Osteofascial compartment syndrome is a serious surgical emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. It presents a challenge for surgeons due to its high disability rate and difficult management. Early fasciotomy decompression is crucial in preventing severe complications. Classic fasciotomy approaches for tibial osteofascial compartment syndrome include double-incision and single-incision techniques.This paper presents a case of a 24-year-old female with bilateral tibial posterior compartment syndrome resulting from prolonged squatting after alcohol intoxication, which is a relatively rare mechanism. We employed an innovative posterior approach to manage the patient with tibial posterior compartment syndrome. Ultimately, we successfully preserved the patient\'s legs and achieved a good functional recovery.The paper reported a rare case with bilateral posterior tibial compartment syndrome resulting from squatting for 10 hours after alcohol intoxication. The patient achieved favorable outcomes in lower limb function following treatment with a new fasciotomy approach, the posterior approach.The new approach for treating posterior tibial compartment syndrome can serve as a valuable reference for surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment for atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients is challenging. We report our experience with posterior intra-articular distraction technique in treating this disorder.
METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study which included 15 patients of atlantoaxial instability whose age was less than 16 years at the time of clinical presentation. All patients underwent anterior soft tissue released through a posterior-only approach, followed by intra-facet cage implantation, cantilever correction, and instrumentation. Clinical results were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale and radiographic measurements including the atlantodental interval (ADI), posterior atlantodental interval (pADI), the distance of odontoid tip above Chamberlain\'s line, clivuscanal angle (CCA), and triangular area (TA) of craniovertebral junction.
RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 72 months, with an average of 41.2 ± 15.2 months. The JOA score increased from 13.6 ± 2.3 to 16.6 ± 0.8. ADI decreased from 4.31 ± 2.37 to 1.85 ± 1.09 mm, and TA decreased from 261.96 ± 107.99 to 197.12 ± 72.37 mm2. pADI increased from 12.89 ± 3.52 to 18.25 ± 3.89 mm, and CCA improved from 132.19 ± 16.34 to 144.35 ± 13.91°. All changes in measurements showed statistically significant. There were no evidence of surgery-related complications or iatrogenic secondary cervical deformity during follow-up. Radiological evaluation showed satisfactory corrections and bony fusions of C1-2 facet joint in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior intra-articular distraction followed by cage implantation and cantilever correction can be one of the safe and effective ways to solve atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis.
METHODS: From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.

METHODS: Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the posterior approach and combined anterior-posterior approach in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with cervical spine fracture by meta-analysis.
METHODS: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the comparison of the posterior approach group and the combined anterior-posterior approach group in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis combined with cervical spine fracture from database establishment to August 2023. The procedure time, intraoperative blood loss, the rates of neurological improvement, mean change in the postoperative neurological function, complication rates, rates of revised surgery, and mortality were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library.
RESULTS: A total of 11 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 215 patients were included in this study. The posterior approach group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the combined anterior-posterior approach group [Mean difference (MD) = -146.05, 95%CI(-187.40,-104.69), P < .00001]; the operation time was significantly less in the posterior approach group than in the combined anterior-posterior approach group [MD = -95.34, 95%CI(-113.13,-77.55), P < .00001]. There were no statistically significant differences in the neurological improvement rates, mean changes in postoperative neurological function, complication rates, modified surgery rates, and mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the posterior approach and combined anterior and posterior approach can achieve good results. Clinicians should develop an individualized approach based on the patient\'s fracture type, degree of spinal cord injury, fracture stability, fracture dislocation, general condition, and underlying disease.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the treatment of moderate-to-severe rigid scoliosis. Anterior release and three-column osteotomy are excessively traumatic, whereas posterior column osteotomy (PCO) alone results in poor outcomes. An emerging surgical technique, posterior intervertebral release (PR), can release the rigid spine from the posterior approach. This study was performed to compare the multi-segment apical convex PR combined with PCO and PCO alone in patients with moderate-to-severe rigid scoliosis.
