UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sotorasib versus docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with KRASG12C mutation from the China and United States\'social perspective.
UNASSIGNED: A Markov model that included three states (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) was developed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental QALY were calculated for the two treatment strategies. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the factors that had a greater impact on the model results, and tornado diagrams were used to present the results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed with 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Assume distributions based on parameter types and randomly sample all parameter distributions each time., The results were presented as cost-effectiveness acceptable curves.
UNASSIGNED: This economic evaluation of data from the CodeBreak 200 randomized clinical trial. In China, sotorasib generated 0.44 QAYL with a total cost of $84372.59. Compared with docetaxel, the ICER value of sotorasib was $102701.84/QALY, which was higher than willingness to pay (WTP), so sotorasib had no economic advantage. In the US, sotorasib obtained 0.35 QALY more than docetaxel, ICER was $15,976.50/QALY, which was more than 1 WTP but less than 3 WTP, indicating that the increased cost of sotorasib was acceptable. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of sotorasib having economic benefits gradually increased when the cost of follow-up examination was reduced in China. And there was no influence on the conclusions within the range of changes in China. When the willingness to pay (WTP) exceeds $102,500, the probability of sotorasib having cost effect increases from 0% to 49%.
UNASSIGNED: Sotorasib had a cost effect from the perspective in the United States. However, sotorasib had no cost effect from the perspective in China, and only when the WTP exceeds $102,500, the probability of sotorasib having cost effect increases from 0% to 49%.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate the affordable price of sotorasib among patients with previously treated advanced KRASG12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspectives of both the Chinese healthcare system and the patients.
METHODS: We developed a Markov model spanning a 20-year time horizon with a cycle length of 21 days. Our data were derived from the CodeBreaK 200 clinical trial, supplemented with published literature, publicly available national databases, and local hospitals. The primary outcomes were the affordable prices of sotorasib which would result in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of sotorasib relative to docetaxel below the preset willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model\'s robustness.
RESULTS: At the national level, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system and patients, the price of sotorasib should be lower than US$0.04673 and $0.03231, respectively, to make it affordable, which is equivalent to $1346 and $931 per box (120 mg × 240 pieces). At the provincial level, the price ceiling of sotorasib/mg fluctuated between $0.04084 to $0.08061 from the Chinese healthcare system\'s perspective and between $0.02642 to $0.06620 from the patients\' perspective. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that, as the price of sotorasib decreased, its likelihood of being cost-effective increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Sotorasib might be a cost-effective therapy in China. The pharmaco-economic evidence generated from this study has significant implications not only for guiding the drug pricing of the upcoming sotorasib but also for determining the reimbursement ratio for its potential inclusion in the National Reimbursement Drugs List in the future.

The oncogenic role of KRAS in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression is well-established. Despite this, identifying effective therapeutic targets for KRAS-mutated CRC remains a significant challenge. This study identifies pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase catalytic subunit 1 (PDP1) as a previously unrecognized yet crucial regulator in the progression of KRAS mutant CRC. A substantial upregulation of PDP1 expression is observed in KRAS mutant CRC cells and tissues compared to wild-type KRAS samples, which correlates with poorer prognosis. Functional experiments elucidate that PDP1 accelerates the malignance of KRAS mutant CRC cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PDP1 acts as a scaffold, enhancing BRAF and MEK1 interaction and activating the MAPK signaling, thereby promoting CRC progression. Additionally, transcription factor KLF5 is identified as the key regulator for PDP1 upregulation in KRAS mutant CRC. Crucially, targeting PDP1 combined with MAPK inhibitors exhibits an obvious inhibitory effect on KRAS mutant CRC. Overall, PDP1 is underscored as a vital oncogenic driver and promising therapeutic target for KRAS mutant CRC.

