Unilateral

单边
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    单侧双胎异位妊娠在自然妊娠中极为罕见,发病率仅为200,000-250,000人中有1人,对育龄妇女构成重大健康风险,甚至会导致危及生命的并发症.缺乏体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)周期后这种罕见疾病患病率的数据。
    我们介绍了一例51岁女性,在冷冻胚胎移植后进行双侧输卵管切除术后,出现罕见的单侧双胎异位妊娠,其次是文献综述。
    双胎异位妊娠是一种非常罕见的妊娠类型,需要高度怀疑才能及早诊断和治疗,以防止并发症和孕产妇死亡。
    UNASSIGNED: Unilateral twin ectopic pregnancy is extremely rare in natural pregnancy, with an incidence rate of only 1 in 200,000-2,500,000, represents a major health risk for reproductive-aged women, leading to even life-threatening complications. There is a lack of data on the prevalence of this rare disease after in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.
    UNASSIGNED: We present a case of a 51-year-old woman with rare unilateral twin ectopic pregnancy after frozen embryo transfer treated with bilateral salpingectomy, followed by a review of the literature.
    UNASSIGNED: Twin ectopic pregnancy is a very rare type of pregnancy that requires a high index of suspicion to diagnose and treat early to prevent complications and maternal death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:色素性静脉旁视网膜脉络膜萎缩(PPRCA)是一种罕见的眼底疾病,其特征是沿视网膜静脉分布的色素团块和视网膜脉络膜萎缩。我们报告了一例中国女性单侧PPRCA伴急性闭角型青光眼(AACG)。
    方法:一名50岁的中国女性出现视力下降和右眼眼压(IOP)升高,然后进行了小梁切除术。她转诊到我们的诊所进行进一步的评估和治疗。眼底镜检查显示视网膜脉络膜萎缩和视网膜静脉上的骨细胞样色素凝集病变以及右眼的乳头周围视网膜前出血。根据过去的急性发作病史,患者还在同一只眼睛中出现AACG,浅前房深度(ACD),超声生物显微镜(UBM)显示的狭窄角度和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)鉴定的青光眼神经病变。其他检查,如荧光素眼底血管造影(FFA),视网膜电图(ERG)和眼电图(EOG)均证实了上述诊断。
    结论:PPRCA是一种罕见的疾病,在女性中不常见,双眼对称。我们介绍了一例罕见的单侧PPRCA伴AACG病例。
    BACKGROUND: Pigmented paravenous retinochoroidal atrophy (PPRCA) is an uncommon fundus disease characterized by perivenous aggregations of pigment clumps and retinochoroidal atrophy distributed along the retinal veins. We report a Chinese female case of unilateral PPRCA with acute angle-closure glaucoma (AACG).
    METHODS: A 50-year-old Chinese female presented with vision loss and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in the right eye and then underwent trabeculectomy. She referred to our clinic for further evaluation and treatment. The funduscopic examination revealed grayish retinochoroidal atrophy and osteocyte-like pigment clumping lesions along the retinal veins and peripapillary preretinal hemorrhage in the right eye. The patient also presented with AACG in the same eye on the basis of past medical history of acute attack, shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD), narrow angle showed by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and glaucomatous neuropathy identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Other examinations like fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA), electroretinogram (ERG) and electrooculography (EOG) all confirmed the aforementioned diagnose.
