Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

性功能障碍,心理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,经历勃起或性功能障碍的男性在面对面的临床接触中讨论他们的性经历可能会感到不舒服。部分原因是与讨论私人性行为相关的污名和尴尬。这项研究调查了电子病人,或者更确切地说,寻求建议的人,和医生在在线医疗咨询(OMC)中交流性功能障碍。我们对CHDoctor的相关OMC进行了主题导向的语篇分析,一个中国医疗咨询网站,了解感知性功能障碍的个体如何表达他们的病情,以及平台上的医生如何回应并向这些个体提供建议。我们的分析显示,OMC为寻求建议者提供了一个公开讨论其性健康问题的地方,并从协助减轻相关社会污名的医生那里获得授权。经过详细的语篇分析,然而,我们发现,寻求建议的人经常将他们的性经历解释为需要医疗干预的疾病症状。作为回应,医生倾向于通过将他们的状况视为医疗问题,并将其描述为由压力和焦虑引起的心理社会问题,来验证这些寻求建议的人的初步自我诊断。与批判的社会学观点保持一致,该观点将性功能障碍视为社会建构的问题,而这些问题是针对性功能的主导规范的,我们认为,医生和寻求建议者对某些性行为的医学化和心理化,在话语上强化了异性性交的本质主义观点并使之合法化。这些观点将阴茎阴道性交和射精作为唯一标准,成功,和可取的性活动形式。这可能会进一步引起成年男性的恐惧和焦虑,他们的性行为实际上与这些规范不符。
    Previous research shows that men who experience erectile or sexual dysfunction may feel uncomfortable discussing their sexual experiences in face-to-face clinical encounters. Part of the reason is the stigma and embarrassment associated with discussing private sexual matters. This study examines how e-patients, or more precisely advice-seekers, and doctors communicate about sexual dysfunction in online medical consultations (OMCs). We conducted a Theme-Oriented Discourse Analysis of relevant OMCs on CH Doctor, a Chinese medical consultation website, to understand how individuals with perceived sexual dysfunction articulate their conditions and how doctors on the platform respond and provide recommendations to these individuals. Our analysis reveals that OMCs afford advice-seekers a place to openly discuss their sexual health issues and gain empowerment from doctors who assist in mitigating the associated social stigma. Upon detailed discourse analysis, however, we find that individuals seeking advice often interpret their sexual experiences as symptoms of illness that requires medical intervention. In response, doctors tend to validate these advice-seekers\' preliminary self-diagnoses by treating their conditions as medical issues and characterizing them as psychosocial problems caused by stress and anxiety. Aligning with a critical sociological perspective that views sexual dysfunction as socially constructed problems referenced against dominant norms of sexual functioning, we argue that the medicalization and psychologization of certain sexual behaviors by doctors and advice-seekers discursively reinforce and legitimize essentialist views of hetero-coital sexual interaction. Such views reify penile-vaginal intercourse and ejaculation as the only standard, successful, and desirable form of sexual activity. This may further induce fear and anxiety among adult men whose sexual behaviors do not realistically align with these norms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:针灸在治疗女性性功能障碍(FSD)方面具有潜力,但其有效性有待验证。
    目的:一项荟萃分析,旨在总结研究针灸治疗FSD的疗效。
    方法:对Pubmed等电子数据库进行了系统筛选,Embase,科克伦图书馆,CNKI,和CBM选择2023年4月之前符合标准的研究。我们只纳入了通过女性性功能指数(FSFI)评估女性性功能的研究。
    结果:通过使用标准化均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)计算相对风险(RR),将这些数据合并,以生成研究结果的摘要.使用随机效应模型计算合并结果。
    结果:共纳入4项研究,涉及178名参与者,综合结果表明,针刺组与对照组的FSFI评分差异有统计学意义。在欲望和唤醒量表中,针刺组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义。但是在润滑的尺度上,性高潮,满意,和痛苦,两组间差异无统计学意义。
    结论:FSFI总分的比较,性欲,性唤起表明,针灸治疗可以在一定程度上改善女性性功能障碍。然而,在阴道润滑方面,性高潮,性满意度,和性疼痛,针刺治疗并没有明显改善女性性功能障碍。在未来,有必要纳入更多的RCT试验,并扩大分析的患者数量,以使结论更可靠。
    BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has potential in the treatment of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), but its effectiveness needs to be verified.
    OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis to provide a summary of studies that had investigated the efficacy of acupuncture as a treatment for FSD.
