BACKGROUND: Auricular reconstruction with tissue expansion has been widely used in children with microtia. Base on the experience of using tissue expander, more patients have undergone a modified auricular reconstruction using a framework wrapped by expanded skin flap without fascial and skin graft transplantation. Skin damage is a common complication that may lead to serious outcomes, such as infection and distortion. Promptly repair is particularly important when using this modified technique. This work aims to record the site and other information on damage to the expanded skin flap, and to apply various salvage methods according to the site and stage.
METHODS: From January 2017 to September 2019, 170 patients who underwent total auricular reconstruction without fascial and skin graft were followed up. All patients who had skin damage received corresponding prompt treatment. Details on the site, occurrence time, and salvage methods were noted.
RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were found to have skin damage during the follow-up period. The defect size ranged from 10 mm2 to 70 mm2. Four patients had skin damage in the lower part of the skin flap combined with expander exposure. The second stage of auricular reconstruction was carried out immediately. Two patients had skin flap damage in anterior 1/3rd of the helix, seven in middle 1/3rd of the helix, four in posterior 1/3rd of the helix and two in the triangular fossa. Most of the skin damage occurred within 4-9 months after auricular reconstruction. According to the site and other factors, the expanded skin flap with the exposed cartilage was repaired using local skin flap, retroauricular skin flap, and retroauricular fascia. Patients were satisfied with the outcome of the repair. Additional skin damage and other complications were not observed after the repair operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Skin damage is a common complication, and it should receive more attention while applying this modified auricular reconstruction using tissue expansion. The site, occurrence time, and other information provide reference to improve the reconstruction without fascial or skin graft transplantation. Salvage methods, such as retroauricular skin flap and retroauricular fascia, have been treated as highly efficient backup methods and have achieved satisfying results.

OBJECTIVE: The retroauricular fascia flap (RFF) is one of the most commonly used vascularized linings for auriculocephalic sulcus reconstruction in staged total auricular reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the histomorphometric features regarding the retroauricular fascia.
METHODS: Histological evaluation included qualitative observation and quantitative analysis of sections of RFF stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson\'s trichrome, Elastica van Gieson, CD31, and Lyve-1. Ultrasonographic evaluation included measurement of the thickness of the superficial layer of the retroauricular fascia (RFF origin) at three different positions in microtia patients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: RFF was a thin, highly organized layer with mainly collagen fibers. From its superior to inferior portions, the percentage of collagen fibers differed significantly (superior 87.57 ± 10.85%, middle 68.29 ± 29.02%, inferior 53.31 ± 33.33%, p < 0.05). The percentages of elastic fibers in the superior (4.86 ± 5.17%) and middle (5.05 ± 5.37%) areas were higher than that in the inferior (2.14 ± 2.42%, p < 0.05). RFF blood vessel density (20× magnification) decreased significantly from the superior to inferior portions (superior 6.39 ± 1.18, middle 5.17 ± 1.15, inferior 2.67 ± 0.78, p < 0.05). Lymphatic vessel density (20× magnification) also decreased significantly from the superior to inferior regions (superior 6.80 ± 0.62, middle 5.26 ± 1.17, inferior 2.11 ± 0.46, p < 0.05). Thickness of the superficial layer of retroauricular fascia increased significantly from the superior to inferior regions (superior 0.29 ± 0.06 mm, middle 0.36 ± 0.09 mm, inferior 0.53 ± 0.14 mm, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: From cranial to caudal, the RFF became thicker, less elastic, and less vascularized, and contained fewer lymphatic vessels. Therefore, when the retroauricular fascia is large enough, the superior portion would be preferred for RFF in auriculocephalic sulcus reconstruction.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .