Respiratory insufficiency

呼吸功能不全
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们评估了不同二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)水平对接受静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(V-VECMO)压力支持通气的呼吸衰竭患者器官灌注的影响。
    方法:在这项12名患者的前瞻性研究中,ECMO气体流量从基线(PaCO2<40mmHg)降低,直到PaCO2增加5-10mmHg(高CO2相)。肠道的抗性指数,脾,脾鼻烟动脉,外周灌注指数(PPI),在基线和高CO2阶段测量心率变异性。
    结果:当PaCO2从基线时的36(36-37)mmHg增加到高CO2阶段的42(41-43)mmHg时(p<0.001),PPI显著下降(p=0.026)。鼻烟动脉(p=0.022),肠系膜上动脉(p=0.042),脾脏(p=0.012)抗性指数显著增加。连续差的均方根(RMSSD)从19.5(18.1-22.7)下降到15.9(14.4-18.6)ms(p=0.034),低频与高频分量之比(LF/HF)从0.47±0.23增加到0.70±0.38(p=0.013)。
    结论:高PaCO2可能通过自主神经系统引起呼吸衰竭患者的外周组织和内脏器官灌注降低。
    BACKGROUND: We evaluated the influence of different partial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) levels on organ perfusion in patients with respiratory failure receiving pressure-support ventilation with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO).
    METHODS: In this twelve patients prospective study, ECMO gas-flow was decreased from baseline (PaCO2 < 40 mmHg) until PaCO2 increased by 5-10 mmHg (High-CO2 phase). Resistance indices of gut, spleen, and snuffbox artery, the peripheral perfusion index (PPI), and heart rate variability were measured at baseline and High-CO2 phase.
    RESULTS: When PaCO2 increased from 36 (36-37) mmHg at baseline to 42 (41-43) mmHg in the High-CO2 phase (p < 0.001), PPI decreased significantly (p = 0.026). The snuffbox artery (p = 0.022), superior mesenteric artery (p = 0.042), and spleen (p = 0.012) resistance indices increased significantly. The root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) decreased from 19.5(18.1-22.7) to 15.9(14.4-18.6) ms (p = 0.034), and the ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency components(LF/HF) increased from 0.47 ± 0.23 to 0.70 ± 0.38 (p = 0.013).
    CONCLUSIONS: High PaCO2 might cause decreased peripheral tissue and visceral organ perfusion through autonomic nervous system in patients with respiratory failure undergoing PSV with V-V ECMO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To summarize the effects of disease-modifying drugs for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) on the ventilation support of type 1 children after acute respiratory failure. Methods: A case-control study was conducted, including the data of clinical characteristics, medication and ventilation supports of 38 SMA patients of type 1 with pneumonia and acute respiratory failure hospitalized in Children\'s Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics from January 2020 to July 2023. Children were divided into the treatment group and the untreated group based on whether they started and persisted in using Nusinersen or Risdiplam or not before hospitalization. The differences of ventilation support between the 2 groups were analyzed. The children of the treatment group were divided into the improved group and the unimproved group based on whether they could be avoid of prolonged dependence on continuous mechanical ventilation in the next six months after discharge. The differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups were analyzed. T-test and χ2 test were used for comparison. Results: Among the enrolled children, 19 were male and 19 were female. The age was 1.3 (0.6, 2.0) years at the time of hospitalization due to pneumonia. There were 26 cases in the treatment group and 12 cases in the untreated group. The treatment group had a higher proportion of patients without prolonged dependence on continuous mechanical ventilation in the next six months after discharge (69% (18/26) vs. 2/12, χ2=9.10, P<0.05). Eighteen children were improved among the treated group, while 8 children were not. The improved group had a larger age of first onset of acute respiratory failure (1.6 (0.4, 3.4) vs. 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) years, Z=2.07, P<0.05), a longer duration of medication taken before hospitalization (3.6 (2.4, 8.7) vs. 1.2 (1.2, 2.4) months, t=2.74, P<0.05), and a smaller proportion with underlying diseases (1/18 vs. 6/8, χ2=13.58, P<0.05). Conclusions: SMA disease-modifying drugs are useful for type 1 children to avoid of prolonged dependence on continuous mechanical ventilation after acute respiratory failure. The patients who take medication longer, or have acute respiratory failure for the first-time at an older age, or without underlying diseases are more likely to avoid of.
