UNASSIGNED: Infantile haemangioma (IH) is the most common benign tumor in children. At present, pulsed dye laser (PDL) has made great progress in the treatment of superficial IH, showing good safety and effectiveness. But some doctors think that superficial IH should choose to wait-and-see. However, studies have reported that most of the IH after resolution still has residual disease, and thickness seems to be an important factor. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between Sequelae and thickness after superficial IH involution. In addition, compare the Sequelae difference between 595-nm pulsed laser combined with 755-nm long-pulse alexandrite laser treatment and wait-and-see.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective observational study included patients with superficial IH evaluated in the past 6 years and divided them into a laser group and an observation group.
UNASSIGNED: The incidence of sequelae in the laser group was 44.6%, and the incidence of sequelae in the observation group was 69.5%. The incidence of Sequelae of superficial IH in the laser group was significantly lower than that in the observation group (χ 2-test, χ 2=10.790, P <0.001). In the observation group, the average A scores of the three thickness subgroups (<2mm, 2-5mm, and >5mm) were 4.38, 3.39, and 1.80, and there were significant differences in the A scores between the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.05). There is a significant difference in the A score between the laser group and the observation group in the superficial IH with a thickness of 2-5 mm and>5mm (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P<0.05).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study showed that the degree of Sequelae of superficial IH after involution is related to its thickness. In addition, the early intervention of 595-nm pulsed laser combined with 755-nm long-pulse alexandrite laser can reduce the incidence and extent of sequelae.

Wait-and-see treatment strategies may benefit rectal cancer patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). In this study, we analyzed data from 9 eligible trials to compare the oncologic outcomes of 251 rectal cancer patients achieving a cCR through nonsurgical management approaches with the outcomes of 344 patients achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) through radical surgery. The two patient groups did not differ in distant metastasis rates or disease-free and overall survival, but the nonsurgical group had a higher risk of 1, 2, 3, and 5-year local recurrence. Hence, we concluded that for rectal cancer patients achieving a cCR after NCRT, a wait-and-see strategy with strict selection criteria, an appropriate follow-up schedule, and salvage treatments achieved outcomes at least as good as radical surgery. Long-term randomized and controlled trials with more uniform inclusion criteria and standardized follow-up schedules will help clarify the risks and benefits of wait-and-see treatment strategies for these patients.

The most effective therapeutic approach for the node-negative (N0) neck in patients with recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains a subject of dispute. In the present study, the records of 163 patients with recurrent laryngeal SCC were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a N0 neck at recurrence. At the time of recurrence, the N0 neck was managed using a wait-and-see strategy (observation group) or treatment (treatment group). A total of 125 (76.7%) patients accepted the wait-and-see strategy and 38 (23.3%) patients underwent treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method with the computation of log-rank was used for analysis of survival. The t-test, χ2 test or Fisher\'s exact test was used for comparisons of non-survival data in the groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference in the two-sided tests. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates after recurrence were 64.5 and 54.6% for the observation group, and 49.9 and 42.5% for the treatment group, respectively (P=0.011). The present study suggests that a wait-and-see policy is a satisfactory management option for the N0 neck in recurrent laryngeal SCC.