    METHODS: A systematic screening was conducted on electronic databases such as Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and CBM to select studies that met the criteria before April 2023. We only included those studies assessing women\'s sexual functioning by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
    RESULTS: By calculating the relative risk (RR) using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI), these data were combined to generate a summary of the findings. The pooled results were calculated using a random-effects model.
    RESULTS: A total of 4 studies involving 178 participants were included, and the comprehensive results indicated a significant difference in FSFI scores between the acupuncture group and the control group. In the desire and arousal scale, there was a statistically significant difference between the acupuncture group and the control group. But in the scale of lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of overall FSFI scores, sexual desire, and sexual arousal revealed that acupuncture treatment can improve female sexual dysfunction to some extent. However, in terms of vaginal lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction, and sexual pain, acupuncture treatment did not significantly improve female sexual dysfunction. In the future, it is necessary to include more RCT trials and expand the number of patients analyzed to make the conclusions more reliable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:一些观察性研究探讨了1型糖尿病女性中女性性功能障碍(FSD)的患病率和预测因素。然而,没有对汇总数据的系统评价和荟萃分析提供了女性1型糖尿病患者FSD患病率的可靠估计.
    目的:调查FSD的全球患病率,分析FSD风险与1型糖尿病之间的关系,并评估女性1型糖尿病患者FSD的预测因子。
    方法:本系统综述的研究检索是通过万方数据库进行的,中国国家知识基础设施,PubMed,和Embase从开始日期到2023年2月28日。用Q和I2检验分析研究之间的异质性。通过亚组分析和荟萃回归检测异质性的来源。
    结果:结果包括1型糖尿病女性FSD的合并患病率,FSD风险与1型糖尿病之间的关系,以及女性1型糖尿病患者FSD的预测因素。
    结果:女性1型糖尿病合并FSD的患病率为38.5%(95%CI,32.1%-45.0%)。1型糖尿病患者的FSD风险高于健康对照组(比值比[OR],3.77;95%CI,2.24-6.35)。女性1型糖尿病患者FSD的显著预测因素是抑郁状态(OR,2.77;95%CI,1.29-5.93)和更长的糖尿病病程(OR,1.19;95%CI,1.06-1.34)。
    结论:女性1型糖尿病患者的FSD患病率明显增加,这表明临床医生应该关注女性1型糖尿病患者的FSD。
    本研究的优势在于,它是第一个系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查1型糖尿病女性中FSD的全球患病率和预测因素。局限性在于,结果在汇集文章后显示出明显的异质性。
    结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析显示,女性1型糖尿病患者的FSD总体患病率为38.5%,证明女性FSD风险与1型糖尿病之间存在显着关联。此外,我们发现,女性1型糖尿病患者FSD的重要预测因素是抑郁和糖尿病病程较长.
    Several observational studies have explored the prevalence and predictors of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) among females with type 1 diabetes. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled data provide reliable estimates of FSD prevalence among females with type 1 diabetes.
    To investigate the global prevalence of FSD, analyze the association between FSD risk and type 1 diabetes, and evaluate the predictors of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes.
    The study search of the present systematic review was conducted through the Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, and Embase from the inception date to February 28, 2023. Heterogeneity among the studies was analyzed with the Q and I2 tests. The sources of heterogeneity were detected through subgroup analyses and meta-regression.
    Outcomes included the pooled prevalence of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes, the association between FSD risk and type 1 diabetes, and the predictors of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes.
    The pooled prevalence of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes was 38.5% (95% CI, 32.1%-45.0%). The risk of FSD was higher in patients with type 1 diabetes than in healthy controls (odds ratio [OR], 3.77; 95% CI, 2.24-6.35). The significant predictors of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes were depression status (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.29-5.93) and longer diabetes duration (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34).
    Females with type 1 diabetes had a significantly increased prevalence of FSD, indicating that clinicians should be concerned about FSD among females with type 1 diabetes.
    The strength of the present study is that it is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the global prevalence and predictors of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes. The limitation is that the results revealed significant heterogeneity after pooling the articles.
