dose reduction or discontinuation of the medication. The combination of DHPCCBs and renin-angiotensin system blockers has shown to reduce the risk of DHPCCBs-associated peripheral edema compared with DHPCCBs monotherapy. We performed the current systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate the rate of peripheral edema with DHPCCBs as a class and with individual DHPCCBs and the ranking of the reduction of peripheral edema. The effects of renin-angiotensin system blockers on DHPCCBs network meta-analysis were created to analyze the ranking of the reduction of peripheral edema. A total of 3312 publications were identified and 71 studies with 56,283 patients were included. Nifedipine ranked highest in inducing peripheral edema (SUCRA 81.8%) and lacidipine (SUCRA 12.8%) ranked the least. All DHPCCBs except lacidipine resulted in higher relative risk (RR) of peripheral edema compared with placebo. Nifedipine plus angiotensin receptor blocker (SUCRA: 92.3%) did not mitigate peripheral edema and amlodipine plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (SUCRA: 16%) reduced peripheral edema the most. Nifedipine ranked the highest and lacidipine ranked the lowest amongst DHPCCBs for developing peripheral edema when used for cardiovascular indications. The second or higher generation of DHPCCBs combination with ACEIs or ARBs or diuretics lowered the chance of peripheral edema development compared to single DHPCCB treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)被广泛用于治疗硬皮病肾危象(SRC)。近年来,在系统性硬化症(SSc)患者中,在SRC发病前使用它们受到了广泛关注。我们采取了一种基于证据的方法来确定在SRC发作之前使用ACEI是否对SSc患者有益。
    方法:我们在PubMed和Embase中搜索了从数据库开始到2021年10月22日之间发表的任何研究。使用适当关键词后获得的文章由两名评审员根据既定的纳入和排除标准独立选择。
    结果:纳入9项研究。汇总结果表明,在SRC之前使用ACEI的SRC发生率高于在SRC之前不使用ACEI的发生率(RR2.05,95%置信区间1.08-3.91,p=0.03)。与SRC发病前未使用ACEI的患者相比,在发病前使用ACEI的SRC患者中,较高比例的患者预后较差(RR1.46,95%置信区间1.20~1.78,p<0.01).SRC发病前使用ACEI的患者与未使用ACEI的患者之间的死亡率差异无统计学意义(RR1.12,95%置信区间0.76-1.65,p=0.57)。
    结论:我们建议在SSc患者中不要在SRC之前使用ACEI。在SRC之前使用ACEI与SRC的发生率较高和预后较差有关。尤其是在患有进行性SSc或SSc相关性肾血管病变(SSc相关性高血压和蛋白尿)的患者中。
    OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely used in the treatment of scleroderma renal crisis (SRC), and their use prior to the onset of SRC in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) has received wide attention in recent years. We undertook an evidence-based approach to identify whether the use of ACEIs prior to the onset of SRC is beneficial for patients with SSc.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for any published studies produced between database inception and 22 October 2021. Articles obtained after using appropriate keywords were selected independently by two reviewers according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Pooled results indicated that using ACEIs prior to SRC was associated with a higher incidence of SRC than no ACEIs prior to SRC (RR 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.08-3.91, p = 0.03). Compared with patients who did not use ACEIs prior to the onset of SRC, a higher proportion of patients with SRC who used ACEIs prior to its onset had a poorer prognosis (RR 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.78, p < 0.01). The difference in mortality between patients who used ACEIs prior to SRC onset and those who did not was not statistically significant (RR 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.65, p = 0.57).
    CONCLUSIONS: We recommend against using ACEIs prior to SRC in SSc patients. The use of ACEIs prior to SRC is associated with a higher incidence of SRC and poorer prognosis, especially in patients with progressive SSc or SSc-related renal vasculopathy (SSc-related hypertension and proteinuria).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管紧张素转换酶-2(ACE2)是SARS-CoV-2的受体。动物研究表明,肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)阻滞剂可能会增加ACE2的表达,并可能增加SARS-CoV-2感染的风险。
    ACE抑制剂(ACEI)治疗对非COVID-19患者肺炎发生率的影响(25项研究,330780例患者)与肺炎风险降低26%相关(比值比[OR]:0.74,P<.001)。接受ACEI治疗的非COVID-19患者的肺炎相关死亡病例减少了27%(OR:0.73,P=.004)。然而,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗(10项研究,275621例非COVID-19患者)没有改变患者的肺炎风险。仅在1项研究中分析了ARB治疗的非COVID-19患者的肺炎相关死亡病例,并且显着降低(OR,0.47;95%置信区间,0.30至0.72)。来自11项研究(840万患者)的结果表明,在接受ACEI治疗的患者中,感染SARS-CoV-2病毒的风险降低了13%(OR:0.87,P=0.014),而来自10项研究(840万患者)的分析显示ARBs治疗没有效果(OR,0.92,P=.354)。来自67644例COVID-19患者的34项研究结果表明,RAAS阻断可将全因死亡率降低24%(OR=0.76,P=.04)。
    ACEI降低了感染SARS-CoV-2病毒的风险。阻断RAAS可降低COVID-19患者的全因死亡率。ACEI还可降低非COVID肺炎的风险。非新冠肺炎导致的全因死亡率因ACEI和ARB降低而降低。
    Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) is the receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Animal studies suggest that renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers might increase the expression of ACE2 and potentially increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    The effect of ACE inhibitor (ACEI) treatment on the pneumonia incidence in non-COVID-19 patients (25 studies, 330 780 patients) was associated with a 26% reduction of pneumonia risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74, P < .001). Pneumonia-related death cases in ACEI-treated non-COVID-19 patients were reduced by 27% (OR: 0.73, P = .004). However, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) treatment (10 studies, 275 621 non-COVID-19 patients) did not alter pneumonia risk in patients. Pneumonia-related death cases in ARB-treated non-COVID-19 patients was analysed only in 1 study and was significantly reduced (OR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.72). Results from 11 studies (8.4 million patients) showed that the risk of getting infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus was reduced by 13% (OR: 0.87, P = .014) in patients treated with ACEI, whereas analysis from 10 studies (8.4 million patients) treated with ARBs showed no effect (OR, 0.92, P = .354). Results from 34 studies in 67 644 COVID-19 patients showed that RAAS blockade reduces all-cause mortality by 24% (OR = 0.76, P = .04).