METHODS: From June 2021 to June 2022, this prospective study of moderate-to-severe (Cobb: 70-90°) rigid scoliosis (flexibility of main curve <25%) involved two groups defined by surgical procedure: the PR group, the patients undergoing PR combined with PCO; and the PCO group, the patients undergoing PCO alone. Follow-up was at least 12 months. Radiographic results mainly included main curve Cobb, correction of per PR/PCO segment, apical vertebra rotation (AVR) and apical vertebra translation (AVT). Demographics, surgical data, complications were also recorded. Student\'s independent samples t test and Pearson\'s chi-square test were used to compare the differences between groups.
RESULTS: Forty patients with an average age of 16.65 years were included (PR group, n = 20; PCO group, n = 20). The main curves averaged 77.56° ± 5.86° versus 78.02° ± 5.72° preoperatively and 20.07° ± 6.73° versus 33.58° ± 5.76° (p < 0.001) at the last follow-up in the PR and PCO groups, respectively. The mean correction rates were 74.30% and 56.84%, respectively (p < 0.001). The average coronal curve correction was 13.49° per release segment, which was significantly higher than the PCO correction of 6.20° (p < 0.001). The correction of apical vertebra rotation and translation in the main thoracic curve was significantly better in the PR group than in the PCO group (p < 0.05). Several minor complications in the two groups improved after conservative treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The multi-segment apical convex PR combined with PCO offers more advantages than PCO alone in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe rigid scoliosis. Owing to its excellent corrective effect and few complications, this is a high benefit-risk ratio surgical strategy for rigid scoliosis.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the clinical and radiological results of the anterior approach versus the posterior approach versus the anterior-posterior approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
UNASSIGNED: The network meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted up to June 22, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials. STATA13.0 was used to perform network meta-analysis. p < .05 was considered significant.
UNASSIGNED: Nine RCTs with a total of 550 patients receiving surgical treatment in at least two of the three approaches, including anterior, posterior and anterior-posterior approaches, were included. The surgical duration and intraoperative bleeding volume in the posterior approach were significantly lower than those in the anterior (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.82, -0.62) and anterior-posterior approaches (SMD, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.65, 5.00). The surgical duration in the anterior approach was significantly lower than that in the anterior-posterior approach (SMD, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.12, 3.10). The Cobb angle in the anterior-posterior approach was significantly lower than that in the anterior approach (MD, -4.83; 95% CI, -9.60, -0.05). The VAS score in the posterior approach was significantly higher than that in the anterior approach (MD, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55, 1.16) and anterior-posterior approach (MD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.12, -0.55). No significant difference was identified among the three surgical approaches in implant failure rate and infection rate.
UNASSIGNED: All three approaches were safe approaches with advantages and disadvantages. The selection of surgical approaches for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures may be individualized.

BACKGROUND: To date, the approach that prevails in the open reduction and internal fixation of crescent fracture-dislocations (CFD) remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CFD treated via the anterior or posterior approach.
METHODS: Data from 64 cases of CFDs openly reduced through an anterior (group A, n = 31) or a posterior (group B, n = 33) approach were retrospectively analyzed. Functional results, reduction quality, residual displacements in the axial and coronal planes, pelvic asymmetry deformity, and correlations between Day\'s classification were compared. Complications and fracture union were also recorded. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months.
RESULTS: The functional scores were similar between the two groups, and all fractures achieved good or excellent reduction postoperatively. In the coronal plane, the excellent/good ratio in group B was higher than in group A. The mean residual displacement in the coronal plane was significantly higher in group A than in group B, with group A showing greater displacement in both planes for Day I fractures and in the coronal plane for Day II fractures. The residual displacement in both planes for Day III fractures was comparable between the groups. The pelvic asymmetry deformity was equal between the two groups and among the different Day\'s fracture types.
CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of CFDs obtained satisfactory outcomes through an anterior or posterior approach. The posterior approach achieved a better sacroiliac joint reduction. The optimal indication for the posterior approach was a Day I fracture, followed by a Day II fracture. No correlation was found between the surgical approach and reduction quality in Day III fractures.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was aimed to compare the postoperative clinical outcomes between the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH, SP) and conventional posterior/posterolateral approach (PA) for total hip arthroplasty in patients who have failed conservative treatment for hip-related disorders.