    The present systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the overall prevalence of FSD among females with type 1 diabetes was 38.5%, demonstrating a significant association between FSD risk and type 1 diabetes among females. Furthermore, we found that the significant predictors for FSD among females with type 1 diabetes were depression and a longer duration of diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管它被列入了《国际疾病分类》的第11次修订版,关于强迫性行为障碍(CSBD)的高质量科学证据几乎是缺乏的,特别是在代表性不足和服务不足的人群中。因此,我们全面检查了42个国家的CSBD,性别,和性取向,并验证了强迫性行为障碍量表的原始(CSBD-19)和简短(CSBD-7)版本,以提供标准化的,国家的最先进的筛选工具的研究和临床实践。
    使用来自国际性别调查的数据(N=82,243;Mage=32.39岁,SD=12.52),我们评估了CSBD-19和CSBD-7的心理测量特性,并比较了42个国家的CSBD,三种性别,八种性取向,和个人与低经历CSBD的高风险。
    总共4.8%的参与者有经历CSBD的高风险。观察到基于国家和性别的差异,而CSBD水平没有基于性取向的差异。只有14%的CSBD患者曾经寻求过这种疾病的治疗,另有33%的人由于各种原因没有寻求治疗。两种版本的量表均表现出出色的有效性和可靠性。
    这项研究有助于更好地理解在代表性不足和服务不足的人群中的CSBD,并通过提供26种语言的基于ICD-11的免费筛查工具,促进其在不同人群中的识别。这些发现也可能作为一个关键的基石,刺激研究以证据为基础,目前文献中缺失的文化敏感性CSBD预防和干预策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite its inclusion in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, there is a virtual paucity of high-quality scientific evidence about compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD), especially in underrepresented and underserved populations. Therefore, we comprehensively examined CSBD across 42 countries, genders, and sexual orientations, and validated the original (CSBD-19) and short (CSBD-7) versions of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale to provide standardized, state-of-the-art screening tools for research and clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: Using data from the International Sex Survey (N = 82,243; Mage = 32.39 years, SD = 12.52), we evaluated the psychometric properties of the CSBD-19 and CSBD-7 and compared CSBD across 42 countries, three genders, eight sexual orientations, and individuals with low vs. high risk of experiencing CSBD.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4.8% of the participants were at high risk of experiencing CSBD. Country- and gender-based differences were observed, while no sexual-orientation-based differences were present in CSBD levels. Only 14% of individuals with CSBD have ever sought treatment for this disorder, with an additional 33% not having sought treatment because of various reasons. Both versions of the scale demonstrated excellent validity and reliability.
    UNASSIGNED: This study contributes to a better understanding of CSBD in underrepresented and underserved populations and facilitates its identification in diverse populations by providing freely accessible ICD-11-based screening tools in 26 languages. The findings may also serve as a crucial building block to stimulate research into evidence-based, culturally sensitive prevention and intervention strategies for CSBD that are currently missing from the literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中国女性性健康服务的目标人群尚不清楚。识别对性健康寻求行为有心理障碍的高危个体和性欲减退(HSDD)的高危个体,我们调查了中国女性不愿意表达性健康的相关性,与性健康相关的疾病的耻辱,性困扰,和HSDD。
    方法:于2020年4月至7月进行了一项在线调查。
    结果:我们在线收到3443份有效回复(有效率82.6%)。参与者主要是中国城市育龄妇女(中位数26岁,Q1-Q323-30)。对性健康知识知之甚少(aOR0.42,95CI0.28-0.63)和对性健康相关疾病感到羞耻(aOR0.32-0.57)的女性不太愿意交流性健康。年龄(aOR4.29,95CI2.26-8.17),低收入(AOR1.52-2.11),家庭负担(AOR1.34-1.43),与配偶(aOR0.66,95CI0.51-0.86)或子女(aOR0.77,95CI0.62-0.96)生活与女性对性健康相关疾病的羞耻感独立相关。年龄(aOR0.98,95CI0.96-0.99)和研究生学位(aOR0.45,95CI0.28-0.71)与生儿育女时低性欲的性困扰较少(aOR1.38-2.10),紧张的工作压力(aOR1.32,95CI1.10-1.60)和沉重的家庭负担(aOR1.43,95CI1.07-1.92)增加了女性痛苦的几率。具有研究生学位的女性(aOR0.42,95CI0.19-0.90),更多关于性健康的知识(AOR0.53-0.67),怀孕引起的性欲下降,最近分娩,或更年期症状(aOR0.60,95CI0.41-0.85)不太可能患有HSDD,而当他们的性欲下降是由于其他性问题(aOR2.56,95CI1.84-3.57)和伴侣性问题(aOR1.72,95CI1.23-2.39)时,他们更有可能患有HSDD。
    结论:性健康教育和相关服务需要关注老年女性的心理障碍,性健康知识不足,工作压力大,和恶劣的经济条件。医护人员需要关注工作或生活压力大、有妇科疾病史的女性的性健康。性欲低下不等于性欲问题,这在将来应该引起注意。
    The target population for women\'s sexual health services in China was unclear. To identify high-risk individuals with psychological barriers to sexual health-seeking behaviors and those at high risk of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), we investigated correlates of Chinese women\'s unwillingness to communicate sexual health, the shame of sexual health-related disorders, sexual distress, and HSDD.
