TAPP

TAPP
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    嵌顿和绞窄腹股沟疝的最佳手术方法存在争议。回顾性研究表明,通过下腹部正中切口或腹腔镜手术入路优于腹股沟斜切口,分别。经腹腹腔镜入路是否优于下腹正中切口入路尚需前瞻性研究。2018年1月至2022年6月金山医院急诊手术的腹股沟嵌顿疝和绞窄疝患者的前瞻性对比研究。根据手术方式的不同分为两组。开放式腹膜前修补术组(OPR)通过下腹部正中切口手术。腹腔镜腹膜前修补术组(TAPP)在经腹腹腔镜下完成。对比分析两组患者围手术期并发症及远期效果。82例患者符合纳入标准,OPR组40,TAPP组42。两组基线资料具有可比性。两组13例(15.9%)均行肠切除吻合术。70例(90.2%)行一期网片修复,其中5例腹膜前疝修补术为肠切除术后。TAPP组手术时间平均延长13min(60.7±13.7minvs47.8±19.8min,P<0.001),术后24h视觉模拟疼痛评分(3.5±1.2vs4.4±1.7,P=0.019)低于OPR组。OPR组膀胱损伤1例(2.5%),TAPP组腹下动脉损伤1例(2.4%)。两组之间的一期疝修补术的发生率没有差异。在OPR组中,2例(5%)延长切口超过2cm,而在TAPP组,1例(2.4%)中转开腹。住院时间(3.2±1.8dvs4.3±2.7d,P=0.036),恢复正常活动(7.9±2.7dvs11.0±4.4d,TAPP组P<0.001)较短。包括慢性疼痛在内的术后总并发症的发生率,手术部位感染,血清肿,TAPP组疝复发率为11.9%,与OPR组的25%无显著差异(P=0.212)。两组30天内均无网状物感染和死亡病例。TAPP用于急性腹股沟嵌顿疝手术是安全可行的。TAPP对适当的嵌顿/绞窄腹股沟疝患者比开放腹膜前修补术有更好的舒适度和更快的恢复。可以减轻急性疼痛,缩短住院时间,早日恢复正常活动。
    The optimal surgical approach of incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia is controversial. Retrospective studies showed that surgical approaches through lower abdominal median incision or laparoscopic are superior to the oblique inguinal incision, respectively. Whether transabdominal laparoscopic approach is superior to the lower abdominal median incision approach needs prospective research.Prospective comparative study of patients with incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia admitted to Jinshan hospital for emergency surgery from January 2018 to June 2022. They were divided into two groups according to different surgical approach. The open preperitoneal repair group (OPR) was operated through the lower abdominal median incision. Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair group (TAPP) was completed under transabdominal laparoscope. The perioperative complications and long-term results of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, 40 in OPR group and 42 in TAPP group. Baseline data of the two groups were comparable. Thirteen cases (15.9%) of the two groups underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis. Seventy cases (90.2%) underwent the 1st stage mesh repair, including 5 cases of preperitoneal hernioplasty after intestinal resection. The average operation time of TAPP group was 13 min longer (60.7 ± 13.7 min vs 47.8 ± 19.8 min P < 0.001), and the visual analogue scale pain score at 24 h after operation was lower (3.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.4 ± 1.7 P = 0.019) than that of OPR group. There was 1 case of bladder injury (2.5%) in OPR group and 1 case of inferior abdominal artery injury (2.4%) in TAPP group. There was no difference in the rate of the 1st stage hernioplasty between the two groups. In OPR group, 2 cases (5%) extended the incision for more than 2 cm, while in TAPP group, 1 case (2.4%) converted to laparotomy. The time of hospital stay (3.2 ± 1.8 d vs 4.3 ± 2.7 d, P = 0.036) and return to normal activities (7.9 ± 2.7 d vs 11.0 ± 4.4 d, P < 0.001) were shorter in TAPP group. The rate of total postoperative complications including chronic pain, surgical-site infection, seroma, hernia recurrence and so on was 11.9% in TAPP group, which was not significantly different from 25% in OPR group (P = 0.212). There were no cases of mesh related infection and death within 30 days in both groups.TAPP is safe and feasible for the operation of acute incarcerated inguinal hernia. TAPP had better comfort and faster recovery over open preperitoneal repair for the appropriate patients with incarcerated/strangulated inguinal hernia, which can reduce acute pain, shorten hospital stay and return to normal activities earlier.