METHODS: PRISMAP guidelines were followed in this systematic review. CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science databases and the reference list grey literature were searched for studies according to the search strategy. Endnote (version 20) was used to screen the searched studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criterias and extract the data from the eligible studied. RR and 95% CI were used for dichotomous variables and MD and 95% CI were used for continuous variables. All analyses and heterogeneity of outcomes were analysed by Review Manage (version 5.4). Publication bias of included studies was analysed by Stata (version 16.0).
RESULTS: Thirty-six randomized control studies were included. Compared to PA group, SP group had a shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter length of hospital stay and do activities earlier. Hip function (HHS) was significantly improved within three months postoperatively. Pain of hip (VAS) was significantly reduced within one month postoperatively. The state of daily living (BI) was significantly improved within three months. Patients\' overall health status (SF-36) improved significantly postoperatively. There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two approaches. PA had a shorter operative time and a higher accuracy of prosthesis placement.
CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of SuperPATH include accelerated functional recovery and less trauma associated with surgery. However, it required a longer operative time and implantation of the prosthesis was less accurate than that of PA.

OBJECTIVE: At present, intraoperative ultrasound was widely used in spinal surgery. But there have been no reports on the use of intraoperative ultrasound in lateral decubitus position spinal surgery. The authors\' research objective was to describe the applications of intraoperative ultrasound in spinal trauma surgery when performed in the lateral decubitus position.
METHODS: Six patients with polytrauma who underwent surgery for spinal trauma between June 2020 and March 2022 and could not be operated on using a posterior approach in the prone position. All six patients underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus position. During surgery, a capsular bag had been designed and surgical field can be filled with normal saline for acoustic coupling, and then ultrasound was used to observe and guide decompression, and assess injuries of the neural elements such as the spinal cord. The data of preoperative and postoperative (12 months) American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS), follow-up time, operation time, blood loss, ultrasound signal change of spinal cord, ultrasound guide decompression, internal fixation (12 months), and fracture healing(12 months) were collected.
RESULTS: The study included four males and two females whose ages ranged from 19 to 56 years old (41.5 ± 13.06 years old). Follow-up times ranged from 12 to 20 months (14.33 ± 2.75 months). The operation times ranged from 195 to 248 mins (222.16 ± 16.86 mins). The estimated volume of blood loss ranged from 280 to 450 mL (383.33 ± 55.58 mL). The six cases\' AIS (preoperative vs. postoperative) were A versus A, C versus D, A versus B, B versus B, B versus C, and B versus C. Intraoperative ultrasound was performed successfully in all patients using our designed method. Intraoperative ultrasound observation revealed varying degrees of changes in spinal cord echo in all patients. Intraoperative ultrasound provided excellent assistance in spinal cord decompression during surgery. The surgery was completed successfully with no surgery-related complications till the last follow-up. At the time of last follow-up (median time of 12 months) satisfactory fracture reduction and good internal fixation was confirmed on postoperative computed tomography scans and radiographs.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors represented the technology of intraoperative ultrasound in spinal trauma surgery when performed in the lateral decubitus position. This technology solves how to apply intraoperative ultrasound in lateral decubitus position.

Our video demonstrates a modified gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroid surgery with the posterior approach for bilateral low-risk thyroid cancer. In this paper, we provided a detailed introduction to the right gasless transaxillary endoscopic total thyroidectomy surgical procedure for bilateral low-risk thyroid cancer, and briefly summarized the Lei\'s seven-sinking method: sinking the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (CHSCM); sinking the cervical vascular sheath; sinking the right wall of the esophagus; sinking the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN); sinking the trachea; sinking the left RLN and sinking the thyroid. A 5-cm incision was made starting from the anterior axillary line along the natural fold at the axilla. A trocar was placed in the axillary incision approximately 3-5 cm away from the side of the breast and slightly below the anterior axillary line. Using blunt dissection and electrocautery, a working space was created by elevating a subcutaneous flap above the pectoralis major muscle. The thyroid bed was accessed through the two heads of the SCM, and then the thyroid was separated from the strap muscles. Thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection were fully endoscopically performed with the posterior approach using conventional endoscopic instruments. Through the posterior approach and the operation steps of the seven-sinking method, total thyroidectomy and bilateral central lymph node dissection can be achieved relatively easily.