■肩袖损伤和撕裂是肩部疼痛和功能障碍的常见原因,需要准确的诊断方法来指导临床决策。这项研究评估了三维(3D)肩部超声检查在识别肩袖损伤和撕裂模式中的诊断实用性。
■对七个电子数据库进行全面搜索,其中包括科克伦图书馆,Embase,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,中国生物医学(CBM)数据库,CNKI,万方,VIP数据库这些数据库用于检索评估3D肩部超声检查对识别肩袖损伤和撕裂模式的诊断价值的文章。根据灵敏度评估三维肩关节超声检查的有效性,特异性,正似然比(PLR),负似然比(NLR),和诊断比值比(DOR)。对于每个参数,计算95%置信区间.此外,构建了概括的接受者工作特征曲线(SROC),允许对诊断准确性进行全面评估,这反映在SROC曲线下的面积(AUC)中。
■筛选了8,508个确定有资格纳入荟萃分析的9个文献,共366名患者。检测任何肩袖撕裂的分析显示灵敏度为0.97,特异性为0.87,DOR为90.03,AUC为0.98。此外,3D肩部超声检查在检测全厚度和部分厚度肩袖撕裂方面显示出令人满意的准确性(灵敏度:0.92vs.0.83,特异性:0.94vs.097,AUC:0.96vs.0.95)。
■这项研究表明,三维超声检查对于检测肩袖撕裂具有令人满意的准确性。
UNASSIGNED: Rotator cuff injuries and tears are common causes of shoulder pain and dysfunction, necessitating accurate diagnostic methods to guide clinical decision-making. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of three-dimensional (3D) shoulder
sonography in identifying rotator cuff injury and tear patterns.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search across seven electronic databases, which included Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library,
China Biology Medicine (CBM) database, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP database. These databases were utilized to retrieve articles that assess the diagnostic value of 3D shoulder
sonography for identifying rotator cuff injuries and tear patterns. The effectiveness of 3D shoulder
sonography was assessed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). For each parameter, the 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Additionally, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) were constructed, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, which is reflected in the area under the SROC curve (AUC).
UNASSIGNED: Screening of 8,508 identified nine literatures eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 366 patients. The analysis of detecting any rotator cuff tear revealed a sensitivity of 0.97 and specificity of 0.87, yielding a DOR of 90.03 and an AUC of 0.98. Furthermore, 3D shoulder sonography demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in detecting both full and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (Sensitivity: 0.92 vs. 0.83, specificity: 0.94 vs. 097, and AUC: 0.96 vs. 0.95).
UNASSIGNED: This study indicates that three-dimensional
sonography has satisfied accuracy for detecting rotator cuff tears.