Regional anaesthesia

区域麻醉
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床前研究表明,麻醉是痴呆的独立危险因素,但痴呆与不同类型全身麻醉或区域麻醉之间的临床关联尚不清楚.我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,使用倾向评分匹配来比较台湾国家健康保险研究数据库中接受各种麻醉类型髋部骨折手术的患者的痴呆发生率。
    方法:从2002年至2019年接受择期髋部骨折手术的年龄≥65岁的患者分为三组,分别接受吸入麻醉(GA)。全静脉麻醉-全身麻醉(TIVA-GA),或区域麻醉(RA),并以1:1的比例匹配。然后确定痴呆的发病率。
    结果:倾向评分匹配在每组89338例患者中(N=268014)。吸入性GA中的痴呆发病率,TIVA-GA,RA组分别为4821、3400和2692/100000人年,分别。吸入性GA与TIVA-GA的痴呆发生率比率(95%置信区间[CI])为1.19(1.14-1.25),吸入GA对RA的影响为1.51(1.15-1.66),对于TIVA-GA,RA为1.28(1.09-1.51)。
    结论:接受髋部骨折手术的老年人中痴呆的发生率比接受全身麻醉的老年人高。与完全静脉麻醉(TIVA)相比,吸入麻醉与痴呆的发生率更高。
    Preclinical studies have indicated that anaesthesia is an independent risk factor for dementia, but the clinical associations between dementia and different types of general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia remain unclear. We conducted a population-based cohort study using propensity-score matching to compare dementia incidence in patients included in the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database who received various anaesthetic types for hip fracture surgery.
    Patients aged ≥65 yr who received elective hip fracture surgery from 2002 to 2019 were divided into three groups receiving either inhalational anaesthesia (GA), total intravenous anaesthesia-general anaesthesia (TIVA-GA), or regional anaesthesia (RA), and matched in a 1:1 ratio. The incidence rates of dementia were then determined.
    Propensity-score matching yielded 89 338 patients in each group (N=268 014). Dementia incidence rates in the inhalational GA, TIVA-GA, and RA groups were 4821, 3400, and 2692 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. The dementia incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for inhalational GA to TIVA-GA was 1.19 (1.14-1.25), for inhalational GA to RA was 1.51 (1.15-1.66), and for TIVA-GA to RA was 1.28 (1.09-1.51).
    The incidence rate ratios of dementia amongst older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery were higher for those receiving general anaesthesia than for those receiving regional anaesthesia, with inhalational anaesthesia associated with a higher incidence rate ratio for dementia than total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:麻醉途径是否是痴呆的独立危险因素尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配(PSM)队列研究,以比较接受不同麻醉途径的手术患者痴呆发生率.
    UNASSIGNED:纳入标准是接受重大择期手术的20岁以上的住院患者,定义为不使用或使用吸入麻醉剂或区域麻醉需要GA的患者,并在2008年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间在台湾住院超过1天。接受重大择期手术的患者根据麻醉类型分为三组:非吸入麻醉,吸入麻醉,和区域麻醉,以1:1的比例匹配。确定痴呆的发生率(IR)。
    未经评估:PSM治疗了63,750名患者(非吸入麻醉组21,250名,吸入麻醉组21,250人,和21,250在区域麻醉组)。在多元Cox回归分析中,与区域麻醉组相比,吸入和非吸入麻醉组痴呆的校正风险比(aHR;95%置信区间)为20.16(15.40-26.35;p<0.001)和18.33(14.03-24.04;p<0.001),分别。吸入麻醉与非吸入麻醉相比,痴呆的aHR为1.13(1.03-1.22;p=0.028)。吸入性痴呆症的IRs,非吸入,区域麻醉组为3647.90、3492.00和272.99/10万人年,分别。
    未经证实:在这项基于人群的队列研究中,接受全身麻醉的手术患者中痴呆的发生率高于接受区域麻醉的患者.在接受全身麻醉的患者中,吸入麻醉比非吸入麻醉与痴呆的风险更高。我们的结果应该在随机对照试验中得到证实。
    未经评估:这项研究得到了Lo-Hsu医学基金会的部分支持,洛通宝爱医院(资金编号:10908、10909、11001、11002、11003、11006和11013)。
    UNASSIGNED: Whether the route of anaesthesia is an independent risk factor for dementia remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a propensity score-matched (PSM) population-based cohort study to compare dementia incidence among surgical patients undergoing different routes of anaesthesia.
    UNASSIGNED: The inclusion criteria were being an inpatient >20 years of age who underwent major elective surgery, defined as those requiring GA without or with inhalation anaesthetics or regional anaesthesia, and being hospitalised for >1 day between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2019 in Taiwan. Patients undergoing major elective surgery were categorised into three groups according to the type of anaesthesia administered: noninhalation anaesthesia, inhalation anaesthesia, and regional anaesthesia, matched at a 1:1 ratio. The incidence rate (IR) of dementia was determined.