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨3D腹腔镜在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝(TAPP)手术老年患者中的安全性和有效性。根据手术期间使用的腹腔镜设备将患者分为两组。术前临床数据,术中,收集和术后资料进行统计分析。从2020年1月到2023年8月,这项研究共评估了127例原发性单侧腹股沟疝患者。3DTAPP组中61和2DTAPP组中66。基线数据差异无统计学意义,包括平均年龄,性别分布,BMI指数,疝类型,疝缺损的大小和位置,合并症,两组抗凝药物使用情况比较(P>0.05)。在操作指标方面,3D组平均手术时间较短(51.61±7.16minvs.78.59±13.51分钟,P<0.001),平均网格放置时间(6.07±1.40minvs.9.77±1.21分钟,P<0.001),和平均腹膜缝合时间(7.34±1.85minvs.9.73±1.32min,P<0.001)与2D组相比。然而,平均失血量没有统计学上的显著差异,术后疼痛评分,术后住院时间,两组住院总费用比较(P>0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者手术期间均未出现头晕、恶心等不良反应。三维腹腔镜在TAPP手术中提供高清晰度,三维手术图像,降低操作难度,有效缩短操作时间。
    This study aims to explore the safety and efficacy of 3D laparoscopy in elderly patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) surgery for inguinal hernia. Patients were divided into two groups based on the laparoscopic equipment used during surgery. Clinical data preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. From January 2020 to August 2023, a total of 127 patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were evaluated in this study, 61 in the 3D TAPP group and 66 in the 2D TAPP group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data, including average age, gender distribution, BMI index, hernia type, hernia defect size and location, comorbidities, and usage of anticoagulant drugs between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of operative indicators, the 3D group showed shorter mean operation time (51.61 ± 7.16 min vs. 78.59 ± 13.51 min, P < 0.001), mean mesh placement time (6.07 ± 1.40 min vs. 9.77 ± 1.21 min, P < 0.001), and mean peritoneal suture time (7.34 ± 1.85 min vs. 9.73 ± 1.32 min, P < 0.001) compared to the 2D group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in mean blood loss, postoperative pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, and total hospital costs between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). No adverse reactions such as dizziness or nausea were reported by surgeons during the procedures in either group. Three-dimensional laparoscopy in TAPP surgery provides high-definition, three-dimensional surgical images, reducing the difficulty of operations and effectively shortening the operation time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨超微型器械在腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝修补术中的可行性。这项回顾性研究包括从2020年1月至2021年12月接受择期手术的83例腹股沟斜疝患者。将所有患者分为传统腹腔镜组和超微型腹腔镜组。操作时间的数据,失血,通风时间,住院,并发症,收集并比较两组患者术后疼痛程度。在这83名患者中,25人被分配到使用超微型仪器的超微型组,而58人被分配到传统组。传统组平均手术时间(57.07min)低于超微组(69.60min)p<0.05,超微组住院时间(2天)短于传统组(3天)p<0.05。超微组6h疼痛明显减轻,1天,术后2天(2、1、0分)与传统组(4、2、1分)比拟p<0.05。失血量无显著差异,通风时间,或两组之间的并发症。使用超微仪器是安全可行的。与传统腹腔镜器械相比,患者术后疼痛少,切口小。值得临床推广。