    An online survey was conducted from April to July 2020.
    We received 3443 valid responses online (effective rate 82.6%). Participants were mainly Chinese urban women of childbearing age (median 26 years old, Q1-Q3 23-30). Women who knew little about sexual health knowledge (aOR 0.42, 95%CI 0.28-0.63) and were ashamed (aOR 0.32-0.57) of sexual health-related disorders were less willing to communicate sexual health. Age (aOR 4.29, 95%CI 2.26-8.17), low income (aOR 1.52-2.11), family burden (aOR 1.34-1.43), and living with friends (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.02-1.91) were independent correlates of women\'s shame about sexual health-related disorders while living with a spouse (aOR 0.66, 95%CI 0.51-0.86) or children (aOR 0.77, 95%CI 0.62-0.96) were correlated with less shame. Age (aOR 0.98, 95%CI 0.96-0.99) and a postgraduate degree (aOR 0.45, 95%CI 0.28-0.71) were linked with less sexual distress of low sexual desire while having children (aOR 1.38-2.10), intense work pressure (aOR 1.32, 95%CI 1.10-1.60) and heavy family burden (aOR 1.43, 95%CI 1.07-1.92) increased women\'s odds of having distress. Women with a postgraduate degree (aOR 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.90), more knowledge about sexual health (aOR 0.53-0.67), and decreased sexual desire caused by pregnancy, recent childbirth, or menopausal symptoms (aOR 0.60, 95%CI 0.41-0.85) were less likely to have HSDD, while they were more likely to have HSDD when their decreased sexual desire was due to other sexual issues (aOR 2.56, 95%CI 1.84-3.57) and partners\' sexual problems (aOR 1.72, 95%CI 1.23-2.39).
    Sexual health education and related services need to focus on psychological barriers of women with older age, insufficient knowledge of sexual health, intense work pressure, and poor economic conditions. The medical staff need to pay attention to the sexual health of women with intense work or life pressure and a history of gynecological disease. Low sexual desire is not equal to the sexual desire problem, which should be noticed in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:女性性功能指数(FSFI)仍然是评估女性性功能最广泛使用的量表。然而,虽然FSFI的改编版本已被证明适合西方少数性别女性,它尚未在中国使用。
    目的:本研究旨在验证中国顺性异性恋女性以及性和性别少数族裔女性的普通话中文版改编的FSFI,并评估其心理测量特性。
    方法:进行横断面在线调查。检查了与零反应相关的修改后的评分方法,和结构有效性,内部一致性,内部可靠性,收敛有效性,和已知组效度进行了评估。
    结果:主要措施是适应的FSFI,并使用积极的性量表和新的性满意度量表简表来测试收敛效度。
    结果:共招募431名中国成年女性,包括193名顺性异性恋女性和238名性和性别少数族裔女性。使用原始分数的验证性因子分析支持原始的6因素模型。使用克朗巴赫的α和麦克唐纳的ω,结果表明,总量表和6个子量表的值在0.76至0.98和0.83至0.98范围内,分别,表明令人满意的可靠性。发现FSFI总得分与积极的性行为和性满意度之间存在中度到强烈的相关性(r=0.32-0.71),支持良好的收敛有效性。
    结论:适应的FSFI有助于在临床环境中使用更具包容性的语言,允许对所有女性的性功能进行更全面和公正的评估。
    这项研究招募了不同性取向的顺性女性和出生时被分配为女性的少数性别女性,证明适应的FSFI可以适用于性少数群体。然而,从性别和性别的完全包容的角度来看,没有关于如何准确评估具有女性外生殖器的跨性别妇女或适当评估具有女性生殖系统但不自我认同为女性的妇女的研究。因此,需要更深入的研究来进一步修订FSFI,以便在更广泛的女性人群中更好地使用.
