BACKGROUND: The increase in the rate of multiple pregnancies in clinical practice is associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Given the high risk of dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplet pregnancies, reducing DCTA triplet pregnancies to twin or singleton pregnancies is often beneficial.
METHODS: This article reports on two cases of DCTA triplet pregnancies resulting from two blastocyst transfers. Given the high risk of complications such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies, patients have a strong desire to preserve the dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twins. Multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) was performed in both cases to continue the pregnancy with DCDA twins by reducing one of the MCDA twins. Both of the pregnant women in this report eventually gave birth to healthy twins at 37 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: For infertile couples with multiple pregnancies but with a strong desire to remain the DCDA twins, our report suggests that reducing DCTA triplets to DCDA twin pregnancies may be an option based on clinical operability and assessment of surgical difficulty.

BACKGROUND: The worldwide occurrence of triplet pregnancy is estimated to be 0.093%, with a natural incidence of approximately 1 in 8000. This study aims to analyze the neonatal health status and birth weight discordance (BWD) of triplets based on chorionicity from birth until discharge.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We reviewed a total of 136 triplet pregnancies at our tertiary hospital between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, inter-triplet BWD, neonatal morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among all cases, the rates of intrauterine death, neonatal death, and perinatal death were 10.29, 13.07, and 24.26%, respectively. Thirty-seven of the cases resulted in fetal loss, including 13 with fetal anomalies. The maternal complications and neonatal outcomes of the 99 triplet pregnancies without fetal loss were compared across different chorionicities, including a dichorionic (DC) group (41 cases), trichorionic (TC) group (37 cases), and monochorionic (MC) group (21 cases). Neonatal hypoproteinemia (P < 0.001), hyperbilirubinemia (P < 0.019), and anemia (P < 0.003) exhibited significant differences according to chorionicity, as did the distribution of BWD (P < 0.001). More than half of the cases in the DC and TC groups had a BWD < 15%, while those in the MC group had a BWD < 50% (47.6%). TC pregnancy decreased the risk of neonatal anemia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.084) and need for blood transfusion therapy after birth (AOR = 0.119). In contrast, a BWD > 25% increased the risk of neonatal anemia (AOR = 10.135) and need for blood transfusion after birth (AOR = 7.127). TC pregnancy, MCDA or MCTA, and BWD > 25% increased neonatal hypoproteinemia, with AORs of 4.629, 5.123, and 5.343, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The BWD differed significantly according to chorionicity. Additionally, TC pregnancies reduced the risk of neonatal anemia and need for blood transfusion, but increased the risk of neonatal hypoproteinemia. In contrast, the BWD between the largest and smallest triplets increased the risk of neonatal anemia and the need for blood transfusion. TC pregnancy, MCDA or MCTA, and BWD > 25% increased the risks of neonatal hypoproteinemia. However, due to the limited number of triplet pregnancies, further exploration of the underlying mechanism is warranted.

BACKGROUND: It is generally beneficial and recommended that dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplet pregnancies be reduced to monochorionic (MC) twin or singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, some infertile couples still have a firm desire to retain twins. For this reason, the best foetal reduction strategies need to be available for infertile couples and clinicians. Given that data on the elective reduction of DCTA triplet pregnancies to twin pregnancies are scarce, we investigated the outcomes of elective reduction of DCTA triplet pregnancies through the retrospective analysis of previous data.
METHODS: Patients with DCTA triplet pregnancies who underwent elective foetal reduction between January 2012 and June 2020 were recruited. A total of 67 eligible patients with DCTA triplet pregnancies were divided into two groups: a DCTA-to-dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin group (n = 38) and a DCTA-to-monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin group (n = 29); the basic clinical data of the two groups were collected for comparison.
RESULTS: Compared with the DCDA-to-MCDA twin group, the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had lower rates of complete miscarriage (7.89% versus 31.03%, p = 0.014), early complete miscarriage (5.26% versus 24.14%, p = 0.034), late preterm birth (25.71% versus 65.00%, p = 0.009) and very low birth weight (0 versus 11.11%, p = 0.025). In addition, the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had higher rates of full-term delivery (65.71% versus 25.00%, p = 0.005), survival (92.11% versus 68.97%, p = 0.023), and taking the babies home (92.11% versus 68.97%, p = 0.023) than did the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. In terms of neonatal outcomes, a significantly greater gestational age (38.06 ± 2.39 versus 36.28 ± 2.30, p = 0.009), average birth weight (3020.77 ± 497.33 versus 2401.39 ± 570.48, p < 0.001), weight of twins (2746.47 ± 339.64 versus 2251.56 ± 391.26, p < 0.001), weight of the larger neonate (2832.94 ± 320.58 versus 2376.25 ± 349.95, p < 0.001) and weight of the smaller neonate (2660.00 ± 345.34 versus 2126.88 ± 400.93, p < 0.001) was observed in the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group compared to the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group.
CONCLUSIONS: The DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had better pregnancy and neonatal outcomes than the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. This reduction approach may be beneficial for patients with dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies who have a strong desire to have DCDA twins.