    CONCLUSIONS: PPRCA is a rare disease, uncommon in females and symmetrical in both eyes. We present a rare case of unilateral PPRCA accompanied with AACG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价术前对侧椎间孔狭窄(CFS)程度与单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)后对侧根部症状发生率的相关性,并根据术前对侧椎间孔狭窄程度评估预防性减压的合适人选。
    方法:进行了一项综合队列研究,以调查单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)后对侧根部症状的发生率以及预防性减压的有效性。共有411名患者被纳入研究,所有这些人都符合纳入和排除标准,并在脊柱外科接受了手术,宁波市第六医院,2017年1月至2021年2月。该研究分为两组:回顾性队列研究A和前瞻性队列研究B。2017年1月至2019年1月纳入研究A的187例患者未接受预防性减压。根据术前对侧椎间孔狭窄程度分为4组:无狭窄组A1、轻度狭窄组A2、中度狭窄组A3、重度狭窄组A4。采用Spearman等级相关分析评价术前对侧孔狭窄程度与单侧TLIF术后对侧根部症状发生率的相关性。从2019年2月至2021年2月,将224例患者纳入前瞻性队列B组,根据术前对侧孔狭窄程度决定术中预防性减压。B1组采用预防性减压治疗重度椎间孔狭窄,B2组采用预防性减压治疗。基线数据,手术相关指标,对侧根部症状的发生率,临床疗效,成像结果,比较A4组和B1组的其他并发症。
    结果:411例患者全部完成手术,平均随访13.5±2.8个月。在回顾性研究中,四组患者基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后对侧根部症状的发生率逐渐增加,术前椎间孔狭窄程度与术后根部症状发生率呈微弱正相关(rs=0.304,P<0.001)。在前瞻性研究中,两组的基线数据无显著差异.A4组手术时间、术中出血量均少于B1组(P<0.05)。A4组的对侧根部症状发生率高于B1组(P=0.003)。然而,术后3个月,两组患者下肢VAS评分及ODI指数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。笼子位置无显著差异,椎间融合率,两组腰椎稳定性比较(P>0.05)。术后无切口感染发生。无椎弓根螺钉松动,位移,骨折,或在随访期间发生椎间融合器移位。
    结论:本研究发现术前对侧孔狭窄程度与单侧TLIF术后对侧根部症状的发生率之间存在弱正相关。术中预防性对侧减压可在一定程度上延长手术时间,增加术中出血量。然而,当对侧椎间孔狭窄达到严重水平时,建议在操作过程中进行预防性减压。该方法可在保证临床疗效的同时降低术后对侧根部症状的发生率。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between the degree of preoperative contralateral foraminal stenosis(CFS) and the incidence of contralateral root symptoms after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) and to evaluate the appropriate candidate of preventive decompression according to the degree of preoperative contralateral foraminal stenosis.
    METHODS: An ambispective cohort study was conducted to investigate the incidence of contralateral root symptoms after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and the effectiveness of preventive decompression. A total of 411 patients were included in the study, all of whom met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and underwent surgery at the Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo Sixth Hospital, between January 2017 and February 2021. The study was divided into two groups: retrospective cohort study A and prospective cohort study B. The 187 patients included in study A from January 2017 to January 2019 did not receive preventive decompression. They were divided into four groups based on the degree of preoperative contralateral intervertebral foramen stenosis: no stenosis group A1, mild stenosis group A2, moderate stenosis group A3, and severe stenosis group A4. A Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between the preoperative contralateral foramen stenosis degree and the incidence of contralateral root symptoms after unilateral TLIF. From February 2019 to February 2021, 224 patients were included in the prospective cohort group B. The decision to perform preventive decompression during the operation was based on the degree of preoperative contralateral foramen stenosis. Severe intervertebral foramen stenosis was treated with preventive decompression as group B1, while the rest were not treated with preventive decompression as group B2. The baseline data, surgical-related indicators, the incidence of contralateral root symptoms, clinical efficacy, imaging results, and other complications were compared between group A4 and group B1.