    This study aimed to explore the feasibility of ultra-micro instruments in the laparoscopic repair of inguinal indirect hernia. This retrospective study included 83 patients with an indirect inguinal hernia who underwent elective surgery from January 2020 to December 2021. All patients were divided into the traditional laparoscopic group and ultra-micro laparoscopic group. The data on operation time, blood loss, ventilation time, hospital stays, complication, postoperative pain degree was collected and compared between the two groups. Of these 83 patients, 25 assigned to the ultra-micro group used ultra-micro instruments while 58 were assigned to the traditional group. The traditional group had a lower mean operation time (57.07 min) than the ultra-micro group (69.60 min) p < 0.05, while ultra-micro group patients had a shorter hospital stay (2 days) than the traditional group (3 days) p < 0.05. The ultra-micro group experienced significantly less pain for 6 h, 1 day, and 2 days postoperatively (2, 1, 0 points) compared to the traditional group (4, 2, 1 points) p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in blood loss, ventilation time, or complication between the two groups. Using ultra-micro instruments is safe and feasible. Patients have less postoperative pain and a smaller incision than the traditional laparoscopic instrument. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管已经有许多关于单切口腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(SIL-IHR)的研究,在大型单一机构接受单切口腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(SIL-TAPP)的患者中,短期和长期结局的报道很少.这项研究的目的是评估SIL-TAPP的短期和长期结果及其在大型单一机构患者中的安全性和可行性。
    方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2022年10月南通大学附属医院966例SIL-TAPP患者的1,054例手术详情。使用常规腹腔镜器械完全通过脐部进行SIL-TAPP。通过门诊和电话随访收集SIL-TAPP的短期和长期结果。此外,我们进一步比较了手术时间,术后住院时间,单纯性和复杂性单侧腹股沟疝患者的术后并发症。
    结果:共对878例单侧腹股沟疝和88例双侧腹股沟疝进行了1,054例手术。总的来说,有803例(76.2%)间接腹股沟疝,192例(18.2%)腹股沟直疝,51例(4.8%)股疝和8例(0.8%)合并疝。单侧腹股沟疝的平均手术时间为35.5±17.0分钟,双侧腹股沟疝的平均手术时间为51.9±25.5分钟。有1例(0.1%)转换为双切口腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术。术中没有出血,发生腹壁下血管损伤或神经损伤。术后并发症较小,无需手术干预即可解决。平均住院时间为1.3±0.8天。中位随访时间为44个月,没有发生套管针疝,有1例(0.1%)复发。复杂腹股沟疝组手术时间明显高于单纯腹股沟疝组(38.9±22.3vs.35.0±15.6,p=0.025)。复杂性腹股沟疝组术后住院时间和并发症发生率略高于单纯腹股沟疝组,但差异无统计学意义。
    结论:SIL-TAPP是安全和技术上可行的,短期和长期结果都是可以接受的。
    Although there have been numerous studies on single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (SIL-IHR), the short- and long-term outcomes in patients from a large single institution who underwent single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TAPP) have rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of SIL-TAPP and its safety and feasibility in patients from a large single institution.
    The details of 1,054 procedures in 966 patients who underwent SIL-TAPP at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from January 2015 to October 2022 were retrospectively analysed. SIL-TAPP was performed completely through the umbilicus using conventional laparoscopic instruments. Short-term and long-term outcomes of SIL-TAPP were collected by outpatient and telephone follow-ups. In addition, we further compared the operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications of patients with simple and complicated unilateral inguinal hernias.
