Speaking skills

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    英语被广泛认为是一种全球性的语言,它对全球交流变得越来越重要。因此,对英语教育的需求一直在上升。在中国,相当多的人从事英语学习。然而,许多英语学习者在中国遇到挑战,当谈到发展他们的口语技能。本研究旨在调查影响中国英语学习者口语能力的因素。采用混合方法方法,数据是通过问卷调查从来自三个不同课程的455名大学生中收集的(艺术,科学与商业,和商业)在中国。研究发现了影响中国英语学习者口语能力的几个因素,包括有限的口语练习机会,害怕犯错误,有限的接触英语环境,教师培训不足,以及汉语对英语发音的影响。此外,该研究强调,对英语环境有更多接触和更多口语练习机会的学习者往往会表现出更好的口语技能。本研究的新颖之处在于其对影响中国英语学习者口语能力的因素的宝贵见解。根据调查结果,建议英语教师接受强化培训,以有效地教授口语技能,应该为学习者提供更多的口语练习机会,如参加小组讨论或演讲活动。
    English is widely regarded as a global language, and it has become increasingly important for global communication. As a result, the demand for English language education has been on the rise. In China, a significant number of individuals are engaged in learning the English language. However, many English learners in China encounter challenges when it comes to developing their speaking skills. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the speaking skills of English learners in China. Employing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through a questionnaire from 455 college students from three different courses (arts, science & business, and commerce) in China. The study findings identified several factors impacting the speaking skills of English learners in China, including limited opportunities for speaking practice, fear of making mistakes, limited exposure to English-speaking environments, inadequate teacher training, and the influence of the Chinese language on English pronunciation. Additionally, the study highlighted that learners who have greater exposure to English-speaking environments and more opportunities for speaking practice tend to demonstrate better speaking skills. The novelty of this study lies in its valuable insights into the factors influencing the speaking skills of English learners in China. Based on the findings, it is recommended that English teachers receive enhanced training to effectively teach speaking skills, and learners should be provided with increased opportunities for speaking practice, such as participating in group discussions or engaging in speaking activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了基于人工智能的教学在自然环境中提高第二语言(L2)口语技能和口语自我调节的有效性。这项研究是对93名中国英语作为外语(EFL)学生进行的,随机分配到接受基于AI指令的实验组或接受传统指令的对照组。
    基于AI的指令利用了Duolingo应用程序,结合自然语言处理技术,互动练习,个性化反馈,和语音识别技术。进行了测试前和测试后,以评估L2口语技能和自我调节能力。
    研究结果表明,实验组,它接受了基于人工智能的指令,与对照组相比,L2口语技能显着提高。此外,实验组参与者的自我调节水平较高.
    这些发现表明,基于AI的教学有效地增强了二语口语技能,并促进了语言学习者的自我调节过程,强调AI技术在优化语言学习体验和促进学习者在口语领域的自主性和元认知策略方面的潜力。然而,需要进一步的研究来探索这些观察到的改善背后的长期效应和具体机制.
    UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based instruction in improving second language (L2) speaking skills and speaking self-regulation in a natural setting. The research was conducted with 93 Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) students, randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving AI-based instruction or a control group receiving traditional instruction.