    目的: 总结脊髓性肌萎缩(SMA)疾病修正药物对1型患儿在急性呼吸衰竭后通气支持需求的影响。 方法: 病例对照研究,纳入2020年1月至2023年7月于首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院呼吸内科因肺炎并急性呼吸衰竭住院的38例1型SMA患儿的临床特征、用药及通气支持需求情况。根据住院前是否开始并坚持使用诺西那生或利司扑兰分为治疗组和未治疗组;根据治疗组患儿出院后半年能否脱离长期持续依赖机械通气分为改善组与未改善组。组间比较采用独立样本t检验、χ2检验。 结果: 38例患儿中男女各19例,因肺炎住院年龄1.3(0.6,2.0)岁。治疗组26例、未治疗组12例,治疗组出院半年后无需长期持续依赖机械通气者比例高于未治疗组[69%(18/26)比2/12,χ2=9.10,P<0.05]。改善组18例、未改善组8例,改善组首次发生急性呼吸衰竭的年龄更大[1.6(0.4,3.4)比0.5(0.3,0.7)岁,Z=2.07,P<0.05],用药时间更长[3.6(2.4,8.7)比1.2(1.2,2.4)月,t=2.74,P<0.05],合并基础疾病比例更小(1/18比6/8,χ2=13.58,P<0.05)。 结论: SMA疾病修正药物有助于1型患儿在急性呼吸衰竭后避免长期持续依赖机械通气,坚持更长时间用药、首次发生急性呼吸衰竭年龄更大、无基础疾病者更有可能避免。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经胸超声心动图显示的二尖瓣多普勒流入速度与环形组织多普勒波速度的比值(E/Ea)和膈肌超声显示的膈肌偏移(DE)已被证实可以预测拔管结果。然而,很少有研究集中在自主呼吸试验(SBT)过程中不同位置的E/Ea和DE的预测值,以及△E/Ea和△DE的影响(SBT期间E/Ea和DE的变化)。
    方法:这项研究是对2017年发表的先前研究中60名难以断奶的患者的数据进行的重新分析。所有符合条件的参与者在拔管后48h内分为呼吸衰竭(RF)组和拔管成功(ES)组。拔管后1周内或再插管(RI)组和非插管(NI)组。呼吸衰竭和再插管的危险因素包括E/Ea和△E/Ea。采用多元逻辑回归分析不同位置的DE和△DE,分别。E/Ea(间隔,横向,平均值)和DE(右,左,平均值)相互比较,分别。
    结果:在60名患者中,29例48h内出现呼吸衰竭,其中14例需要在1周内重新插管。多因素logistic回归分析显示E/Ea均与呼吸衰竭相关,而SBT后只有DE(右)和DE(平均)与再插管有关。E/Ea在不同位置的ROC曲线之间没有统计学差异。在DE的ROC曲线之间也是如此。RF组和ES组△E/Ea差异无统计学意义。NI组的△DE(平均值)明显高于RI组。然而,多因素logistic回归分析显示△DE(平均值)与再次插管无关。
    结论:在SBT期间不同位置的E/Ea可以预测拔管后呼吸衰竭,但它们之间没有统计学差异。同样,SBT后只有DE(右)和DE(平均)可以预测再次插管,彼此之间没有统计学差异.