    RESULTS: All 411 patients completed the operation and were followed up for an average of 13.5 ± 2.8 months. In the retrospective study, there was no significant difference in baseline data among the four groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative contralateral root symptoms increased gradually, and a weak positive correlation was found between the degree of preoperative intervertebral foramen stenosis and the incidence of postoperative root symptoms (rs = 0.304, P < 0.001). In the prospective study, there was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups. The operation time and blood loss in group A4 were less than those in group B1 (P < 0.05). The incidence of contralateral root symptoms in group A4 was higher than that in group B1 (P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in leg VAS score and ODI index between the two groups at 3 months after the operation (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in cage position, intervertebral fusion rate, and lumbar stability between the two groups (P > 0.05). No incisional infection occurred after the operation. No pedicle screw loosening, displacement, fracture, or interbody fusion cage displacement occurred during follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found a weak positive correlation between the degree of preoperative contralateral foramen stenosis and the incidence of contralateral root symptoms after unilateral TLIF. Intraoperative preventive decompression of the contralateral side may prolong the operation time and increase intraoperative blood loss to some extent. However, when the contralateral intervertebral foramen stenosis reaches the severe level, it is recommended to perform preventive decompression during the operation. This approach can reduce the incidence of postoperative contralateral root symptoms while ensuring clinical efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    内镜下经腋窝甲状腺切除术是远程访问甲状腺切除术的常用方法。该方法通常使用无气方法,和一个长切口插入一个特殊的牵开器。此外,由于接近甲状腺对侧部分的问题,它被认为仅适用于单侧肺叶切除术。我们在这里描述,一例年轻女性使用内窥镜方法进行甲状腺全切除术。我们减少了通常需要的非充气4-6厘米切口,进入三个洞,并进行了单侧经腋窝甲状腺切除术;随访期间放射性碘摄取和甲状腺球蛋白水平证实了这一点。该方法在临床上是成功的,并导致最小的疤痕。需要更多的研究来优化这种有前途的技术。
    Endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomy is a common method for remote-access thyroidectomy. The approach typically uses a gasless method, and a long incision to insert a special retractor. In addition, it is considered only suitable for unilateral lobectomy because of problems accessing contralateral parts of the thyroid gland. We describe here, a case of a young woman who had a total thyroidectomy performed using an endoscopic approach. We reduced the non-inflated 4-6 cm incision that is usually required, into three holes, and performed unilateral transaxillary thyroidectomy; this was verified by radioactive iodine uptake and thyroglobulin levels during follow-up. The approach was clinically successful and resulted in minimal scarring. More studies are required to optimize this promising technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:放射性支架插入(RSI)广泛用于梗阻性肝门部胆管癌(HC)患者,以增加支架的通畅性和总生存期(OS)。然而,治疗HC患者的一个争议是确定是否使用单侧或双侧支架置入术.关于单侧和双侧RSI疗效的一般知识仍然缺乏。
    UNASSIGNED:评估HC患者单侧和双侧RSI的临床疗效和长期预后。
    UNASSIGNED:在2016年1月至2020年12月之间,所有在我们医院接受单侧和双侧RSI的HC患者均被选择用于本研究。我们比较了接受这两种手术的患者的治疗效果和长期预后。
    未经评估:总的来说,65例HC患者接受单侧(n=33)或双侧(n=32)RSI。技术(100%)和功能(97.0%与90.6%,p=0.584)两组之间的成功率。单侧和双侧组中有6例和9例患者发生支架再阻塞,分别(p=0.341)。单侧和双侧组的中位支架通畅率为214天和233天,分别(p=0.650)。单侧和双侧组的中位OS分别为240天和281天,分别(p=0.068)。最后,单侧组的总并发症发生率明显较低,与双边组相比(12.1%vs.34.4%,p=0.033)。
    UNASSIGNED:单侧和双侧RSI为HC患者提供了相当的临床疗效和长期预后。然而,单侧支架置入术显示出明显较低的并发症发生率.
    UNASSIGNED: Radioactive stent insertion (RSI) is widely used for patients with obstructive hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) to increase the stent patency and overall survival (OS). However, one controversy of treating HC patients is determining whether to use unilateral or bilateral stenting. General knowledge on unilateral and bilateral RSI efficacy is still lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and long-term prognoses of unilateral and bilateral RSI in HC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Between January 2016 and December 2020, all HC patients who received unilateral and bilateral RSI at our hospital were selected for this study. We compared the treatment efficacy and long-term prognosis of patients undergoing these two procedures.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 65 HC patients received either unilateral (n = 33) or bilateral (n = 32) RSI. There were no significant differences in the technical (both 100%) and functional (97.0% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.584) success rates between the 2 groups. Stent re-obstruction occurred in 6 and 9 patients in the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively (p = 0.341). Median stent patency was 214 and 233 days in the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively (p = 0.650). Median OS was 240 and 281 days in the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively (p = 0.068). Lastly, the total complication rate was significantly lower in the unilateral group, as compared to the bilateral group (12.1% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.033).