It is recommended to reduce triplet pregnancy containing monochorionic (MC) twins to singleton. Given that some couples with infertility are eager to retain twins, better strategy is needed to avoid obstetrical risks and satisfy their strong wish. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the outcomes of triplet pregnancy reduction.
Subjects with triplet pregnancies who underwent selective reduction between 2016 and 2019 at our hospital were enrolled. A total of 66 subjects with dichorionic triplet (DCT) with MC twins and an MC singleton were divided into two groups: group A (N = 38), reduced to dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twins; group B (N = 28), reduced to MC diamniotic (MCDA) twins. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes were compared between groups.
Group A had significantly lower rates of early miscarriage (0% vs 14.3%, p = 0.028), cesarean section (81.6% vs 100%, p = 0.041), and late premature delivery (21.1% vs 45.4%, p = 0.047) than group B. Significantly higher rates of full-term delivery (71% vs 36.4%, p = 0.009) and take-home baby (100% vs 78.6%, p = 0.004), and higher gestational age at delivery (median: 38 [36.9, 39.0] vs 35.8 [34.4, 37.0] weeks, p < 0.001), total neonatal weight (2899.7 ± 647.6 vs 2354.4 ± 651.8 g, p < 0.001), weight of twins (2550 vs 2350 g, p = 0.039), and weight of larger neonate in twins (2790 vs 2500 g, p = 0.045) were observed in group A compared to group B.
DCT reduced to DCDA twins confers better pregnancy outcomes than into MCDA twins. This might benefit for triplet pregnancy subjects who strongly want to retain fraternal twins.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of different multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) programs in dichorionic (DC) triplets, and explore the association between early ultrasound characteristics and co-twin death after potassium chloride (KCl) injection into one monochorionic (MC) twin.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of DC triplets who underwent MFPR at our center during 2012-2021. Patients were grouped as follows: intracardiac KCl injection into one MC twin (group A), intracardiac KCl injection into both MC twins simultaneously (group B), and reduction of the singleton fetus (group C) and pregnancy outcomes were compared. Logistic regression was used to determine whether ultrasound measurements at 11-13+6 weeks predicted co-twin death and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the predictive performance.
RESULTS: Finally, we enrolled 184 patients. 153 cases were in group A, and 18, 13 cases were in group B and C respectively. Gestational age at the time of MFPR did not differ among the 3 groups (median: [Formula: see text] weeks). The survival rate was 89.6%, 88.9%, and 92.3% in group A, B, and C respectively, which was comparable among groups. Preterm birth was more common in group C (10/12, 83.3%). After KCl injection into one MC twin, co-twin death occurred in 86.3% cases (132/153) within 1 day; however, 3 patients had 2 live births each, with normal postnatal development. Intertwin nuchal translucency (NT) difference/discordance significantly predicted co-twin death within 1 day after MFPR, and the areas under the ROC curve were 0.694 and 0.689, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: For MFPR in DC triplet pregnancies, reduction of the MC twins results in less preterm birth, and women with KCl injection into either one or both MC twins had similar outcomes. Large intertwin NT difference/discordance was associated with co-twin death within 1 day after KCl injection into one of the MC twins.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the preferred approach for selective reduction in complex monochorionic (MC) multiple pregnancies owing to the ease of operation and minimal invasiveness. To optimize the RFA technique and reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome resulting from the heat-sink effect of RFA therapy, we used an innovative RFA method, in which an electrode needle was expanded incrementally and stepwise. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of this novel multistep incremental expansion RFA method for selective fetal reduction in MC twin and triplet pregnancies.
This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of all MC multiple pregnancies undergoing RFA between March 2016 and October 2022 at our center. The multistep RFA technique involved the use of an expandable needle, which was gradually expanded during the RFA procedure until cessation of umbilical cord blood flow was achieved. The needle used for the single-step RFA method was fully extended from the start of treatment.
In total, 132 MC multiple pregnancies underwent selective reduction using RFA, including 50 cases undergoing multistep RFA and 82 cases undergoing single-step RFA. The overall survival rates were not significantly different between the multistep and single-step RFA groups (81.1% vs 72.3%; P = 0.234). Similarly, the rates of preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes within 2 weeks after RFA, procedure-related complications, spontaneous preterm delivery and pathological findings on cranial ultrasound, as well as gestational age at delivery and birth weight, did not differ between the two groups. However, there was a trend towards a prolonged procedure-to-delivery interval following multistep RFA compared with single-step RFA (median, 109 vs 99 days; P = 0.377). Moreover, the fetal loss rate within 2 weeks after RFA in the multistep RFA group was significantly lower than that in the single-step RFA group (10.0% vs 24.4%; P = 0.041). The median ablation time was shorter (5.3 vs 7.8 min; P < 0.001) and the median ablation energy was lower (10.2 vs 18.0 kJ; P < 0.001) in multistep compared with single-step RFA. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes following multistep vs single-step RFA.
