BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears are among the most common shoulder injuries and can be a source of persistent pain, disability, and decreased range of motion and strength. Our hypothesis was to conduct a meta-analysis of recently published studies to compare the clinical results of a double-row technique with the results of a single-row technique for different tear sizes.
METHODS: A search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid databases. All randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials that reported the outcome of single-row repair and double-row repair techniques were included in our meta-analysis. Two subgroups were set according to the tear size. The outcomes were the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, UCLA score, re-tear rate, range of motion, and muscle strength.
RESULTS: We included 9 studies in this meta-analysis, 5 of which were randomized prospective studies. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of double-row repair for the overall ASES score, re-tear rate, and internal rotation range of motion. In subgroup 2 (tear size > 30 mm in the anteroposterior dimension), double-row techniques produced better outcomes than single-row techniques. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall Constant score, UCLA score, external rotation and forward elevation range of motion, or muscle strength.
CONCLUSIONS: Double-row rotator cuff repair techniques have a significantly lower re-tear rate, higher ASES score, and greater range of motion of internal rotation compared with single-row repair techniques. Especially in those rotator cuff tears with a size >30 mm, the double-row technique is recommended for repair.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether radiofrequency based plasma microtenotomy has a positive effective in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome with cuff tendinosis.
METHODS: Eighty patients with impingement syndrome and cuff tendinosis that were treated arthroscopically were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) alone (ASD group, n = 40) or arthroscopic subacromial decompression combined with radiofrequency (RF) based plasma microtenotomy (RF group, n = 40). Clinical outcome data including VAS pain score, shoulder range of motion (ROM), ASES, UCLA, Constant-Murley, and SST score were recorded preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Sixty-five out of eighty patients (81.3%) were available for the final follow-up at 1 year postoperation. There were 32 patients in the ASD group and 33 in the RF group. Both treatment groups showed significantly (P = .031 in the ASD group vs P = .017 in the RF group) reduced pain 3 weeks postoperatively. Both treatment groups showed significantly improved functional scores 3 months postoperatively. Both treatment groups showed significantly improved flexion elevation (FE) and external rotation (ER) 1 year postoperatively and internal rotation (IR) 6 months postoperatively. No significant difference between the 2 groups was found in any of the outcome measurements at any time point postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic subacromial decompression is a reliable treatment for refractory impingement syndrome. The additional radiofrequency based plasma microtenotomy did not show any significant positive effects regarding pain relief, ROM, or functional recovery.