    UNASSIGNED: The AI-based instruction leveraged the Duolingo application, incorporating natural language processing technology, interactive exercises, personalized feedback, and speech recognition technology. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to assess L2 speaking skills and self-regulation abilities.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of the study demonstrated that the experimental group, which received AI-based instruction, exhibited significantly greater improvement in L2 speaking skills compared to the control group. Moreover, participants in the experimental group reported higher levels of self-regulation.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings suggest that AI-based instruction effectively enhances L2 speaking skills and fosters self-regulatory processes among language learners, highlighting the potential of AI technology to optimize language learning experiences and promote learners\' autonomy and metacognitive strategies in the speaking domain. However, further research is needed to explore the long-term effects and specific mechanisms underlying these observed improvements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查在线语言交流对中国研究生在高级英语课程中的口语技能和沟通意愿(WTC)的影响。该研究比较了两个完整的类别:电子串联,通过串联语言交换应用程序与外国英语使用者交流,传统的,在课堂上参与协作演讲任务。该研究还考察了EFL学习者对在线语言交流的态度和看法。
    58名中国研究生是从二年级高级英语课程中招募的,分为两个完整的班级:电子串联和常规。电子串联小组使用串联语言交换应用程序与以英语为母语的外国人士在线交流,而常规小组参与课堂内的协作演讲任务。数据是通过雅思口语模块收集的,WTC量表,半结构化面试。使用描述性和推断性统计学对数据进行分析。
    两组的口语技能和WTC均有改善。然而,电子串联组优于常规组。研究结果表明,在线语言交流对英语学习者的口语技能和WTC有积极影响。英语学习者对在线语言交流也有积极的态度和看法,尽管有些人表示保留。
    该研究得出结论,在线语言交流可以成为提高EFL学习者口语技能和WTC的有效工具。该研究还表明,EFL环境中的协作口语课程应考虑纳入在线语言交流。然而,该研究还强调需要解决一些EFL学习者对在线语言交流的担忧和保留。总的来说,这项研究对EFL设置具有重要的教学意义,这表明在线语言交流可以提高口语技能和WTC。
    UNASSIGNED: The current study aims to investigate the impact of online language exchanges on the speaking skills and willingness to communicate (WTC) of Chinese postgraduate students in an advanced English program. The study compares two intact classes: e-tandem, who communicate with foreign English speakers through the Tandem language exchange application, and conventional, who participate in collaborative speaking tasks inside the class. The study also examines the attitudes and perceptions of the EFL learners toward the online language exchanges.
    UNASSIGNED: 58 Chinese postgraduate students were recruited from a second-year advanced English program and divided into two intact classes: e-tandem and conventional. The e-tandem group used the Tandem language exchange application to communicate with foreign English speakers online, while the conventional group participated in collaborative speaking tasks inside the class. The data were collected through the IELTS speaking module, WTC scale, and semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
    UNASSIGNED: Both groups showed improvement in their speaking skills and WTC. However, the e-tandem group outperformed the conventional group. The findings indicate that online language exchanges have a positive impact on the speaking skills and WTC of EFL learners. The EFL learners also had positive attitudes and perceptions toward the online language exchanges, although some expressed reservations.
    UNASSIGNED: The study concludes that online language exchanges can be an effective tool for improving the speaking skills and WTC of EFL learners. The study also suggests that collaborative speaking courses in EFL settings should consider incorporating online language exchanges. However, the study also highlights the need to address the concerns and reservations expressed by some EFL learners regarding online language exchanges. Overall, the study has important pedagogical implications for EFL settings, suggesting that online language exchanges can enhance speaking skills and WTC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心理学中可能有助于教学和学习计划发展的流行理论之一是大脑优势。根据这个理论,根据个人特征和认知方式,大脑分为两个半球。研究大脑优势与第二语言学习之间的相关性很有趣。因此,这项研究旨在研究大脑优势与英语阅读发展之间的相关性,和说话技巧。为此,所需的数据是从四所不同大学的230名大二学生中随机收集的,并通过皮尔逊卡方检验进行分析,Kruskal-Wallis测试,还有Mann-Whitney测试.研究结果表明,大脑优势与阅读技能之间存在显着相关性。三类大脑优势组在阅读技能上有所不同,其中中度右脑得分最高。关于说话技巧,然而,结果表明,大脑优势和说话技巧之间没有显著的相关性。三组脑支配在说话技巧三个方面没有显著差别,包括准确性,流利,和可理解性。该研究最后提出了一系列含义和进一步研究的一些途径。
    One of the popular theories in psychology that potentially contributes to the development of teaching and learning programs is brain dominance. According to this theory, the brain is categorized into two hemispheres based on personal traits and cognitive styles. It is interesting to investigate the correlation between brain dominance and second language learning. Therefore, this study set out to examine the correlation between brain dominance and the development of English reading, and speaking skills. For this purpose, the required data were randomly gathered from 230 sophomore students in four different universities and were analyzed through a Pearson Chi-Square test, a Kruskal-Wallis test, and a Mann-Whitney test. Findings evidenced a significant correlation between brain dominance and reading skills. Three categories of brain dominance groups differ in reading skills in which moderate right-brain shows the highest score. Concerning the speaking skills, however, the results documented no significant correlation between brain dominance and speaking skills. Three groups of brain dominance were not significantly different in three aspects of speaking skills, including accuracy, fluency, and comprehensibility. The study concludes by proposing a range of implications and some avenues for further research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号