OBJECTIVE: To observe and analyse the hearing outcome in infants with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who failed universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis included infants with mild-to-moderate SNHL and with complete etiological diagnosis and followed up over three years.
RESULTS: Out of 96 infants with mild-to-moderate SNHL 72 were stable (75%). Only one case was normal (1.04%), ten cases were improved (10.42%), and 13 were deteriorated (13.54%). The pathogenic mutation of GJB2 was the most common cause (50/96, 52.08%), and most of them were homozygous or complex heterozygous mutations of p.V37I (44/50, 88%). There were 11 cases (11.49%) with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) and nine cases (9.38%) with perinatal risk factors. Infants with GJB2 pathogenic mutation and those without certain etiology mostly had unchanged hearing levels, accounting for 84% (42/50) and 84.61% (22/26), respectively. Hearing deterioration in LVAS was associated with seven cases (63.64%). There was no difference in types of outcomes in perinatal risk factor infants, who were more likely to improve than the other groups, but there were three cases (33.3%) deteriorated to profound hearing loss. Comparison of outcomes of different etiologies showed statistically significant difference (Chi-square = 28.673, p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Normal and improved hearing in infants with mild-to-moderate SNHL was rare before the age of three, unlike in many previous studies, and appropriate intervention is recommended. However, intervention should be adjusted according to the hearing outcomes because of the possibility of improvement or deterioration. The etiological diagnosis of infants with mild-to-moderate SNHL would be helpful for predicting the outcome and managing intervention.

Newborn hearing screening (NHS) can reduce the economic and social burden of hearing impairment. To track the progress of the goal set by the National Program of Action for Child Development (NPACD) and to estimate the detection rates of hearing impairment, the present study examined NHS coverage in 2008-2010 and 2016 and the detection of hearing impairment across China in 2016.
Licensed medical institutions across China were surveyed in 2012 and 2018 by the National Center for Birth Defects Monitoring of China to collect data for the 2008-2010 period and for 2016 on live births, initial screening rates (total and referral), secondary screening rates (total and referral), and rates of hearing impairment diagnosis among infants who were referred in the secondary screening. To calculate universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) coverage, the number of newborns who received NHS within 4 weeks after birth was divided by the number of live births. The detection rate of hearing impairment was calculated by combining referral rates on primary and secondary screening with the rate of diagnosis.
National UNHS coverage increased from 29.9% in 2008 to 86.5% in 2016, with different regions showing different increases. During this period, the number of provinces with UNHS coverage over 90.0% increased from 2 to 17, with UNHS coverage in 2016 being substantially higher in eastern provinces (93.1%) than in western provinces (79.4%). In 2016, the detection rate of hearing impairment across the country was 0.23% (95% CI 0.15-0.25%), and it varied from 0.17% in western provinces to 0.22% in central provinces and 0.28% in eastern provinces. The lowest rate was 0.02% in Heilongjiang Province and the highest rate was 0.63% in Hainan Province.
National UNHS coverage increased substantially from 2008 to 2016, although provinces and regions still showed differences. The detection rate of infant hearing impairment in China is comparable to that in other countries. A national individual-level information system is urgently needed in China to facilitate the integration of screening, diagnosis and treatment of infant hearing impairment, which may also lead to a more accurate estimate of the detection rate.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of a sequential hearing screening protocol using transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) tests in healthy newborns.
METHODS: A TEOAE screening was performed during the first 48-72 h of life. If the infants failed, an AABR test was performed at the same time, and they were referred for a TEOAE rescreening at six weeks old. The results of screening Protocol 1 (only TEOAE) were compared with those of screening Protocol 2 (sequential TEOAE + AABR screenings for the first screening and TEOAE for the rescreening).
METHODS: A total of 1062 healthy newborns were enrolled in this research.
RESULTS: For Protocol 1, the first screening and rescreening referral rates were 11.1% and 2.2%, respectively. In contrast, for Protocol 2, the referral rates were significant lower at 3.8% and 0.9%, respectively. Using the two protocols, six infants were diagnosed with hearing loss (0.57%).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding simultaneous AABR tests for infants who fail TEOAE testing at the first screening stage can significantly reduce referral rates without increasing misdiagnosis rates. Although this sequential screening process involves slightly more time and has a higher cost than TEOAE alone, its greater accuracy compensates for this difference.

OBJECTIVE: By comparing the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) program as implemented in Shanghai and other regions in China and countries around the world, this study makes an assessment of the Shanghai model and summarizes the experiences implementing the UNHS program, so as to provide a valuable reference for other countries or regions to carry out UNHS more effectively. Since Shanghai is one of the most developed regions in China, we also examined the relationship between economic development and the UNHS starting year and coverage rate.
METHODS: The study conducted a systematic review of published studies in Chinese and English on the program status of neonatal hearing screening to compare and analyze the implementation of the UNHS program in 20 cities or provinces in China and 24 regions or countries around the world. The literature search in Chinese was conducted in the three most authoritative publication databases, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), WANFANGDATA, and CQVIP (http://www.cqvip.com/). We searched all publications in those databases with the keywords \"neonatal hearing screening\" (in Chinese) between 2005 and 2014. English literature was searched using the same keywords (in English). The publication database included Medline and Web of Science, and the search time period was 2000-2014.
RESULTS: Shanghai was one of the first regions in China to implement UNHS, and its coverage rate was among the top regions by international comparison. The starting time of the UNHS program had no relationship with the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in the same year. Economic level serves as a threshold for carrying out UNHS but is not a linear contributor to the exact starting time of such a program. The screening coverage rate generally showed a rising trend with the increasing GDP per capita in China, but it had no relationship with the area\'s GDP per capita in selected regions and countries around the world. The system design of UNHS is the key factor influencing screening coverage. Policy makers, program administrators, and cost-sharing structures are important factors that influence the coverage rates of UNHS.
CONCLUSIONS: When to carry out a UNHS program is determined by the willingness and preference of the local government, which is influenced by the area\'s social, political and cultural conditions. Mandatory hearing screening and minimal-cost to no-cost intervention are two pillars for a good coverage rate of UNHS. In terms of system design, decision-making, implementation, funding and the concrete implementation plan are all important factors affecting the implementation of the UNHS.