    UNASSIGNED: Unilateral and bilateral RSI provided comparable clinical efficacy and long-term prognoses of HC patients. However, unilateral stenting exhibited a markedly lower complication rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(UPKP)可有效缩短手术时间,水泥体积,与双侧椎体后凸成形术相比,骨水泥渗漏(CL)率。然而,没有设备可以帮助确定运行过程中的轨迹,特别是内倾角。评估新型导向装置(GD)用于UPKP治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体骨折(TLOVFs)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:从2019年1月至2021年5月,对31例诊断为单发TLOVF且接受UPKP的患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为两组:传统UPKP组(UPKP组,15例患者)和UPKP辅助GD(UPKP-GD组,16名患者)。术前人口统计,临床和放射学特征,手术程序细节,收集术后1天和12个月的临床和放射学结局.使用SPSS24.0进行统计分析。两组基线特征比较采用独立样本t检验或χ2检验。骨折椎骨的前高度或局部后凸角(LKA),视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,采用配对t检验比较各组间的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)。
    结果:共有31名患者(5名男性和26名女性;年龄范围:58-90岁)完成了完整的术后12个月随访计划。在性别方面,治疗组之间没有观察到显著差异,年龄,身体质量指数,术前骨密度,或手术水平。与UPKP组相比,UPKP-GD组手术时间明显缩短(40.8±5.5minvs.48.5±8.5min,p=0.005),UPKP-GD组术中透视次数明显减少(20.6±4.5vs.25.2±2.4,p=0.001)。UPKP-GD组中有5例(31.3%)患者和UPKP组中有4例(26.7%)患者患有骨CL。VAS和ODI分数,两组患者术后椎体前高度和LKA均有明显改善。术后VAS和ODI评分无显著差异,前高度或LKA骨折的椎骨,观察两组间注射水泥或CL的体积.
    结论:对于患有TLFs的患者,使用新型GD进行单侧穿刺是一种安全有效的技术,使用新型GD辅助的UPKP具有更少的术中透视时间和更短的手术时间。
    OBJECTIVE: Unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (UPKP) has been effective in reducing the operative time, cement volume, and cement leakage (CL) rate compared with bilateral kyphoplasty. However, no device can help to determine the trajectory during operation, especially the inner inclination angle. To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel guide device (GD) for UPKP in the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures (TLOVFs).
    METHODS: From January 2019 to May 2021, 31 patients diagnosed with single TLOVF who underwent UPKP were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: traditional UPKP (UPKP group, 15 patients) and UPKP assisted with GD (UPKP-GD group, 16 patients). Pre-procedure demographic, clinical and radiologic characteristics, operative procedure details, and clinical and radiologic outcomes at 1 day and 12 months post-procedure were collected. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 24.0. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared by the independent sample t test or the χ2 test. The anterior height or local kyphotic angle (LKA) of the fractured vertebrae, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) within groups were compared using the paired t test.
    RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (five men and 26 women; age range: 58-90 years) completed the full 12-month postoperative follow-up schedule. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups with respect to sex, age, body mass index, preoperative bone mineral density, or surgical level. Compared with the UPKP group, the operation time in the UPKP-GD group was significantly shorter (40.8 ± 5.5 min vs. 48.5 ± 8.5 min, p = 0.005), and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy times in the UPKP-GD group was significantly decreased (20.6 ± 4.5 vs. 25.2 ± 2.4, p = 0.001). Five (31.3%) patients in the UPKP-GD group and four (26.7%) patients in the UPKP group had bone CL. The VAS and ODI scores, anterior height and LKA of the fractured vertebrae were significantly improved after surgery in each group. No significant differences in postoperative VAS and ODI scores, anterior height or LKA of the fractured vertebrae, volume of injected cement or CL were observed between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral puncture using a novel GD is a safe and effective technique for patients with TLFs and UPKP assisted with a novel GD is associated with fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times and shorter operation time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    有2年无症状史的男孩,涉及躯干右侧和右上肢的线性色素斑。RCM显示真皮乳头状环被破坏,许多具有高屈光值的不规则颗粒结构分布在真皮浅层。RCM特征暗示了界面皮炎的可能性。RCM是线性色素性黄斑的补充诊断工具。
    A boy with a 2-year history of asymptomatic, linear pigmented macules involving the right side of the trunk and right upper limb. RCM revealed the dermal papillary rings were destroyed, and numerous irregular particulate structures with high refractive values were distributed in the superficial dermis. The RCM features implied the possibility of interface dermatitis. RCM was a complementary diagnostic tool for linear pigmented macules.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:回顾性研究。
    UNASSIGNED:在需要单方面与双侧椎弓根椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)。临床研究很少比较多水平PVP的两种方法。本研究旨在使用两种OVCF方法评估多级PVP的临床和影像学结果。
    UNASSIGNED:纳入了78例接受多水平PVP的OVCFs患者,其中36例接受单侧PVP,42例接受双侧PVP。临床和放射学评估,包括视觉模拟评分(VAS),矢状和冠状节段Cobb,椎体压缩率(VCR),术前和术后评估椎侧比率(VSR)。
    UNASSIGNED:所有患者都获得了至少2年的随访。共纳入164个骨折椎骨。关于临床疗效,两组患者术后VAS评分均有改善,但两组无显著差异.矢状节段Cobb的变化趋势,VSR,术后VCR相似,组间差异无统计学意义。至于日冕节段科布角,单侧和双侧组的患者在至少2年的随访时间内显示有5.0°±4.0°和2.6°±2.2°的矫正损失,分别。单侧组的冠状节段Cobb矫正损失明显大于双侧组。
    UNASSIGNED:多水平单侧和双侧椎弓根PVP均实现了显着的疼痛减轻和椎体高度恢复。此外,双侧PVP在稳定OVCFs患者的冠状Cobb角方面显示出优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective study.
    UNASSIGNED: Controversy exists over the need for unilateral vs. bilateral pedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Clinical research is scarce comparing two approaches for multi-level PVP. This study aimed at evaluating the clinical and radiographic outcomes of multi-level PVP using two approaches for OVCFs.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-eight patients with OVCFs undergoing multi-level PVP were enrolled including 36 patients undergoing unilateral PVP and 42 undergoing bilateral PVP. The clinical and radiological assessments including the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), sagittal and coronal segmental Cobb, vertebral compression ratio (VCR), and vertebral sides ratio (VSR) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients achieved a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 164 fractured vertebrae were enrolled. Regarding clinical efficacy, the VAS score improved in both groups after surgery, but the two groups did not differ significantly. The changes tendency in Sagittal Segmental Cobb, VSR, and VCR were similar postoperatively, and no statistically significant difference between groups. As for the Coronal Segmental Cobb angle, patients in unilateral and bilateral groups were shown to have 5.0° ± 4.0° and 2.6° ± 2.2° degrees loss of correction at a minimum 2-years follow-up duration, respectively. The loss of correction in the Coronal Segmental Cobb of unilateral group was significantly greater than that of bilateral group.
    UNASSIGNED: Both multi-level unilateral and bilateral pedicular PVP achieved significant pain reduction and vertebral height restoration. Moreover, the bilateral PVP has shown advantages in stabilizing Coronal Cobb angle in patients with OVCFs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本荟萃分析旨在探讨单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定(UPSF)与双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定(BPSF)在腰椎退行性疾病经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)中是否具有可比性。
    方法:截至2022年9月,建立了包括PubMed、WebofScience,EMBASE,对Cochrane图书馆进行了系统搜索。包括以英文发表的随机对照试验(RCTs),比较了UPSF与BPSF在TLIF中的疗效。对方法学质量进行了评价,提取了相关数据,并进行了适当的荟萃分析。融合率数据,并发症,笼子迁移,视觉模拟量表(VAS),和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),总失血量(TBL),操作时间,提取并分析住院时间。计算了结果的平均差异和风险比(RR)以及95%置信区间(95%CI)。
    结果:我们的meta分析包括10个RCT,包括614个患者(UPSF=294,BPSF=320)。融合率没有显著差异,VAS(VAS-BP和VAS-LP),ODI,并发症,UPSF组和BPSF组之间的住院时间或住院时间(分别为P>0.05)。UPSF组明显具有失血少的优势(SMD=-2.99,95%CI[-4.54,-1.45],P=0.0001)和手术时间(SMD=-2.05,95%CI[-3.10,-1.00],P=0.0001)。然而,UPSF比BPSF增加了笼子的迁移(10.7%对4.8%,RR=2.23,95%CI[1.07,4.65],P=0.03)。
    结论:根据本荟萃分析的结果,UPSF在TLIF中与BPSF一样有效,可以减少失血量和手术时间。然而,UPSF可能导致比BPSF更多的笼迁移。
    This meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) is comparable to bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Up to September 2022, established electronic literature databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English that compared the efficacy of UPSF versus BPSF in TLIF were included. The methodological quality was evaluated, relevant data was extracted, and suitable meta-analysis was carried out. Data of fusion rate, complications, cage migration, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), total blood loss (TBL), operation time, and hospital stay were extracted and analyzed. Pooled mean differences and risk ratio (RR) along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the results.