    ACEIs reduce the risk of getting infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Blocking the RAAS may decrease all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. ACEIs also reduce the risk of non-COVID pneumonia. All-cause mortality due to non-COVID pneumonia is reduced by ACEI and potentially by ARBs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    藜麦蛋白因其营养特性和有益作用越来越受到重视。随着生物信息学的发展,生物活性肽数据库和计算机辅助模拟为蛋白质潜在生物活性的理论估计提供了一种高效、省时的方法。因此,使用BIOPEP数据库评估了藜麦蛋白序列释放生物活性肽的潜力,这揭示了藜麦蛋白,尤其是球蛋白,是具有二肽基肽酶-IV(DPP-IV)和血管紧张素-I转换酶(ACE)抑制活性的肽的潜在来源。三种植物蛋白酶,即木瓜蛋白酶,ficin,和茎菠萝蛋白酶,用于藜麦蛋白的硅蛋白水解。此外,四种三肽(MAF,NMF,HPF,和MCG)通过PeptideRanker筛选为新型有前途的生物活性肽。使用化学合成和体外测定来确认所选择的肽的生物活性。目前的工作表明,藜麦蛋白可以作为生物活性肽的良好来源,计算机模拟方法可以为功能肽的研究和生产提供理论帮助。
    Quinoa protein has been paid more and more attention because of its nutritional properties and beneficial effects. With the development of bioinformatics, bioactive peptide database and computer-assisted simulation provide an efficient and time-saving method for the theoretical estimation of potential bioactivities of protein. Therefore, the potential of quinoa protein sequences for releasing bioactive peptides was evaluated using the BIOPEP database, which revealed that quinoa protein, especially globulin, is a potential source of peptides with dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities. Three plant proteases, namely papain, ficin, and stem bromelain, were employed for the in silico proteolysis of quinoa protein. Furthermore, four tripeptides (MAF, NMF, HPF, and MCG) were screened as novel promising bioactive peptides by PeptideRanker. The bioactivities of selected peptides were confirmed using chemical synthesis and in vitro assay. The present work suggests that quinoa protein can serve as a good source of bioactive peptides, and in silico approach can provide theoretical assistance for investigation and production of functional peptides.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The critical role of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the development of kidney disease has been well demonstrated in animal and cell-culture experiments, but evidence from human kidney tissues is lacking. In this study, we screened 438 patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and analyzed their clinical characteristics. Renal biopsy revealed the expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R), and MAS receptor (MASR) in the tissues of 260 patients not treated with RAS inhibitors, 32 patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and 89 patients treated with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The correlations in expression among these three receptors and the results of Oxford typing were analyzed, together with the ability of ACEIs and ARBs to reduce proteinuria and the effects of ARBs on AT1R and AT2R expression. The results showed significantly higher AT1R, AT2R, and MASR expression in the M1 group (mesangial score > 0.5) than in the M0 group (mesangial score < 0.5), significantly higher AT1R expression in the S1 group (presence of segmental glomerulosclerosis) than in the S0 group (absence of segmental glomerulosclerosis); AT1R expression in the C2 group (crescent formation > 25%) was significantly higher than in the C0 (crescent formation = 0) and C1 (crescent formation < 25%) groups. Patients treated with an ARB for < 6 months had significantly lower urinary protein levels than those taking these drugs for > 6 months. These findings imply that overexpression of AT1R on the mesangial cells of IgAN patients is associated with mesangial cell proliferation, glomerular segmental sclerosis, and crescent formation. In addition, long-term administration of ARB may decrease the efficacy of these medications in terms of reducing proteinuria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号