    UNASSIGNED: PSM yielded 63,750 patients (21,250 in the noninhalation anaesthesia group, 21,250 in the inhalation anaesthesia group, and 21,250 in the regional anaesthesia group). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% confidence intervals) of dementia for the inhalation and noninhalation anaesthesia groups compared with the regional anaesthesia group were 20.16 (15.40-26.35; p < 0.001) and 18.33 (14.03-24.04; p < 0.001), respectively. The aHR of dementia for inhalation anaesthesia compared with noninhalation anaesthesia was 1.13 (1.03-1.22; p = 0.028). The IRs of dementia for the inhalation, noninhalation, and regional anaesthesia groups were 3647.90, 3492.00, and 272.99 per 100,000 person-years, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: In this population based cohort study, the incidence of dementia among surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia was higher than among those undergoing regional anaesthesia. Among patients undergoing general anaesthesia, inhalation anaesthesia was associated with a higher risk of dementia than noninhalation anaesthesia. Our results should be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was partially supported by Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital (Funding Number: 10908, 10909, 11001, 11002, 11003, 11006, and 11013).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究比较了在猫尸体中使用1点(TAP-L)或2点(TAP-SL)方法进行超声引导的平面内TAP注射后布比卡因-碘帕醇-染料溶液的分布。两具尸体被用来研究TAP超声解剖学,而八具尸体被纳入随机研究,prospective,盲目的调查。每只猫在一个半腹部随机接受0.5mL/kg的TAP-L,在对侧半腹部随机接受0.25mL/kg/点的TAP-SL。注射后,进行计算机断层扫描和解剖以评估对比剂分布和染色的目标神经数量。与TAP-L相比,TAP-SL导致更宽的对比扩散(mm)(87±7对71±9;p=0.002)。使用TAP-SL的神经染色患病率高于TAP-L(p=0.001)。T10,T11,T12,T13,L1和L2的腹侧分支分别以2/8,2/8,5/8,7/8,4/8和1/8以及7/8,7/8,8/8,8/8,8/8和1/8使用TAP-SL方法染色,分别。计算机断层扫描和解剖识别出1个TAP-L和2个TAP-SL后,腹膜内或镰状韧带脂肪内的注射量最少。超声引导的TAP-SL比TAP-L在胸腰椎脊神经分支周围提供了更好的注射分布。
    This study compared the distribution of a bupivacaine-iopamidol-dye solution following ultrasound-guided in-plane TAP injection using a 1-point (TAP-L) or 2-point (TAP-SL) approach in cat cadavers. Two cadavers were used to study the TAP sonoanatomy while eight cadavers were enrolled in a randomized, prospective, blinded investigation. Each cat randomly received a TAP-L with 0.5 mL/kg in one hemiabdomen and a TAP-SL with 0.25 mL/kg/point in the contralateral hemiabdomen. After injection, computed tomography and dissection were performed to assess contrast distribution and number of stained target nerves. TAP-SL resulted in a wider contrast spread (mm) compared with TAP-L (87 ± 7 versus 71 ± 9; p = 0.002). The prevalence of nerve staining was higher using TAP-SL than TAP-L (p = 0.001). The ventral branches of T10, T11, T12, T13, L1 and L2 were stained in 2/8, 2/8, 5/8, 7/8, 4/8 and 1/8, and in 7/8, 7/8, 8/8, 8/8, 8/8 and 1/8 using TAP-L and TAP-SL approaches, respectively. Computed tomography and dissection identified minimal injectate intraperitoneally or within the falciform ligament fat following 1 TAP-L and 2 TAP-SL. Ultrasound-guided TAP-SL provided better injectate distribution around the thoracolumbar spinal nerve branches than TAP-L.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    布比卡因常用于兽医学中的外周神经阻滞。这项研究描述了在接受卵巢子宫切除术的猫中通过超声引导的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞给药后两种剂量的布比卡因的药代动力学。12只健康的雌性成年猫被纳入随机调查,prospective,盲法临床试验。麻醉方案包括乙酰丙嗪-丁丙诺啡-丙泊酚-异氟醚-美洛昔康。每只猫在手术前通过双侧两点TAP阻滞接受1mL/kg布比卡因0.2%或0.25%(分别为BUPI-2和BUPI-2.5)(n=6/组)。使用液相色谱-质谱法检测布比卡因的血浆浓度。单隔室模型和非隔室分析描述了药代动力学参数。在480分钟内检测到布比卡因(BUPI-2为335±76,BUPI-2.5为485±198ng/mL)。对于BUPI-2和BUPI-2.5,在33±14和47±22分钟时的最大血浆浓度分别为1166±511和1810±536ng/mL,清除率为5.3±1.8和4.9±1.5mL/min/kg,消除半衰期分别为253±55和217±52分钟,分别。通过TAP阻断的两种剂量的布比卡因在猫中产生低于毒性水平的浓度。2.5mg/kg布比卡因的剂量在健康猫中使用该阻断给药是安全的。
