Patient-centered outcomes research

以患者为中心的结果研究
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:基于价值的医疗保健旨在将患者和卫生系统结合在一起,以最大程度地提高质量与成本的比率。为了评估卒中管理中的医疗保健价值,我们定义了一套以患者为中心的卒中结局指标的国际标准,适用于各种医疗机构.
    方法:由代表患者的国际专家小组实施了改良的Delphi过程,倡导者,和中风结局的临床专家,冲程寄存器,全球健康,流行病学,和康复,以就首选成果措施达成共识,包括人口,和基线风险调整变量。
    结果:选择到医院就诊的缺血性卒中或脑出血患者作为这些建议的目标人群。包括短暂性脑缺血发作。推荐用于评估的结果类别是生存和疾病控制,急性并发症,和患者报告的结果。建议在90天评估的患者报告结果为疼痛,心情,喂养,自我保健,移动性,通信,认知功能,社会参与,恢复日常活动的能力,和健康相关的生活质量,流动性,喂养,自我保健,和通信也在出院时收集。一种仪器能够收集大多数患者报告的子域(9/16,56%)。用于风险调整的最低数据收集包括患者人口统计,病前功能,中风类型和严重程度,血管和全身危险因素,和具体的治疗/护理相关因素。
    结论:制定了共识中风测量标准集,增加脑卒中护理价值的务实方法。当用于跨不同护理环境的监测和比较时,应在实践中验证该集合。
    OBJECTIVE: Value-based health care aims to bring together patients and health systems to maximize the ratio of quality over cost. To enable assessment of healthcare value in stroke management, an international standard set of patient-centered stroke outcome measures was defined for use in a variety of healthcare settings.
    METHODS: A modified Delphi process was implemented with an international expert panel representing patients, advocates, and clinical specialists in stroke outcomes, stroke registers, global health, epidemiology, and rehabilitation to reach consensus on the preferred outcome measures, included populations, and baseline risk adjustment variables.
    RESULTS: Patients presenting to a hospital with ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were selected as the target population for these recommendations, with the inclusion of transient ischemic attacks optional. Outcome categories recommended for assessment were survival and disease control, acute complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes proposed for assessment at 90 days were pain, mood, feeding, selfcare, mobility, communication, cognitive functioning, social participation, ability to return to usual activities, and health-related quality of life, with mobility, feeding, selfcare, and communication also collected at discharge. One instrument was able to collect most patient-reported subdomains (9/16, 56%). Minimum data collection for risk adjustment included patient demographics, premorbid functioning, stroke type and severity, vascular and systemic risk factors, and specific treatment/care-related factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: A consensus stroke measure Standard Set was developed as a simple, pragmatic method to increase the value of stroke care. The set should be validated in practice when used for monitoring and comparisons across different care settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号