    A total of 1,054 procedures were performed for 878 unilateral inguinal hernias and 88 bilateral inguinal hernias. In total, there were 803 (76.2%) indirect inguinal hernias, 192 (18.2%) direct inguinal hernias, 51 (4.8%) femoral hernias and 8 (0.8%) combined hernias. The mean operative time was 35.5 ± 17.0 min for unilateral inguinal hernias and 51.9 ± 25.5 min for bilateral inguinal hernias. There was one (0.1%) conversion to two-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty. No intraoperative haemorrhages, inferior epigastric vessel injury or nerve damage occurred. Postoperative complications were minor and could be resolved without surgical intervention. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 ± 0.8 days. The median follow-up was 44 months, no trocar hernia occurred, and there was one (0.1%) recurrence. The operation time in the complicated inguinal hernia group was significantly higher than that in the simple inguinal hernia group (38.9 ± 22.3 vs. 35.0 ± 15.6, p = 0.025). The length of postoperative hospital stay and complication rate of the complicated inguinal hernia group were slightly higher than those of the simple inguinal hernia group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
    SIL-TAPP is safe and technically feasible, and both short- and long-term outcomes are acceptable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:分析比较经脐单孔腹腔镜TAPP(SILS-TAPP)与传统腹腔镜TAPP(CL-TAPP)治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效。
    方法:自2019年1月至2021年6月,在南通大学附属医院普外科接受SILS-TAPP和CL-TAPP治疗的221例老年腹股沟疝患者。围手术期指标,对比两组患者术后并发症及随访情况,探讨SILS-TAPP治疗老年腹股沟疝的可行性及优越性。
    结果:两组之间的人口统计学特征没有差异。SILS-TAPP组的平均手术时间(28.6±4.2minvs28.2±5.3min)与CL-TAPP组的平均手术时间(P=0.623)无明显差异。医院费用没有显著增加(P=0.748)。术中出血量(7.4±3.4ml),术后当天VAS评分(2.2±0.7),SILS-TAPP组的平均恢复活动时间(8.2±1.9h)和术后平均住院时间(0.8±0.2d)均优于CL-TAPP组(P<0。05).两组患者术中(P=0.128)和术后并发症(P=0.125)的总发生率无统计学差异。
    结论:单切口腹腔镜手术TAPP(SILS-TAPP)在老年患者中是可行和有效的,为可以耐受全身麻醉的患者提供了一种新的替代手术方法。
    BACKGROUND: To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP(SILS-TAPP) and conventional laparoscopic TAPP(CL-TAPP) in the treatment of senile inguinal hernia.
    METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2021, a total of 221 elderly patients (≥60 years old) with inguinal hernia received SILS-TAPP and CL-TAPP in General Surgery Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. The perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and follow-up of the two groups were compared to explore the feasibility and superiority of SILS-TAPP in the treatment of inguinal hernia in the elderly.
    RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. The mean operation time (28.6 ± 4.2 min vs 28.2 ± 5.3 min) in the SILS-TAPP group was not significantly different from that in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ = 0.623), and there was no significant increase in hospital costs(Ρ = 0.748). The intraoperative blood loss (7.4 ± 3.4 ml), VAS score on the postoperative day (2.2 ± 0.7), mean time of resuming activity (8.2 ± 1.9 h) and mean postoperative hospital stay (0.8 ± 0.2 d) in the SILS-TAPP group were better than those in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ < 0. 05).There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of intraoperative (Ρ = 0.128) and postoperative complications (Ρ = 0.125) between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP (SILS-TAPP) is feasible and effective in elderly patients, providing a new alternative surgical method for patients who can tolerate general anesthesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)中疝囊横切术是否影响血清肿的发生,探讨血清肿的危险因素。
    方法:总共,回顾性纳入2020年1月至2021年6月在青岛大学附属医院行TAPP修补术的330例男性腹股沟斜疝患者。根据术中疝囊治疗,患者被分为完全缩小囊组和横切囊组。
    结果:在330例腹股沟疝男性患者中,240例接受疝囊减少术,90例接受疝囊横切术。54名病人出现血清肿,发病率为16.4%。对于疝缺损≥3cm并延伸到阴囊的患者,两个治疗组之间血清肿发生率的差异接近显著性(P=0.052).血清肿的危险因素,高体重指数,疝囊≥3cm,疝向阴囊的延伸和手术时间与术后血清肿显著相关.
    结论:本研究显示TAPP后血清肿的发生率高达16.4%。对于疝气囊太大并向下延伸到阴囊的患者,横切疝囊可能优于完全解剖,对于高体重指数的患者应采取预防措施,疝囊测量≥3厘米,疝气延伸到阴囊的风险很高。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) affects the occurrence of seroma, and to explore the risk factors for seroma.