    Ten RCTs including 614 patients (UPSF = 294, BPSF = 320) were included in our meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in terms of fusion rate, VAS (VAS-BP and VAS-LP), ODI, complications, or hospital stay between UPSF and BPSF groups (P > 0.05, respectively). The UPSF group clearly had the advantage of less blood loss (SMD = -2.99, 95% CI [-4.54, -1.45], P = 0.0001) and operation time (SMD = -2.05, 95% CI [-3.10, -1.00], P = 0.0001). However, UPSF increased cage migration more than BPSF (10.7% vs 4.8%, RR = 2.23, 95% CI [1.07, 4.65],  P = 0.03).
    According to the findings of this meta-analysis, UPSF is just as effective as BPSF in TLIF and may reduce blood loss and operation time. Nevertheless, UPSF may result in more cage migration than BPSF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)可以通过经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗。与传统的PKP相比,新型可偏转经皮椎体后凸成形术(DPKP),是一种单侧经椎弓根入路手术,允许类似的双侧穿刺效果,这归因于可偏转的弯曲骨扩张器产生跨中心线腔,以实现水泥的均匀分布和生物力学平衡,同时减少手术时间和辐射暴露。
    目的:本研究的目的是前瞻性地比较和评估一种创新的外科手术,DPKP,与常规双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(BPKP)相比。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)。
    方法:在2019年5月至2020年10月期间,所有患有OVCF的参与者(n=90)通过SAS9.3进行随机分组,以生成区组随机序列。它被用来以1:1的比例随机分组,分配到DPKP组(n=45)和BPKP组(n=45)进行相应的程序。
    方法:主要结果是总手术时间。次要结果包括:视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的比较评估,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),后凸角度(KA),受伤椎骨的前缘高度(AH),术中X射线透视的频率,注射量,骨水泥的分布规律和渗漏率。
    方法:所有受试者都接受了至少一位资深骨科医生和放射科医生的VAS评分评估,ODI,KA,受伤的椎骨,总手术时间,注射量,分布模式,术前和24小时骨水泥渗漏率,6个月,术后1年。这项前瞻性研究的纳入标准如下:(1)60岁<80岁;(2)术前脊柱X线,CT,MRI证实为单节段,新鲜胸腰椎OVCF(T5-L5,15%<塌陷<80%);MRI在T1-WI上显示低信号,在T2-WI上显示高信号,特别是具有以椎体水肿为特征的STIR高信号;(3)难以治疗的疼痛性OVCFs,2周<症状持续时间<3个月;(4)具有明显的局部压痛体征;(5)骨密度(BMD)T评分<-2.5。
    结果:DPKP组的总手术时间显着减少(43.3±19.58分钟,95%CI:37.23-49.37)与BPKP组(55.16±11.56分钟,95%CI:51.78-58.54)(p<0.001)。与BPKP组相比(术中X线透视频率:43.42±8.64,95%CI:40.90-45.95;骨水泥注入量:5.56±0.85ml,95%CI:5.31-5.81),术中X线透视频率(30.05±17.41,95%CI:24.66-35.45)和骨水泥注射量(5.08±0.97ml,95%CI:4.78-5.38)与DPKP组相比显著降低(p<0.001)。此外,与术前相比,两组患者术后VAS评分均有显著改善,ODI,KA,和AH(p<0.001),但DPKP组和BPKP组之间在任何时间点都没有统计学差异(p>0.05)。有趣的是,虽然没有统计学差异,在DPKP组中观察到较低的骨水泥渗漏率趋势。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,创新的DPKP在缓解疼痛方面与BPKP一样安全有效,提高患者的生活质量,重建椎体高度。特别是,与BPKP相比,DPKP确实减少了手术时间和辐射暴露,这与单边和双边暴露程序相关。此外,在DPKP中,最终的水泥分布是不可预测的,需要进一步的研究来阐明DPKP与常规单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(UPKP)和BPKP的优势。
    BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) can be treated with percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). In contrast to conventional PKP, the novel deflectable percutaneous kyphoplasty (DPKP), is a unilateral transpedicular approach procedure allowing a similar bilateral puncture effect, which owes to the deflectable curved bone expander creating a transcentral line cavity to achieve uniform distribution of cement and biomechanical balance while reducing operative time and radiation exposure.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare and evaluate an innovative surgical procedure, DPKP, versus conventional bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (BPKP).
    METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT).