    BACKGROUND: The ratio (E/Ea) of mitral Doppler inflow velocity to annular tissue Doppler wave velocity by transthoracic echocardiography and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) by diaphragm ultrasound have been confirmed to predict extubation outcomes. However, few studies focused on the predicting value of E/Ea and DE at different positions during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), as well as the effects of △E/Ea and △DE (changes in E/Ea and DE during a SBT).
    METHODS: This study was a reanalysis of the data of 60 difficult-to-wean patients in a previous study published in 2017. All eligible participants were organized into respiratory failure (RF) group and extubation success (ES) group within 48 h after extubation, or re-intubation (RI) group and non-intubation (NI) group within 1 week after extubation. The risk factors for respiratory failure and re-intubation including E/Ea and △E/Ea, DE and △DE at different positions were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of E/Ea (septal, lateral, average) and DE (right, left, average) were compared with each other, respectively.
    RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 29 cases developed respiratory failure within 48 h, and 14 of those cases required re-intubation within 1 week. Multivariate logistic regression showed that E/Ea were all associated with respiratory failure, while only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT were related to re-intubation. There were no statistic differences among the ROC curves of E/Ea at different positions, nor between the ROC curves of DE. No statistical differences were shown in △E/Ea between RF and ES groups, while △DE (average) was remarkably higher in NI group than that in RI group. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that △DE (average) was not associated with re-intubation.
    CONCLUSIONS: E/Ea at different positions during a SBT could predict postextubation respiratory failure with no statistical differences among them. Likewise, only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT might predict re-intubation with no statistical differences between each other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺良性转移性平滑肌瘤是一种罕见的疾病,主要影响有子宫平滑肌肿瘤和子宫平滑肌瘤手术史的育龄妇女。PBML的进展通常是不可预测的,并且取决于肺部受累的程度。一般来说,大多数患者仍然无症状,但是少数人可能会咳嗽,喘息,或者呼吸急促,经常被误诊为肺炎。因此,这对诊断前的治疗和护理都提出了重大挑战.本文报道了一名35岁的女性,主要被诊断为急性低氧性呼吸衰竭,该女性从急诊室转移到重症监护病房。患者肺部的初始计算机断层扫描扫描显示弥漫性间质性肺炎,但是肺泡灌洗液病原体宏的测序没有检测到任何细菌,真菌,或病毒。此外,患者在确诊前仍处于持续缺氧状态.因此,我们的重点是保持患者的气道通畅,使用俯卧通风,吸入一氧化氮,监测电阻抗断层成像,预防呼吸机相关性肺炎改善氧合,同时等待患者活检肺组织的免疫组织化学染色。这将有助于我们明确诊断并根据病因进行治疗。经过精心的治疗和护理,26天后,患者脱离呼吸机,40天后转移到呼吸病房。该病例研究可作为临床实践的参考,并帮助患有PBML的患者。
    Pulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma is an uncommon condition, predominantly affecting women of childbearing age with a history of uterine smooth muscle tumors and uterine leiomyoma surgery for uterine leiomyoma. The progression of PBML is often unpredictable and depends on the extent of lung involvement. Generally, most patients remain asymptomatic, but a minority may experience coughing, wheezing, or shortness of breath, which are frequently misdiagnosed as pneumonia. consequently, this presents significant challenges in both treatment and nursing care before diagnosis. This paper reports the case of a 35-year-old woman primarily diagnosed with acute hypoxic respiratory failure who was transferred from the emergency room to the intensive care unit. The initial computed tomography scan of the patient\'s lungs indicated diffuse interstitial pneumonia, but the sequencing of the alveolar lavage fluid pathogen macro did not detect any bacteria, fungi, or viruses. Moreover, the patient remained in a persistent hypoxic state before the definitive diagnosis. Therefore, our focus was on maintaining the airway patency of the patient, using prone ventilation, inhaling nitric oxide, monitoring electrical impedance tomography, and preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia to improve oxygenation, while awaiting immunohistochemical staining of the patient\'s biopsied lung tissue. This would help us clarify the diagnosis and treat it based on etiology. After meticulous treatment and nursing care, the patient was weaned off the ventilator after 26 days and transferred to the respiratory ward after 40 days. This case study may serve as a reference for clinical practice and assist patients suffering from PBML.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:据报道,易醒定位可减少2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者的气管插管。然而,尚不清楚长时间使用清醒倾向定位是否能进一步改善结局.