    结论:这个中文版的FSFI具有良好的心理测量特性,是评估女性性功能的可靠有效工具。此外,在性活动不活跃的女性样本中,改进的评分方法可能是一种有效的替代方法.
    The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) remains the most widely used scale for assessing female sexual function. However, while an adapted version of the FSFI has been proven to be suitable for Western sexual minority women, it has yet to be used in China.
    This study aimed to validate the Mandarin Chinese version of the adapted FSFI among Chinese cisgender heterosexual women and sexual and gender minority women, and evaluate its psychometric properties.
    A cross-sectional online survey was conducted. The modified scoring method related to zero responses was examined, and structural validity, internal consistency, internal reliability, convergent validity, and known-group validity were evaluated.
    The primary measure was the adapted FSFI, and the Positive Sexuality Scale and the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short Form were used to test convergent validity.
    A total of 431 Chinese adult women were recruited, including 193 cisgender heterosexual women and 238 sexual and gender minority women. Confirmatory factor analysis using the original scores supported the original 6-factor model. Using both Cronbach\'s α and McDonald\'s ω, the results showed that the values of the total scale and 6 subscales were in the 0.76 to 0.98 and 0.83 to 0.98 ranges, respectively, indicating satisfactory reliability. Moderate-to-strong correlations among the total FSFI scores and positive sexuality and sexual satisfaction were found (r = 0.32-0.71), supporting good convergent validity.
    The adapted FSFI facilitates the use of more inclusive language in the clinical setting, allowing for a more comprehensive and unbiased assessment of sexual function in all women.
    This study recruited both cisgender women of varied sexual orientations and gender minorities who were assigned female at birth, demonstrating that the adapted FSFI could be suitably applied to sexual minority populations. However, from a fully inclusive perspective of sex and gender, there is no research on how to accurately evaluate transgender women with female external genitalia or appropriately assess those with a female reproductive system but who do not self-identify as female. Therefore, more in-depth research is needed to further revise the FSFI for better use in the wider female population.
    This Chinese version of the adapted FSFI has good psychometric properties and is a reliable and valid instrument to assess female sexual function. Furthermore, the modified scoring method could be an effective alternative among samples of sexually inactive women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对中国女性乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)的性功能障碍和性困扰知之甚少,以及它们与物理变量的关联,心理因素,身体形象,和性态度。
    方法:采用女性性功能指数(FSFI)和女性性困扰量表(FSDS-R)对341例BCS进行了横断面研究。物理变量之间的关联,心理因素,身体形象,性态度,性功能障碍,和性困扰使用逻辑回归进行评估,针对混杂因素进行了调整。
    结果:我们发现,在过去的一个月中,有75.37%和18.48%的BCS报告了性功能障碍和性困扰,分别。对性行为的态度,如性活动可能会阻碍疾病的康复,性活动可能导致癌症复发或转移,“性活动可能会削弱治疗效果”与报告性功能障碍和性困扰的可能性增加显着相关。身体形象的破坏,例如“由于您的疾病或治疗而感到身体不那么有吸引力”与性困扰的经历显着相关。
    结论:性功能障碍和性困扰是中国BCS的常见问题。性误解可能导致性功能障碍和性困扰,身体形象与BCS的性困扰有显著的负相关。针对性态度和身体形象的干预措施对于解决BCSs的性问题和改善其整体性健康可能很重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Little is known about sexual dysfunction and sexual distress in Chinese female breast cancer survivors (BCSs), and their associations with physical variables, psychological factors, body image, and sexual attitudes.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 341 BCSs was performed with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R). Associations between physical variables, psychological factors, body image, sexual attitudes, sexual dysfunction, and sexual distress were evaluated using logistic regression, adjusted for confounding factors.