UNASSIGNED: One Kirsten Ras (KRAS) G12C mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient had improved poor performance status and obtained mixed response with the first-line KRAS-targeted treatment of sotorasib. After disease progression, partial response was achieved with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. KRAS G12C mutated immunoenvironment in NSCLC may favor the immunotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: KRAS is one of the most commonly mutated genes, which used to be untargetable. The phase II CodeBreak 100 trial revealed 6.8-month median progress-free survival (PFS) and 12.5-month overall survival (OS) in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC patients treated with KRAS inhibitor, sotorasib. The specimens of the brain, lymph node (LN), and blood from the patient were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry were performed for pathological characterization. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were used for treatment response evaluation. The patient was diagnosed in a bad Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) with metastatic KRAS G12C-mutated lung adenocarcinoma who had achieved mixed response to sotorasib as the first-line treatment. Although 5-month PFS of the treatment with sotorasib was not surprising, the patient achieved significantly improved ECOG-PS score from 4 to 1. Subsequently, partial response (PR) was achieved with the treatment of pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab. This case highlights superior efficacy of first-line treatment with sotorasib for the advance untreated KRAS G12C-mutant patients. The high efficacy of the treatment with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy revealed that immunoenvironment of KRAS G12C-mutated patient may favor the immunotherapy.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Sotorasib has been approved for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to the limitations of clinical trials, potential adverse events (AEs) and long-term safety issues cannot be detected. The presented study aimed to evaluate sotorasib-associated AEs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
UNASSIGNED: Post-marketing AE reports of sotorasib in the database were collected for analysis. Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC) and empirical bayes geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms, were performed to mine the signals of sotorasib-associated AEs. The median duration, quartiles and the Weibull shape parameter (WSP) test were used to assess the onset time data.
UNASSIGNED: The database contained 1538 cases of sotorasib as primary suspect (PS), with 27 signals detected, scattering in 5 SOCs. The SOC of hepatobiliary disorders (182, ROR 4.48, PRR 4.07, IC 2.02, EBGM 4.07) met the four methodological thresholds. The median onset time of sotorasib-associated AEs was 42 days (interquartile range [IQR] 14-86.75 days). Different SOCs had different types of risk over time.
UNASSIGNED: After obtaining marketing authorization, the study identified all potentially relevant adverse event (AE) signals expected to have a reporting frequency higher than anticipated and characterized them during sotorasib treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a high incidence of lung cancer, with a 30% incidence of KRAS mutations and a low 5-year survival rate. Until the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sotorasib in May 2021, no therapies targeted mutated KRAS in cancer. Sotorasib, a new KRAS inhibitor, is currently recognized as the newest clinically targeted agent with apparent clinical efficacy in NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutations. FDA approval is required for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC undergoing at least one chemotherapy regimen.
UNASSIGNED: In our study, we report a patient with advanced NSCLC combined with brain metastases, clinical stage IV (c.T3N0M1b), KRAS G12C (+) detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, direct use of sotorasib, an inhibitor of KRAS G12C, as first-line therapy. The patient was treated with 4 months of oral therapy, had significant partial remission (PR), and remained in stable disease (SD) for nearly 9 months of follow-up, with no other side effects. Further extension of the follow-up period is needed to assess the impact of sotorasib as first-line therapy on patient survival. A series of clinical trials in phase 3 is ongoing, covering the first-line usage widespread.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the literature review, this is the first domestic report in China where sotorasib was used directly as first-line treatment in patients with advanced combined brain metastasis from NSCLC. It needs a longer follow-up to evaluate the efficacy of sotorasib further as a first-line.

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus protein (KRAS) is a protein that plays a central role in signal transduction using extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) cellular signaling pathway. KRAS is a frequently mutated oncogene and plays a pivotal role in tumor initiation and progression. Hotspot mutations on codon 12, 13 and 61 in KRAS are well-known for their role in drug resistance and non-hotspot mutations also play a significant part in contributing to resistance mechanisms. The understanding of how these non-hotspot mutations might affect the signal transduction of KRAS and their contribution towards drug resistance is understudied. Here we provide structural insights into the interaction of non-hotspot KRAS mutants with GTP (the native ligand) using a molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation approach. Extensive molecular docking and simulation studies suggest that non-hotspot mutations (E31D and E63K) show stable interaction with native ligand using all five trajectories, as evidenced by root mean square of distance (RMSD), root mean square of fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (RoG), coulomb short-range energy and MMGBSA analysis. These results suggest that non-hotspot mutations do not undermine the oncogenic nature of KRAS. This observation is consistent with previous findings where overexpressing E31D and E63K mutations share phenotypic features with G12D and G13D transfected cells, including increased proliferative capacity, actin cytoskeleton organization, and migration rates. We further test whether FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib successfully inhibit the E31D and E63K mutants. Results suggest that these two non-hotspot mutants can be inhibited by both drugs with following trend of structural stability (E31D > E63K > wild-KRAS > Q61H > G12C). Based on sharp coherence in trajectories between wild KRAS and non-hotspot mutants, it is suggested that these novel mutants do not contribute to drug resistance mechanism. Overall, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of non-hotspot mutations on KRAS and their potential as targets for effective cancer therapies.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRASG12C inhibitors in patients with KRASG12C-mutated solid tumors.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials published in English up to March 6, 2023. Clinical trials investigating sotorasib or adagrasib and reporting the clinical outcomes of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were eligible. The primary endpoint was the ORR. Secondary endpoints included the DCR, incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs, and odds ratio (OR) of the ORR between patients with or without co-mutation. The Random-effects model was applied for the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS: 18 studies with 1224 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR, DCR, and incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 31 % (95 % CI, 25-37 %), 86 % (95 % CI, 82-89 %), and 29 % (95 % CI, 23-36 %), respectively. KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC patients with a co-mutation of KEAP1 exhibited a worse ORR than those with wild-type KEAP1 (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.77).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety of KRASG12C inhibitors in treating solid tumors and identified KEAP1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker of inferior response in patients treated with KRASG12C inhibitors. These findings may assist in the design of future clinical trials for identifying populations that may benefit from KRASG12C inhibitor treatment.

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and encodes a key signaling protein in tumors. Due to its high affinity for GTP and the lack of a large binding pocket that allosteric inhibitors can occupy, KRAS has long been considered \'non-druggable.\' Finding effective treatment measures for patients with KRAS mutations is our top priority.
In this article, we will provide an overview of the KRAS pathway and review the current state of therapeutic strategies for targeting oncogenic KRAS, as well as their potential to improve outcomes in patients with KRAS-mutant malignancies. We will also discuss the development of these strategies and gave an outlook on prospects.
KRAS mutations have posed a significant challenge in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past few decades. However, the emergence of immunotherapy and KRAS inhibitors, such as Sotorasib (AMG 510) and Adagrasib (MRTX849), has marked a new era in cancer therapy. As more research and clinical trials continue, we anticipate the development of more effective treatment strategies and better options for lung cancer patients.