    方法:在本随机分组中,在中国12家医院进行的开放标签临床试验,未插管的COVID-19相关AHRF患者被随机分配到长时间清醒俯卧位(每天目标>12小时,共7天)或标准护理,且清醒俯卧位时间较短.主要结果是随机分组后28天内气管插管。关键次要结局包括死亡率和不良事件。
    结果:总计,409名患者被纳入并随机分配到长时间清醒倾向定位(n=205)或标准护理(n=204)。在随机化后的前7天,在长时间清醒的俯卧位定位组中,俯卧位的中位持续时间为12h/d(四分位距[IQR]12-14h/d)。5h/d(IQR2-8h/d)在标准护理组中。在意向治疗分析中,35例(17%)患者接受长时间清醒俯卧位,56例(27%)患者接受标准治疗(相对危险度0.62[95%可信区间(CI)0.42-0.9]).插管的危险比(HR)为0.56(0.37-0.86),对于死亡率为0.63(0.42-0.96),与标准护理相比,28天内。两组中预先指定的不良事件的发生率很低,并且相似。
    结论:延长COVID-19相关AHRF患者的清醒倾向定位可降低插管率,且无明显损害。这些结果支持COVID-19相关AHRF患者的长时间清醒倾向定位。
    OBJECTIVE: Awake prone positioning has been reported to reduce endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, it is still unclear whether using the awake prone positioning for longer periods can further improve outcomes.
    METHODS: In this randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at 12 hospitals in China, non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related AHRF were randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (target > 12 h daily for 7 days) or standard care with a shorter period of awake prone positioning. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 28 days after randomization. The key secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events.
    RESULTS: In total, 409 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (n = 205) or standard care (n = 204). In the first 7 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 12 h/d (interquartile range [IQR] 12-14 h/d) in the prolonged awake prone positioning group vs. 5 h/d (IQR 2-8 h/d) in the standard care group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, intubation occurred in 35 (17%) patients assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning and in 56 (27%) patients assigned to standard care (relative risk 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.9]). The hazard ratio (HR) for intubation was 0.56 (0.37-0.86), and for mortality was 0.63 (0.42-0.96) for prolonged awake prone positioning versus standard care, within 28 days. The incidence of pre-specified adverse events was low and similar in both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF reduces the intubation rate without significant harm. These results support prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者相比,非HIV合并肺孢子菌肺炎(PCP)的患者起病更快,更快速的发展,和更高的死亡率。
    研究非HIV-PCP合并呼吸衰竭(RF)患者入院后获得的变量对院内死亡和90天预后的预测价值。
    这是一个在三级护理机构进行的为期15年的单中心回顾性研究。它包括4月1日在北京大学第一医院出院或死亡的所有经实验室证实的非HIV-PCP合并RF的成人住院患者(≥18岁),2007年11月1日,2022年。流行病学,临床,实验室,影像学和结局数据收集自患者记录.
    在这项研究中,共有146例非HIV-PCP患者接受RF治疗.有57名患者(39%)在住院期间死亡,44例患者(53%)在重症监护病房(ICU)死亡。共有137名患者完成了90天的随访,其中58人(42.3%)死亡。多元回归分析显示CD8+T细胞计数<115/μl(P=0.009),支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)-中性粒细胞百分比≥50%(P=0.047),糖皮质激素停药至症状发作时间≤5天(P=0.012),从就诊到开始服用磺胺类药物的时间≥2天(P=0.011)是院内死亡的独立危险因素。此外,CD8+T细胞计数<115/μl(P=0.001),从就诊到开始接受磺胺类药物治疗的时间≥2天(P=0.033)与90天全因死亡独立相关.