Overall survival rates were similar between the two RFA methods. However, the multistep RFA technique was associated with a lower risk of fetal loss within 2 weeks after RFA. The multistep RFA technique required significantly less ablation energy and a shorter ablation time compared with single-step RFA in selective fetal reduction of MC twin and triplet pregnancies. Additionally, there was a trend towards a prolonged procedure-to-delivery interval with the multistep RFA technique. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of pregnancy outcomes after selective fetal reduction treatment in monochorionic, dichorionic, and trichorionic triplet pregnancies.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 118 pregnant women carrying triplets. All subjects underwent regular prenatal check-ups and were admitted for delivery at West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University between January 1, 2012 and January 31, 2021. According to the chorionicity, the subjects were divided into a monochorionic group ( n=13), a dichorionic group ( n=44), and a trichorionic group ( n=61). Within each group, the subjects were further divided into two subgroups, a reduction group and an expectant treatment group, according to whether they underwent fetal reduction or not. The clinical data and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the subgroups within each group.
UNASSIGNED: In the monichorionic group, the reduction subgroup had a lower preterm birth rate and higher neonatal birth body mass than those of the expectant management subgroup, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the dichorionic and trichorionic groups, the rates of preterm delivery, neonatal hospitalization, and serious complications of the reduction subgroups were lower than those of the expectant subgroups ( P<0.05), while the neonatal birth body mass was higher in the reduction subgroups than that in the expectant subgroups ( P<0.05). In the dichorionic group, the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis during pregnancy was lower in the reduction subgroup than that in the expectant treatment subgroup. In all 3 groups, there was no statistically significant difference between the subgroups in the incidence of gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum hemorrhage. The survival curve analysis showed that women receiving fetal reduction during the first trimester had a lower risk of pregnancy loss and more significant prolonged of gestational age than those undergoing the procedure during the second trimester.
UNASSIGNED: Fetal reduction of triplets can significantly prolong the gestational age and improve the perinatal prognosis. In addition, selective reduction in the first trimester may lead to greater benefits than selective reduction in the second trimester does.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of monochorionic triamniotic (MCTA) triplets managed expectantly with those reduced to twins.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing expectant management (EM) with fetal reduction (FR) to twins in 43 consecutive MCTA triplets with 3 live fetuses at 11-14 weeks between 2012 and 2021.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients managed expectantly and 24 triplets reduced to twins were included. The rate of pregnancy with at least one survivor was 84.2% in the EM group and 66.7% in the FR group (P = 0.190). Compared to the EM cases, triplets reduced to twins had a higher median gestational age at delivery (36.0 vs. 33.3 weeks; P < 0.001), a higher mean birth weight (2244.3 ± 488.6 g vs. 1751.1 ± 383.2 g; P < 0.001) and a lower risk of preterm birth before 34 weeks (11.8% vs. 64.7%; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the risk of miscarriage, pregnancy complications and composite adverse neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In MCTA triplets, FR to twins could reduce the risk of preterm birth, whereas EM seems to be a reasonable choice when the priority is at least one survivor. However, due to the small sample size of this study, these findings must be interpreted with great caution.

BACKGROUND: It is generally beneficial for triplet gestation or high-order multiple pregnancies to operate multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) after assisted reproductive techniques. However, data on pregnancy outcomes is lacking regarding dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) and trichorionic triplets (TCTA) pregnancy.
METHODS: This research analyzes the difference between 128 DCTA and 179 TCTA pregnancies with or without MFPR after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles between January 2015 and June 2020. The subdivided subgroups of the two groups are reduction to singleton, reduction to dichorionic twins, and expectant management groups. We also compare the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between 2104 dichorionic twins and 122 monochorionic twins.
RESULTS: The research subgroups were DCTA to monochorionic singleton pregnancies (n = 76), DCTA to dichorionic twin pregnancies (n = 18), DCTA-expectant management (n = 34), TCTA to monochorionic singleton pregnancies (n = 31), TCTA to dichorionic twin pregnancies (n = 130), and TCTA-expectant management (n = 18). In DCTA-expectant management group, the complete miscarriage rate is dramatically higher, and the survival rate and the rate of take-home babies are lower. However, there was no difference between the rates of complete miscarriages, survival rates, and take-home babies in TCTA-expectant management group. But the complete miscarriage rate of DCTA-expectant management was obviously higher than that of TCTA-expectant management group (29.41 vs. 5.56%, p = 0.044). For obstetric outcomes, MFPR to singleton group had higher gestational week and average birth weight, but lower premature delivery, gestational hypertension rates and low birth weight in both DCTA and TCTA pregnancy groups (all p < 0.05). DCTA to monochorionic singleton had the lowest incidence of gestational diabetes, whereas The subdivided subgroups of TCTA had no significant difference in the incidence of gestational diabetes. Monochorionic twins have higher rates of complete, early, and late miscarriage, premature delivery, and late premature delivery, and lower survival rate (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: MFPR could improve gestational week and average birth weight, reducing premature delivery, LBW, and gestational hypertension rates in DCTA and TCTA pregnancies. Monochorionic twins have worse pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. MFPR to singleton is preferable recommended in the pregnancy and obstetric management of complex triplets with monochorionic pair.