    RESULTS: We found that 75.37% and 18.48% of BCSs reported sexual dysfunction and sexual distress during the past month, respectively. Attitudes toward sexual behavior such as \"sexual activity may impede disease recovery,\" \"sexual activity may cause cancer recurrence or metastasis,\" and \"sexual activity may weaken treatment effects\" were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of reporting sexual dysfunction and sexual distress. Body image disruption such as \"felt physically less attractive as a result of your disease or treatment\" was significantly associated with the experience of sexual distress.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction and sexual distress are common issues in Chinese BCSs. Sexual misconception likely contributes to sexual dysfunction and sexual distress, and body image has a significantly negative association with sexual distress in BCSs. Interventions targeting sexual attitudes and body image might be important to address BCSs\' sexual issues and improve their overall sexual health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    调查中国不同地区家庭隔离生活对女性性生活和性行为的影响及影响因素,分析COVID-19流行期间女性性功能障碍(FSD)的患病率。我们使用在线问卷调查了在COVID-19爆发期间有规律性生活(包括定期手淫)并在家中隔离至少一个月的成年女性。这项调查在筛选后回收了678份完整的问卷。根据调查结果,大流行期间女性性功能量表(FSFI)的总分为21.98±6.38,FSD的频率为61.9%,以及上海FSD的频率,南京,宁夏为60.6%,75.2%,52.2%,分别。FSFI分数和其他特定项目的频率(欲望,唤醒,润滑,性高潮,满意,和疼痛)在三个区域之间存在显着差异(P<0.05)。自慰人群中FSD的总体频率为34.4%,低于配对性交女性的FSD频率(60.1%)(p<0.05)。进一步分析发现,大流行期间FSD的发生与不同年龄阶段有关,更年期,交货方式,焦虑和抑郁的程度,和性生活方式。COVID-19大流行对人们的精神和性生活产生了巨大影响,这是由与个人和环境相关的多个不同变量引起的。我们应该强调性健康在流行病中的重要性,拥有和谐稳定的性生活将帮助我们度过孤独的无聊生活。
    To investigate the impact and factors of home quarantine life on women\'s sexual lives and behaviors in different areas of China and analyze the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed adult women who had a regular sexual life (including regular masturbation) and had been isolated at home for at least one month during the COVID-19 outbreak using online questionnaires. This survey recovered 678 complete questionnaires after screening. According to the findings, the overall score of the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) during the pandemic was 21.98 ± 6.38, the frequency of FSD was 61.9%, and the frequencies of FSD in Shanghai, Nanjing, and Ningxia were 60.6%, 75.2%, and 52.2%, respectively. The frequency of FSFI scores and other specific items (Desire, Arousal, Lubrication, Orgasm, Satisfaction, and Pain) varied significantly across the three regions (P < 0.05). The overall frequency of FSD in the masturbation population was 34.4%, which was lower than the frequency of FSD in women having paired sexual intercourse (60.1%) (p < 0.05). Further analysis revealed that the occurrence of FSD during the pandemic was related to different age stages, menopause, mode of delivery, level of anxiety and depression, and sexual lifestyles. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a great impact on people\'s spiritual and sexual lives, which are caused by multiple different variables related to both the individual and the environment. We should emphasize the importance of sexual health in epidemics, and having a harmonious and stable sex life will help us survive the boring life of isolation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    宫颈癌是一种常见的妇科恶性肿瘤。然而,随着存活率的提高,越来越多的注意力集中在幸存者的性生活质量上。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以调查CC女性中女性性功能障碍(FSD)的患病率和严重程度。我们搜查了PubMed,科克伦图书馆,Embase,中国国家知识基础设施,和王芳数据库,并从截至2020年12月发表的所有研究中提取数据,这些研究评估了具有女性性功能指数(FSFI)的CC患者的性功能障碍。根据特定的纳入和排除标准筛选研究。并对纳入研究的质量进行评价。16项研究,共有2009年女性患有CC,包括1306名FSD妇女,纳入荟萃分析。在CC患者中,FSD的发生率为80%(95%置信区间(95CI)0.74~0.87),平均FSFI评分为20.25(95CI18.96~21.53).这些结果表明,女性CC患者的FSD患病率高,性功能差,建议需要定期评估这些CC女性的性功能,以提高对FSD的早期认识,从而允许适当的干预措施,以改善受影响患者的性生活。
    Cervical cancer (CC) is a common malignant gynaecological tumour. However, as survival rates have improved, increasing attention has focused on the quality of the survivors\' sex lives. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence and severity of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in women with CC. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wang Fang databases, and extracted data from all studies published up to December 2020 that evaluated sexual dysfunction in patients with CC with the female sexual function index (FSFI). Studies were screened according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the qualities of the included studies were evaluated. Sixteen studies with a total of 2009 women with CC, including 1306 women with FSD, were included in the meta-analysis. Among patients with CC, the incidence of FSD was 80% (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.74-0.87) and the average FSFI score was 20.25 (95%CI 18.96-21.53). These results revealed a high prevalence of FSD and poor sexual function among women with CC, suggesting a need to assess sexual function regularly in these women with CC to improve early recognition of FSD and thereby allow appropriate interventions to enhance the sex life of affected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号