    外周血中CD8+T细胞计数低,高比例的BALF中性粒细胞,从皮质类固醇戒断到症状发作的短时间内,从就诊到开始服用磺胺类药物的时间较长与非HIV-PCPRF患者的预后不良相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) patients, non-HIV patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) have more rapid onset, more rapid progression, and higher mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the predictive value of variables obtained upon hospital admission for in-hospital death and 90-day outcomes in non-HIV-PCP patients with respiratory failure (RF).
    UNASSIGNED: This was a single center retrospective study in a tertiary care institution over 15 years. It included all adults inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory confirmed non-HIV-PCP with RF who were discharged or died from Peking University First Hospital between April 1st, 2007 and November 1st, 2022. Epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, imaging and outcome data were collected from patient records.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, a total of 146 non-HIV-PCP patients with RF were included. There were 57 patients (39%) died during hospitalization, 44 patients (53%) died in Intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 137 patients completed 90 days of follow-up, of which 58 (42.3%) died. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that a CD8+ T cell count <115/μl (P=0.009), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-neutrophil percentage ≥50% (P=0.047), the time from corticosteroids withdrawal to symptom onset ≤5 days (P=0.012), and the time from visit to initiation of sulfonamides ≥2 days (P=0.011) were independent risk factors for in-hospital death. Furthermore, a CD8+ T cell count < 115/μl (P=0.001) and the time from visit to initiation of sulfonamides therapy ≥2 days (P=0.033) was independently associated with 90-day all-cause death.
    UNASSIGNED: A low CD8+ T cell count in peripheral blood, a high percentage of BALF-neutrophils, a short time from corticosteroids withdrawal to symptom onset, and a long time from visit to initiation of sulfonamides are associated with poor prognosis in non-HIV-PCP patients with RF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿片样物质通过激动阿片样物质受体和激活与受体如G-蛋白和/或β-抑制蛋白偶联的信号通路来发挥镇痛作用。伴随呼吸抑制(RD)是一个常见的临床问题,RD的改善通常是通过特定的拮抗剂如纳洛酮来实现的;然而,纳洛酮可拮抗阿片类药物镇痛,并可能产生更多未知的不良反应。近年来,研究人员已经使用各种方法分离阿片受体介导的镇痛和RD,目的是保留阿片类药物镇痛,同时减弱RD。目前,重点主要是开发新的呼吸抑制作用较弱的阿片类药物或使用非阿片类药物刺激呼吸。这篇综述报道了新型阿片类药物的最新进展,如混合阿片受体激动剂,外周选择性阿片受体激动剂,阿片受体剪接变体激动剂,偏向性阿片受体激动剂,和阿片受体的变构调节剂,以及在非阿片类药物中,如AMPA受体调节剂,5-羟色胺受体激动剂,磷酸二酯酶-4抑制剂,和烟碱乙酰胆碱受体激动剂。
    Opioids exert analgesic effects by agonizing opioid receptors and activating signaling pathways coupled to receptors such as G-protein and/or β-arrestin. Concomitant respiratory depression (RD) is a common clinical problem, and improvement of RD is usually achieved with specific antagonists such as naloxone; however, naloxone antagonizes opioid analgesia and may produce more unknown adverse effects. In recent years, researchers have used various methods to isolate opioid receptor-mediated analgesia and RD, with the aim of preserving opioid analgesia while attenuating RD. At present, the focus is mainly on the development of new opioids with weak respiratory inhibition or the use of non-opioid drugs to stimulate breathing. This review reports recent advances in novel opioid agents, such as mixed opioid receptor agonists, peripheral selective opioid receptor agonists, opioid receptor splice variant agonists, biased opioid receptor agonists, and allosteric modulators of opioid receptors, as well as in non-opioid agents, such as AMPA receptor modulators, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管累积研究表明,高流量鼻插管吸氧(HFNC)在急性高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭中具有有益作用,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)合并急性-中度高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭患者中,比较HFNC和无创通气(NIV)作为初始治疗的随机试验是有限的.这个随机化的目的,开放标签,非劣效性试验旨在比较HFNC和NIV患者的治疗失败率.