    METHODS: In total, 330 consecutive male patients with indirect inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP repair at the Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. According to the intraoperative hernia sac treatment, patients were divided into a completely reduced sac group and a transected sac group.
    RESULTS: Among the 330 inguinal hernia male patients, 240 received hernia sac reduction and 90 received hernia sac transection. Fifty-four patients developed seroma, with an incidence of 16.4%. In patients with a hernia defect measuring ≥3 cm and extension into the scrotum, the difference in the incidence of seroma between the two treatment groups approached significance (P = 0.052). The risk factors for seroma, high body mass index, hernia sac ≥3 cm, extension of the hernia into the scrotum and operation time were significantly associated with postoperative seroma.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the incidence of seroma after TAPP was as high as 16.4%. For patients with a hernia sac that is too large and descended extends into the scrotum, transection may be better than complete dissection of the hernia sac and preventive measures should be taken for patients with high body mass index, hernia sac measuring ≥3 cm, and a high risk of the hernia extending into the scrotum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨腹腔镜间接疝修补术后减少血清肿形成的最佳方法。我们注意到,腹腔镜网状疝修补术中的内环缺损闭合术可以提供有希望的结果,并能减少血清肿的形成。我们介绍我们的闭包技术并报告我们的经验。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究于2019年5月至2021年5月进行。招募欧洲疝学会L3级间接疝或阴囊疝患者,并接受腹腔镜经腹补片成形术(TAPP)。在展开网状物之前进行疝缺损闭合。主要结果是血清肿形成,术后疼痛,和疝气复发。记录围手术期数据和术后并发症。
    结果:在两个地区三级医院连续招募了77例89例间接性疝(包括51例阴囊疝)患者。所有操作均成功,没有开放式转换。疝缺损的平均大小为3.7±0.5cm(范围,2.5-5.0厘米)。每次疝修补术(腹膜至腹膜)的平均手术时间为48.3±10.8分钟(范围,33-72分钟),内环闭合所需的平均时间为6.7±2.2分钟(范围,4-10分钟)。术中出血极少。术后第一天休息时的平均视觉模拟疼痛评分为2.2(范围,1-4).术后平均住院时间为18h(范围,14-46小时)。在平均9.4个月的随访期内(范围,3-23个月),无疝气复发或慢性疼痛.术后第7天在单侧疝的六侧检测到血清瘤形成(6.7%),平均体积为45.8ml(范围,24-80毫升)。所有血清均为轻度,并在3个月内自发消退。不需要疏散或其他治疗,对最终结果没有重大影响。
    结论:腹腔镜下网状疝修补术治疗大型间接疝是安全可行的,可显著减少术后血清肿形成及相关并发症。这种方法在大型间接或阴囊疝修补术中推荐。
    OBJECTIVE: The best way to reduce seroma formation after laparoscopic indirect hernia repair is debated. We noticed that internal ring defect closure in laparoscopic mesh hernioplasty could provide promising outcomes with an effect on diminishing seroma formation. We introduce our closure technique and report our experience.
    METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May 2019 to May 2021. Patients with European Hernia Society classification L3 indirect or scrotal hernia were recruited and underwent laparoscopic transabdominal patch plasty (TAPP). Hernia defect closure was performed before mesh deployment. The primary outcomes were seroma formation, postoperative pain, and hernia recurrence. Perioperative data and postoperative complications were also recorded.