    Bupivacaine is commonly used for peripheral nerve block in veterinary medicine. This study described the pharmacokinetics of two doses of bupivacaine following administration by an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Twelve healthy female adult cats were included in a randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial. Anaesthetic protocol included acepromazine-buprenorphine-propofol-isoflurane-meloxicam. Each cat received 1 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.2% or 0.25% (BUPI-2 and BUPI-2.5, respectively) via bilateral two-point TAP block before surgery (n = 6/group). Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine were detected using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A one-compartment model and non-compartmental analysis described the pharmacokinetic parameters. Bupivacaine was detected up to 480 min (335 ± 76 in BUPI-2 and 485 ± 198 ng/mL in BUPI-2.5). For BUPI-2 and BUPI-2.5, maximum plasma concentrations were 1166 ± 511 and 1810 ± 536 ng/mL at 33 ± 14 and 47 ± 22 min, clearance was 5.3 ± 1.8 and 4.9 ± 1.5 mL/min/kg, and elimination half-life were 253 ± 55 and 217 ± 52 min, respectively. The two doses of bupivacaine via TAP block produced concentrations below toxic levels in cats. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine was safe to be administered using this block in healthy cats.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于麻醉类型与住院时间之间关系的证据存在争议。因此,本研究的目的是调查在校正其他协变量后,单侧全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的麻醉类型是否与住院时间独立相关.
    本研究为队列研究。从2013年1月1日至2014年6月30日,共有2622名参与者在新加坡一家医院接受了全膝关节置换术(TKA)。目标自变量和因变量为两种类型的麻醉和住院时间,分别。协变量包括年龄,BMI,血红蛋白(Hb),停留时间(LOS)手术持续时间,性别,种族,美国麻醉师协会(ASA)地位,吸烟,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)糖尿病(DM),DM对胰岛素,缺血性心脏病(IHD),充血性心力衰竭(CCF),脑血管意外(CVA),肌酐>2mg/dl,手术的星期几。对可能影响两种麻醉选择和LOS的变量进行了多元线性和逻辑回归分析。然后使用分层变量通过亚组分析检验这种关联。
    2366名参与者的平均年龄为66.57±8.23岁,其中约24.18%为男性。所有入组患者的平均LOS为5.37±4.87天,接受全身麻醉(GA)的患者为5.92±6.20天,接受区域麻醉(RA)的患者为5.09±3.98天,P<0.05。全调整线性回归结果显示,GA比RA延长0.93天(β=0.93,95%CI(0.54,1.32)),P<0.05。全校正logistic回归结果显示,GA的LOS>6天比RA高45%(OR=1.45,95%CI(1.15,1.84)),P<0.05。通过亚组分析,结果基本稳定可靠。
    我们的研究表明,与RA相比,GA增加了单侧TKA的停留时间。这一发现需要在未来的研究中得到验证。
    Evidence regarding the relationship between the type of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay is controversial. Therefore, the objective of this research was to investigate whether the type of anaesthesia was independently related to the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after adjusting for other covariates.
    The present study was a cohort study. A total of 2622 participants underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a hospital in Singapore from 2013 to 1-1 to 2014-6-30. The target independent variable and the dependent variable were two types of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay, respectively. The covariates included age, BMI, hemoglobin (Hb), length of stay (LOS), duration of surgery, sex, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Status, smoking, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), diabetes mellitus (DM), DM on insulin, ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive cardiac failure (CCF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), creatinine > 2 mg/dl, day of week of operation. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed on the variables that might influence the choice of the two types of anaesthesia and the LOS. This association was then tested by subgroup analysis using hierarchical variables.
    The average age of 2366 selected participants was 66.57 ± 8.23 years old, and approximately 24.18% of them were male. The average LOS of all enrolled patients was 5.37 ± 4.87 days, 5.92 ± 6.20 days for patients receiving general anaesthesia (GA) and 5.09 ± 3.98 days for patients receiving regional anaesthesia (RA), P < 0.05. The results of fully adjusted linear regression showed that GA lasted 0.93 days longer than RA (β = 0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.32)), P < 0.05. The results of fully adjusted logistic regression showed that LOS > 6 days was 45% higher for GA than for RA (OR = 1.45, 95% CI (1.15, 1.84)), P < 0.05. Through the subgroup analysis, the results were basically stable and reliable.
    Our study showed that GA increased the length of stay during unilateral TKA compared with RA. This finding needs to be validated in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号