    方法:在2018年3月至2022年12月期间,被诊断为AECOPD且基线动脉血气pH值在7.25至7.35之间且PaCO2≥50mmHg的患者在一家大型三级教学医院的两个重症监护病房(ICU)被随机分配到HFNC或NIV。主要终点是治疗失败率,定义为气管内插管或切换到其他研究治疗方式。次要终点是插管率或治疗改变率,血气值,在一个生命体征,12和48小时,28天死亡率,以及ICU和医院的住院时间。
    结果:共有225例患者(HFNC组113例,NIV组112例)被纳入意向治疗分析。HFNC组的失败率为25.7%,而NIV组为14.3%。两组的失败率风险差异为11.38%(95%CI0.25-21.20,P=0.033),高于9%的非劣效性截止值。在符合方案的分析中,治疗失败发生在HFNC组110例患者中的28例(25.5%)和NIV组109例患者中的15例(13.8%)(风险差异,11.69%;95%CI0.48-22.60)。HFNC组的插管率高于NIV组(14.2%vs5.4%,P=0.026)。治疗切换率,HFNC组与NIV组相比,ICU、住院时间及28天死亡率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
    结论:HFNC作为AECOPD伴急性-中度高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭患者的初始呼吸支持时,治疗失败的发生率高于NIV。
    背景:chictr.org(ChiCTR1800014553)。2018年1月21日注册,http://www.chictr.org.cn.
    BACKGROUND: Although cumulative studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, randomized trials to compare HFNC with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as initial treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure are limited. The aim of this randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial was to compare treatment failure rates between HFNC and NIV in such patients.
    METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AECOPD with a baseline arterial blood gas pH between 7.25 and 7.35 and PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg admitted to two intensive care units (ICUs) at a large tertiary academic teaching hospital between March 2018 and December 2022 were randomly assigned to HFNC or NIV. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation or a switch to the other study treatment modality. Secondary endpoints were rates of intubation or treatment change, blood gas values, vital signs at one, 12, and 48 h, 28-day mortality, as well as ICU and hospital lengths of stay.
    RESULTS: 225 total patients (113 in the HFNC group and 112 in the NIV group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The failure rate of the HFNC group was 25.7%, while the NIV group was 14.3%. The failure rate risk difference between the two groups was 11.38% (95% CI 0.25-21.20, P = 0.033), which was higher than the non-inferiority cut-off of 9%. In the per-protocol analysis, treatment failure occurred in 28 of 110 patients (25.5%) in the HFNC group and 15 of 109 patients (13.8%) in the NIV group (risk difference, 11.69%; 95% CI 0.48-22.60). The intubation rate in the HFNC group was higher than in the NIV group (14.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.026). The treatment switch rate, ICU and hospital length of stay or 28-day mortality in the HFNC group were not statistically different from the NIV group (all P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: HFNC was not shown to be non-inferior to NIV and resulted in a higher incidence of treatment failure than NIV when used as the initial respiratory support for AECOPD patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure.