    METHODS: The totality of the participants (n=90) suffering from OVCFs between May 2019 and October 2020, were randomized by SAS 9.3 to generate a block randomization sequence, which was utilized to randomize the groups in a 1:1 ratio, assigned to the DPKP group (n=45) and the BPKP group (n=45) to undergo accordingly procedures.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was the total operative time. The secondary outcomes included: comparative assessment of visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), kyphosis angle (KA), anterior border height (AH) of the injured vertebra, frequency of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy, the injection volume, distribution pattern and leakage rate of bone cement.
    METHODS: All subjects underwent assessment by at least one senior orthopedist and radiologist for the VAS scores, ODI, KA, AH of the injured vertebra, total operative time, the injection volume, distribution pattern, leakage rate of bone cement at preoperative and 24 hours, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Inclusion criteria for subjects in this prospective study were as follows: (1) 60 < age < 80 years old; (2) preoperative spinal X-ray, CT, and MRI confirmed as single-segment, fresh thoracolumbar OVCFs (T5-L5, 15% < collapse < 80%); MRI shows low signal on T1-WI and high signal on T2-WI, especially with STIR high signal characterized by vertebral edema; (3) painful OVCFs refractory to medical treatment, 2 weeks < Symptom duration < 3 months;(4) With significant physical signs of local tenderness; (5) T score of bone mineral density (BMD) < -2.5.
    RESULTS: The total operative time was significantly reduced in the DPKP group (43.3±19.58 minutes, 95% CI: 37.23-49.37) compared to the BPKP group (55.16±11.56 minutes, 95% CI: 51.78-58.54) (p<.001). Compared to the BPKP group (frequency of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy: 43.42±8.64, 95% CI: 40.90-45.95; the volume of bone cement injected: 5.56±0.85 mL, 95% CI: 5.31-5.81), the frequency of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy (30.05±17.41, 95% CI: 24.66-35.45) and volume of bone cement injected (5.08±0.97 mL, 95% CI: 4.78-5.38) significantly reduced in the DPKP group compared to the (p<.001). In addition, compared to the preoperative period, both groups showed significant improvements in the postoperative VAS scores, ODI, KA, and AH (p<.001), but there was no statistical difference between the DPKP and BPKP groups (p>.05) at any time-point. Interestingly, although without statistical differences, a tendency towards a lower rate of bone cement leakage was observed in the DPKP group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study results indicate that the innovative DPKP is as safe and effective as BPKP in relieving pain, improving the patient\'s quality of life, and reconstructing vertebral body height. Particularly, DPKP did reduce operative time and radiation exposure compared to BPKP, which correlated with unilateral and bilateral exposure procedures. Moreover, the final cement distribution was less predictable in DPKP, and further studies are warranted to clarify the advantages of DPKP versus conventional unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (UPKP) and BPKP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号