    RESULTS: Consecutive 77 patients with 89 indirect hernias (including 51 scrotal hernias) were recruited in two regional tertiary hospitals. All operations were successful without open conversion. The mean size of the hernia defect was 3.7 ± 0.5 cm (range, 2.5-5.0 cm). The mean operative time for each hernia repair (peritoneum to peritoneum) was 48.3 ± 10.8 min (range, 33-72 min), and the mean time required for internal ring closure was 6.7 ± 2.2 min (range, 4-10 min). Intraoperative bleeding was minimal. The mean visual analog scale pain score at rest on the first postoperative day was 2.2 (range, 1-4). The average postoperative length of hospital stay was 18 h (range, 14-46 h). During a mean follow-up period of 9.4 months (range, 3-23 months), no hernia recurrence or chronic pain were noted. Seroma formation was detected on six sides of unilateral hernias (6.7%) on postoperative day 7, with a mean volume of 45.8 ml (range, 24-80 ml). All seromas were mild and resolved spontaneously within 3 months, with no need for evacuation or other treatment and without major impact on the final outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Defect closure in laparoscopic mesh hernioplasty for large indirect hernias is safe and feasible and can significantly reduce postoperative seroma formation and relative complications. This approach is recommended in large indirect or scrotal hernia repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Groin hernioplasty is the most performed intervention in the adults worldwide, the minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair techniques widely used by surgeons today are transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP). We report a 62-year-old man with bowel obstruction caused by the use of self-anchoring barbed suture to close the peritoneum 3 days after TAPP. Surgeons using the barbed suture should be alert to this possibility when encountering this complication of intestinal obstruction, so as to avoid more serious consequences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background: Reports on preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) and botulinum toxin A (BTA) for managing giant inguinoscrotal hernias are limited. Hence, we report our experience with these preoperative techniques in patients with this condition. Materials and Methods: Observational study of 8 consecutive patients with giant inguinoscrotal hernias between January 2018 and December 2018. All patients were treated preoperatively with BTA injection to the lateral abdominal wall muscles and PPP for passive abdominal cavity expansion. Length of abdominal wall muscles, volume of inguinal hernia (VIH), volume of the abdominal cavity (VAC), and VIH/VAC ratio were measured before and after PPP and BTA using abdominal computed tomography. All hernias were repaired laparoscopically using transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair techniques. Results: The mean insufflated volume of air for PPP was 5625 ± 845 mL for 15.4 ± 1.6 days. An average reduction of 5.3% of the VIH/VAC ratio after PPP and BTA was obtained (P < .01). The length of lateral abdominal muscles with a mean gain of 3.3 cm/side (P < .01) and complications associated with PPP were 12.5% and with surgical technique, 25%. Laparoscopic TAPP repair was achieved in all cases, with no clinical evidence of postoperative abdominal hypertension. The mean follow-up was 22 months; no hernia recurrences have been reported. Conclusions: Combination of PPP and BTA is feasible and useful for surgically managing giant inguinoscrotal hernias, which can avoid abdominal compartment syndrome after laparoscopic TAPP repair of giant inguinoscrotal hernias.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    OBJECTIVE: Patients taking acetylsalicylic acid are common in surgical departments; in most cases, acetylsalicylic acid is discontinued 5-7 days before the operation to minimize the intra- and postoperative bleeding, but the perioperative management of patients under antithrombotic and anticoagulative treatments is controversial. This study aims to address whether the low-dose acetylsalicylic acid increases bleeding and occurrence of postoperative complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair when it was only ceased on the operation day.
    METHODS: From July 2017 to January 2019, 901 patients including 781 (86.7%) male and 120 (13.3%) female patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique were recruited, among whom 152 (16.9%) had been taking low-dose (100 mg per day) acetylsalicylic acid which was continued during hospitalization except the operation day. The intra-operative bleeding volume, postoperative pain, overall occurrence of complications such as seroma, hematoma, scrotal edema, calf muscle venous thrombosis, and the time of resuming normal activities were compared with patients on whom these medications were not needed.
    RESULTS: The age, BMI, hospital stay, ASA classification, morbidity of CHD and hypertension, FIB value, and the time of resuming normal activities of patients taking acetylsalicylic acid were higher (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference on mean operative time, intra-operative bleeding volume, and the occurrence postoperative complications among two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with inguinal hernias, laparoscopic TAPP repair is completely safe to be performed on those taking low-dose acetylsalicylic acid when it was only ceased on the operation day, with intravenous salvianolate given after the operation instead.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号