    BACKGROUND: chictr.org (ChiCTR1800014553). Registered 21 January 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    外周静脉中心静脉导管(PICC)是需要中心静脉通路的儿童静脉输液的常用工具。虽然医生和护士可以安全放置,感染等并发症,遮挡,静脉炎,出血可能发生。我们报告了一名5个月大的婴儿,该婴儿因导管错位而导致呼吸衰竭,导致大量液体注入胸腔。使用即时超声(POCUS)来识别大量胸腔积液,从而提示紧急引流。儿科患者中与PICC相关的并发症并不常见,但有时很难立即识别。因此,医师应特别注意识别和降低PICC相关并发症的风险.因此,强烈建议使用视觉工具来提高侵入性手术的安全性。
    Peripheral intravenous central catheter (PICC) is a common tool for intravenous infusion for children who need central venous access. Although it is safe for physicians and nurses to place, complications like infection, occlusion, phlebitis, and bleeding can occur. We report a 5-month-old infant who suffered respiratory failure caused by catheter malposition resulting in massive fluid infusion into the thoracic cavity. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was utilized to identify a massive pleural effusion that prompted urgent drainage. Complications related to PICC in pediatric patients are not common but difficult to immediately identify sometimes. Therefore, careful attention should be paid by physicians to identify and reduce the risk of complications associated with PICC. Thus, visual tools are strongly advised to enhance the safety of invasive procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用高流量鼻套管(HFNC)氧疗治疗急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)越来越受欢迎。然而,关于HFNC治疗闭合性胸外伤(BCT)患者低氧性ARF的有效性的证据有限.
    方法:本回顾性分析集中于2021年1月至2022年12月在急诊内科接受HFNC或非有创通气(NIV)治疗的轻中度低氧性ARFBCT患者。主要终点是治疗失败,定义为有创通气,或切换到其他研究治疗(NFNC组患者的NIV,反之亦然)。
    结果:本研究共纳入157例BCT患者(HFNC组72例,NIV组85例)。HFNC组治疗失败率为11.1%,NIV组为16.5%,风险差异为5.36%(95%CI,-5.94-16.10%;P=0.366)。HFNC组失败的最常见原因是呼吸窘迫加重。而在NIV组,失败的最常见原因是治疗不耐受.HFNC组治疗不耐受显著低于NIV组(1.4%vs9.4%,95%CI0.40-16.18;P=0.039)。单因素logistic回归分析显示,慢性呼吸系统疾病,简化损伤量表评分(胸部)(≥3),急性生理学和慢性健康评估II评分(≥15),治疗1小时的部分动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数(≤200)和治疗1小时的呼吸频率(≥32/min)是与HFNC失败相关的危险因素。
    结论:在轻度-中度低氧性ARF的BCT患者中,与NIV相比,使用HFNC并未导致更高的治疗失败率.发现HFNC比NIV提供更好的舒适度和耐受性,提示它可能是BCT轻中度ARF患者的一种有希望的新的呼吸支持疗法。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is gaining popularity for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of HFNC for hypoxemic ARF in patients with blunt chest trauma (BCT).
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis focused on BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF who were treated with either HFNC or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the emergency medicine department from January 2021 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as either invasive ventilation, or a switch to the other study treatment (NIV for patients in the NFNC group, and vice-versa).
    RESULTS: A total of 157 patients with BCT (72 in the HFNC group and 85 in the NIV group) were included in this study. The treatment failure rate in the HFNC group was 11.1% and 16.5% in the NIV group - risk difference of 5.36% (95% CI, -5.94-16.10%; P = 0.366). The most common cause of failure in the HFNC group was aggravation of respiratory distress. While in the NIV group, the most common reason for failure was treatment intolerance. Treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group (1.4% vs 9.4%, 95% CI 0.40-16.18; P = 0.039). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that chronic respiratory disease, abbreviated injury scale score (chest) (≥3), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (≥15), partial arterial oxygen tension /fraction of inspired oxygen (≤200) at 1 h of treatment and respiratory rate (≥32 /min) at 1 h of treatment were risk factors associated with HFNC failure.
    CONCLUSIONS: In BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF, the usage of HFNC did not lead to higher rate of treatment failure when compared to NIV. HFNC was found to offer better comfort and tolerance than NIV, suggesting it may be a promising new respiratory support therapy for BCT patients with mild-moderate ARF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号